Advertisement

Environmental Management

, Volume 45, Issue 1, pp 52–66 | Cite as

Key Principles of Community-Based Natural Resource Management: A Synthesis and Interpretation of Identified Effective Approaches for Managing the Commons

  • James S. Gruber
Article

Abstract

This article examines recent research on approaches to community-based environmental and natural resource management and reviews the commonalities and differences between these interdisciplinary and multistakeholder initiatives. To identify the most effective characteristics of Community-based natural resource management (CBNRM), I collected a multiplicity of perspectives from research teams and then grouped findings into a matrix of organizational principles and key characteristics. The matrix was initially vetted (or “field tested”) by applying numerous case studies that were previously submitted to the World Bank International Workshop on CBNRM. These practitioner case studies were then compared and contrasted with the findings of the research teams. It is hoped that the developed matrix may be useful to researchers in further focusing research, understanding core characteristics of effective and sustainable CBNRM, providing practitioners with a framework for developing new CBNRM initiatives for managing the commons, and providing a potential resource for academic institutions during their evaluation of their practitioner-focused environmental management and leadership curriculum.

Keywords

Community-based environmental initiatives Community-based natural resource management Environmental curriculum Interdisciplinary Process Social ecologic systems The Commons 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I acknowledge S. Margles, and M. Cadot (Antioch New England Institute of Antioch University New England), T. Webler and B. Kaplin (Antioch University New England), T. Legovic (R. Bošković Institute, Croatia), and P. Stoddard for their helpful comments and editorial assistance. Support for this work was provided by Antioch New England Institute and the N. Howes Fund.

References

  1. Addams H, Proops J (2000) Social discourse and environmental policy: an application of Q methodology. Edward Elgar, Northampton, MAGoogle Scholar
  2. Allan C, Curtis A (2005) Nipped in the bud: why regional scale adaptive management is not blooming. Environmental Management 36:414–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Agrawal A, Gibson CC (1999) Enchantment and disenchantment: the role of the community in natural resource conservation. World Development 27:629–649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderies JM, Janssen MA, Ostrom E (2004) A framework to analyze the robustness of social-ecological systems from an institutional perspective. Ecology and Society 9(1):18 (online). http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss1/art18/
  5. Armitage D (2005) Adaptive capacity and community-based natural resource management. Environmental Management 35:703–715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Arnstein SR (1969) A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 35:216–224Google Scholar
  7. Barker A (2005) Capacity building for sustainability: towards community development in coastal Scotland. Journal of Environmental Management 75:11–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C (eds) (2003) Navigating social-ecological systems: building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  9. Borrini-Feyerabend G, Pimbert M, Farvar MT, Kothari A, Renard Y (2004) Sharing power. Learning-by-doing in co-management of natural resources throughout the world. IIED AND IUCN.CEESP/CMWG, Cenesta, TehranGoogle Scholar
  10. Bradshaw B (2003) Questioning the credibility and capacity of community-based resource management. The Canadian Geographer 47:137–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brosius JP, Tsing AL, Zerner C (1998) Presenting communities: histories and politics of community-based natural resource management. Society and Natural Resources 11(2):157–169Google Scholar
  12. Brown J, Mitchell N, Beresford M (eds) (2005) The protected landscape approach: linking nature, culture, and community. IUCN–The World Conservation Union, Gland, Switzerland, and Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  13. Butler KF, Koontz TM (2005) Theory into practice: implementing ecosystem management objectives in the USDA Forest Service. Environmental Management 35:138–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Campbell LM, Vainio-Mattila A (2003) Participatory development and community-based conservation: opportunities missed for lessons learned? Human Ecology 31:417–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. CBNRM Net (2006) The Community-Based Natural Resource Management Network. Available at http://www.cbnrm.net. Accessed: 13 August 2006
  16. Child B (2007) Lessons, experiences, and critical conditions for CBNRM. Can communities conservation bring international goals down to earth? Chairman’s report from a workshop on the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen, Denmark, From 29 Oct 2007 to 2 Nov 2007Google Scholar
  17. Child B, Lyman M (eds) (2005) Natural resources as community assets. Sand County Foundation and The Aspen Institute, Madison, WIGoogle Scholar
  18. Dietz T, Ostrom E, Stern PC (2003) The struggle to govern the commons. Science 302:5652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Eade D (1997) Capacity-building: an approach to people-centered development. Oxfam, UKGoogle Scholar
  20. Fisher S, Abdi DI, Ludin J, Smith R, Williams S, Williams S (2000) Working with conflict: skills and strategies for action. Zed Books, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  21. Gruber JS, Clark D (2000) Building sustainable communities through new partnerships of central and local governments: lessons learned from Eastern Europe and New England: 2000 international conference on sustainable development, environmental conditions, and public management. Published 2002 in sustainable development, environmental conditions, and public management, National Academy of Public Administration (US) and National Institute for Research Advancement (Japan), Tokyo, Japan, pp 264–286Google Scholar
  22. Grumbine RE (1994) What is ecosystem management? Conservation Biology 8:27–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hackel JD (1999) Community conservation and the future of Africa’s wildlife. Conservation Biology 13:726–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Heifetz RA (1994) Leadership without easy answers. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  25. Heifetz RA, Linsky M (2002) Leadership on the line: staying alive through the dangers of leading. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  26. Homer-Dixon TF (1999) Environment, scarcity, and violence. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  27. Kofman F, Senge P, Kanter RM, Handy C, Chawla S, Renesch J (eds) (1995) Learning organizations: developing cultures for tomorrow’s workplace. Productivity Press, Portland, ORGoogle Scholar
  28. Leach M, Mearns R, Scoones I (1999) Environmental entitlements: dynamics and institutions in community-based natural resource management. World Development 27:225–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Meinzen-Dick R, Knox A (1999) Collective action, property rights, and devolution of natural resource management: a conceptual framework. Workshop: 2020 Vision Initiative. International Food Policy and Research InstituteGoogle Scholar
  30. Newsom M, Chalk L (2004) Environmental capital: an information core to public participation in strategic and operational decisions—the example of River “Best Practice” Project. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 47:899–920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Olsson P, Folke C, Berkes F (2004) Adaptive comanagement for building resilience in social-ecological systems. Environmental Management 34:75–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons. Cambridge University Press, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  33. Poteete AR, Welch D (2004) Institutional development in the face of complexity: developing rules for managing forest resources. Human Ecology 32:279–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Putnam RD, Feldstein LM, Cohen D (2003) Better together: restoring the American community. Simon and Schuster, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  35. Senge PM, Kleiner A, Roberts C, Ross RB, Smith BJ (1994) The fifth discipline fieldbook: strategies and tools for building a learning organization. Doubleday, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  36. Scheberle D (2000) Moving toward community-based environmental management. American Behavioral Scientist 44:564–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Soeftestad LT (ed) (2006) The Community-Based Natural Resource Management Network, newsletter. Issues 1–25 (online). Available at http://www.cbnrm.net/index.html. Accessed 22 Nov 2008
  38. Spiteri A, Nepal SK (2006) Incentive-based conservation programs in developing countries: a review of some key issues and suggestions for improvements. Environmental Management 37:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Stephenson W (1935) Correlating persons instead of tests. Character and Personality 4:17–24Google Scholar
  40. Thompson PM, Sultana P, Islam N (2003) Lessons from community based management of floodplain fisheries in Bangladesh. Journal of Environmental Management 69:307–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Walker B, Carpenter S, Anderies J, Abel N, Cumming GS, Janssen M, Lebel L, Norberg J, Peterson GD, Pritchard R (2002) Resilience management in social-ecological systems: a working hypothesis for a participatory approach. Conservation Ecology 6(1):14 (online). Available at http://www.consecol.org/vol6/iss1/art14/ Google Scholar
  42. Webler T, Tuler S, Krueger R (2001) What is a good public participation process? Five perspectives from the public. Environmental Management 27:435–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. World Bank (1998) Conference Proceedings, International Workshop on Community-Based Natural Resource Management. World Bank, Washington, DC, 5–14 May 1998Google Scholar
  44. World Bank (1996) The World Bank participation sourcebook. World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  45. Zanetell BA, Knuth BA (2004) Participation rhetoric or community-based management reality? Influences on willingness to participate in a Venezuelan freshwater fishery. World Development 32:793–807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Zyl JV, Barbosa T, Parker AN, Sonn L (1995) Decentralized rural development and enhance community participation: a case study for northern Brazil. The World Bank Working Paper 1498Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Environmental Studies, Antioch New England InstituteAntioch University New EnglandKeeneUSA

Personalised recommendations