Advertisement

Environmental Management

, Volume 45, Issue 4, pp 807–821 | Cite as

The Efficacy of a Programme of Landslide Risk Reduction in Areas of Unplanned Housing in the Eastern Caribbean

  • Malcolm G. AndersonEmail author
  • Elizabeth Holcombe
  • Maricarmen Esquivel
  • Joaquin Toro
  • Francis Ghesquiere
Article

Abstract

Poor countries are disproportionately affected by the cost of disasters. Yet there is evidence of the benefits of seeking to mitigate the impact of a disaster, compared with the costs incurred in ‘making good’ after a major event has occurred. This article reviews a programme of landslide risk reduction in unplanned communities in the Eastern Caribbean. The construction of appropriate surface water management measures, based on the application of scientific and engineering principles, has been demonstrated to reduce the hazard from rainfall-triggered landslides. Adopting a community-based approach additionally delivers social and environmental benefits relating to employment generation, improvements in the environmental conditions within the community, and improvements slope management practices. The sustained implementation of the community-based projects has provided the necessary evidence-base for these practices to influence Government policy and practice, and gain recognition from regional development agencies. The strategic and incremental uptake of the community-based methodology is demonstrated to be an effective means for delivering physical landslide risk reduction measures in the most ‘at risk’ areas of unplanned housing.

Keywords

Landslides Unplanned housing Disaster risk reduction Slope management Developing countries 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the SetSquared Partnership, UK; Governments of St Lucia and Dominica; and USAID. The authors acknowledge the assistance of the World Bank in providing editorial commentary on the manuscript.

References

  1. AGS (2000) Landslide Risk Management Concepts and Guidelines. Australian Geomechanics Society Google Scholar
  2. Anderson MG, Holcombe EA (2004) Management of slope stability in communities. Insight 6:15–17Google Scholar
  3. Anderson MG, Holcombe EA (2006a) Purpose driven public sector reform: the need for within-Government capacity build for the management of slope stability in communities (MoSSaiC) in the Caribbean. Environmental Management 37:15–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson MG, Holcombe EA (2006b) Community based landslide risk reduction. Proceedings Institution Civil Engineers. Engineering Sustainability 159:23–30Google Scholar
  5. Anderson MG, Holcombe EA (2007) Reducing landslide risk in poor housing areas of the Caribbean–developing a new Government-Community partnership model. Jour International Development 19:205–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Anderson MG, Collison AJC, Hartshorne J, Lloyd DM, Park A (1996) Developments in slope hydrology-stability modelling for tropical slopes”. In: Anderson MG, Brooks SM (eds) Advances in Hillslope processes. Wiley, Chichester, pp 799–821Google Scholar
  7. Anderson MG, Kemp MJ, Lloyd DM (1997) Hydrological design manual for slope stability in the Tropics. Transport Research Laboratory, CrowthorneGoogle Scholar
  8. Anderson MG, Holcombe EA, Renaud JP (2007) Assessing slope stability in unplanned settlements in developing countries. Journal Environmental Management 85:101–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Anstey C (2005) Country Director for the Caribbean, World Bank, quoted in The STAR 16 September 2005, p 18Google Scholar
  10. Anthony KD (2001) Strengthening modernizing and repositioning the economy. Budget speech by The Honourable Dr. Kenny D. Anthony, Prime Minister and Minister for Finance, Economic Affairs and Information. Government of Saint LuciaGoogle Scholar
  11. Bainbridge DA (2004) The price falls short. Solar Today 18:52–59Google Scholar
  12. Bird G (2004) Growth, poverty and the IMF. Journal of International Development 16:621–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bull-Kamanga L, Diagne K, Lavell A, Leon E, Lerise F, MacGregor H, Maskrey A, Meshack M, Pelling M, Reid H, Satterthwaite D, Songsore J, Westgate K, Yitambe A (2003) From everyday hazards to disasters: the accumulation of risk in urban areas. Environment and Urbanization 15:193Google Scholar
  14. Carrara A (1995) GIS technology in mapping landslide hazard. In: Carrara A, Guzzetti F (eds) Geographical information systems in assessing natural hazards. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 135–176Google Scholar
  15. Carrara A, Guzzetti F, Cardinali M, Reichenbach P (1999) Use of GIS technology in the prediction and monitoring of landslide hazard. Natural Hazard 20:117–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Charveriat C (2000) Natural Disasters in Latin America and the Caribbean: An Overview of Risk. Working Paper No. 434. Research Department, Inter-American Development Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  17. DeGraff JV (1985) Landslide hazard on St. Lucia, West Indies-Final Report. Organization of American States, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  18. DeGraff, JV (1987a) Landslide hazard on Dominica, West Indies-Final Report. Organization of American States, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  19. DeGraff JV (1987b) Geologic reconnaissance of the 1986 landslide activity at Good Hope, D’Leau Gommier, and Belvue Slopes. Commonwealth of Dominica, West Indies. Washington, DC, Organization of American StatesGoogle Scholar
  20. DeGraff JV (1988) Landslide hazard on St. Vincent, West Indies-Final Report. Washington DC, Organization of American States Google Scholar
  21. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ) GmbH (2005) Linking poverty reduction with disaster risk management, Bonn GermanyGoogle Scholar
  22. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ) GmbH (2008) Disaster Risk Management. Topic 193, Bonn, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  23. DFID (2004) Disaster risk reduction: a development concern. DFID, LondonGoogle Scholar
  24. Dilley M, Chen RS, Deichmann U, Lerner-Lam AL, Arnold M (2005) Natural disaster hotspots: a global risk analysis. World Bank, Washington, DCCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Easterly W (2006) The White Man’s burden. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  26. Gay D, Rogers C (1999) Black Mallet Landslide: preliminary geotechnical evaluation, 9 pp. www.geocities.om/black_mallet/blackmalletuwi.htm
  27. Gue S-S, Karnawati D, Wong S-Y (2009) Ploicy and institutional framework for landslide mitigation and risk reduction. In: Sasa K, Canuti P (eds) Landslides–Disaster Risk Reduction. Springer, Berlin, pp 531–554Google Scholar
  28. Holcombe EA, Anderson MG (2008) Implementation of community-based landslide hazard mitigation measures: the role of stakeholder engagement in ‘sustainable’ project scale-up. Sustainable Development. doi: 10.1002/sd.409
  29. Hulme D (2000) Impact assessment methodologies for microfinance: theory, experience, and better practice. World Development 28:79–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (2004) World Disasters Report. http://www.ifrc.org/publicat/wdr2004/
  31. Karawati, D, Pramumumijyo, S and Koentjoro, M (2005) Public eductaiojn on geoscience for susatianbility of life in geohazard vulnerable area Indonesia. Proceedings of the annual geoscince education organisation 2nd international meeting, Singapore, June 20–24Google Scholar
  32. Knutson TR, Tuelya RE (2004) Impact of CO2-induced warming on simulated hurricane intensity and precipitation: sensitivity to the choice of climate model and convective parameterization. Journal of Climate 17:3477–3495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Knutson TR, Tuelya RE, Kurihara Y (1998) Simulated increase of hurricane intensities in a CO2 warmed climate. Science 279:1018–1021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kremer M, Miguel E (2004) The Illusion of Sustainability. NBER Working Papers 10324, National Bureau of Economic Research, IncGoogle Scholar
  35. MacLeod A, Hofmeister R.J, Wnag, Y, Burns, S (2005) Landslide Indirect Losses: Methods and Case Studies from Oregon, Open-File Report O-05-X. State of Oregon, Department of Geology and Mineral Industries, Portland, OregonGoogle Scholar
  36. Mann EM, Emanuel KA (2006) Atlantic hurricane trends linked to climate change. EOS Transactions American Geophysical Union 87:233–235Google Scholar
  37. Mayoux L, Mosedale S (2005) Impact assessment for pro-poor accountability: innovations and challenges. Journal of International Development 17:187–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mechler R (2002) Natural disaster risk and cost-benefit analysis. In: Kreimer A, Arnold M, Carlin A (eds) The future of disaster risk: building safer cities. A. Kreimer. World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  39. Mechler R (2004) Risk management and financing loss in developing countries. Verlag, KarlsruheGoogle Scholar
  40. OFDA/CRED (2002) International Disaster Database (EM-DAT)Google Scholar
  41. Organisation of American States (2005) The economics of disaster mitigation in the Caribbean: quantifying benefits and costs of mitigating natural hazard losses—lessons learned from the 2004 Hurricane Season. Policy Series, 7Google Scholar
  42. Putnam R (1995) Turning in, turning out: the strange disappearance of social capital in America. Political Science and Politics 28:667–683Google Scholar
  43. Strata Engineering Consultants Ltd (1999) Landslide Investigation at Black Mallet / Maynard Hill, Castries, St. Lucia, West Indies. Consultants Report to the Government of Saint Lucia. http://www.geocities.com/blackmallestgoslreport.htm?200623
  44. Teams (1999) Position paper on the earth movement crisis of Black Mallet and Maynard Hill, 7 ppGoogle Scholar
  45. UN (2006) Landslides: Asia has the most; Americas, the deadliest; Europe, the Costliest; Experts seek ways to mitigate Landslide Losses; Danger said growing due to Climate Change, Other Causes. News Release January 18, 2006, MR/E01/06/rev1, United Nations UniversityGoogle Scholar
  46. UNDP (2004) A Global Report. Reducing disaster risk: a challenge for development, Bureau for Crisis Prevention and Relief, United Nations Development ProgramGoogle Scholar
  47. UNDP (2005) Local risk management and disaster preparedness in the Andean Region. Systematization of best practices and lessons learned, Bureau for Crisis Prevention and Relief, United Nations Development ProgramGoogle Scholar
  48. UN-ISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster reduction) (2002) Living with risk; a global view of disaster reduction initiatives. UN Inter-Agency Secretariat, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  49. USGS (2003) National landslide hazards mitigation strategy – a framework for loss reduction Circular 1244Google Scholar
  50. Wamsler C (2006) Mainstreaming risk reduction in urban planning and housing: a challenge for international aid organisations. Disaster 30:51–177Google Scholar
  51. Webster PJ, Holland GJ, Curry JA, Chang H-R (2005) Changes in tropical cyclone number, duration, and intensity in a warming environment. Science 309:1844–1846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wilkinson PW (2001) Investigating the hydrological and geotechnical effects of vegetation on slope stability: development of a fully integrated numerical model. Unpublished PhD thesis. University of BristolGoogle Scholar
  53. Wilkinson PL, Brooks SM, Anderson MG (2000) Design and application of an automated non-circular slip surface search within a Combined Hydrology and Stability Model (CHASM). Hydrological Processes 14:2003–2017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. World Bank (2003) Making services work for poor people. World Development Report 2004. World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  55. World Bank Community Based Disaster Risk Management (2007) Environmental Planning Collaborative, Ahmedabad, India and the World Bank Institute. On-line course. http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/WBI/WBIPROGRAMS/CMUDLP/0,,contentMDK:21343111~pagePK:64156158~piPK:64152884~theSitePK:461754,00.html

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Malcolm G. Anderson
    • 1
    Email author
  • Elizabeth Holcombe
    • 1
  • Maricarmen Esquivel
    • 2
  • Joaquin Toro
    • 2
  • Francis Ghesquiere
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Geographical SciencesUniversity of BristolBristolUK
  2. 2.Sustainable Development Unit, Latin America and the CaribbeanWorld BankWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations