Advertisement

Environmental Management

, 48:878 | Cite as

Integrating Ecological Knowledge, Public Perception and Urgency of Action into Invasive Species Management

  • Paul Caplat
  • Shaun R. Coutts
Article

Abstract

Recently Prévot-Julliard and colleagues presented a concept paper on biological conservation strategies using exotic species as a case study. They emphasized the difficulty of integrating conservation into a broad picture that accounts for public perception as well as scientific knowledge. We support this general call for better integration of society in conservation research, but we believe that the original framework might misguide conservation practices if wrongly interpreted. Our objective is to complement their paper and correct a few misleading points, by showing that (1) for regions of high endemicity “reservation” may be the best conservation practice, and does not prevent public participation, (2) aiming for broad societal agreement is valuable, but in some cases risky, and always complex, and (3) calling a harmful invasive species harmful shouldn’t be an issue. The Australian context provides us with many cases of the labeling of exotic species as harmful or not, using inputs from scientists, industry, and the public. Integration of social and scientific points of view can only improve conservation on the ground if it allows managers to use the ecological, economic and social impacts of exotic species to prioritize conservation actions in an operative way.

Keywords

Conservation policy Invasive management Australia Social integration 

Notes

Acknowledgments

PC was funded through CSIRO’s OCE Postdoctoral Fellowships. The authors thank Yvonne Buckley, Rieks van Klinken, Susan Cormier, Glenn Suter and Robert Grese for their comments on the manuscript.

References

  1. Australian weeds Committee www.weeds.org.au/docs/weednet6.pdf. Retrieved Dec 2010
  2. Benke KK, Steel JL, Weiss JE (2010) Risk assessment models for invasive species: uncertainty in rankings from multi-criteria analysis. Biological Invasions 13:239–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Booth JE, Gaston KJ, Armsworth PR (2010) Who benefits from recreational use of protected areas? Ecology and Society 15(3): 19 http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss3/art19/
  4. Csurhes S, Hanna-jones M (2008) Pest plant risk assessment Gamba grass (Andropogon gayanus). Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries, QueenslandGoogle Scholar
  5. Davies KW, Sheley RL (2007) A conceptual framework for preventing the spatial dispersal of invasive plants. Weed Science 55:178–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Firn J (2009) African lovegrass in Australia: a valuable pasture species or embarrassing invader? Tropical Grasslands 43:86–97Google Scholar
  7. Hobbs RJ, Cole DN, Yung L, Zavaleta ES, Aplet GH, Chapin FS, Landres PB, Parsons DJ, Stephenson NL, White PS, Graber DM, Higgs ES, Millar CI, Randall JM, Tonnessen KA, Woodley S (2010) Guiding concepts for park and wilderness stewardship in an era of global environmental change. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 8:483–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Johnston WH, Aveyard JM, Legge K (1984) Selection and testing of Consol Lovegrass for soil conservation and pastoral use. Journal of Soil Conservation 40:38–45Google Scholar
  9. Larson B (2007) An alien approach to invasive species: objectivity and society in invasion biology. Biological Invasions 9:947–956CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lonsdale WM (1999) Global patterns of plant invasions and the concept of invasibility. Ecology 80:1522–1536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Newberry B, Jones DN (2007) Presence of Asian house gecko Hemidactylus frenatus across an urban gradient in Brisbane influence of habitat and potential for impact on native gecko species. In: Lunney D, Eby P, Hutchings P, Burgin S (eds) Pest or guest: the zoology of overabundance. Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales, MosmanGoogle Scholar
  12. PA IUCN-WC (2010) Putting plans to work: IUCN’s commitment to protected areas. IUCN, GlandGoogle Scholar
  13. Perrings C, Williamson M, Barbier EB, Delfino D, Dalmazzone S, Shogren J, Simmons P, Watkinson A (2002) Biological invasion risks and the public good: an economic perspective. Conservation Ecology 6:1 http://www.consecol.org/vol6/iss1/art1
  14. Prévot-Julliard A-C, Clavel J, Teillac-Deschamps P, Julliard R (2011) The need for flexibility in conservation practices: exotic species as an example. Environmental Management 47(3):315–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Queensland Government (2002) Land Protection (Pest and Stock Route Management) act 2002, State of QueenslandGoogle Scholar
  16. Richardson DM, Pyšek P, Rejmánek M, Barbour MG, Panetta FD, West CJ (2000) Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions. Diversity and Distributions 6:93–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Roberge J-M, Mikusinski G, Possingham HP (2010) Has the term “conservation biology” had its day? Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 8:121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sandbrook C, Scales IR, Vira B, Adams WM (2010) Value plurality among conservation professionals. Conservation Biology 25(2):285–294Google Scholar
  19. Setterfield SA, Rossiter-Rachor NA, Hutley LB, Douglas MM, Williams RJ (2010) Turning up the heat: the impacts of Andropogon gayanus (Gamba grass) invasion on fire behaviour in northern Australian savannas. Diversity and Distributions 16:854–861CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Soulé M, Lease G (1995) Reinventing nature: responses to postmodern deconstruction. Island Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  21. Taylor M, Sattler P, Evans M, Fuller R, Watson J, Possingham H (2011) What works for threatened species recovery? An empirical evaluation for Australia. Biodiversity and Conservation 20:766–777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Trigger D, Mulcock J, Gaynor A, Toussaint Y (2008) Ecological restoration, cultural preferences and the negotiation of ‘nativeness’ in Australia. Geoforum 39:1273–1283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. van Kleunen M, Weber E, Fischer M (2010) A meta-analysis of trait differences between invasive and non-invasive plant species. Ecology Letters 13:235–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CSIRO Ecosystem SciencesBrisbaneAustralia
  2. 2.School of Biological SciencesUniversity of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations