Environmental Management

, Volume 44, Issue 4, pp 609–623

Tropical Timber Rush in Peruvian Amazonia: Spatial Allocation of Forest Concessions in an Uninventoried Frontier



Land-use allocation has important implications for the conservation and management of tropical forests. Peru’s forestry regime has recently been reformed and more than 7 million ha has been assigned as forest concessions. This potentially has a drastic impact on the land-use practices and species composition of the assigned areas. Nevertheless, the environmental variation found within the concessions and the process applied to delimit them are poorly studied and documented. Thus, it is difficult to estimate the biological impacts of forestry activities in concessions or plan them sustainably. This paper reveals the characteristics of the current concession allocation in Loreto, Peruvian Amazonia, using environmental and access-related variables and compares the concessions to other major land-use assignments. The work draws on a number of data sets describing land-use, ecosystem diversity, and fluvial network in the region. According to our data, certain environment types such as relatively fertile Pebas soils are overrepresented in the concessions, while others, like floodplain forests, are underrepresented in comparison to other land-use assignments. Concessions also have less anthropogenic disturbance than other areas. Furthermore, concessions are located on average further from the river network than the other land-use assignments studied. We claim that forest classification based on productivity, soil fertility, accessibility, and biodiversity patterns is an achievable long-term goal for forest authorities in Peru, and in many other tropical countries. We present a rough design of a geographic information system incorporating environmental, logging, and access-related data that could be applied to approach this goal in Peru.


Tropical forestry Land-use planning Amazonia Forest concessions Environmental information Geographic information systems 


  1. Agrawal A, Chhatre A, Hardin R (2008) Changing governance of the world’s forests. Science 320:1460–1462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Asner G, Broadbent E, Oliveira P, Keller M, Knapp D, Silva J (2006) Condition and fate of logged forests in the Brazilian Amazon. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103:12947–12950CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Biodamaz (2001a) Estrategia Regional de la Diversidad Biológica Amazónica, Serie Técnica. IIAP-Biodamaz, Iquitos, PeruGoogle Scholar
  4. Biodamaz (2001b) Macrounidades ambientales en la Amazonía peruana con énfasis en la selva baja: primera aproximación a manera de hipótesis de trabajo, Serie Técnica. IIAP-Biodamaz, Iquitos, PeruGoogle Scholar
  5. Biodamaz (2001c) Marco teórico y metodológico para identificar unidades ambientales en la selva baja peruana, Serie Técnica. IIAP-Biodamaz, Iquitos, PeruGoogle Scholar
  6. Blundell A, Gullison R (2003) Poor regulatory capacity limits the ability of science to influence the management of mahogany. Forest Policy and Economics 5:395–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chirinos C, Ruiz M (2003) Informe final del estudio: desarrollo e implementación de lineamientos de control de la extracción ilegal para un manejo forestal sostenible en el Perú. ITTC, Ciudad de Panamá, PanamaGoogle Scholar
  8. Chung W, Stuckelberger J, Aruga K, Cundy T (2008) Forest road network design using a trade-off analysis between skidding and road construction costs. Canadian Journal of Forest Research-Revue Canadienne de Recherche Forestiere 38:439–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. de Castilho C, Magnusson W, de Araujo R, Luizao R, Lima A, Higuchi N (2006) Variation in aboveground tree live biomass in a central Amazonian Forest: effects of soil and topography. Forest Ecology and Management 234:85–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dinerstein E, Wikramanayake E, Graham DJ, Webster AL, Primm SA, Bookbinder MP, Ledec G (1995) A conservation assessment of the terrestrial ecoregions of Latin America and the Caribbean. World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  11. Dourojeanni MJ (1990) Amazonía, ¿Qué hacer? Centro de Estudios Teológicos de la Amazonía, Iquitos, PeruGoogle Scholar
  12. Elías E (2004) The Tarapoto process: establishing criteria and indicators for the sustainable management of Amazon forests. Unasylva 55:47–52Google Scholar
  13. Ewers R, Rodrigues A (2008) Estimates of reserve effectiveness are confounded by leakage. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 23:113–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Feldpausch TR, McDonald AJ, Passos CAM, Lehmann J, Riha SJ (2006) Biomass, harvestable area, and forest structure estimated from commercial timber inventories and remotely sensed imagery in southern Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 233:121–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Galarza E, La Serna K (2005) Las concesiones forestales en el Perú: ¿cómo hacerlas sostenibles? In: R Barrantes (ed) La política forestal en la Amazonía Andina. Estudios de caso, Bolivia, Ecuador y Perú, publicación del Consorcio de Investigación Económica y Social (CIES)Google Scholar
  16. Gray JA (2002) Forest concession policies and revenue systems: country experience and policy changes for sustainable tropical forestry. World Bank, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  17. IIAP, WWF (1999) Proyecto Ecoregion de Bosques Inundables y Ecosistemas Acuáticos de Várzea e Igapó—División Perú. Informe Final, Iquitos, PeruGoogle Scholar
  18. INRENA (1996a) Guía Explicativa del Mapa Forestal 1995. Instituto de Recursos Naturales. Dirección General Forestal, Lima, PeruGoogle Scholar
  19. INRENA (1996b) Estrategia para la zonificación ecológica económica y monitoreo geográfico de la Amazonía Peruana. Instituto Nacional de Recursos Naturales. Dirección General de Medio Ambiente Rural, Lima, PeruGoogle Scholar
  20. INRENA (2004) Mapificación y evaluación forestal del Bosque de Producción Permanente del Departamento de Loreto—Documento de Trabajo, Lima, PeruGoogle Scholar
  21. Josse C, Navarro G, Encarnación F, Tovar A, Comer P, Ferreira W, Rodríguez F, Saito J, Sanjurjo J, Dyson J, Rubin de Celis E, Zárate R, Chang J, Ahuite M, Vargas C, Paredes F, Castro W, Maco J, Reátegui F (2007a) Digital ecological systems map of the Amazon Basin of Peru and Bolivia. NatureServe, Arlington, VAGoogle Scholar
  22. Josse C, Navarro G, Encarnación F, Tovar A, Comer P, Ferreira W, Rodríguez F, Saito J, Sanjurjo J, Dyson J, Rubin de Celis E, Zárate R, Chang J, Ahuite M, Vargas C, Paredes F, Castro W, Maco J, Reátegui F (2007b) Sistemas Ecológicos de la Cuenca Amazónica de Perú y Bolivia. Clasificación y mapeo. NatureServe, Arlington, VAGoogle Scholar
  23. Juvonen S, Tello Fernández H (2004) Important advances in biodiversity conservation in Peruvian Amazonia. Lyonia 6:25–33Google Scholar
  24. Kaimovitz D, Vallejos C, Pacheco PB, López R (1998) Municipal Governments and forest management in lowland Bolivia. Journal of Environment & Development 7:45–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Karsenty A, García Drigo I, Piketty M-G, Singer B (2008) Regulating industrial forest concessions in Central Africa and South America. Forest Ecology and Management 256:1498–1508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kometter R, Martinez M, Blundell A, Gullison R, Steininger M, Rice R (2004) Impacts of unsustainable mahogany logging in Bolivia and Peru. Ecology and Society 9(1):12Google Scholar
  27. Kvist L, Nebel G (2001) A review of Peruvian flood plain forests: ecosystems, inhabitants and resource use. Forest Ecology and Management 150:3–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lamoreux J, Wettengel W, Hedao P, Kassem K (2001) Terrestrial ecoregions of the worlds: a new map of life on Earth. BioScience 51:933–938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Linna A, Irion G, Kauffman S, Wesselingh F, Kalliola R (1998) Heterogeneidad edáfica de la zona de Iquitos: origen y comprensión de sus propiedades. In: Kalliola R, Flores-Paitán S (eds) Geoecología y desarrollo Amazónico: estudio integrado en la zona de Iquitos. University of Turku, Turku, Perú, pp 461–480Google Scholar
  30. Malhi Y, Baker TR, Phillips OL, Almeida S, Álvarez E, Arroyo L, Chave J, Czimczik CI, di Fiore A, Higuchi N, Killeen TJ, Laurance SG, Laurance WF, Lewis SL, Mercado Montoy LM, Monteagudo A, Neill DA, Núñez Vargas P, Patiño S, Pitman NCA, Quesada CA, Salomão R, Macedo Silva JN, Torres Lezama A, Vásquez Martínez R, Terborgh J, Vinceti B, Lloyd J (2004) The above-ground coarse wood productivity of 104 Neotropical forest plots. Global Change Biology 10(5):563–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Marengo J (1998) Climatología de la zona de Iquitos, Perú. In: Kalliola R, Flores-Paitán S (eds) Geoecología y desarrollo Amazónico: estudio integrado en la zona de Iquitos. University of Turku, Turku, Perú, pp 35–57Google Scholar
  32. McCarthy JF (2000) The changing regime: forest property and Reformasi in Indonesia. Development and Change 31:91–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Merry F, Amacher G (2005) Forest taxes, timber concessions, and policy choices in the Amazon. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 20:15–44Google Scholar
  34. Ndoye O, Tieguhong J (2004) Forest resources and rural livelihoods: the conflict between timber and non-timber forest products in the Congo Basin. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 19:36–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Normand S, Vormisto J, Svenning J, Grandez C, Balslev H (2006) Geographical and environmental controls of palm beta diversity in paleo-riverine terrace forests in Amazonian Peru. Plant Ecology 186:161–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Oliveira PJC, Asner GP, Knapp DE, Almeyda A, Galvan-Gildemeister R, Keene S, Raybin RF, Smith RC (2007) Land-use allocation protects the Peruvian Amazon. Science 317:1233–1236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Olson D, Dinerstein E, Wikramanayake E, Burgess N, Powell G, Underwood E, D’Amico J, Itoua I, Strand H, Morrison J, Loucks C, Allnutt T, Ricketts T, Kura Y, O’Neill G, Dawson I, Sotelo-Montes C, Guarino L, Guariguata M, Current D, Weber J (2001) Strategies for genetic conservation of trees in the Peruvian Amazon. Biodiversity and Conservation 10:837–850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Peru (2001) Aprueban el Reglamento de la Ley Forestal y de Fauna Silvestre, Decreto Supremo 014-2001-AG. Diario Oficial El Peruano XIX:201105–201146Google Scholar
  39. Peru (2006) Aprueban la Directiva “Metodología para la Zonificación Ecológica y Económica.” Decreto del Consejo Directivo N. 010-2006-CONAM/CD. Diario Oficial El Peruano XXIII:322546–322558Google Scholar
  40. Phillips O, Baker T, Arroyo L, Higuchi N, Killeen T, Laurance W, Lewis S, Lloyd J, Malhi Y, Monteagudo A, Neill D, Vargas P, Silva J, Terborgh J, Martinez R, Alexiades M, Almeida S, Brown S, Chave J, Comiskey J, Czimczik C, Di Fiore A, Erwin T, Kuebler C, Laurance S, Nascimento H, Olivier J, Palacios W, Patino S, Pitman N, Quesada C, Salidas M, Lezama A, Vinceti B (2004) Pattern and process in Amazon tree turnover, 1976–2001. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 359:381–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Räsänen M, Salo J, Jungner H, Romero Pittman L (1990) Evolution of the Western Amazon lowland relief: impact of Andean foreland dynamics. Terra Nova 2:320–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Räsänen M, Neller R, Salo J, Jungner H (1992) Recent and ancient fluvial deposition systems in the Amazonian Foreland basin, Peru. Geological Magazine 129:293–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rocha K, Moreira A, Reis E, Carvalho L (2006) The market value of forest concessions in the Brazilian Amazon: a real option approach. Forest Policy and Economics 8:149–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Roddaz M, Baby P, Brusset S, Hermoza W, Darrozes J (2005) Forebulge dynamics and environmental control in Western Amazonia: The case study of the Arch of Iquitos (Peru). Tectonophysics 399:87–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ruokolainen K, Tuomisto H, Macia M, Higgins M, Yli-Halla M (2007) Are floristic and edaphic patterns in Amazonian rain forests congruent for trees, pteridophytes and Melastomataceae? Journal of Tropical Ecology 23:13–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schulman L, Ruokolainen K, Junikka L, Saaksjarvi I, Salo M, Juvonen S, Salo J, Higgins M (2007) Amazonian biodiversity and protected areas: Do they meet? Biodiversity and Conservation 16:3011–3051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schulze M, Zweede J (2006) Canopy dynamics in unlogged and logged forest stands in the eastern Amazon. Forest Ecology and Management 236:56–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Silva E, Kaimowitz D, Bojanic A, Ekoko F, Manurung T, Pavez I (2002) Making the law of the jungle: the reform of forest legislation in Bolivia, Cameroon, Costa Rica, and Indonesia. Global Environmental Politics 2(3):63–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Smith J, Colan V, Sabogal C, Snook L (2006) Why policy reforms fail to improve logging practices: the role of governance and norms in Peru. Forest Policy and Economics 8:458–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Soares-Filho B, Nepstad DC, Curran LM, Cerqueira GC, Garcia RA, Ramos CA, Voll E, McDonald A, Lefebvre P, Schlesinger P (2006) Modelling conservation in the Amazon basin. Nature 440:520–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tello Fernández H, Quevedo Guevara A, Gasché J (2004) Sistema de Incentivos para el manejo de bosques de Loreto: El caso de los recursos forestales maderables. Informe final. IIAP–CIES, Iquitos, PeruGoogle Scholar
  52. ter Steege H, Pitman N, Phillips O, Chave J, Sabatier D, Duque A, Molino J, Prevost M, Spichiger R, Castellanos H, von Hildebrand P, Vasquez R (2006) Continental-scale patterns of canopy tree composition and function across Amazonia. Nature 443:444–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Thomas R, Mcqueen D, Hawker Y, DeMenconda T (2003) Small and medium forest enterprise in Guyana. Guyana Forestry Commission and International Institute for Environment and Development, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  54. Toivonen T, Maeki S, Kalliola R (2007) The riverscape of Western Amazonia—a quantitative approach to the fluvial biogeography of the region. Journal of Biogeography 34:1374–1387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tuomisto H, Ruokolainen K, Kalliola R, Linna A, Danjoy W, Rodriguez Z (1995) Dissecting Amazonian biodiversity. Science 269:63–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Udvardy MDF (1975) A classification of the biogeographical provinces of the world. IUCN Occasional Paper no. 18. IUCN, Morges, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  57. Wesselingh F, Räsänen M, Irion G, Vonhof H, Kaandorp R, Renema W, Romero Pittman L, Gi M (2002) Lake Pebas: a palaeoecological reconstruction of a Miocene, long-lived lake complex in western Amazonia. Cainozoic Research 1:35–81Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of TurkuTurkuFinland
  2. 2.Department of GeographyUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations