Advertisement

Environmental Management

, Volume 43, Issue 6, pp 1096–1107 | Cite as

Social Learning Through Evaluation: A Case Study of Overcoming Constraints for Management of Dryland Salinity

  • Thomas G. Measham
Article

Abstract

Conventional approaches to evaluation of environmental programs have tended to limit themselves to restricted measures of program effectiveness. This paper shows how a social learning approach can be incorporated into evaluating public environmental programs. A social learning approach is particularly suited to complex environmental challenges which are inherently difficult to understand, predict, and manage, thus complicating the evaluation process. The paper presents an Australian case study of dryland salinity management where there are major knowledge barriers impeding conventional management techniques. The research presented in this paper focused on evaluating a public demonstration program to track its impact through its design, implementation, and monitoring phases. The paper shows that, by incorporating social learning principles and practices, program evaluation can promote collective action, critical reflection, and increased knowledge to underpin improved environmental management.

Keywords

Monitoring Collaborative learning Community engagement Participation Environmental policy 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by Wallatin Wildlife and Landcare Inc., CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, and the CSIRO Water for Healthy Country Flagship. I thank Glenice Batchelor and all participants for their commitment and enthusiasm. Thanks also go to Toni Darbas and Heinz Schandl, along with three anonymous reviewers, for helpful comments on earlier versions of the manuscript.

References

  1. ABS (2002) Salinity on Australian farms. Australian Bureau of Statistics, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  2. ANAO (2008) Performance audit: regional delivery model for the Natural Heritage Trust and the National Action Plan for Salinity and Water Quality. Audit report No. 21200708. Australian National Audit Office, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  3. Bellamy JA, Walker DH, McDonald GT, Syme GJ (2001) A systems approach to the evaluation of natural resource management initiatives. Journal of Environmental Management 63(4):407–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blackmore C, Ison R, Jiggins J (2007) Social learning: an alternative policy instrument for managing in the context of Europe’s water. Environmental Science & Policy 10(6):493–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blackstock KL, Kelly GJ, Horsey BL (2007) Developing and applying a framework to evaluate participatory research for sustainability. Ecological Economics 60(4):726–742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buchy M, Ahmed S (2007) Social learning, academics and NGOs: can the collaborative formula work? Action Research 5(4):358–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Conley A, Moote M (2003) Evaluating collaborative natural resource management. Society & Natural Resources 16(5):371–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Curtis A, Byron I, McDonald S (2003) Integrating spatially referenced social and biophysical data to explore landholder responses to dryland salinity in Australia. Journal of Environmental Management 68(4):397–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. DEH (2003) $6 million to demonstrate salinity management in WA. Department of Environment and Heritage. Available at: http://www.deh.gov.au/minister/env/2003/mr15oct03.html. Accessed August 16, 2007
  10. Dyball R, Brown VA, Keen M (2007) Towards sustainability: five strands of social learning. In: Wals AEJ (ed) Social learning: towards a sustainable world: principles, perspectives, and praxis. Wageningen Academic, Wageningen, Netherlands, pp 181–194Google Scholar
  11. Finger M, Verlaan P (1995) Learning our way out: a conceptual framework for social-environmental learning. World Dev 23(3):503–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ghassemi F, Jakeman AJ, Nix HA (1995) Salinisation of land and water resources: human causes, extent, management, and case studies. University of New South Wales Press, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  13. Haw M, Cocklin C, Mercer D (2000) A pinch of salt: landowner perception and adjustment to the salinity hazard in Victoria, Australia. Journal of Rural Studies 16:155–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Henschke CJ (2001) Review of WISALTS bank installations. Resource Management Technical Report No. 62. Department of Agriculture Western Australia, PerthGoogle Scholar
  15. High C, Nemes G (2007) Social learning in LEADER: exogenous, endogenous and hybrid evaluation in rural development. Sociologia Ruralis 47(2):103–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Holloway J (2001) Understanding evaluation: part 18 of managing the project. Open University Press, Milton Keynes, UKGoogle Scholar
  17. Ison R, Röling N, Watson D (2007) Challenges to science and society in the sustainable management and use of water: investigating the role of social learning. Environmental Science & Policy 10(6):499–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Keen M, Brown V, Dyball R (2005) Social learning in environmental management: towards a sustainable future. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. Kemmis S, McTaggart R (2000) Participatory action research. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln Y (eds) Handbook of qualitative research, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp 567–605Google Scholar
  20. Ludwig D (2001) The era of management is over. Ecosystems 4(8):0758–0764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mahanty S, Stacey N, Holland P, Wright A, Menzies S (2007) Learning to learn: designing monitoring plans in the Pacific Islands International Waters Project. Ocean Coast Manag 50:392–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Martin V (2001) Completing and evaluating the project: part 16 of managing the project. Open University Press, Milton Keynes, UKGoogle Scholar
  23. McAllister RRJ, Abel N, Stokes, CJ, Gordon IJ (2006) Australian pastoralists in time and space: the evolution of a complex adaptive system. Ecology and Society 11(2):41 [online]Google Scholar
  24. McKinney M, Field P (2008) Evaluating community-based collaboration on federal lands and resources. Society & Natural Resources 21(5):419–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Measham T (2006) Implementing best practice for salinity and biodiversity in Wallatin and O’Brien sub-catchments social dimension milestone A6: findings and guiding principles. CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  26. Measham TG, Batchelor G (2008) Team effort a winner in bid to restore salt-affected land. Farming Ahead 192:28–30Google Scholar
  27. Measham TG, Kelly GJ, Smith FP (2007) Best management practice for complex problems: a case study of defining BMP for dryland salinity. Geographical Research 45(3):262–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Muro M, Jeffrey P (2008) A critical review of the theory and application of social learning in participatory natural resource management processes. J Environ Plan Manage 51(3):325–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. NLWRA (2001) Australian dryland salinity assessment 2000: extent, impacts, processes, monitoring and management options. National Land and Water Resources Audit, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  30. Pahl-Wostl C, Mostert E, Tàbara D (2008) The growing importance of social learning in water resources management and sustainability science. Ecology and Society 13(1):24 [online]Google Scholar
  31. Pannell DJ (2001) Dryland salinity: economic, scientific, social and policy dimensions. Australian Journal of Agricultural & Resource Economics 45(4):517–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pannell DJ, Ewing MA (2006) Managing secondary dryland salinity: options and challenges. Agric Water Manage 80(1–3):41–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Paterson J (2005) Saline water disposal next step in drainage debate. Farming Ahead 159:55–57Google Scholar
  34. Peck AJ, Hatton T (2003) Salinity and the discharge of salts from catchments in Australia. J Hydrol 272(1–4):191–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Petts J (2007) Learning about learning: lessons from public engagement and deliberation on urban river restoration. Geogr J 173(4):300–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ray C (2000) Endogenous socio-economic development in the European Union—issues of evaluation. Journal of Rural Studies 16(4):447–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Reynolds JF, Stafford Smith DM, Lambin EF, Turner BL, Mortimore M, Batterbury SPJ, Downing TE, Dowlatabadi H, Fernández RJ, Herrick JE, Huber-Sannwald E, Jiang H, Leemans R, Lynam T, Maestre F, Ayarza M, Walker B (2007) Global desertification: building a science for dryland development. Science 316(5826):847–851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rist S, Chidambaranathan M, Escobar C, Wiesmann U, Zimmermann A (2007) Moving from sustainable management to sustainable governance of natural resources: the role of social learning processes in rural India, Bolivia and Mali. Journal of Rural Studies 23(1):23–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Robertson MJ, Kingwell R, Measham TG, Doole G, O’connor M, Batchelor G, John M (2009) Constraints to farmers managing dryland salinity in the Central wheatbelt of Western Australia. Land Degradation & Development. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ldr.887. Accessed January 21, 2009
  40. Robertson MJ, Measham TG, Batchelor G, George R, Kingwell R, Hosking K (2008) Effectiveness of a publicly-funded demonstration program to promote management of dryland salinity by landholders in the central wheatbelt of Western Australia. Presented at 2nd international salinity forum: salinity, water and society—global issues, local action, 31 March-3 April, Adelaide, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  41. Rowe G, Marsh R, Frewer LJ (2004) Evaluation of a deliberative conference. Science, Technology and Human Values 29(1):88–121Google Scholar
  42. Sanderson I (2002) Evaluation, policy learning and evidence-based policy making. Public Administration 80(1):1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schusler TM, Decker DJ, Pfeffer MJ (2003) Social learning for collaborative natural resource management. Society & Natural Resources 15(4):309–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Steyaert P, Jiggins J (2007) Governance of complex environmental situations through social learning: a synthesis of SLIM’s lessons for research. policy and practice. Environmental Science & Policy 10(6):575–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Steyaert P, Barzman M, Billaud J, Brives H, Hubert B, Ollivier G, Roche B (2007) The role of knowledge and research in facilitating social learning among stakeholders in natural resources management in the French Atlantic coastal wetlands. Environmental Science & Policy 10(6):537–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Thomson D, Pepperdine S (2003) Assessing community capacity for riparian restoration. Land and Water Australia, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  47. Van Kerkhoff L (2005). Strategic integration: the practical politics of integrated research in context. Journal of Research Practice 1(2):article M5 [online]Google Scholar
  48. Wals AEJ (2007) Social learning: towards a sustainable world: principles, perspectives, and praxis. Wageningen Academic, Wageningen, NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  49. Williams WD (1999) Salinisation: a major threat to water resources in the arid and semi-arid regions of the world. Lakes & Reservoirs: Research & Management 4(3–4):85–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wynne B (1991) Knowledges in context. Science, Technology and Human Values 16(1):111–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© CSIRO Australia 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Social and Economic Sciences ProgramCSIRO Sustainable EcosystemsCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations