Environmental Management

, Volume 43, Issue 1, pp 28–37

Understanding the Ecology of Blue Elderberry to Inform Landscape Restoration in Semiarid River Corridors

  • Mehrey G. Vaghti
  • Marcel Holyoak
  • Amy Williams
  • Theresa S. Talley
  • Alexander K. Fremier
  • Steven E. Greco


Societal constraints often limit full process restoration in large river systems, making local rehabilitation activities valuable for regeneration of riparian vegetation. A target of much mitigation and restoration is the federally threatened Valley elderberry longhorn beetle and its sole host plant, blue elderberry, in upper riparian floodplain environments. However, blue elderberry ecology is not well understood and restoration attempts typically have low success rates. We determined broad-scale habitat characteristics of elderberry in altered systems and examined associated plant species composition in remnant habitat. We quantified vegetation community composition in 139 remnant riparian forest patches along the Sacramento River and elderberry stem diameters along this and four adjacent rivers. The greatest proportion of plots containing elderberry was located on higher and older floodplain surfaces and in riparian woodlands dominated by black walnut. Blue elderberry saplings and shrubs with stems <5.0 cm in diameter were rare, suggesting a lack of recruitment. A complex suite of vegetation was associated with blue elderberry, including several invasive species which are potentially outcompeting seedlings for light, water, or other resources. Such lack of recruitment places increased importance on horticultural restoration for the survival of an imperiled species. These findings further indicate a need to ascertain whether intervention is necessary to maintain functional and diverse riparian woodlands, and a need to monitor vegetative species composition over time, especially in relation to flow regulation.


Blue elderberry Floodplain restoration Landscape variables Sacramento River Sambucus mexicana Valley elderberry longhorn beetle 


  1. Allen-Wardell G, Bernhardt P, Bitner R, Burquez A, Buchmann S, Cane J, Cox PA, Dalton V, Feinsinger P, Ingram M, Inouye D, Jones CE, Kennedy K, Kevan P, Koopowitz H, Medellin R, Medellin-Morales S, Nabhan GP (1998) The potential consequences of pollinator declines on the conservation of biodiversity and stability of food crop yields. Conservation Biology 12:8–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barr CB (1991) The distribution, habitat, and status of the Valley elderberry longhorn beetle Desmocerus californicus dimorphus Fisher (Insecta: Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Sacramento, CAGoogle Scholar
  3. Institute Bay (1998) From the Sierra to the sea: the ecological history of the San Francisco Bay-Delta watershed. Bay Institute, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  4. Chirman DB (1994) Nutrient dynamics during establishment of understory woody species in California Central Valley riparian habitats. M.S. thesis. University of California, DavisGoogle Scholar
  5. CNPS (California Native Plant Society) (2000) Relevé field form and relevé protocol. Revised 04/02/2004. CNPS Vegetation Committee, Sacramento, CAGoogle Scholar
  6. Dynesius M, Nilsson C (1994) Fragmentation and flow regulation of river systems in the northern third of the World. Science 266:753–762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Federal Register (1980) Listing the Valley elderberry longhorn beetle as a threatened species with critical habitat. Federal Register 45:52803. Friday August 8, 1980. Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records AdministrationGoogle Scholar
  8. Federal Register (1994) Code of federal regulations: wildlife and fisheries, vol 50, parts 1 to 199. Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records AdministrationGoogle Scholar
  9. Fremier AK (2003) Floodplain age modeling techniques to analyze channel migration and vegetation patch dynamics on the Sacramento River, California. M.A. thesis. University of California, DavisGoogle Scholar
  10. Fremier AK, TalleyTS (2008) Scaling riparian conservation efforts with river hydrology: lessons from blue elderberry distributions along four central California rivers. Wetlands (in press)Google Scholar
  11. Gillison AN, Brewer KRW (1985) The use of gradient directed transects or gradsects in natural resource survey. Journal of Environmental Management 20:103–127Google Scholar
  12. Greco SE, Plant RE (2003) Temporal mapping of riparian landscape change on the Sacramento River, miles 196–218, California, USA. Landscape Research 28:405–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Greco SE, Tuil JL, Parker TM (2003) Land cover mapping of the Sacramento River from 1997 aerial photography: Colusa to Red Bluff (river miles 144–245). Technical report prepared for the California Department of Water Resources, Northern District, Red Bluff. Landscape Analysis and Systems Research Laboratory, Department of Environmental Design, University of California, DavisGoogle Scholar
  14. Greco SE, Fremier AK, Plant RE, Larsen EW (2007) A tool for tracking floodplain age land surface patterns on a large meandering river with applications for ecological planning and restoration design. Landscape and Urban Planning 81(4):354–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Greco SE, Girvetz EH, Larsen EW, Mann JP, Tuil JL, Lowney C (2008) Relative elevation topographic surface modeling of a large alluvial river floodplain and applications for the study and management of riparian landscapes. Landscape Research 33:461–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hickman JC (ed) (1993) The Jepson manual: higher plants of California. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  17. Holyoak M, Koch-Munz M (2008) The effects of site conditions and mitigation practices on success of establishing the Valley elderberry longhorn beetle and its host plant, blue elderberry. Environmental Management 42:444–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hubbell JG (1997) Competitive effects of intercropping alfalfa with valley oak and blue elderberry seedlings. Thesis. California State University, ChicoGoogle Scholar
  19. Hughes FMR, Adams WM, Muller E, Nilsson C, Richards KS, Barsoum N, Decamps H, Foussadier R, Girel J, Gilloy H, Hayes A, Johansson M, Lambs L, Pautou G, Peiry JL, Perrow M, Vautier F, Winfield M (2001) The importance of different scale processes for the restoration of floodplain woodlands. Regulated Rivers Resource Management 17:325–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hunter JC, Willet KB, McCoy MC, Quinn JF, Keller KE (1999) Prospects for preservation and restoration of riparian forests in the Sacramento Valley, California, USA. Environmental Management 24:65–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jones WM (1997) Spatial patterns of woody plant regeneration in two California Central Valley floodplain forests. Thesis. University of MontanaGoogle Scholar
  22. Linsley EG, Chemsak JA (1972) Cerambycidae of North America. Part VI, No. 1. Taxonomy and classification of the subfamily Lepturinae. University of California Publications in Entomology 69:1–138Google Scholar
  23. Neal PR (1998) Pollinator restoration. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13:132–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. NRC (National Research Council) (2002) Riparian areas: functions and strategies for management. National Academy Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  25. Sprenger MD, Smith LM, Taylor JP (2002) Restoration of riparian habitat using experimental flooding. Wetlands 22:49–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Talley TS (2005) Spatial ecology and conservation of the Valley elderberry longhorn beetle. Ph.D. dissertation. University of California, DavisGoogle Scholar
  27. Talley TS, Fleishman E, Holyoak M, Murphy D, Ballard A (2007) Rethinking a rare-species conservation strategy in an urbanizing landscape: the case of the Valley elderberry longhorn beetle. Biological Conservation 135:21–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. USFWS (United States Fish and Wildlife Service) (1999) Conservation guidelines for the Valley elderberry longhorn beetle. Department of the Interior, Sacramento, California. Available at: http://sacramento.fws.gov/es/protocol.htm. Accessed 23 October 2008
  29. Vaghti MG (2003) Riparian vegetation classification in relation to environmental gradients, Sacramento River, California. Thesis. University of California, DavisGoogle Scholar
  30. Vaghti MG, Greco SE (2007) Riparian vegetation of the Great Valley. In: Barbour M, Keeler-Wolf T, Schoenherr A (eds) Terrestrial vegetation of California, 3rd edn. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  31. Williams AM (2006) Modeling the spatial distributions of riparian plant species on the Sacramento River, California, with conservation applications. Thesis. University of California, DavisGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mehrey G. Vaghti
    • 1
  • Marcel Holyoak
    • 2
  • Amy Williams
    • 1
  • Theresa S. Talley
    • 2
  • Alexander K. Fremier
    • 1
  • Steven E. Greco
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Environmental DesignUniversity of California, DavisDavisUSA
  2. 2.Department of Environmental Science and PolicyUniversity of California, DavisDavisUSA

Personalised recommendations