Advertisement

Environmental Management

, Volume 44, Issue 3, pp 552–565 | Cite as

Stream Discharge and Riparian Land Use Influence In-Stream Concentrations and Loads of Phosphorus from Central Plains Watersheds

  • Eric B. K. Banner
  • Anthony J. Stahl
  • Walter K. DoddsEmail author
Article

Abstract

Total annual nutrient loads are a function of both watershed characteristics and the magnitude of nutrient mobilizing events. We investigated linkages among land cover, discharge and total phosphorus (TP) concentrations, and loads in 25 Kansas streams. Stream monitoring locations were selected from the Kansas Department of Health and Environment stream chemistry long-term monitoring network sites at or near U.S. Geological Survey stream gauges. We linked each sample with concurrent discharge data to improve our ability to estimate TP concentrations and loads across the full range of possible flow conditions. Median TP concentration was strongly linked (R 2 = 76%) to the presence of cropland in the riparian zones of the mostly perennial streams. At baseflow, discharge data did not improve prediction of TP, but at high flows discharge was strongly linked to concentration (a threshold response occurred). Our data suggest that on average 88% of the total load occurred during the 10% of the time with the greatest discharge. Modeled reductions in peak discharges, representing increased hydrologic retention, predicted greater decreases in total annual loads than reductions of ambient concentrations because high discharge and elevated phosphorus concentrations had multiplicative effects. No measure of land use provided significant predictive power for concentrations when discharge was elevated or for concentration rise rates under increasing discharge. These results suggest that reductions of baseflow concentrations of TP in streams without wastewater dischargers may be managed by reductions of cropland uses in the riparian corridor. Additional measures may be needed to manage TP annual loads, due to the large percentage of the TP load occurring during a few high-flow events each year.

Keywords

Total phosphorus Discharge Riparian zones Watershed management Perennial streams 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Michael Butler of the Kansas Department of Health and Environment for his assistance with data handling and quality control. We thank Dolly Gudder, Thomas Stiles, and two anonymous reviewers for comments provided on early versions of the manuscript. Support for W·K.D. was provided by EPA STAR GAK10783 and NSF ESPCoR 0553722. This is publication 09-058-J from the Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station.

References

  1. Dodds WK (2002) Freshwater ecology: concepts and environmental applications. Academic Press, San Diego, CAGoogle Scholar
  2. Dodds WK (2006) Eutrophication and trophic state in rivers and streams. Limnology and Oceanography 51:671–680Google Scholar
  3. Dodds WK, Oakes RM (2006) Controls on nutrients across a prairie stream watershed: land use and riparian cover effects. Environmental Management 37:634–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dodds WK, Oakes RM (2008) Headwater influences on downstream water quality. Environmental Management 41:367–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dodds WK, Smith VH, Lohman K (2002) Nitrogen and phosphorus relationships to benthic algal biomass in temperate streams. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 59:865–874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dow CL, Arscott DB, Newbold JD (2006) Relating major ions and nutrients to watershed conditions across a mixed-use, water supply watershed. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 25:887–911CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dunne T, Leopold L (1978) Water in environmental planning. W. H. Freeman, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  8. Gentry LE, David MB, Royer TV, Mitchell CA, Starks KM (2007) Phosphorus transport pathways to streams in tile-drained agricultural watersheds. Journal of Environmental Quality 36:408–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gerla P (2007) Estimating the effect of cropland to prairie conversion on peak storm run-off. Restoration Ecology 15:720–730Google Scholar
  10. Gray JR, Glysson GD, Turcios LM, Schwarz GE (2000) Comparability of suspended-sediment concentration and total suspended solids data. USGS Water-Resources Investigations Report 00-04191Google Scholar
  11. Helsel DR, Hirsch RM (1991) Statistical methods in water resources. USGS techniques of water-resources investigations of the United States Geological Survey. Book 4. Hydrologic analysis and interpretation. USGSGoogle Scholar
  12. Hey DL, Philippi NS (2006) Flood reduction through wetland restoration: the Upper Mississippi River Basin as a case history. Restoration Ecology 3:4–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hill AR (1996) Nitrate removal in stream riparian zones. Journal of Environmental Quality 25:743–755Google Scholar
  14. Jones JA (2000) Hydrologic processes and peak discharge response to forest removal, regrowth, and roads in 10 small experimental basins, western Cascades, Oregon. Water Resources Research 36:2621–2642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jones RH, Molitoris BA (1984) A statistical method for determining the breakpoint of two lines. Analytical Biochemistry 141:287–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jones KB, Neale AC, Nash MS, VanRemortel RD, Wickham JD, Riitters KH, O’Neill RV (2001) Predicting nutrient and sediment loadings to streams from landscape metrics: a multiple watershed study from the United States Mid-Atlantic region. Landscape Ecology 16:301–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Juracek KE (2002) Historical channel change along Soldier Creek, northeast Kansas. U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 02-4047Google Scholar
  18. Juracek KE, Ziegler AC (2007) Estimation of sediment sources using selected chemical tracers in the Perry Lake and Lake Wabaunsee Basins, northeast Kansas. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2006-5307Google Scholar
  19. Kansas Department of Health and Environment (2004) Kansas surface water register. Kansas Department of Health and Environment, Bureau of Environmental Field Services, Topeka. Available at: http://www.kdheks.gov/befs/download/2004_WR_ALL_052405.pdf
  20. Kansas Department of Health and Environment (2007) Stream chemistry monitoring program quality assurance management plan. Bureau of Environmental Field Services, Topeka. Available at: www.kdheks.gov/environment/qmp_2000/download/2007/SCMP-QAMP.pdf
  21. Kansas Department of Health and Environment (2008) Kansas Environment 2008. Kansas Department of Health and Environment, Division of Environment, Topeka. Available at: http://www.kdheks.gov/environment/download/Kansas_Environment_2008.pdf
  22. Litke DW (1999) Review of phosphorus control measures in the United States and their effects on water quality. U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 99-4007Google Scholar
  23. McDowell R, Sharpley A, Folmar G (2001) Phosphorus export from an agricultural watershed: linking source and transport mechanisms. Journal of Environmental Quality 30:1587–1595Google Scholar
  24. Mulholland PJ, Helton AM, Poole GC, Hall RO Jr, Hamilton SK, Peterson BJ, Tank JL, Ashkenas LR, Cooper LW, Dahm CN, Dodds WK, Findlay S, Gregory SV, Grimm NB, Johnson SL, McDowell HW, Meyer JL, Valett HM, Webster JL, Arango C, Beaulieu JJ, Bernot MJ, Burgin AJ, Crenshaw C, Johnson L, Niederlehner BR, O’Brien JM, Potter JD, Sheibley RW, Sobota DJ, Thomas SM (2008) Stream denitrification across biomes and its response to anthropogenic nitrogen loading. Nature 452:202–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Multi-Resolution Land Characteristics Consortium (MRLC) (2007) National Land Cover Database 2001 data. Available at: http://www.mrlc.gov/
  26. National Research Council (1992) Restoration of aquatic ecosystems: Science, technology and public policy. National Academy Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  27. Natural Resources Conservation Service (2001) Riparian areas inventory. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Salina, KSGoogle Scholar
  28. Natural Resources Conservation Service (2006) STATSGO. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Salina, KSGoogle Scholar
  29. Oosterbaan RJ (2008) SegRegW. Available at: http://www.waterlog.info/segreg.htm
  30. Oosternbaan RJ, Sharma DP, Singh KN, Rao KVGK (1990) Crop production and soil salinity: evaluation of field data from India by segmented linear regression with breakpoint. Proceedings of the Symposium on Land Drainage for Salinity Control in Arid and Semi-Arid Regions 3:373–383Google Scholar
  31. Porterfield G (1972) Computation of fluvial-sediment discharge. In: Applications of hydrualics. U.S. Geological Survey, Chap C3Google Scholar
  32. Rasmussen TJ, Ziegler AC, Rasmussen PR (2005) Estimation of constituent concentrations, densities, loads, and yields in Lower Kansas River, northeast Kansas, using regression models and continuous water-quality monitoring, January 2000 through December 2003. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2005-5165Google Scholar
  33. Reddy KR, Kadlec RH, Flaig E, Gale PM (1999) Phosphorus retention in streams and wetlands: a review. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology 29:83–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Royer TV, David MB, Gentry LE (2006) Timing of riverine export of nitrate and phosphorus from agricultural watersheds in Illinois: implications for reducing nutrient loading to the Mississippi River. Environmental Science and Technology 40:4126–4131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schloss JA, Buddemeier RW, Wilson BB (2000) An atlas of the Kansas high plains aquifer. Educational series 14. Kansas Geological Survey, LawrenceGoogle Scholar
  36. USGS Seamless (2006) National Elevation Dataset 1 Arc Second. U.S. Geological Survey. Available at: http://seamless.usgs.gov/
  37. Sharpley AN, McDowell RW, Kleinman PJA (2001) Phosphorus loss from land to water: integrating agricultural and environmental management. Plant Soil 237:287–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sharpley AN, Kleinman PJA, Heathwaite AL, Gburek WJ, Folmar GJ, Schmidt JP (2008) Phosphorus loss from an agricultural watershed as a function of storm size. Journal of Environmental Quality 37:362–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Smil V (2000) Phosphorus in the environment: natural flows and human interferences. Annual Review of Energy and Environment 25:53–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Smith VH (2003) Eutrophication of freshwater and coastal marine ecosystems: a global problem. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 10:126–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Smith VH, Joye SB, Howarth RW (2006) Eutrophication of freshwater and marine ecosystems. Limnology and Oceanography 51:351–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sonoda K, Yeakley JA (2007) Relative effects of land use and near-stream chemistry on phosphorus in an urban stream. Journal of Environmental Quality 36:144–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sponseller RA, Benfield EF, Valett HM (2001) Relationships between land use, spatial scale and stream macroinvertebrate communities. Freshwater Biology 46:1409–1424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Toms JD, Lbsperance ML (2003) Piecewise regression: a tool for identifying ecological thresholds. Ecology 84:2034–2041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. US EPA (2007) National water quality inventory: report to Congress (2002 reporting cycle). USEPA 841-R-07-001. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  46. US EPA (2001) Ambient water quality criteria recommendations—rivers and streams in nutrient ecoregion V. USEPA 822-B-01-014. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  47. Venterink HO, Wiegman F, Van der Lee GEM, Vermaat JE (2003) Role of active floodplains for nutrient retention in the River Rhine. Journal of Environmental Quality 32:1430–1435Google Scholar
  48. Weller DE, Jordan TE, Correll DJ (1998) Heuristic models for material discharge from landscapes with riparian buffers. Ecological Applications 8:1156–1169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Yarbo LA, Kuenzler EJ, Mulholland PJ, Sniffen RP (1984) Effects of stream channelization on exports of nitrogen and phosphorus from North Carolina coastal plains watersheds. Environmental Management 8:151–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zedler JB (2003) Wetlands at your service: reducing impacts of agriculture at the watershed scale. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 1:65–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eric B. K. Banner
    • 1
  • Anthony J. Stahl
    • 1
  • Walter K. Dodds
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Kansas Department of Health and EnvironmentTopekaUSA
  2. 2.Division of BiologyKansas State UniversityManhattanUSA

Personalised recommendations