Environmental Management

, Volume 42, Issue 5, pp 735–752 | Cite as

Characterizing the Relative Contributions of Large Vessels to Total Ocean Noise Fields: A Case Study Using the Gerry E. Studds Stellwagen Bank National Marine Sanctuary

  • Leila Hatch
  • Christopher Clark
  • Richard Merrick
  • Sofie Van Parijs
  • Dimitri Ponirakis
  • Kurt Schwehr
  • Michael Thompson
  • David Wiley
Article

Abstract

In 2006, we used the U.S. Coast Guard’s Automatic Identification System (AIS) to describe patterns of large commercial ship traffic within a U.S. National Marine Sanctuary located off the coast of Massachusetts. We found that 541 large commercial vessels transited the greater sanctuary 3413 times during the year. Cargo ships, tankers, and tug/tows constituted 78% of the vessels and 82% of the total transits. Cargo ships, tankers, and cruise ships predominantly used the designated Boston Traffic Separation Scheme, while tug/tow traffic was concentrated in the western and northern portions of the sanctuary. We combined AIS data with low-frequency acoustic data from an array of nine autonomous recording units analyzed for 2 months in 2006. Analysis of received sound levels (10–1000 Hz, root-mean-square pressure re 1 μPa ± SE) averaged 119.5 ± 0.3 dB at high-traffic locations. High-traffic locations experienced double the acoustic power of less trafficked locations for the majority of the time period analyzed. Average source level estimates (71–141 Hz, root-mean-square pressure re 1 μPa ± SE) for individual vessels ranged from 158 ± 2 dB (research vessel) to 186 ± 2 dB (oil tanker). Tankers were estimated to contribute 2 times more acoustic power to the region than cargo ships, and more than 100 times more than research vessels. Our results indicate that noise produced by large commercial vessels was at levels and within frequencies that warrant concern among managers regarding the ability of endangered whales to maintain acoustic contact within greater sanctuary waters.

Keywords

Shipping Underwater noise Whales Automatic Identification System U.S. National Marine Sanctuary Marine protected area 

Supplementary material

267_2008_9169_MOESM1_ESM.doc (1.2 mb)
(DOC 1186 kb)

References

  1. Agreement on the Conservation of Cetaceans of the Black and Mediterranean Sea and Atlantic Contiguous Area (ACCOBAMS) (2003) Annex 34g, Recommendation 2.7. Second Meeting of the Scientific Committee to ACCOBAMS. Istanbul, Turkey, November 20–23. Available at: http://www.cms.int/pdf/en/summary_sheets/Accobams_Agr_Sum_Sheet.pdf
  2. Agreement on the Conservation of Small Cetaceans of the Baltic and North Seas (ASCOBANS) (2003) Effects of noise and of vessels. Resolution 5. Fourth Meeting of Parties to ASCOBANS, Esbjerg, Denmark. Available at: http://www.ascobans.org/files/agreement1992.pdf
  3. Andrew RK, Howe BM, Mercer JA (2002) Ocean ambient sound: comparing the 1960s with the 1990s for a receiver off the California coast. Acoustics Research Letters Online 3:65–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bachman R, Schey T, Philip W, Booth NO, Ryal FJ (1996) Geoacoustic databases for matched-field processing: preliminary results in shallow water off San Diego, California. Journal Acoustical Society of America 4:2077–2085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bartlett ML, Wilson GR (2002) Characteristics of small boat signatures. Journal Acoustical Society of America 112:2221Google Scholar
  6. Calupca TA, Fristrup KM, Clark CW (2000) A compact digital recording system for autonomus bioacoustic monitoring. Journal Acoustical Society of America 108:2582Google Scholar
  7. Cato DH (1976) Ambient sea noise in waters near Australia. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 60:320–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cato DH, McCauley RD (2002) Australian research in ambient noise. Acoustic Australia 30:13–20Google Scholar
  9. Clark CW, Ellison WT (2004) Potential use of low-frequency sounds by baleen whales for probing the environment: evidence from models and empirical measurements. In: Thomas J, Moss C, Vater M (eds) Echolocation in bats and dolphins. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, pp 564–582Google Scholar
  10. Cortopassi K (2007) LTspec tool. Cornell University Bioacoustics Research Program. Cornell University, Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
  11. Cressie N (1993) Statistics for spatial data. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Cummings J (2007) Regulating ocean noise: entering uncharted waters. Journal of International Wildlife Law and Policy 10:101–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Curtis KR, Howe BM, Mercer JA (1999) Low-frequency ambient sound in the North Pacific: long time series observations. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 106:3189–3200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ellison WT, Weixel K, Clark CW (1999) An acoustic integration model (AIM) for assessing the impact of underwater noise on marine wildlife. Journal Acoustical Society of America 106:2250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Erbe C (2002) Underwater noise of whale-watching boats and potential effects on killer whales (Orcinus orca), based on an acoustic impact model. Marine Mammal Science 18:394–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Erbe C, Farmer DM (1998) Masked hearing thresholds of a beluga whale (Delphinapterus leucas) in icebreaker noise. Deep Sea Research 45:1373–1387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Erbe C, Farmer DM (2000) Zones of impact around icebreakers affecting beluga whales in the Beaufort Sea. Journal Acoustical Society of America 108:1332–1340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc. (ESRI) (2006) ArcGIS. 9.2. Available at: http://www.esri.com/
  19. Federal Register (2003) Automatic Identification System; vessel carriage requirement. Coast Guard, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, 60559-60570. October 22. Available at: http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/14mar20010800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2003/pdf/03-26350.pdf
  20. Figueroa H (2007) XBAT. v5. Cornell University Bioacoustics Research Program. Available at: http://xbat.org/
  21. Firestone J, Jarvis C (2007) Response and responsibility: regulating noise pollution in the marine environment. Journal of International Wildlife Law and Policy 10:109–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Frankel AS, Ellison WT, Buchanan J (2003) Application of the Acoustic Integration Model (AIM) to predict and minimize environmental impacts. IEEE 1438–1442Google Scholar
  23. Gray LM, Greeley DS (1980) Source level model for propeller blade rate radiation for the world’s merchant fleet. Journal Acoustical Society of America 67:516–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Greene J, Greene CR, Moore SE (1995) Man-made noise. In: Richardson JW, Greene CR, Malme CI, Thomson DH (eds) Marine mammals and noise. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp 101–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Harati-Mokhtaria A, Walla A, Brooksa P, Wang J (2007) Automatic Identification System (AIS): data reliability and human error implications. Journal of Navigation 60:373–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Haren AM (2007) Reducing noise pollution from commercial shipping in the Channel Islands National Marine Sanctuary: a case study in marine protected area management of underwater noise. Journal of International Wildlife Law and Policy 10:153–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Heitmeyer RM, Wales SC, Pflug LA (2004) Shipping noise predictions: capabilities and limitations. Marine Technology Society Journal 37:54–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. International Association of Marine Aids to Navigation and Lighthouse Authorities (IALA) (2004) IALA Guideline No. 1028 on the Automatic Identification System (AIS): Part I. Operational issues. 1. Saint Germain en Laye, France. Available at: http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/enav/ais/IALA_AIS_Guidelines_Vol1_Pt1%20OPS%20(1.3).pdf
  29. International Maritime Organization of the United Nations (IMO) (2006) New and amended existing traffic separation schemes. COLREG.2/Circ.58. Maritime Safety Committee, Geneva, Switzerland, November 29–December 8Google Scholar
  30. International Whaling Commission (IWC) (2005) Report of the Scientific Committee. Annex K of the Scientific Committee Report. Journal of Cetacean Research and Management Supplement 7Google Scholar
  31. Jensen A, Silber G (2003) Large Whale Ship Strike Database. NMFS-F/OPR-25. NOAA Technical Memorandum. U.S. Department of Commerce, Silver Spring, MDGoogle Scholar
  32. Johnson MP, Tyack PL (2003) Digital acoustic recording tag for measuring the response of wild marine mammals to sound. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering 28:3–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kipple BM, Gabriele CM (2003) Glacier Bay watercraft noise: report to Glacier Bay National Park by the Naval Surface Warfare Cent-Detachment Bremerton. Technical Report NSWCCD-71-TR-2003/522Google Scholar
  34. Marsh HW, Schulkin M (1962) Shallow-water transmission. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 34L:863–864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McCarthy E (2004) International regulation of underwater sound: establishing rules and standards to address ocean noise pollution. Kluwer Academic, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  36. McDonald MA, Hildebrand JA, Wiggins SM (2006) Increases in deep ocean ambient noise in the Northeast Pacific west of San Nicolas Island, California. Journal Acoustical Society of America 120:711–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mills HG, Figueroa HK (2005) Extensible bioacoustical analysis software: two examples. Journal Acoustical Society of America 117:2525Google Scholar
  38. Morisaka T, Shinohara M, Nakahara F, Akamatsu T (2005) Effects of ambient noise on the whistles of Indo-Pacific bottlenose dolphin populations. Journal of Mammalogy 86:541–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. National Research Council of the U.S. National Academies (NRC) (1994) Low-frequency sound and marine mammals: current knowledge and research needs. National Academy Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  40. National Research Council of the US National Academies (NRC) (2000) Marine mammals and low-frequency sound: progress since 1994. National Academy Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  41. National Research Council of the U.S. National Academies (NRC) (2003) Ocean noise and marine mammals. National Academy Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  42. National Research Council of the U.S. National Academies (NRC) (2005) Marine mammal populations and ocean noise: determining when ocean noise causes biologically significant effects. National Academy Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  43. Nowacek DP, Thorne LH, Johnston D, Tyack PL (2007) Responses of cetaceans to anthropogenic noise. Mammal Review 37:81–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Parks SL, Clark CW (2005) Variation in acoustic activity of North Atlantic right whales in three critical habitat areas in 2004. Journal Acoustical Society of America 117:2469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Parks SL, Tyack PL (2005) Sound production by North Atlantic right whales (Eubalaena glacialis) in surface active groups. Journal Acoustical Society of America 117:3298–3306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Payne R, Webb D (1971) Orientation by means of long range acoustic signaling in baleen whales. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 188:110–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Piggott CL (1964) Ambient sea noise at low frequencies in shallow water of the Scotian Shelf. Journal Acoustical Society of America 36:2152–2163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Richardson JW, Greene CR Jr, Malme CI, Thomson DH (eds) (1995) Marine mammals and noise. Academic Press, San Diego, CAGoogle Scholar
  49. Ross DG (1976) Mechanics of underwater noise. Pergamon, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  50. Ross DG (1993) On ocean underwater ambient noise. Acoustics Bulletin Jan./Feb.:5–8Google Scholar
  51. Santilli S, Leslie M (2007) PostGIS. 1.2.1. Available at: http://www.postgis.org
  52. Schwehr K (2007) noaadata—Python software for processing AIS and water level data. v0.29. Available at: http://www.vislab-ccom.unh.edu/~schwehr/software/noaadata
  53. Scott KN (2007) Sound and cetaceans: a regional response to regulating acoustic marine pollution. Journal of International Wildlife Law and Policy 10:175–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Southall BL (2005) Shipping noise and marine mammals: a forum for science, management, and technology. Final Report of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) International Symposium. U.S. NOAA Fisheries, Arlington, Virginia, May 18–19, 2004. Available at: http://www/nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/acoustics/shipnoise.htm
  55. Southall BL (2007) Potential application of quieting technology on large commercial vessels. Announcement and Final Agenda of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) International Symposium. U.S. NOAA Fisheries, Silver Spring, Maryland, May 1–2, 2007Google Scholar
  56. Southall BL, Schusterman RJ, Kastak D (2000) Masking in three pinnipeds: underwater, low-frequency critical thresholds. Journal Acoustical Society of America 108:1322–1326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Southall BL, Bowles AE, Ellison WT, Finneran JJ, Gentry RL, Greene CR Jr, Kastak D, Ketten DR, Miller JH, Nachtigall PE, Richardson WJ, Thomas JA, Tyack PL (2007) Marine mammal noise exposure criteria: initial scientific recommendations. Aquatic Mammals 33:411–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. U.K. Inter-Agency Committee on Marine Science and Technology (IACMST) (2006) Report of the IACMST Working Group on Underwater Sound and Marine Life. National Oceanography Centre, Southampton, UK, JanuaryGoogle Scholar
  59. U.S. Marine Mammal Commission (U.S. MMC) (2007) Marine mammals and noise: a sound approach to research and management. A Report to the U.S. Congress from the Marine Mammal Commission, Bethesda, MDGoogle Scholar
  60. U.S. Marine Mammal Protection Act 1972, as amended through 1997. 16 U.S.C. 86: 1361–1407, October 21, 1972. Available at: http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/laws/MMPA/mmpatext/mmpaall.pdf
  61. U.S. National Marine Sanctuaries Act. 1992, as amended through 2000. 16 U.S.C. 1431 et seq. Available at: http://www.cr.nps.gov/locallaw/FHPL_NtlMarineSanct.pdf
  62. U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Adminisitration (U.S. NOAA) (2005) Regulations governing the taking and importing of marine mammals. Subchapter C: Marine Mammal Protection Act regulations (50 CFR 216)Google Scholar
  63. U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Adminisitration (U.S. NOAA) (2006) Draft environmental impact statement to implement the operational measures of the North Atlantic right whale ship strike reduction strategy. U.S. NOAA Fisheries Office of Protected Resources, Silver Spring, MDGoogle Scholar
  64. U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Adminstration (U.S. NOAA) (2008) Stellwagen Bank National Marine Sanctuary draft management plan/draft environmental assessment. U.S. National Marine Sanctuary Program, Silver Spring, MD Google Scholar
  65. Urazghildiiev IR, Clark CW (2006) Acoustic detection of North Atlantic right whale contact calls using the generalized likelihood ratio test. Journal Acoustical Society of America 120:1956–1963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Urick RJ (1983) Principles of underwater sound, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  67. Valentine PC, Baker JL, Unger TS, Evans J, Polloni CF (1999) Sea floor topographic, backscatter, and interpretive maps and bottom photos of the Massachusetts Bay Disposal Site region off Boston, Massachusetts. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 98–344. CD-ROM. Available at: http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/of98-344/
  68. Van Parijs S, Southall BL (2007) Report of the 2006 NOAA National Passive Acoustics Workshop. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-F/SPO-81. U.S. NOAA Fisheries, Woods Hole, MAGoogle Scholar
  69. Wenz GM (1962) Acoustic ambient noise in the ocean: spectra and sources. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 34:1936–1956CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Wenz GM (1969) Low-frequency deep-water ambient noise along the Pacific Coast of the United States. U.S. Navy Journal Underwater Acoustics 19:423–444Google Scholar
  71. Wiley DN, Hatch LT, Thompson MA, Schwehr K (2008) Characterizing commercial shipping traffic in the Stellwagen Bank National Marine Sanctuary and associated risk of large whale mortality (in preparation)Google Scholar
  72. World Conservation Union (IUCN) (2004) Resolution on undersea noise. RESWCC3.068. Available at: http://www.awionline.org/whales/Noise/IONC/Docs/IUCN_RES053.pdf
  73. Worley RD, Walker RA (1982) Low-frequency ambient ocean noise and sound transmission over a thinly sedimented rock bottom. Journal Acoustical Society of America 71:863–870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Zakarauskas P (1986) Ambient noise in shallow water: a literature review. Canadian Acoustics 14:3–17Google Scholar
  75. Zakarauskas P, Chapman DMF, Staal PR (1990) Underwater acoustic ambient noise levels on the eastern Canadian continental shelf. Journal Acoustical Society of America 87:2064–2071CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leila Hatch
    • 1
  • Christopher Clark
    • 2
  • Richard Merrick
    • 3
  • Sofie Van Parijs
    • 3
  • Dimitri Ponirakis
    • 2
  • Kurt Schwehr
    • 4
  • Michael Thompson
    • 1
  • David Wiley
    • 1
  1. 1.Gerry E. Studds Stellwagen Bank National Marine SanctuaryU.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationScituateUSA
  2. 2.Bioacoustics Research ProgramCornell University Laboratory of OrnithologyIthacaUSA
  3. 3.Northeast Fisheries Science CenterU.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationWoods HoleUSA
  4. 4.Center for Coastal and Ocean Mapping Joint Hydrographic CenterUniversity of New HampshireDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations