Environmental Management

, Volume 49, Issue 3, pp 675–689 | Cite as

A Framework for Assessing Collaborative Capacity in Community-Based Public Forest Management

Article

Abstract

Community-based collaborative groups involved in public natural resource management are assuming greater roles in planning, project implementation, and monitoring. This entails the capacity of collaborative groups to develop and sustain new organizational structures, processes, and strategies, yet there is a lack of understanding what constitutes collaborative capacity. In this paper, we present a framework for assessing collaborative capacities associated with community-based public forest management in the US. The framework is inductively derived from case study research and observations of 30 federal forest-related collaborative efforts. Categories were cross-referenced with literature on collaboration across a variety of contexts. The framework focuses on six arenas of collaborative action: (1) organizing, (2) learning, (3) deciding, (4) acting, (5) evaluating, and (6) legitimizing. Within each arena are capacities expressed through three levels of social agency: individuals, the collaborative group itself, and participating or external organizations. The framework provides a language and set of organizing principles for understanding and assessing collaborative capacity in the context of community-based public forest management. The framework allows groups to assess what capacities they already have and what more is needed. It also provides a way for organizations supporting collaboratives to target investments in building and sustaining their collaborative capacities. The framework can be used by researchers as a set of independent variables against which to measure collaborative outcomes across a large population of collaborative efforts.

Keywords

Collaboration Collaborative capacity Community-based natural resource management Public lands National forests USDA Forest Service 

References

  1. Abers RN (2007) Organizing for governance: building collaboration in Brazilian river basins. World Development 35(8):1450–1463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agranoff R (2006) Inside collaborative networks: ten lessons for public managers. Public Administration Review 66(Supplement):56–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Agranoff R, McGuire M (1998) Multinetwork management: collaboration and the hollow state in local economic policy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 8(1):67–91Google Scholar
  4. Ansell C, Gash A (2008) Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18(4):543–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Armitage D (2005) Adaptive capacity and community-base natural resource management. Environmental Management 35(6):703–715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baker M, Kusel J (2003) Community forestry in the United States: Learning from the past crafting the future. Island Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  7. Beckley TM, Martz D, Nadeau S, Wall E, Reimer B (2008) Multiple capacities, multiple outcomes: delving deeper into the meaning of community capacity. Journal of Rural and Community Development 3:56–75Google Scholar
  8. Bonnell JE, Koontz TM (2007) Stumbling forward: the organizational challenges of building and sustaining collaborative watershed management. Society & Natural Resources 20:153–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brick P, Snow D, Van de Wetering S (eds) (2001) Across the Great Divide: explorations in collaborative conservation and the American West. Island Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  10. Bryson JM, Crosby BC, Stone MM (2006) The design and implementation of cross-sector collaborations: propositions from the literature. Public Administration Review 66(Supplement):44–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Burns S, Cheng AS (2005) The utilization of collaborative processes in forest planning. Report to the USDA Forest Service. Office of Community Services, Fort Lewis CollegeGoogle Scholar
  12. Chaskin RJ (2001) Building community capacity: a definitional framework and case studies from a comprehensive community initiative. Urban Affairs Review 36:291–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cheng AS (2006) Build it and they will come? Mandating collaboration in public lands planning and management. Natural Resource Journal 46:841–858Google Scholar
  14. Cheng AS, Fernandez-Gimenez M (2006) Ford foundation community-based forestry demonstration program research component: final report. Department of Forest, Rangeland and Watershed Stewardship. Colorado State University, Fort CollinsGoogle Scholar
  15. Cheng AS, Mattor KM (2010) Place-based planning as a platform for social learning: insights from a national forest assessment process in Western Colorado. Society and Natural Resources 23(5):385–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Coggins GC (1999) Regulating federal natural resources: a summary case against devolved collaboration. Ecology Law Quarterly 25:602–610Google Scholar
  17. Conley A, Moote MA (2003) Evaluating collaborative natural resource management. Society and Natural Resources 16(5):371–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Daniels SE, Walker GB (1996) Using Collaborative Learning in fire recovery planning. Journal of Forestry 94(8):4–9Google Scholar
  19. Daniels SE, Walker GB (2001) Working through environmental conflict: the collaborative learning approach. Praeger, WestportGoogle Scholar
  20. Farnum JO, Kruger LE (2008) Place-based planning: innovations and applications from four Western forests. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-741. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station, PortlandGoogle Scholar
  21. Fernandez-Gimenez ME, Ballard HL, Sturtevant VE (2008) Adaptive management and social learning in collaborative and community-based monitoring: a study of five community-based forestry organizations in the western USA. Ecology and Society 13(2):4 http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss2/art4/
  22. Fleeger WE, Becker ML (2008) Creating and sustaining community capacity for ecosystem-based management: is local government the key? Journal of Environmental Management 88(4):1396–1405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Folke C, Hahn T, Olsson P, Norberg J (2005) Adaptive governance of socio-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 30:441–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Foster-Fishman PG, Berkowitz SL, Lounsbury DL, Jacobson S, Allen NA (2001) Building collaborative capacity in community coalitions: A review and integrative framework. American Journal of Community Psychology 29(2):241–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Goldsmith S, Eggers WD (2004) Governing by network: the new shape of the public sector. The Brookings Institution, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  26. Granner ML, Sharpe PA (2004) Evaluating community coalition characteristics and functioning: a summary of measurement tools. Health Education Research 19(5):514–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gray GJ, Enzer MJ, Kusel J (eds) (2001) Understanding community-based forest ecosystem management. Food Products Press, BinghamptonGoogle Scholar
  28. Imperial MT (2005) Using collaboration as a governance strategy: lessons from six watershed management programs. Administration & Society 37:281–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jakes PJ, Nelson KC, Enzler SA, Burns S, Cheng AS, Sturtevant VE, Williams DR, Bujak A, Brummel RF, Grayzeck-Souter S, Staychock D (2011) Community wildfire protection planning: Is the Healthy Forest Restoration Act’s vagueness genius? International Journal of Wildland Fire 20:350–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Koontz TM, Thomas CW (2006) What do we know and need to know about environmental outcomes of collaborative management? Public Administration Review 66(Supplement):111–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Koontz TM, Steelman TA, Carmin J, Korfmacher KS, Moseley C, Thomas CW (2004) Collaborative environmental management: what roles for government? Resources For the Future, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  32. Kusel J, Adler E (eds) (2003) Forest communities, community forests: struggles and successes in rebuilding communities and forests. Rowman and Littlefield, LandhamGoogle Scholar
  33. Laverack G (2005) Using a ‘domains’ approach to build community empowerment. Community Development Journal 41(1):4–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Leach W, Pelkey NW (2001) Making watershed partnerships work: a review of the empirical literature. Journal of Water Resources Planning 127(6):378–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McCloskey M (1999) Local communities and the management of public forests. Ecology Law Quarterly 25(4):624–629Google Scholar
  36. Moote MA, Becker DR (2003) Exploring barriers to collaborative forestry. In A report from a workshop held at Hart Prairie, Flagstaff, AZ, September 17–19, 2003. Ecological Restoration Institute, Northern Arizona University, FlagstaffGoogle Scholar
  37. Nelson DR, Adger WN, Brown K (2007) Adaptation to environmental change: contributions of a resilience framework. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 32:395–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Paulson DD (1998) Collaborative management of public rangeland in Wyoming: lessons in co-management. Professional Geographer 50(3):301–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Richard T, Burns S (1998) Beyond “scoping”: citizens and San Juan National Forest managers, learning together. Journal of Forestry 96(4):39–43Google Scholar
  40. Richard T, Burns S (1999) The Ponderosa Pine Partnership: forging new relationships to restore a forest. Office of Community Services, Fort Lewis CollegeGoogle Scholar
  41. Selin SW, Chavez D (1995) Developing a collaborative model for environmental planning and management. Environmental Management 19(2):189–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Selin SW, Schuett MA, Carr DS (1997) Has collaborative planning taken root in the National Forests? Journal of Forestry 95(7):17–21Google Scholar
  43. Strauss A, Corbin J (2008) Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques, 3rd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  44. Sturtevant VE, Lange JI (2003) From them to us: The applegate partnership. In: Kusel J, Adler E (eds) Forest communities, community forests: struggles and successes in rebuilding communities and forests. Rowman & Littlefield, LandhamGoogle Scholar
  45. Sturtevant VE, Moote MA, Jakes PJ, Cheng AS (2005) Social science to improve fuels management: a synthesis of research on collaboration. US Department of Agriculture. Forest Service. North Central Research Station, St. PaulGoogle Scholar
  46. Sustainable Northwest, National Network of Forest Practitioners (2005) Investing in rural communities and forest health in the West: examples of the USDA Forest Service Economic Action Programs. Sustainable Northwest and National Network of Forest Practitioners, Portland and ProvidenceGoogle Scholar
  47. Taylor PL, Cheng AS (2012) Environmental governance as embedded process: managing change in two North American and Central American community-based forestry organizations. Human Organization 71(1): In PressGoogle Scholar
  48. Thomas CW, Koontz TM (2011) Research designs for evaluating the impact of community-based management on natural resource conservation. Journal of Natural Resources Policy Research 3(2):97–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Thomson AM, Perry JL (2006) Collaboration processes: inside the black box. Public Administration Review 66(Supplement):20–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wagner CL, Fernandez-Gimenez ME (2009) Effects of community-based collaborative group characteristics on social capital. Environmental Management 44(4):632–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Walker BH, Anderies JM, Kinzig AP, Ryan P (2006) Exploring resilience in socio-ecological systems through comparative studies and theory development: introduction to the special issue. Ecology and Society 11 (1):12 http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art12/
  52. Weber EP (2003) Bringing society back in: grassroots ecosystem management accountability and sustainable communities. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  53. Weber EP, Lovrich N, Gaffney M (2005) Collaboration, enforcement, and endangered species: a framework for assessing collaborative problem-solving capacity. Society & Natural Resources 18(8):677–698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wilson RK (2003) Community-based management and national forests in the Western United States: five challenges. Policy Matters 12:216–224Google Scholar
  55. Wilson RK (2006) Collaboration in context: rural change and community forestry in the Four Corners. Society and Natural Resources 19:53–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wolff T (2001) A practitioner’s guide to successful coalitions. American Journal of Community Psychology 29(2):173–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wondolleck JM, Yaffee SL (2000) Making collaboration work: lessons from innovation in natural resource management. Island Press, CoveloGoogle Scholar
  58. Zakocs RC, Edwards EM (2006) What explains community coalition effectiveness? A review of the literature. American Journal of Preventative Medicine 30(4):351–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Forest & Rangeland StewardshipColorado State UniversityFort CollinsUSA
  2. 2.Department of SociologySouthern Oregon UniversityAshlandUSA

Personalised recommendations