Environmental Management

, Volume 42, Issue 4, pp 688–697

An Approach Toward Understanding Wildlife-Vehicle Collisions



Among the most conspicuous environmental effects of roads are vehicle-related mortalities of wildlife. Research to understand the factors that contribute to wildlife-vehicle collisions can be partitioned into several major themes, including (i) characteristics associated with roadkill hot spots, (ii) identification of road-density thresholds that limit wildlife populations, and (iii) species-specific models of vehicle collision rates that incorporate information on roads (e.g., proximity, width, and traffic volume) and animal movements. We suggest that collision models offer substantial opportunities to understand the effects of roads on a diverse suite of species. We conducted simulations using collision models and information on Blanding’s turtles (Emydoidea blandingii), bobcats (Lynx rufus), and moose (Alces alces), species endemic to the northeastern United States that are of particular concern relative to collisions with vehicles. Results revealed important species-specific differences, with traffic volume and rate of movement by candidate species having the greatest influence on collision rates. We recommend that future efforts to reduce wildlife-vehicle collisions be more proactive and suggest the following protocol. For species that pose hazards to drivers (e.g., ungulates), identify collision hot spots and implement suitable mitigation to redirect animal movements (e.g., underpasses, fencing, and habitat modification), reduce populations of problematic game species via hunting, or modify driver behavior (e.g., dynamic signage that warns drivers when animals are near roads). Next, identify those species that are likely to experience additive (as opposed to compensatory) mortality from vehicle collisions and rank them according to vulnerability to extirpation. Then combine information on the distribution of at-risk species with information on existing road networks to identify areas where immediate actions are warranted.


Alces alces Emydoidea blandingii Lynx rufus Roadkills Vehicle collisions 


  1. Aresco MJ (2005) Mitigation measures to reduce highway mortality of turtles and other herpetofauna at a north Florida lake. Journal of Wildlife Management 69:549–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bashore TL, Tzilkowski WM, Bellis ED (1985) Analysis of deer-vehicle collision sites in Pennsylvania. Journal of Wildlife Management 49:769–774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cain AT, Tuovila VR, Hewitt DG, Tewes ME (2003) Effects of a highway and mitigation projects on bobcats in southern Texas. Biological Conservation 114:189–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Conover MR, Pitt WC, Kessler KK, DuBow TJ, Sanborn WA (1995) Review of human injuries, illnesses, and economic losses caused by wildlife in the United States. Wildlife Society Bulletin 23:407–414Google Scholar
  5. Findlay CS, Bourdages J (2000) Response time of wetland biodiversity to road construction on adjacent lands. Conservation Biology 14:86–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Forman RTT (2000) Estimate of the area affected ecologically by the road system in the United States. Conservation Biology 14:31–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Forman RTT, Alexander LE (1998) Roads and their major ecological effects. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 29:207–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Forman RTT, Reineking B, Hersperger AM (2002) Road traffic and nearby grassland bird patterns in a suburbanizing landscape. Environmental Management 29:782–800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Forman RTT, Sperling D, Bissonette JA, Clevenger AP, Cutshal CC, Dale VH, Fahrig L, France R, Goldman CR, Heanue K, Jones JA, Swanson WJ, Turrentine T, Winter TC (2003) Road ecology: science and solutions. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  10. Fuller TK, Berg WE, Radde GL, Lenarz MS, Joselyn GB (1992) A history and current wolf distribution and numbers in Minnesota. Wildlife Society Bulletin 20:42–55Google Scholar
  11. Gibbs JP, Shriver G (2002) Estimating the effects of road mortality on turtle populations. Conservation Biology 16:1647–1652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gibbs JP, Shriver G (2005) Can road mortality limit populations of pool-breeding amphibians? Wetlands Ecology and Management 13:281–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Groot-Bruinderink GWTA, Hazebroek E (1996) Ungulate traffic collisions in Europe. Conservation Biology 1059–1067Google Scholar
  14. Hamby DM (1994) A review of techniques for parameter sensitivity—an analysis of environmental models. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 32:135–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Harestad AS, Bunnell FL (1979) Home range and body weight—a reevaluation. Ecology 60:389–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hels T, Buchwald E (2001) The effects of road kills on amphibian populations. Biological Conservation 99:331–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hubbard MW, Danielson BJ, Schmitz RA (2000) Factors influencing the location of deer-vehicle collisions. Wildlife Society Bulletin 25:809–818Google Scholar
  18. Huijser MP, Bergers PJM (2000) The effects of roads and traffic on hedgehog (Erinaceus europaeus) populations. Biological Conservation 95:111–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hussain A, Armstrong JB, Brown DB, Hogland J (2007) Land-use pattern, urbanization, and deer-vehicle collisions in Alabama. Human-Wildlife Conflicts 1:89–96Google Scholar
  20. Iuell B, Bekker GJ, Cuperus R, Dufek J, Fry G, Hicks C, Hlavác V, Keller VB, Rosell C, Sangwine T, Tørsløv N, le Maire Wandall B (eds) (2003) Wildlife and traffic: a European handbook for identifying conflicts and designing solutions. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  21. Litvaitis JA, Tash JP, Stevens CL (2006) The rise and fall of bobcats in New Hampshire: relevance of historical harvests to understanding current patterns of distribution and abundance. Biological Conservation 128:517–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Marchand MN, Litvaitis JA (2004) Effects of habitat features and landscape composition on population structure of a common aquatic turtle in a region undergoing rapid development. Conservation Biology 18:758–767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. MEDOT (Maine Department of Transportation) (2001) Collisions between large wildlife species and motor vehicles in Maine. Interim report. Maine Interagency Work Group on Wildlife/Motor Vehicle Collisions, Maine Department of Transportation, AugustaGoogle Scholar
  24. Miller BK, Litvaitis JA (1992) Habitat segregation by moose (Alces alces) in a boreal forest ecotone. Acta Theriologica 37:41–50Google Scholar
  25. Nielsen CK, Anderson RG, Grund MD (2003) Landscape influences on deer-vehicle accident areas in an urban environment. Journal of Wildlife Management 67:46–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. NRC (National Research Council) (2005) Assessing and managing the ecological impacts of paved roads. National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  27. Ramp D, Caldwell J, Edwards KA, Warton D, Croft DB (2005) Modelling of wildlife fatality hotspots along the Snowy Mountain Highway in New South Wales, Australia. Biological Conservation 126:474–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Riitters KH, Wickham JD (2003) How far to the nearest road? Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 1:125–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schwabe KA, Schuhmann PW, Tonkovitch M (2002) A dynamic exercise in reducing deer-vehicle collisions: management through vehicle mitigation techniques and hunting. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 27:261–280Google Scholar
  30. Seiler A (2003) Effects of Infrastructure on Nature. In: Trocmé M, Cahill S, De Vries JG, Farrall H, Folkeson L, Fry G, Hicks C, Peymen J (eds) Habitat fragmentation due to transportation infrastructure: the European review. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, pp 31–50Google Scholar
  31. Seiler A (2005) Predicting locations of moose-vehicle collisions in Sweden. Journal of Applied Ecology 42:371–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Trombulak SC, Rissell CA (2000) Review of ecological effects of roads on terrestrial and aquatic communities. Conservation Biology 14:18–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. van Langevelde F, Jaarsma CF (2004) Using traffic flow theory to model traffic mortality in mammals. Landscape Ecology 19:895–907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wilkie D, Shaw E, Rotberg F, Morelli G, Auzell P (2000) Roads, development, and conservation in the Congo Basin. Conservation Biology 14:1614–1622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wren K, Claussen DL, Kurz M (1998) The effects of body size and extrinsic mass on locomotion of the ornate box turtle, Terrepene ornata. Journal of Herpetology 32:144–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zhao F, Chung S (2001) Estimation of annual average daily traffic in a Florida county using GIS and regression. Transportation Research Record 1769:113–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Natural ResourcesUniversity of New HampshireDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations