Environmental Management

, Volume 47, Issue 4, pp 630–643 | Cite as

Marine Protected Dramas: The Flaws of the Brazilian National System of Marine Protected Areas

  • Leopoldo C. Gerhardinger
  • Eduardo A. S. Godoy
  • Peter J. S. Jones
  • Gilberto Sales
  • Beatrice P. Ferreira
Article

Abstract

This article discusses the current problems and issues associated with the implementation of a National System of Marine Protected Areas in Brazil. MPA managers and higher governmental level authorities were interviewed about their perceptions of the implementation of a national MPA strategy and the recent changes in the institutional arrangement of government marine conservation agencies. Interviewees’ narratives were generally pessimistic and the National System was perceived as weak, with few recognizable marine conservation outcomes on the ground. The following major flaws were identified: poor inter-institutional coordination of coastal and ocean governance; institutional crisis faced by the national government marine conservation agency; poor management within individual MPAs; problems with regional networks of marine protected areas; an overly bureaucratic management and administrative system; financial shortages creating structural problems and a disconnect between MPA policy and its delivery. Furthermore, a lack of professional motivation and a pessimistic atmosphere was encountered during many interviews, a malaise which we believe affects how the entire system is able to respond to crises. Our findings highlight the need for a better understanding of the role of ‘leadership’ in the performance of socio-ecological systems (such as MPA networks), more effective official evaluation mechanisms, more localized audits of (and reforms if necessary to) Brazil’s federal biodiversity conservation agency (ICMBio), and the need for political measures to promote state leadership and support. Continuing to focus on the designation of more MPAs whilst not fully addressing these issues will achieve little beyond fulfilling, on paper, Brazil’s international marine biodiversity commitments.

Keywords

Coastal management Marine conservation Marine reserves Convention on biological diversity Marine spatial management Ocean governance 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This is a contribution from the the Meros do Brasil network (www.merosdobrasil.org). We sincerely acknowledge the staff of the Ministry of Environment (MMA), Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (ICMBio) and IBAMA for providing their time and dedication to our interviews and logistics. We thank the key financial support of Programa Petrobras Ambiental and Center for Marine Conservation (Duke University) to our work, and a scholarship provided by Shell Chevening Centenary Scholarship to Leopoldo Cavaleri Gerhardinger for his master degree at University College London.

References

  1. Abdallah PR, Sumaila UR (2007) An historical account of Brazilian public policy on fisheries subsidies. Marine Policy 31:444–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agardy T, Wilkinson T (2003) Conceptualizing a system of marine protected area networks for North America. In Conference presentation, science and management of protected areas association conference, Victoria, BC, 11–16 May 2003Google Scholar
  3. Chatwin A (ed) (2007) Priorities for coastal and marine conservation in South America. The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, VAGoogle Scholar
  4. CIRM—Comissão Interministerial para os Recursos do Mar (1999) V Plano Setorial para os Recursos do Mar (1999–2003), Brasília DFGoogle Scholar
  5. Crowder LB, Osherenko G, Young OR, Airamé S, Norse EA, Baron N, Day JC, Douvere F, Ehler CN, Halpern BS, Langdon SJ, McLeod KL, Ogden JC, Peach RE, Rosenberg AA, Wilson JA (2006) Resolving mismatches in U.S. ocean governance. Science 313:617–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ferreira IV, Prates APL (2002) O processo de integração da gestão das unidades de conservação marinho costeiras de santa catarina–Brasil. Gerenciamento Costeiro Integrado 2:10–11Google Scholar
  7. Ferreira L, Tavolaro S (2008) Environmental concerns in contemporary Brazil: an insight into some theoretical and societal backgrounds (1970–1990s). International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society 19:161–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ferreira BP, Maida M, Messias LT (2004) The Environmental Municipal Councils as an instrument in coastal integrated management. Journal of Coastal Research SI 39Google Scholar
  9. Ferreira BP, Maida M, Messias LT (2007) Os Conselhos Municipais de Meio Ambiente como Instrumento de Gestão Integrada: A Experiência na Área de Proteção Ambiental Costa de Corais (AL/PE), In: ÁREAS PROTEGIDAS DO BRASIL 4, Brasília, MMAGoogle Scholar
  10. Floeter SR, Halpern BS, Ferreira CEL (2006) Effects of fishing and protection on Brazilian reef fishes. Biological Conservation 128:391–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gerhardinger LC, Godoy EAS, Jones PJS (2009) Local ecological knowledge and the management of marine protected areas in Brazil. Ocean & Coastal Management 52:154–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gonçalves L (2008) À deriva–um panorama dos mares brasileiros. Greenpeace, São PauloGoogle Scholar
  13. Gravestock P, Roberts CM, Bailey A (2008) The income requirements of marine protected areas. Ocean & Coastal Management 51(3):272–283Google Scholar
  14. IUCN-WCPA (International Union for the Conservation of Nature-World Commission on Protected Areas) (2008) Establishing marine protected area networks—making it happen. IUCN-WCPA, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and The Nature Conservancy, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  15. Jentoft S, Chuenpagdee R (2009) Fisheries and coastal governance as a wicked problem. Marine Policy 33(4):553–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jones PJS (2001) Marine protected area strategies: issues, divergences and the search for middle ground. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 11(3):197–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jones PJS (2006) Collective action problems posed by no take zones. Marine Policy 30(2):143–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jones PJS (2007) Point of view—Arguments for conventional fisheries management and against no-take marine protected areas: only half of the story? Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 17(1):31–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kelleher G, Bleakley C, Wells S (1995) Priority areas for a global representative system of marine protected areas. Report to the World Bank Environment Department, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  20. Lubchenco J, Palumbi SR, Gaines SD, Andelman S (2003) Plugging a hole in the ocean: the emerging science of marine reserves. Ecological Applications 13:3–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. MMA (2004) Gestão Participativa do SNUC, Áreas Protegidas do Brasil 2. MMA, BrasíliaGoogle Scholar
  22. MMA (2006) Sumário Executivo do terceiro relatório nacional para a convenção sobre diversidade biológica: Brazil, Ministério do Meio Ambiente. Secretaria de Biodiversidade e Florestas, BrasíliaGoogle Scholar
  23. Marchioro GB, Ilha HH (2007) A Elaboração do Programa Rumar—Rede de Unidades Marinhas e Costeiras do Ibama: Uma Análise da sua Evolução e Expectativas de Implementação. In: XII Congresso Latino-americano de Ciências do Mar, 2007, Anais do XII COLACMAR, FlorianópolisGoogle Scholar
  24. Marchioro GB, Nunes MA, Dutra GF, Moura RD, Pereira PGP (2005) Avaliação dos impactos da exploração e produção de hidrocarbonetos no Banco dos Abrolhos e adjacências. Megadiversidade 1(2):225–310Google Scholar
  25. Medeiros R (2006) Evolução das tipologias e categorias de áreas protegidas no Brasil. Revista Ambiente e Sociedade 9(1):41–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Muanis MM, Serrão M, Geluda L (2009) Quanto custa uma unidade de conservação federal?: uma visão estratégica para o financiamento do Sistema Nacional de Unidades de Conservação (SNUC). Rio de Janeiro, FunbioGoogle Scholar
  27. Pereira PM (1999) Unidades de Conservação das Zonas Costeira e Marinha do Brasil. http://www.bdt.org.br/workshop/costa/uc
  28. Prates AP, Cordeiro AZ, Ferreira BP, Maida M (2007) Unidades de Conservação Costeiras e Marinhas de Uso Sustentavel como Instrumento para Gestão Pesqueira. In: MMA/SBF (eds) Areas Aquáticas Protegidas como Instrumento de Gestão Pesqueira, Brasilia. Série Áreas Protegidas 1:25–38Google Scholar
  29. Rodríguez-Martínez RE (2008) Community involvement in marine protected areas: the case of Puerto Morelos reef, México. Journal of Environmental Management 88:1151–1160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Seixas CS, Davy B (2008) Self-organization in integrated conservation and development initiatives. International Journal of the Commons 2:99–125Google Scholar
  31. Silva PP (2004) From common property to co-management: lessons from Brazil’s first maritime extractive reserve. Marine Policy 28:419–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Timmer V (2004) Community-based Conservation and Leadership: frame-works for analyzing the equator initiative. CID graduate student work-ing paper no. 2. Science, Environment, and Development Group, Center for International Development, Harvard University, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  33. UNEP-WCMC (2008) National and regional networks of marine protected areas: a review of progress. UNEP-WCMC, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  34. Wells S, Burgess N, Ngusaru A (2007) Towards the 2012 marine protected area targets in Eastern Africa. Ocean & Coastal Management 50:67–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leopoldo C. Gerhardinger
    • 1
    • 2
  • Eduardo A. S. Godoy
    • 3
  • Peter J. S. Jones
    • 4
  • Gilberto Sales
    • 5
  • Beatrice P. Ferreira
    • 6
  1. 1.Associação de Estudos Costeiros e Marinhos—ECOMAR NGOCaravelasBrazil
  2. 2.CTTMar, Laboratório de Educação AmbientalUniversidade do Vale do ItajaíItajaíBrazil
  3. 3.Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade, SCENBrasíliaBrazil
  4. 4.Department of GeographyUniversity College London (UCL)LondonUK
  5. 5.Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade, Centro TamarArembepe, CamaçariBrazil
  6. 6.Centro de Tecnologia, Departamento de OceanografiaUniversidade Federal de PernambucoRecifeBrazil

Personalised recommendations