Environmental Management

, Volume 45, Issue 2, pp 336–350

Influences of Spatial Scale and Soil Permeability on Relationships Between Land Cover and Baseflow Stream Nutrient Concentrations

  • F. Bernard Daniel
  • Michael B. Griffith
  • Michael E. Troyer
Article

Abstract

The Little Miami River (LMR) basin, dominated by agriculture, contains two geologically-distinct regions; a glaciated northern till plain with soils three times more permeable than a southern, pre-Wisconsinan drift plain. The influences of two landscape measures, percent row crop cover (%RCC, computed at three spatial scales), and soil permeability (PERM), on baseflow nutrient concentrations were modeled using linear regressions. Quarterly water samples collected for four years were analyzed for nitrate-N (NN), Kjeldahl-N (KN), total-N (TN), and total-P (TP). In till plain streams (n = 17), NN concentrations were 8.5-times greater than drift plain streams (n = 18), but KN and TP were 20–40% lower at comparable %RCC. These differences resulted in TN/TP molar ratios >80 in till plain streams, but <6 in drift plain streams. For till plain steams regression models based on %RCC accounted for 79% of the variance in NN concentrations but only 27% in drift plain streams. However, regressions on %RCC accounted for 68–75% of the KN and TP concentration variance in the drift plain streams but essentially none in the till plain. Catchment PERM influenced the regional NN/KN ratios which were 10-fold higher in the drift plain streams. For both till and drift streams the catchment scale %RCC gave the best predictions of NN, a water soluble anion, but the smaller spatial scales produced better models for insoluble nutrient species (e.g., KN and TP). Published literature on Ohio streams indicates that these inter-regional differences in nutrient ratios have potential implications for aquatic biota in the receiving streams.

Keywords

Land cover Row crop Spatial scale Non-point source Nutrients Soil permeability Water quality Aquatic biotic integrity 

References

  1. Allan JD (2004) Landscapes and riverscapes: the influence of land use on stream ecosystems. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 35:257–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker DB, Richards RP (2002) Phosphorus budgets and riverine export in northwestern Ohio watersheds. Journal of Environmental Quality 31:96–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bertram PE (1993) Total phosphorus and dissolved oxygen trends in the Central Basin of Lake Erie, 1970–1991. Journal of the Great Lakes 19:224–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brookshire ENJ, Valett HM, Thomas SA, Webster JR (2005) Coupled cycling of dissolved organic nitrogen and carbon in a forest stream. Ecology 86:2487–2496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buck O, Niyogi DK, Townsend CR (2004) Scale-dependence of land use effects on water quality of streams in agricultural catchments. Environmental Pollution 130:287–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burkart MR, James DE (1999) Agricultural-nitrogen contributions to hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico. Journal of Environmental Quality 28:850–859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Calhoun FG, Baker DB, Slater BK (2002) Soils, water quality, and watershed size: interactions in the Maumee and Sandusky River basins of northwestern Ohio. Journal of Environmental Quality 31:47–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Campbell JL, Hornbeck JW, McDowell WH, Buso DC, Shanley JB, Likens GE (2000) Dissolved organic nitrogen budgets for upland, forested ecosystems in New England. Biogeochemistry 49:123–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Caraco NF, Cole JJ (2002) The importance of organic nitrogen production in aquatic systems: a landscape perspective. In: Findlay SEG, Sinsabaugh RL (eds) Aquatic ecosystems: interactivity of dissolved organic matter. Elsevier Science/Academic Press, San Diego, pp 263–284Google Scholar
  10. Carpenter SR, Caraco NE, Correll DL, Howarth RW, Shapley AN, Smith VH (1998) Nonpoint pollution of surface waters with phosphorus and nitrogen. Ecological Applications 8:559–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Castillo MM, Allan JD, Brunzell S (2000) Nutrient concentrations and discharges in a Midwestern agricultural catchment. Journal of Environmental Quality 29:1142–1151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chin Y-P (2002) The speciation of hydrophobic organic compounds by dissolved organic matter. In: Findlay SEG, Sinsabaugh RL (eds) Aquatic ecosystems: interactivity of dissolved organic matter. Elsevier Science/Academic Press, San Diego, pp 161–184Google Scholar
  13. Correll DL (1998) The role of phosphorus in the eutrophication of receiving waters: a review. Journal of Environmental Quality 27:261–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cundill AP, Chapman PJ, Adamson JK (2007) Spatial variation in concentrations of dissolved nitrogen species in an upland blanket peat catchment. Science of the Total Environment 373:166–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. David MB, Gentry LE (2000) Anthropogenic inputs of nitrogen and phosphorus and riverine export for Illinois, USA. Journal of Environmental Quality 29:494–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. David MB, Gentry LE, Kovacic DA, Smith KM (1997) Nitrogen balance in and export from an agricultural watershed. Journal of Environmental Quality 26:1038–1048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dodds WK, Oakes RM (2006) Controls on nutrients across a prairie stream watershed: land use and riparian cover effects. Environmental Management 37:634–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dodds WK, Oakes RM (2008) Headwater influences of downstream water quality. Environmental Management 41:367–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dodds WK, Priscu JC (1990) A comparison of methods for assessment of nutrient deficiency of phytoplankton in a large oligotrophic lake. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 47:2328–2338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dodds WK, Welch EB (2000) Establishing nutrient criteria in streams. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 19:186–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fenelon JM, Moore RC (1998) Transport of agrichemicals to ground and surface water in a small central Indiana watershed. Journal of Environmental Quality 27:884–894CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Findlay S, Sinsabaugh RL (2003) Response of hyporheic biofilm metabolism and community structure to nitrogen amendments. Aquatic Microbial Ecology 33:127–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Franklin DH, Steiner JL, Cabrera ML, Usery EL (2002) Distribution of inorganic nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations in stream flow of two southern Piedmont watersheds. Journal of Environmental Quality 31:1910–1917Google Scholar
  24. Gburek WJ, Sharpley AN (1998) Hydrogic controls on phosphorous loss form upland agricultural watersheds. Journal of Environmental Quality 27:267–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gburek WJ, Sharpley AN, Heathwaite L, Folmar GJ (2000) Phosphorous management at the watershed scale: a modification of the phosphorous index. Journal of Environmental Quality 29:130–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Goolsby DA, Battaglin WA, Aulenbach BT, Hooper RP (2001) Nitrogen input to the Gulf of Mexico. Journal of Environmental Quality 30:329–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Griffith MB, Hill BH, Herlihy AT, Kaufmann PR (2002) Multivariate analysis of periphyton assemblages in relation to environmental gradients in Colorado Rocky Mountain streams. Journal of Phycology 38:83–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Griffith MB, Daniel FB, Morrison MA, Troyer ME, Lazorchak JM, Schubauer-Berigan JP (2009) Linking excess nutrients, light, and fine bedded sediments to impacts on faunal assemblages in headwater agricultural streams. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, in pressGoogle Scholar
  29. Hawkins CP, Norris RH, Gerritsen J, Hughes RM, Jackson SK, Johnson RK, Stevenson RJ (2000) Evaluation of the use of landscape classifications for the prediction of freshwater biota: synthesis and recommendations. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 19:541–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Heathwaite L, Sharpley A, Gburek W (2000) A conceptual approach for integrating phosphorous and nitrogen management at watershed scales. Journal of Environmental Quality 29:158–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Helsel DR (1990) Less than obvious: statistical treatment of data below the detection limit. Environmental Science and Technology 24:1766–1774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hill J, Nelson E, Tilman D, Polasky S, Tiffany D (2006) Environmental, economic, and energetic costs and benefits of biodiesel and ethanol biofuels. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103:11206–11210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Howarth RW, Billen G, Swaney D, Townsend A, Jaworski N, Lajtha K, Downing JA, Elmgren R, Caraco N, Jordan T, Berendse F, Freney J, Kudeyarov V, Murdoch P, Zhao-Liang Z (1996) Regional nitrogen budgets and riverine N & P fluxes for the drainages to the North Atlantic Ocean: natural and human influences. Biogeochemistry 35:75–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Howarth RW, Sharpley A, Walker D (2002) Sources of nutrient pollution to costal waters in the United States: implications for achieving costal water quality goals. Estuaries 25:656–676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Johnson LB, Richards C, Host GE, Arthur JW (1997) Landscape influences on water chemistry in Midwestern stream ecosystems. Freshwater Biology 37:193–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jones KB, Neale AC, Nash MS, van Remortel RD, Wickham JD, Riitters KH, O’Neill RV (2001) Predicting nutrient and sediment loadings to streams from landscape metrics: a multiple watershed study from the United States Mid-Atlantic region. Landscape Ecology 16:301–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jones DL, Healey JR, Willett VB, Farrar JF, Hodge A (2005) Dissolved organic nitrogen uptake by plants—an important N uptake pathway? Soil Biology and Biochemistry 37:413–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jordan TE, Correll DL, Weller DE (1997) Nonpoint source discharges of nutrients from Piedmont watersheds of Chesapeake Bay. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 33:631–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jordan TE, Weller DE, Correll DL (2003) Sources of nutrient inputs to the Patuxent River estuary. Estuaries 26:226–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. King RS, Baker ME, Whigham DF, Weller DE, Jordan TE, Kazyak PF, Hurd MK (2005) Spatial considerations for linking watershed land cover to ecological indicators in streams. Ecological Applications 15:137–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lane EW, Borland WM (1954) River-bed scour during floods. Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers 119:1069–1079Google Scholar
  42. Lewis WM Jr, Melack JM, McDowell WH, McClain M, Richey JE (1999) Nitrogen yields from undisturbed watersheds in the Americas. Biogeochemistry 46:149–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lowrance R (1992) Nitrogen outputs from a field-size agricultural watershed. Journal of Environmental Quality 21:602–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. McDowell R, Sharpley A (2002) Phosphorus transport in overland flow in response to position of manure application. Journal of Environmental Quality 31:217–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. McDowell R, Sharpley A, Folmar G (2001) Phosphorus export from an agricultural watershed: linking source and transport mechanisms. Journal of Environmental Quality 30:1587–1595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. McIsaac GF, Hu X (2004) Net N input and riverine N export from Illinois agricultural watersheds with and without extensive tile drainage. Biogeochemisty 70:251–271Google Scholar
  47. Miltner RJ, Rankin ET (1998) Primary nutrients and the biotic integrity of rivers and streams. Freshwater Biology 40:145–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) (2003) Monthly surface data report no. 3220. National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Climatic Data Center, Asheville. http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/documentlibrary/surface-doc.html#3220. Accessed September 2007
  49. Neff JC, Holland EA, Dentener FJ, McDowell WH, Russell KM (2002) The origin, composition and rates of organic nitrogen deposition: a missing piece of the nitrogen cycle? Biogeochemistry 57(58):99–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Neff JC, Chapin FS III, Vitousek PM (2003) Breaks in the cycle: dissolved organic nitrogen in terrestrial ecosystems. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 1:205–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Norton MM, Fisher TR (2000) The effects of forest on stream water quality in two coastal plain watersheds of the Chesapeake Bay. Ecological Engineering 14:337–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (OEPA) (1987) Biological criteria for the protection of aquatic life: volume II: users manual for biological field assessment of Ohio surface waters. Division of Water Quality Planning and Assessment. Ecological Assessment Section, ColumbusGoogle Scholar
  53. Osborne LL, Wiley MJ (1988) Empirical relationships between land use/cover and stream water quality in an agricultural watershed. Journal of Environmental Management 26:9–27Google Scholar
  54. Parry R (1998) Agricultural phosphorus and water quality: a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency perspective. Journal of Environmental Quality 27:258–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Peterjohn WT, Correll DL (1984) Nutrient dynamics in an agricultural watershed: observations on the role of a riparian forest. Ecology 65:1466–1475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rabalais NN, Turner RE, Wiseman WJ Jr (2001) Hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico. Journal of Environmental Quality 30:320–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Randall GW, Mulla DJ (2001) Nitrate nitrogen in surface waters as influenced by climatic conditions and agricultural practices. Journal of Environmental Quality 30:337–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Redfield AC (1958) The biological control of chemical factors in the environment. American Scientist 46:205–221Google Scholar
  59. Richards PR, Baker DB (2002) Trends in water quality in LEASEQ rivers and streams (Northwestern Ohio), 1975–1995. Journal of Environmental Quality 31:90–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Richards C, Johnson LB, Host GE (1996) Landscape-scale influences on stream habitats and biota. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 53:295–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Schilling KE, Libra RD (2000) The relationship of nitrate concentrations in streams to row crop land use in Iowa. Journal of Environmental Quality 29:1846–1851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Seitzinger SP, Sanders RW (1999) Atmospheric inputs of dissolved organic nitrogen stimulate estuarine bacteria and phytoplankton. Limnology and Oceanography 44:721–730Google Scholar
  63. Sharpley A, Tunney H (2000) Phosphorus research strategies to meet agricultural and environmental challenges of the 21st century. Journal of Environmental Quality 29:176–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Shirazi MA, Boersma L, Haggerty PK, Johnson CB (2001) Spatial extrapolation of soil characteristics using whole-soil particle size distributions. Journal of Environmental Quality 30:101–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Smith VH (1982) The nitrogen and phosphorous dependence of algal biomass in lakes: an empirical and theoretical analysis. Limnology and Oceanography 27:1101–1112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Stevenson RJ (2006) Refining diatom indicators for valued ecological attributes and development of water quality criteria. In: Ognjanova-Rumenova N, Manoylov K (eds) Advances in Physiological Studies. Pensoft, Moscow, pp 365–383Google Scholar
  67. Troyer ME, Heo J, Ripley H (2006) Classification of high spatial resolution, hyperspectral remote sensing imagery of the Little Miami River watershed in southwest Ohio, USA. NCEA-C-1698. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development. National Center for Environmental Assessment, CincinnatiGoogle Scholar
  68. US Department of Agriculture (USDA) (1994) State soil geographic (STATSGO) data base: data use information. Miscellaneous publication number 1492. National Resources Conservation Service, Ft WorthGoogle Scholar
  69. US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (1983) Methods for chemical analysis of water and wastes. EPA/600/4-79/020. Office of Research and Development, Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory, CincinnatiGoogle Scholar
  70. US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (1996) Environmental indicators of water quality in the United States. EPA/841/R-96/002. Office of Water, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  71. US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (2000) Ambient water quality criteria recommendations: information supporting the development of state and tribal nutrient criteria for rivers and streams in Nutrient Ecoregion VI. EPA/822/B-00/017. Office of Water, Office of Science and Technology, Health and Ecological Criteria Division, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  72. US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (2004) Analytical tools interface for landscape assessments (ATtiILA): user manual. EPA/600/R-04/083. Office of Research and Development, National Exposure Research Laboratory, Las VegasGoogle Scholar
  73. US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (2007) Level IV ecoregions of Ohio and Indiana. Office of Research and Development, Washington, DC. http://www.epa.gov/wed/pages/ecoregions/ohin_eco.htm#Please%20note. Accessed 23 February 2009
  74. US Geological Survey (USGS) (1999a) National hydrography dataset. USGS Fact Sheet 106-99. U.S. Geological Survey, Reston. http://egsc.usgs.gov/isb/pubs/factsheets/fs10699.pdf. Accessed May 2005
  75. US Geological Survey (USGS) (1999b) National elevation dataset. USGS Fact Sheet 148-99. U.S. Geological Survey, Reston. http://egsc.usgs.gov/isb/pubs/factsheets/fs14899.pdf. Accessed May 2005
  76. US Geological Survey (USGS) (2003) National atlas of the United States; hydrologic unit boundaries. U.S. Geological Survey, Reston. http://www.nationalatlas.gov/natlas/Natlasstart.asp. Accessed March 2005
  77. Vanderbilt KL, Lajtha K, Swanson FJ (2003) Biogeochemistry of unpolluted forested watersheds in the Oregon Cascades: temporal patterns of precipitation and stream nitrogen fluxes. Biogeochemisty 62:87–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Vitousek PM, Aber JD, Howarth RW, Likens GE, Matson PA, Schindler DW, Schlesinger WH, Tilman DG (1997) Human alteration of the global nitrogen cycle: sources and consequences. Ecological Applications 7:737–750Google Scholar
  79. Vondracek B, Blann KL, Cox CB, Nerbonne JF, Mumford KG, Nerbonne BA, Sovell LA, Zimmerman JKH (2005) Land use, spatial scale, and stream systems: lessons from an agricultural region. Environmental Management 36:775–791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Weller DE, Jordan TE, Correll DL, Liu Z-J (2003) Effects of land-use change on nutrient discharges from the Patuxent River watershed. Estuaries and Coasts 26:244–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Willett VB, Reynolds BA, Stevens PA, Ormerod SJ, Jones DL (2004) Dissolved organic nitrogen regulation in freshwaters. Journal of Environmental Quality 33:201–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Williams M, Hopkinson C, Rastetter E, Vallino J, Claessens L (2005) Relationships of land use and stream solute concentrations in the Ipswich River basin, northeastern Massachusetts. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 161:55–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© U.S. Government 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Bernard Daniel
    • 1
  • Michael B. Griffith
    • 2
  • Michael E. Troyer
    • 2
  1. 1.National Exposure Research Laboratory, Office of Research and DevelopmentU.S. Environmental Protection AgencyCincinnatiUSA
  2. 2.National Center for Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and DevelopmentU.S. Environmental Protection AgencyCincinnatiUSA

Personalised recommendations