Advertisement

Environmental Management

, Volume 43, Issue 2, pp 237–248 | Cite as

Capturing Old-Growth Values for Use in Forest Decision-Making

  • Rochelle J. OwenEmail author
  • Peter N. Duinker
  • Thomas M. Beckley
Article

Abstract

Old-growth forests have declined significantly across the world. Decisions related to old growth are often mired in challenges of value diversity, conflict, data gaps, and resource pressures. This article describes old-growth values of citizens and groups in Nova Scotia, Canada, for integration in sustainable forest management (SFM) decision-making. The study is based on data from 76 research subjects who participated in nine field trips to forest stands. Research subjects were drawn from Aboriginal groups, environmental organizations, forestry professionals, and rural and urban publics. Diaries, group discussions, and rating sheets were used to elicit information during the field trips. Findings show that different elicitation techniques can influence the articulation of intensity with which some values are held. In addition, certain values are more often associated with old-growth than with other forest-age classes. Some values associated with old-growth are considered more important than others, and some silvicultural treatments are perceived to compromise old-growth values more than others. Demographic characteristics, such as constituency group, gender, and age, are shown to influence value priorities. Ideas on how to incorporate old-growth values into SFM decision-making are highlighted.

Keywords

Old-growth forest Values Stakeholders Field trips Mixed-methods Canada Nova Scotia Decision-making 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We extend hearty thanks to all the research participants for taking a day from their lives to provide their views. Also, sincere thanks to Bowater Mersey Paper Company, and in particular Peter Jones, for providing equipment, facilities, and access to OGF stands. Financial support was provided by the Sustainable Forest Management Network.

References

  1. Association of British Columbia Professional Foresters (1993) Position statement: old-growth forests [special issue]. In Forestry on the hill: old-growth forests, vol 1185–9598. Canadian Forestry Association, Ottawa, ON, pp 55–57Google Scholar
  2. Bass S (2001) Sustaining social values and benefits. In: Evans J (ed) The forests handbook (vol 2). Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK, pp 221–232)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beckley TM (2003) Forests, paradigms, and policies through ten centuries. In: Shindler BA, Beckely TM, Finley MC (eds) Two paths toward sustainable forests. Oregon State University Press, Cornvallis, OR, pp 18–34Google Scholar
  4. Beckley TM, Boxall PC, Just LK, Wellstead AM (1999) Forest stakeholder attitudes and values: selected social-science contributions, NOR-X-362. Canadian Forest Service, Edmonton, AB, p 24Google Scholar
  5. Bengston DN, Xu Z (1995) Changing national forest values: a content analysis (NC-323). USDA Forest Service, St. Paul, MNGoogle Scholar
  6. Berman T (1994) “Takin” it “Back”. In: Hatch R (ed) Clayoquot and dissent. Ronsdale Press, Vancouver, BCGoogle Scholar
  7. Bissell S, Duda M (2003) Factors related to hunting and fishing: participation among the Nation’s youth. Retrieved September 01, 2007, from http://www.ihea.com/documents/YouthFactorsPhaseI.pdf
  8. Booth D (1994) Aboriginal view of nature and old-growth forests. Chap. 3. In valuing nature: the decline and preservation of old-growth forests. Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc., Lanham, MDGoogle Scholar
  9. Booth D (1997) Preserving old-growth forest ecosystems: valuation and policy. Environmental Values 6:31–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boyle JR (1997) Planned forests: views and viewpoints. New Forests 17:5–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brown G, Reed P (2000) Validation of a forest values typology for use in national forest planning. Forest Science 46:240–247Google Scholar
  12. Brown TC (1984) The concept of values in resource allocation. Land Economics 60:231–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Burton P, Messier C, Weetman G, Prepas E, Adamowicz W, Tittler R (2003) The current state of boreal forestry and the drive for change. In: Burton P, Messier C, Adamowicz W, Smith D (eds) Towards sustainable management of the boreal forest. National Research Council Press, Ottawa, ON, pp 1–40Google Scholar
  14. Creswell JW (2003) Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods, 2nd edn. Sage Publications Ltd., Thousand Oaks, CA, 246 ppGoogle Scholar
  15. Drushka K (2003) Canada’s forests: a history. Forest History Society, Durham, NC, p 128Google Scholar
  16. Duinker P (1998) Public participation’s promising progress: advances in forest decision-making in Canada. Commonwealth Forestry Review 77:107–112Google Scholar
  17. Dunk T (1994) Talking about trees: environment and society in forest workers’ culture. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology 31:14–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dunlap RE, Van Liere KD, Mertig AD, Jones RE (1992) Measuring endorsement of an ecological paradigm: a revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues 56:425–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Etzioni A (1986) The case for a multi-utility conception. Economics and Philosophy 2:159–183Google Scholar
  20. Greene JC, Caracelli VJ, Graham WF (1989) Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 11:255–274Google Scholar
  21. Greenpeace (2006) Greenpeace activists blockade Kimberly-Clark factory in Ontario. Retrieved June 15, 2007, from http://www.kleercut.net/en/
  22. Gregory R (1999) Identifying environmental values. In: Dale VH, English MR (eds) Tools to aid environmental decision-making. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 32–58Google Scholar
  23. Grevatt G (2002) January 7. Man fighting to protect forest from clear cutting. The Halifax Herald. Retrieved April 19, 2007, from http://www.halifaxherald.com/cgi-bin/home/displaypackstory?2002/01/07+126.raw+GPIAtlantic+2
  24. Hammond H (1993) Old-growth, the zenith of forests [special issue]. In: Forestry on the hill: old-growth forests, vol 1185–9598. Canadian Forestry Association, Ottawa, ON, pp 47–54Google Scholar
  25. Hilbert J, Wiensczyk A (2007) Old-growth definitions and management: a literature review. BC Journal of Ecosystems and Management 8:15–31Google Scholar
  26. Homer PM, Kahle L (1998) A structural equation test of the value-attitude-behaviour hierarchy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54:638–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Janis IL (1972) Victims of groupthink. Hougthon Mifflin Co., Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  28. Kaltenborn B, Bjerke T (2002) Associations between environmental value orientations and landscape preferences. Landscape and Urban Planning 59:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kamakura WA, Mazzon JA (1991) Value segmentation: a model for the measurement of values and value systems. Journal of Consumer Research 18:208–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kimmins H (1992) Balancing act: environmental issues in forestry. UBC Press, Vancouver, BC, 244 ppGoogle Scholar
  31. Leverett R, Davis M (1996) Introduction. In: Davis M (ed) Eastern old-growth forests: prospects for rediscovery and recovery: part 1. Definitions and history. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 3–17Google Scholar
  32. Lewis J, Sheppard S, Sutherland K (2004) Computer-based visualization of forest management: a primer for resources managers, communities, and educators. BC Journal of Ecosystems and Management 5:5–13Google Scholar
  33. Lindhagen A, Hörnsten L (2000) Forest recreation in 1977 and 1997 in Sweden: changes in public preferences and behaviour. Forestry 73:143–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Loo J, Ives N (2003) The Acadian forest: historical condition and human impacts. The Forestry Chronicle 79:462–474Google Scholar
  35. Lynch T (1996) Deep ecology as an aesthetic movement. Environmental Values 5:147–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lynds A (1989) Nova Scotia’s old-growth forests. Conservation 13:4–6Google Scholar
  37. Lynds A, LeDuc J (1995) September. Old forests of Nova Scotia. Natural Resources Occasional Papers, 1–18Google Scholar
  38. Manning R, Valliere W, Minteer B (1999) Values, ethics, and attitudes toward national forest management: an empirical study. Society and Natural Resources 12:421–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Marchak P (1983) Green Gold: the Forestry Industry in British Columbia. University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver, BC, 474 ppGoogle Scholar
  40. Mausner C (2006) Capturing the hike experience on video: a new methodology for studying human transactions with nature. In: Peden JG, Schuster RM, comps (eds) Proceedings of the 2005 northeastern recreation research symposium; 2005 April 10–12; Bolton Landing, NY. Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-341. U.S. Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station, Newtown Square, PA, pp 168–176Google Scholar
  41. McFarlane B, Boxall PC (2000) Factors influencing forest values and attitudes of two stakeholder groups: the case of the foothills model forest in Alberta, Canada. Society and Natural Resources 13:649–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McIntyre N, Yuan M, Payne R, Moore J (2004) Development of a values-based approach to managing recreation on Canadian crown lands [Working paper of the Finnish Forest Research Institute 2]. Retrieved January 28, 2007, from http://www.metla.fi/julkaisut/workingpapers/2004/mwp002.htm
  43. Medley KE, Pobocik CM, Okey BW (2003) Historical changes in forest cover and land ownership in a midwestern U.S. landscape. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 93:104–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mosseler A, Lynds JA, Major JE (2003) Old-growth forests of the Acadian Forest Region. Environmental Review 11:S47–S77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Motavalli J (1999) Sparing those trees. E, 10(6):A57800740Google Scholar
  46. Moyer J (2006) Values and attitudes toward old-growth forest: a Narrative Study of Leaders in Canada’s Forest Sector. Thesis for Master of Environmental Studies, Dalhousie UniversityGoogle Scholar
  47. Moyer JM, Owen RJ, Duinker PN (2008) A forest-values framework for old growth. The Open Forest Science Journal: acceptedGoogle Scholar
  48. National Roundtable on the Environment, Economy (1997) Private woodlot management in the Maritimes. Renouf Publishing Co. Ltd., Ottawa, ON, 44 ppGoogle Scholar
  49. Nova Scotia Museum of Natural History (1997) The Mi’kmaq [Info Sheet]. Retrieved June 15, 2007, from http://www.museum.gov.ns.ca/arch/infos/mikmaq1.htm
  50. O’Brien EA (2003) Human values and their importance to the development of forestry policy in Britain: a literature review. Forestry 76:3–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. O’Brien EA (2005) Publics and woodlands in England: well-being, local identity, social learning, conflict and management. Forestry 78:321–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Oliver CD, Larson BC (1990) Forest Stand Dynamics. McGraw-Hill, New York, 467 ppGoogle Scholar
  53. Oliver CD, Larson BC (1996) Forest Stand Dynamics. Update Edition. John Wiley and Sons, New York, p 521Google Scholar
  54. Owen RJ (2006) Old-growth-forest values of citizen constituencies in Nova Scotia, Canada. Thesis for Master of Environmental Studies, Dalhousie UniversityGoogle Scholar
  55. Patel A, Rapport DJ, Vanderlinden L, Eyles J (1999) Forests and societal values: comparing scientific and public perception of forest health. Environmentalist 19:239–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Reed WJ (1993) The decision to conserve or harvest old-growth forest. Ecological Economics 8:45–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rokeach M (1973) The nature of human values. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  58. Rolston III H, Coufal J (1991) A forest ethic and mulitvalue forest management. Journal of Forestry 89:35–40Google Scholar
  59. Rose SK, Chapman D (2003) Timber harvest adjacency economics, hunting, species protection, and old growth value: seeking the dynamic optimum. Ecological Economics 44:325–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rossman GB, Rallis SF (2003) Learning in the field: an introduction to qualitative research, 2nd edn. Sage Publications Inc., New York, 368 ppGoogle Scholar
  61. Satterfield T (2002) Anatomy of a conflict: identity, knowledge, and emotion in old-growth forests. University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver, BC, 198 ppGoogle Scholar
  62. Sheppard S (2005) Participatory decision support for sustainable forest management: a framework. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 35:1515–1526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Shields DJ, Martin IM, Martin WE, Haefele MA (2002) Survey results of the American public’s values, objectives, beliefs, and attitudes regarding forests and grasslands: a technical document supporting the 2000 USDA Forest Service RPA Assessment. General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-95. USDA Forest Service. Fort Collins, COGoogle Scholar
  64. Shindler B, Cramer L (1999) Shifting public values for forest management: making sense of wicked problems. Western Journal of Applied Forestry 14:28–34Google Scholar
  65. Steel B, List P, Shindler B (1994) Conflicting values about federal forests: a comparison of national and Oregon publics. Society of Natural Resources 7:137–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Stewart BJ, Neily PD, Quigley ED, Duke AP, Benjamin LK (2003) Selected Nova Scotia old-growth forests: age, ecology, structure, and scoring. The Forestry Chronicle 79:632–644Google Scholar
  67. Tarrant TM, Cordell KH (2002) Amenity values of public and private forests: examining the value-attitude relationship. Environmental Management 30:692–703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Tarrant MA, Cordell HK, Green GT (2003) PVF: a scale to measure public forest values of forests. Journal of Forestry 101:24–30Google Scholar
  69. Tindal DB (2003) Social Values and the contingent nature of public opinion and attitudes about forests. Forestry Chronicles 79:692–705Google Scholar
  70. Townsend (2004) Nova Scotia forest inventory based on permanent sample plots measured between 1999 and (2003) General Technical Report FOR 2004 – 3. Nova Scotia Department of Natural Resources Truro, NSGoogle Scholar
  71. United Nations Environmental Programme (2002) Global environmental outlook 3. UNEP, Nairobi, KEGoogle Scholar
  72. Van De Ven AH, Delbecq AL (1974) The effectiveness of nominal, Delphi, and interacting group decision-making processes. The Academy of Management Journal 17:605–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Wagner R, Flynn J, Gregory R, Mertz C, Slovic P (1998) Acceptable practices in Ontario’s forests: differences between the public and forestry professionals. New Forests 16:139–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Williams RM Jr (1979) Change and stability in values and value systems: a sociological perspective. In: Rokeach M (ed) Understanding human values: individual and societal. Free Press, New York, pp 15–46Google Scholar
  75. Williams M (2000) Dark ages and dark areas: global deforestation in the deep past. Journal of Historical Geography 26:28–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Williams K, Harvey D (2001) Transcendent experience in forest environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology 21:249–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Wilson SJ, Colman R, O’Brien M, Pannozzo L (2001) The Nova Scotia Genuine Progress Index Forest Accounts (vol 1). Accessed: 08 June 2007. Available from GPI Atlantic http://www.gpiatlantic.org/pdf/forest/forest1.pdf

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rochelle J. Owen
    • 1
    Email author
  • Peter N. Duinker
    • 2
  • Thomas M. Beckley
    • 3
  1. 1.Dalhousie UniversityHalifaxCanada
  2. 2.School for Resource and Environmental StudiesDalhousie UniversityHalifaxCanada
  3. 3.Faculty of Forestry and Environmental ManagementUniversity of New BrunswickFrederictonCanada

Personalised recommendations