Environmental Management

, Volume 43, Issue 4, pp 571–584

Determinants of Trust for Public Lands: Fire and Fuels Management on the Bitterroot National Forest

  • Adam Lijeblad
  • William T. Borrie
  • Alan E. Watson
Article

Abstract

Management of public lands occurs today with high levels of scrutiny and controversy. To succeed, managers seek the support, involvement, and endorsement of the public. This study examines trust as an indicator of managerial success and attempts to identify and measure the components that most influence it. A review of trust literature yielded 14 attributes that were hypothesized to contribute to trust, grouped into the three dimensions of Shared Norms and Values, Willingness to Endorse, and Perceived Efficacy. Operationalizing these attributes and dimensions, a telephone survey was administered to a sample of Montana, USA, residents living adjacent to the Bitterroot National Forest (= 1,152). Each of the attributes was measured in the context of federal lands fire and fuel management. Structural equation modeling showed that all 14 attributes were found to be influential contributors to levels of trust. Results suggest that if managers are to maintain or increase levels of public trust, they need to consider each of trust’s attributes as they make social, ecological, and economic resource decisions.

Keywords

Trust Shared values Public involvement Collaboration Fire and fuels management Bitterroot National Forest 

References

  1. Aplet GH (2006) Evolution of wilderness fire policy. International Journal of Wilderness 12(1):9–13Google Scholar
  2. Barkeley YC, Schnepf C, Cohen JD (2004) Protecting and landscaping homes in the wildland/urban interface. Station Bulletin 67: January 2005. Idaho Forest, Wildlife and Range Experiment Station, University of Idaho Extension, Moscow Google Scholar
  3. Bentler PM, Hu EJC (2005) EQS 6.1 for Windows user’s guide. Multivariate Software, Inc., Encino, CAGoogle Scholar
  4. Berk RA (2006) An introduction to ensemble methods for data analysis. Sociological Methods and Research 34(3):263–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bigley GA, Pearce JL (1998) Straining for shared meanings in organization science: problems of trust and distrust. Academy of Management Review 23:405–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bitterroot Valley Chamber of Commerce (2005) Available at: http://www.bvchamber.com/local_info/government.php
  7. Blackburn S (1998) Trust, cooperation, and human psychology. In: Braithwaite V, Levi M (eds) Trust and governance. Russell Sage Foundation, New York, pp 28–45Google Scholar
  8. Borrie WT, Christensen N, Watson AE, Miller TA, McCollum DW (2002) Public purpose marketing: a focus on the relationships between the public and public lands. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration 2:49–68Google Scholar
  9. Boyle R, Bonacich P (1970) The development of trust and mistrust in mixed-motive games. Sociometry 33:123–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bureau of Business and Economic Research (2001) Bitterroot National Forest social survey. Unpublished report. University of Montana, MissoulaGoogle Scholar
  11. Butler JK (1991) Toward understanding and measuring conditions of trust: evolution of a conditions of trust inventory. Journal of Management 17:643–663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Citrin J, Muste C (1999) Trust in government. In: Robinson JP, Shaver PR, Wrightsman LS (eds) Measures of political attitudes. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp 465–532Google Scholar
  13. Cohen JD (2000) Preventing disaster: home ignitability in the wildland-urban interface. Journal of Forestry 98(3):15–21Google Scholar
  14. Cook J, Wall T (1980) New work attitude measure of trust, organizational commitment, and personal need nonfulfillment. Journal of Occupational Psychology 53(1):39–52Google Scholar
  15. Curtin R, Presser S, Singer E (2005) Changes in telephone survey nonresponse over the past quarter century. Public Opinion Quarterly 69:87–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cvetkovich G, Winter PL (2003) Trust and social representations of the management of threatened and endangered species. Environment and Behavior 35:286–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cvetkovich GT, Winter PL (2004) Seeing eye-to-eye on natural resource management: trust, value similarity, and action consistency/justification. In: Proceedings of the fourth social aspects and recreation research symposium, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, February 4–6, pp 47–50Google Scholar
  18. Davenport MA, Leahy JE, Anderson DH, Jakes PJ (2007) Building trust in natural resource management: a case study of the Midewin National Tallgrass Prairie. Environmental Management 39:353–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Deutsch M (1960) The effect of motivational orientation upon trust and suspicion. Human Relations 13:123–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dillman DA (2007) Mail and Internet surveys: the tailored design method, 2nd edn. 2007 update. Wiley, Hoboken, NJGoogle Scholar
  21. Earle TC, Cvetkovich GT (1995) Social trust: toward a cosmopolitan society. Praeger, Westport, CTGoogle Scholar
  22. Farris G, Senner E, Butterfield D (1973) Trust, culture, and organizational behavior. Industrial Relations 12:144–157Google Scholar
  23. Fukuyama F (1995) Trust. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Gabarro J (1978) The development of trust, influence, and expectations. In: Athos AG, Gabarro JJ (eds) Interpersonal behavior: communication and understanding in relationships. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp 290–303Google Scholar
  25. Ganesan S, Hess R (1997) Dimensions and levels of trust: implications for commitment to a relationship. Marketing Letters 8:439–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Giffin K (1967) The contribution of studies of source credibility to a theory of interpersonal trust in the communication department. Psychological Bulletin 68:104–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Good D (1988) Individuals, interpersonal relations, and trust. In: Gambetta DG (ed) Trust. Basil Blackwell, New York, pp 131–185Google Scholar
  28. Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC (1998) Multivariate data analysis, 5th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJGoogle Scholar
  29. Hardin R (1993) The street-level epistemology of trust. Politics and Society 21:505–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hart KM, Capps HR, Cangemi JP, Canillouet LM (1986) Exploring organizational trust and its multiple dimensions: a case study of General Motors. Organization Development Journal 4:31–39Google Scholar
  31. Hovland CI, Janis IL, Kelly HH (1953) Communication and persuasion. Yale University Press, New Haven, CTGoogle Scholar
  32. Hu L-t, Bentler P (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling 6:1–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Institute for Social Research (1999) 1999–2000 World Values Survey Questionnaire. Available at: http://wvs.isr.umich.edu/wvs2000.doc/. Accessed July 7, 2003
  34. Johnson BB (1999) Exploring dimensionality in the origins of hazard-related trust. Journal of Risk Research 2:325–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Johnson-George C, Swap W (1982) Measurement of specific interpersonal trust: Construction and validation of a scale to assess trust in a specific other. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology I 43:1306–1317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jones AP, James LR, Bruni JR (1975) Perceived leadership behavior and employee confidence in the leader as moderated by job involvement. Journal of Applied Psychology 60:146–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kee HW, Knox RE (1970) Conceptual and methodological considerations in the study of trust and suspicion. Journal of Conflict Resolution 14:357–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kish L (1949) A procedure for objective respondent selection within the household. Journal of the American Statistical Association 44:380–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kline RB (2005) Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, 2nd edn. Guilford, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  40. Knotek K, Watson AE (2006) Organizational characteristics that contribute to success in engaging the public to accomplish fuels management at the wilderness/non-wilderness interface. In: Andrews PL, Butler BW (comps.) (eds) Fuels management—how to measure success: conference proceedings. 2006 28–30 March; Portland, OR. Proceedings RMRS-P-41. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, CO, pp 703–713Google Scholar
  41. Kramer R (1999) Trust and distrust in organizations: emerging perspective, enduring questions. Annual Review of Psychology 50:569–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lachapelle PR, McCool SF, Patterson ME (2003) Barriers to effective natural resource planning in a “messy” world. Society and Natural Resources 16:473–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Larzelere R, Huston T (1980) The dyadic trust scale: toward understanding interpersonal trust in close relationships. Journal of Marriage and the Family 42:595–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Leahy JE, Davenport MA, Anderson DA, Jakes PJ (2004) Community trust in natural resource agencies: case studies from Illinois. In: Proceedings of the fourth social aspects and recreation research symposium; 2004 February 4–6; San Francisco State University, San Francisco, pp 51–57Google Scholar
  45. Levi M (1998) A state of trust. In: Braithwaite V, Levi M (eds) Trust and governance. Russell Sage Foundation, New York, pp 77–101Google Scholar
  46. Levi M (2000) When good defenses make good neighbors. In: Menard C (ed) Institutions, contracts, and organizations: perspectives from new institutional economics. Edward Elgar, Chichester, UK, pp 137–157Google Scholar
  47. Lieberman JK (1981) The litigious society. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  48. Liljeblad A, Borrie WT, Watson AE (2005) Monitoring trust as an evaluation of the success of collaborative planning the a landscape-level fuel hazard reduction treatments project in the Bitterroot Valley, Montana. Final report. Unpublished manuscript. University of MontanaGoogle Scholar
  49. Mason WM, House JS, Martin SS (1985) On the dimensions of political alienation in America. Sociological Methodology 15:111–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mayer RC, Davis JH, Schoorman FD (1995) An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review 20:709–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Miller AH (1974) Political issues and trust in government: 1964–1970. American Political Science Review 68:951–972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mishra AK (1996) Organizational responses to crisis: the centrality of trust. In: Kramer RM, Tyler T (eds) Trust in organizations. Sage, Newbury Park, CA, pp 261–287Google Scholar
  53. Morgan RM, Hunt SD (1994) The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing 58:20–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Peters RG, Covello VT, McCallum DB (1997) Determinants of trust and credibility in environmental risk assessment: an empirical study. Risk Analysis 17:43–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Ring SM, Van de Ven A (1992) Structuring cooperative relationships between organizations. Strategic Management Journal 13:483–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rosen B, Jerdee TH (1977) Influence of subordinate characteristics on trust and use of participative decision strategies in a management simulation. Journal of Applied Psychology 62:628–631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rousseau DM, Sitkin SB, Burt RS, Camerer C (1998) Not so different after all: a cross discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review 23:393–404Google Scholar
  58. Schumaker RE, Lomax RG (2004) A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJGoogle Scholar
  59. Sheppard BH, Sherman DM (1998) The grammars of trust: a model and general implications. Academy of Management Review 23:422–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Shindler BA, Toman E (2003) Fuel reduction strategies in forest communities: a longitudinal analysis of public support. Journal of Forestry 101:8–15Google Scholar
  61. Shindler BA, Brunson M, Stankey GH (2002) Social acceptability of forest conditions and management practices: a problem analysis. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-537. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, ORGoogle Scholar
  62. Sitkin SB, Roth NL (1993) Explaining the limited effectiveness of legalistic “remedies” for trust/distrust. Organization Science 4:367–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sjöberg L (2001) Limits of knowledge and the limited importance of trust. Risk Analysis 21:189–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Solomon L (1960) The influence of some types of power relationships and game strategies upon the development of interpersonal trust. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 61:223–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Strickland LH (1958) Surveillance and trust. Journal of Personality 26:200–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Sudman S, Bradburn NM, Schwartz N (1995) Thinking about answers: the application of cognitive processes to survey methodology. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  67. Thomas CW (1998) Maintaining and restoring public trust in government agencies and their employees. Administration and Society 30:166–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Van den Bos K, Wilke HAM, Lind EA (1998) When do we need procedural fairness? The role of trust in authority. Journal of Personality and Social Society 75:1449–1458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Weick KE, Sutcliffe KM (2001) Managing the unexpected: assuring high performance in an age of complexity. Wiley, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  70. Winter PL, Cvetkovich GT (2003) A study of Southwesterners’ opinions on the management of wildland and wilderness fires—fire management version. Unpublished report. Pacific Southwest Research Station. USDA Forest Service, Riverside, CAGoogle Scholar
  71. Winter PL, Palucki LJ, Burkhardt RL (1999) Anticipated responses to a fee program: the key is trust. Journal of Leisure Research 3:207–226Google Scholar
  72. Winter GJ, Vogt CA, Fried JS (2002) Fuel treatments at the wildland urban interface: common concerns in diverse regions. Journal of Forestry 100:15–21Google Scholar
  73. Winter G, Vogt CA, McCaffrey S (2004) Examining social trust in fuels management strategies. Journal of Forestry 102:8–15Google Scholar

Copyright information

© U. S. Government 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adam Lijeblad
    • 1
  • William T. Borrie
    • 2
  • Alan E. Watson
    • 3
  1. 1.National Forest FoundationMissoulaUSA
  2. 2.College of Forestry and ConservationUniversity of MontanaMissoulaUSA
  3. 3.Aldo Leopold Wilderness Research InstituteMissoulaUSA

Personalised recommendations