Environmental Management

, Volume 42, Issue 2, pp 327–343 | Cite as

Forest Restoration and Forest Communities: Have Local Communities Benefited from Forest Service Contracting of Ecosystem Management?

  • Cassandra MoseleyEmail author
  • Yolanda E. Reyes


Conservation-based development programs have sought to create economic opportunities for people negatively impacted by biological diversity protection. The USDA Forest Service, for example, developed policies and programs to create contracting opportunities for local communities to restore public lands to replace jobs lost from reduced timber harvest. This article examines 12 years of Forest Service land management contracting in western Oregon, Washington, and northern California to evaluate if contractors located in communities near national forests have been awarded more land management contracts and contract value over time. We find that land management contracting spending has declined dramatically and, once we control for intervening factors, we find that local contractors have received a smaller proportion of land management contracts over time.


Conservation-based development Forest communities Procurement contracting Forest Service Northwest Forest Plan 



This research was supported by the University of Oregon, Ford Foundation, and the USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region agreement number NFS-03-JV-11060000–231 and Pacific Northwest Research Station agreement number PNW-05-JV-11261975–255. We thank Mikhael Balaev, Shanna French-Moore, Adam Lake, Martin Tussler, and Jim Wolf for their help with data entry, cleaning, and calculating; Jessica Green, Robin High, Ken Hudson, Laura Leete, Jean Stockard, and Richard York for helping us think through our analysis; and Claudia Stuart for proving forest-level budget data. We also appreciate the Forest Service contracting officers and technicians who were willing to answer questions about the minutia of the data tracking practices. Finally, we are grateful to Susan Charnley for supporting this project and providing timely data. Errors remain ours.


  1. Allison PD (2005) Fixed affects regression methods for longitudinal data using SAS. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NCGoogle Scholar
  2. Bhat G, Bergstrom J, Teasley RJ, Bowker JM, Cordell HK (1998) An ecoregional approach to the economic valuation of land- and water-based recreation in the United States. Environmental Management 22(1):69–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown B (2000) The multi-ethnic, nontimber forest workforce in the Pacific Northwest: reconceiving the players in forest management. In: Salazar DJ, Alper DK (eds) Sustaining the forests of the Pacific coast. UBC Press, Vancouver, Canada, pp 148–169Google Scholar
  4. Buttolph LP, Kay W, Charnley S, Moseley C, Donoghue EM (2006) Northwest Forest Plan—the first 10 years: socioeconomic monitoring of the Olympic National Forest and three local communities. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, ORGoogle Scholar
  5. Carroll MS (1995) Community & the Northwestern logger: continuities and changes in the era of the spotted owl. Westview Press, Boulder, COGoogle Scholar
  6. Carroll MS, Daniels SE, Kusel J (2000) Employment and displacement among Northwestern forest products workers. Society & Natural Resources 13(2):151–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Casanova V, McDaniel J (2005) “No Sobra Y No Falta”: recruitment networks and guest workers in Southeastern U.S. Forest industries. Urban Forestry 34(1):45–84Google Scholar
  8. Charnley S (2006) Northwest Forest Plan—the first 10 years (1994–2003): socioeconomic monitoring results. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, ORGoogle Scholar
  9. Charnley, S, Dillingham C, Stuart C, Moseley C, Donoghue E (Forthcoming) Northwest Forest Plan—the first 10 years (1994–2003): Socioeconomic Monitoring of Klamath National Forest and Three Local Communities. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, ORGoogle Scholar
  10. Charnley S, Donoghue EM, Stuart C, Dillingham C, Buttolph LP, Kay W, McLain RJ, Moseley C, Phillips RH, Tobe L (2006) Northwest Forest Plan—The first 10 years (1994–2003)—socioeconomic monitoring results—volume III: rural communities and economies. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, ORGoogle Scholar
  11. Daly M (2003) The other healthy forest initiative: community-based forestry takes root in the U.S. [On-line Magazine]. Grist Magazine, September 3 2003 [cited September 3 2003]. Available from
  12. Daniels SE, Gobeli CL, Findley AJ (2000) Reemployment programs for displaced timber workers: lessons from Oregon. Society & Natural Resources 13(2):135–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dillingham, C, Poe M, Grinspoon E, Stewart C, Moseley C, Mazza R, Charnley S, Donoghue E, Meierotto L, Toth N (Forthcoming) Socioeconomic monitoring of Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest and five local communities. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, ORGoogle Scholar
  14. Fairbanks R (2003) Workforce Planning on the Willamette National Forest [World Wide Web]. National Federation of Federal Employees Local 457 2003 [cited July 21, 2003 2003]. Available from
  15. Forest Ecosystem Management Assessment Team (1993) Forest ecosystem management: an ecological, economics, and social assessment. U.S. Government Printing Office, Portland, ORGoogle Scholar
  16. Government Accounting Office (1999) Western national forests: a cohesive strategy is needed to address catastrophic wildfire threats. Government Accounting Office, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  17. Government Accounting Office (2001) Land management agencies: restoring fish passage through culverts on forest service and BLM lands in Oregon and Washington could take decades. Government Accounting Office, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  18. Gray GJ, Enzer MJ, Kusel J (eds) (2001) Understanding community-based forest ecosystem management. Food Products Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Gregory LD (2005) Following the money: the National Fire Plan, performance measures, and funding in the USDA Forest Service. Paper presented at the Western Political Science Association Meeting, Oakland, CA, March 17–19, 2005Google Scholar
  20. Hallock M (1998) Improving jobs, community, and the environment: lessons from the Ecosystem Workforce Project. Labor Education Research Center, University of Oregon, Eugene, ORGoogle Scholar
  21. Halverson R, Palmquist R (1980) The interpretation of dummy variables in semilogarithmic equations. The American Economic review 70(3):474–475Google Scholar
  22. Hardie IW, Narayan TA, Gardner BL (2001) The joint influence of agricultural and nonfarm factors on real estate value: an application to the mid-Atlantic region. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 83(1):120–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hartsfield A, Ostermeier D (2003) Certification: the view from FSC-certified land managers. Journal of Forestry 101(8):32–37Google Scholar
  24. Hartzell HJ (1987) Birth of a cooperative: Hoedads, Inc., a worker owner forest labor co-op. Hulogos’I, Eugene, ORGoogle Scholar
  25. Hirt PW (1994) A conspiracy of optimism: management of the National Forests since World War Two. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, NEGoogle Scholar
  26. Ihara DM, Hackett SC (2003) Reinvestment in jobs, communities and forests: the benefits and costs of a National program for road removal on US Forest Service lands, a preliminary analysis. Center for Environmental Economic Development, Arcada, CAGoogle Scholar
  27. Jungwirth L (2002) Who will be the gardeners of Eden? Chronicle of Community Spring 31–34Google Scholar
  28. Kay WM, Donoghue EM, Charnley S, Moseley C (2007) Northwest Forest Plan—the first 10 years (1994–2003): socioeconomic monitoring of the Mount Hood National Forest and three local communities. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, ORGoogle Scholar
  29. Kitzhaber J, Williams R, Zielinski E (1998) Letter to staff: state of Oregon, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region, and USDI Bureau of Land Management, Oregon State OfficeGoogle Scholar
  30. Little JB (1996) Forest communities become partners in management. American Forests 102(3):17(13)Google Scholar
  31. Mackie G (1994) Success and failure in an American workers’ cooperative movement. Politics and Society 22(2):215–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mann G (2001) The state, race, and ‘wage slavery’ in the forest sector of the Pacific Northwest United States. Journal of Peasant Studies 29(1):61–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McDaniel J, Casanova V (2003) Pines in lines: tree planting, H2B guest workers, and rural poverty in Alabama. Southern Rural Sociology 19(1):73–96Google Scholar
  34. McLain RJ, Tobe L, Charnley S, Donoghue EM, Moseley C (2006) Northwest Forest Plan—the first 10 years (1994–2003): socioeconomic monitoring of Coos Bay District and three local communities. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, ORGoogle Scholar
  35. Meidinger EE (1997) Organizational and legal challenges for ecosystem management. In: Kohm KA, Franklin JF (eds) Creating a forestry for the 21st century. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 361–379Google Scholar
  36. Moseley C (2002) A survey of innovative contracting for quality jobs and ecosystem management. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OregonGoogle Scholar
  37. Moseley C (2005) Procurement contracting in the affected counties of the Northwest Forest Plan: twelve years of change. USDA Forest Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, ORGoogle Scholar
  38. Moseley C (2006) Ethnic differences in job quality among contract forest workers on six national forests. Policy Sciences 39(2):113–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Moseley C, Balaev M, Lake A (2003) Long term trends in contracting and the impact of the National Fire Plan in northern California. Ecosystem Workforce Program, University of Oregon, Eugene, ORGoogle Scholar
  40. Moseley C, Reyes Y (2007) Comparing job quality in logging and forestry services in oregon. Journal of Forestry 105(6):293–300Google Scholar
  41. Moseley C, Shankle S (2001) Who gets the work? National forest contracting in the Pacific Northwest. Journal of Forestry 99(9):32–37Google Scholar
  42. Moseley C, Stone C (2007) Forest service use of best value contracting: a sample from the Southwest region. Ecosystem Workforce Program, University of Oregon, Eugene, ORGoogle Scholar
  43. Moseley C, Toth N (2004) Fire hazard reduction and economic opportunity: how are the benefits of the National Fire Plan distributed? Society and Natural Resources 17(8):701–716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Power TM (1996) Lost landscapes and failed economies: the search for a value of place. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  45. Rickenbach MG (2002) Forest certification of small ownerships: some practical challenges. Journal of Forestry 100(6):43–50Google Scholar
  46. Sample VA (1990) The impact of federal budget process on National Forest Planning. Greenwood Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  47. Sarathy B (2006) The latinization of foresty management work in Southern Oregon: a case from the Rogue Valley. Journal of Forestry 104(7):359–365Google Scholar
  48. Schallau CH (1989) Sustained yield versus community stability. Journal of Forestry 87(9):16–28Google Scholar
  49. Schallau CH, Alston RM (1987) The commitment to community stability: a policy or shibboleth? Environmental Law 17(3):429–481Google Scholar
  50. Small Business Administration (2005) Table of small business size standards [World Wide Web] 2005 [cited April 11 2005]. Available from
  51. Spencer C (1999) Linking forest employment and forest ecosystem objectives in the Pacific Northwest. Community Development Journal 34(1):47–57Google Scholar
  52. U.S. Census Bureau (2007) Zip code tabulation areas 2007 [cited October 31 2007]. Available from
  53. Weeks EC (1990) Mill closures in the Pacific Northwest: the consequences of economic decline in rural industrial communities. In: Lee RG, Field DR, Burch WRJ (eds) Community and forestry: continuities in the sociology of natural resources. Westview Press, Boulder, CO, pp 125–140 Google Scholar
  54. Wells M, Brandon K (1992) Peoples and parks: linking protected area management with local communities. World Bank, World Wildlife Fund, and U.S. Agency for International Development, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  55. Willamette National Forest (1999) Request for quotation: vegetation remeasurement and monitoring jobs in the Woods Project. Willamette National Forest, Eugene, ORGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ecosystem Workforce Program, Institute for a Sustainable EnvironmentUniversity of OregonEugeneUSA

Personalised recommendations