Environmental Management

, Volume 44, Issue 3, pp 420–429 | Cite as

Sand Fences in the Coastal Zone: Intended and Unintended Effects



Sand-trapping fences modify the character of the coastal landscape and change its spatial structure, image, and meaning. This paper examines the relationship between these changes and fence usage at the municipal level, where most decisions about fence deployment are made. Use of fences in 29 municipalities on the developed coast of New Jersey is examined over a 6-year period. Interviews with municipal officers indicate that wooden slat sand-trapping fences are used primarily to build dunes to provide protection against wave uprush and flooding, but they are also used to control pedestrian traffic and demarcate territory. These uses result in changes in landforms and habitats. An aerial video inventory of fences taken in 2002 indicates that 82% of the shoreline had fences and 72% had dunes. Single and double straight fence rows are the most commonly used. Fences are often built to accomplish a specific primary purpose, but they can cause many different and often unanticipated changes to the landscape. The effects of a sand fence change through time as the initial structure traps sand, creates a dune that is colonized by vegetation, and becomes integrated into the environment by increasing topographic variability and aesthetic and habitat value. Sand fences can be made more compatible with natural processes by not placing them in locations where sources of wind blown sand are restricted or in unnatural shore perpendicular orientations. Symbolic fences are less expensive, are easy to replace when damaged, are less visually intrusive, and can be used for controlling pedestrian access.


Beach Dune Landscape Sand fence Wind-blown sand 


  1. Anthony B (2007) The dual nature of parks:attitudes of neighboring communities towards Kruger National Park, South Africa. Environmental Conservation 34:236–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bateman MB, Howard IC, Johnson AR, Walton JM (2007) Validation of a computer simulation of the impact performance of a wire rope safety fence. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers—Part C—Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science C 221:1557–1570Google Scholar
  3. Bates CG (1911) Windbreaks:their influence and value Forest Service Bulletin 86. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  4. Bouaziz OA, Souissi R, Abdeljaoued S, Choura M, Souissi F, Torki MA (2003) The monitoring of bordering dunes in the littoral of Mahdia (Eastern Tunisia) after the setting-up of windbreakers. In: Ozhan E (ed) Proceedings of the 6th international conference in the mediterranean coastal environment (MEDCOAST 03), Ravenna, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  5. Breton F, Esteban P (1995) The management and recuperation of beaches in Catalonia. In: Healy MG, Doody JP (eds) Directions in European coastal management. Samara, Cardigan, pp 511–517Google Scholar
  6. Burke S (1998) Windbreaks. Butterworth-Heinemann, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  7. Caborn JM (1965) Shelterbelts and windbreaks. Faber, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. Centner TJ (2000) Coordinating fence law with range management strategies in the USA. Environmental Conservation 27:2001–2007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Coastal Engineering Research Center (CERC) (1984) Shore protection manual. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Ft. BelvoirGoogle Scholar
  10. Cohen SE (2006) Israel’s West Bank barrier: an impediment to peace? Geographical Review 96:682–695Google Scholar
  11. Cole VJ, Chapman MG, Underwood AJ (2007) Landscapes and life-histories influence colonization of polychaetes to intertidal biogenic habitats. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 348:191–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cordshagen H (1964) Der Küstenschutz in Mecklenburg. Petermänken-Verlag, SchwerinGoogle Scholar
  13. Dauvin JC, Lozachmeur O, Capet Y, Dubrulle JB, Ghezali M, Mesnard AH (2004) Legal tools for preserving France’s natural heritage through integrated coastal zone management. Ocean and Coastal Management 47:463–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Davidson RA, Entrikin JN (2005) The Los Angeles coast as a public place. Geographical Review 95:578–593Google Scholar
  15. Dodd CK Jr, Barichivich WJ, Smith LL (2004) Effectiveness of a barrier wall and culverts in reducing wildlife mortality on a heavily traveled highway in Florida. Biological Conservation 118:619–631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Doherty MS (2001) Textures to stimulate memories. American Artist 65:28–31Google Scholar
  17. Dong Z, Guanting C, Xingdong HHZ, Wang X (2004) Controlling wind blown sand along the highway crossing the Taklimakan Desert. Journal of Arid Environments 57:329–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Edmonds RL (1979) The willow palisade. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 69:599–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Eley T, Northon C (2003) The geography of Russel Fence. Geographical Review 93:114–123Google Scholar
  20. Gallacher DJ, Hill JP (2008) Effects of camel grazing on density and species diversity of seeding emergence in the Dubai (UAE) inland desert. Journal of Arid Environments 72:853–860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gares PA (1990) Aeolian processes and dune changes at developed and undeveloped sites, Island Beach, New Jersey. In: Nordstrom KF, Psuty NP, Carter RWG (eds) Coastal dunes: form and processes. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Gómez EM (2003) Reimagining the landscape. Art and Antiques 26(10):66–71Google Scholar
  23. Gómez-Pina G, Muñoz-Pérez JJ, Ramírez JL, Ley C (2002) Sand dunes management and problems. Journal of Coastal Research SP 36:325–332Google Scholar
  24. Grant PF, Nickling WG (1998) Direct field measurement of wind drag on vegetation for application to windbreak design and modeling. Land Degradation and Development 9:57–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hart JF, Mather EL (1957) The American fence. Landscape 6:4–9Google Scholar
  26. Harrod J (1991) The garden wall: fences, hedges and walls their planning and planting. Atlantic Monthly Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Hewes L (1981) Early fencing on the western margin of the prairie. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 71:499–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hewes L, Jung CL (1981) Early fencing on the middle western Prarie. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 71:177–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Holloway M (2002) Trees of the Triassic. Scientific American 286(5):96–98Google Scholar
  30. Hotta S, Kraus NC, Horikawa K (1987) Function of sand fences in controlling wind-blown sand. Coastal Sediments 87. American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, pp 772–787Google Scholar
  31. Hotta S, Kraus NC, Horikawa K (1991) Functioning of multi-row sand fences in forming foredunes. Coastal Sediments 91. American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, pp 261–275Google Scholar
  32. Jackson NL, Nordstrom KF, Smith DR (2005) Influence of waves and horseshoe crab spawning on beach morphology and sediment grain size characteristics on a sandy estuarine beach. Sedimentology 52:1097–1108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kearney AR, Bradley GA, Petrich CH, Kaplan R, Kaplan S, Simpson-Colebank D (2008) Public perception as support for scenic quality regulation in a nationally treasured landscape. Landscape and Urban Planning 87:117–128Google Scholar
  34. Lagerquist P (2004) Fencing the last sky: excavating Palestine after Israel’s “Separation Wall”. Journal of Palestine Studies 32:5–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Leatherman SP, Nicholls PJ, Dennis KC (1995) Aerial videotape-assisted vulnerability analysis: a cost-effective approach to assess sea-level rise impacts. Journal of Coastal Research 14:15–25Google Scholar
  36. Litz SA (2000) The fortified society: social exclusion as a result of privatization and fortification of space. Berliner Journal für Soziologie 10:535–554Google Scholar
  37. Martin GA (1888) Fences, gates and bridges: a practical manual. O. Judd, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  38. Matsumasa M, Murai M (2005) Changes in blood glucose and lactate levels of male fiddler crabs: effects of aggression and claw waving. Animal Behavior 69:569–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Melvin SM, Griffin CR, MacIvor LH (1991) Recovery strategies for piping plovers in managed coastal landscapes. Coastal Management 19:21–34Google Scholar
  40. Melvin SM, MacIvor LH, Griffin CR (1992) Predator enclosures: a technique to reduce predation at piping plover nests. Wildlife Society Bulletin 20:143–148Google Scholar
  41. Mendelssohn IA, Hester MW, Monteferrante FJ, Talbot F (1991) Experimental dune building and vegetation stabilization in a sand-deficient barrier island setting on the Louisiana coast, U.S.A. Journal of Coastal Research 7:137–149Google Scholar
  42. Miller DL, Thetford M, Yager L (2001) Evaluation of sand fence and vegetation for dune building following overwash by Hurricane Opal on Santa Rosa Island, Florida. Journal of Coastal Research 17:936–948Google Scholar
  43. Minnich RA, Bahre CJ (1995) Wildland fire and chaparral succession along the California Baja-California boundary. International Journal of Wildland Fire 5:13–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mitteager WA, Burke A, Nordstrom KF (2006) Restoring natural landscapes on private shore properties in New Jersey, USA. Journal of Coastal Research SI 39:891–898Google Scholar
  45. Moseby KE, Read JL (2006) The efficacy of feral cat, fox and rabbit exclusion fence designs for threatened species protection. Biological Conservation 127:429–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. NJDEP (1984) Assessment of dune and shore protection ordinances in New Jersey. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, TrentonGoogle Scholar
  47. NJDEP (2007) Valuing New Jersey’s natural capital: an assessment of the economic value of the state’s natural resources. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, TrentonGoogle Scholar
  48. Newman D, Paasi A (1998) Fences and neighbors in the postmodern world:boundary narratives in political geography. Progress in Human Geography 22:186–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Nordstrom KF (1994) Beaches and dunes of human-altered coasts. Progress in Physical Geography 18:497–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Nordstrom KF (2000) Beaches and dunes of developed coasts. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  51. Nordstrom KF (2008) Beach and dune restoration. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  52. Nordstrom KF, Mauriello MN (2001) Restoring and maintaining naturally-functioning landforms and biota on intensively developed barrier islands under a no-retreat scenario. Shore and Beach 69(3):19–28Google Scholar
  53. Nordstrom KF, Lampe R, Vandemark LM (2000) Reestablishing naturally functioning dunes on developed coasts. Environmental Management 25:37–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ode A, Tveit MS, Fry G (2008) Capturing landscape visual character using indicators: touching base with landscape aesthetic theory. Landscape Research 33:89–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Olsson MPO, Widen P, Larkin JL (2008) Effectiveness of a highway overpass to promote landscape connectivity and movement of moose and roe deer in Sweden. Landscape and Urban Planning 85:133–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Patterson IJ (1977) The control of fox movement by electric fencing. Biological Conservation 11:267–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pelletier AR (2007) Preventing suicide by jumping: the effect of a bridge safety fence. Injury Prevention 13:57–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pickard J (2005) Post and rail fences: derivation, development, and demise of rural technology in colonial Australia. Agricultural History 79:27–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Pickard J (2007) Australian rural fences: heritage challenges for conserving the unconservable. International Journal of Heritage Studies 13:489–510Google Scholar
  60. Price LW (1993) Hedges and shelterbelts on the Canterbury Plains, New Zealand: transformation of an antipodean landscape. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 83:119–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Raitz K (1995) Rock fences and preadaptation. Geographical Review 85:50–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Ranwell DS, Boar R (1986) Coast dune management guide. Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, NERC, Huntingdon  Google Scholar
  63. Rimmer DW, Deblinger RD (1990) Use of predator exclosures to protect piping plover nests. Journal of Field Ornithology 61:217–223Google Scholar
  64. Savage RP, Woodhouse WW (1968) Creation and stabilization of coastal barrier dunes. In: Proceedings of the 11th conference on coastal engineering. American Society of Civil Engineers, pp 671–700Google Scholar
  65. Schnell I, Mishal S (2008) Place as a source of identity in colonizing societies: Israeli settlements in Gaza. Geographical Review 98:242–259Google Scholar
  66. Sherman DJ, Nordstrom KF (1994) Hazards of wind blown sand and sand drifts. Journal of Coastal Research Special 12:263–275Google Scholar
  67. Skidmore EL, Jacobs HS, Hagen LJ (1972) Microclimate modification by slat-fence windbreaks. Agronomy Journal 64:160–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Snyder MR, Pinet PR (1981) Dune construction using two multiple sand fence configurations: implications regarding protection of eastern Long Island’s south shore. Northeastern Geology 3:25–29Google Scholar
  69. Spooner PG, Biggs SV (2008) Woodlands on farms in southern New South Wales: a longer-term assessment of vegetation changes after fencing. Ecological Management and Restoration 9:33–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Sturrock JW (1988) Shelter: its management and promotion. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 22(23):1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Tinus RW (ed) (1976) Shelterbelts on the Great Plains. Great Plains Agricultural Council, Publication 78Google Scholar
  72. Tveit M, Ode A, Fry G (2006) Key concepts in a framework for analyzing visual landscape character. Landscape Research 31:229–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. US Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE) (1962) Coastal storm of 6–7 March 1962. Post Flood Report. US Army Corps of Engineers, Philadelphia District, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  74. US Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE) (1963) Report on operation five-high: March 1962 storm. US Army Corps of Engineers, North Atlantic Division, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  75. van der Laan D, van Tongeren OFR, van der Putten WH, Veenbaas G (1997) Vegetation development in coastal foredunes in relation to methods of establishing marram grass (Ammophila arenaria). Journal of Coastal Conservation 3:179–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. VerCauteren KC, Lavelle MJ, Hygnstrom S (2006) Fences and deer-damage management: a review of designs and efficacy. Wildlife Society Bulletin 34:191–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Wang H, Takle ES (1995) A numerical simulation of boundary layer flows near shelterbelts. Boundary-Layer Meteorology 75:141–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Wilson JD (1997) A Field study of the mean pressure about a windbreak. Boundary-Layer Meteorology 85:327–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Zaghloul NA (1997) Sand accumulation around porous fences. Environmental Modeling and Software 12:113–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Rutgers University—GeographyPiscatawayUSA
  2. 2.Rutgers University—Institute of Marine and Coastal SciencesNew BrunswickUSA

Personalised recommendations