Environmental Management

, Volume 41, Issue 6, pp 949–958 | Cite as

Monitoring Plant Phenology Using Digital Repeat Photography

Article

Abstract

Repeated observations of plant phenology have been shown to be important indicators of global change. However, capturing the exact date of key events requires daily observations during the growing season, making phenologic observations relatively labor intensive and costly to collect. One alternative to daily observations for capturing the dates of key phenologic events is repeat photography. In this study, we explored the utility of repeat digital photography for monitoring phenologic events in plants. We provide an illustration of this approach and its utility by placing observations made using repeat digital imagery in context with local meteorologic and edaphic variables. We found that repeat photography provides a reliable, consistent measurement of phenophase. In addition, digital photography offers advantages in that it can be mathematically manipulated to detect and enhance patterns; it can classify objects; and digital photographs can be archived for future analysis. In this study, an estimate of greenness and counts of individual flowers were extracted by way of mathematic algorithms from the photo time series. These metrics were interpreted using meteorologic measurements collected at the study site. We conclude that repeat photography, coupled with site-specific meteorologic measurements, could greatly enhance our understanding environmental triggers of phenologic events. In addition, the methods described could easily be adopted by citizen scientists and the general public as well as professionals in the field.

Keywords

Digital imaging Image processing Meteorologic monitoring Phenology Repeat photography RGB 

References

  1. Abu-Asab M, Peterson PM, Shetler SG, Orli SS (2001) Earlier plant flowering in spring as a reponse to global warming in the Washington, DC area. Biodiversity and Conservation 10:597–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adamsen FJ, Coffelt TA, Nelson JM, Barnes EM, Rice RC (2000) Method for using images from a color digital camera to estimate flower number. Crop Science 40:704–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adamsen FJ, Pinter PJ Jr, Barnes EM, LaMorte RL, Wall GW, Leavitt SW et al (1999) Crop ecology, production, and management. Crop Science 39:719–724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ahmad I, Naeem AM, Islam M, Nawaz S (2006) Weed classification using histogram maxima with threshold for selective herbicide applications. International Journal of Applied Science, Engineering, and Technology 4:331–334Google Scholar
  5. Al-Mufti MM, Sydes CL, Furness SB, Grime JP, Band SR (1977) A quantitative analysis of shoot phenology and dominance in herbaceous vegetation. Journal of Ecology 65:759–791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Badeck FW, Bondeau A, Böttcher K, Doktor D, Lucht W, Schaber J et al (2004) Responses of spring phenology to climate change. New Phytologist 162:295–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baker GA, Rundel PW, Parsons DJ (1982) Comparative phenology and growth in three chaparral shrubs. Botanical Gazette 143:94–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Betancourt JL, Schwartz MD, Breshears DD, Cayan DR, Dettinger MD, Inouye DW et al (2005) Implementing a US national phenology network. Eos 86:539–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Booth DT, Cox SE, Berryman RD (2006) Point sampling digital imagery with “SamplePoint.” Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 123:97–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bowers JE, Dimmitt MA (1994) Flowering phenology of six woody plants in the northern Sonoran Desert. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Society 121:215–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cannell MGR, Palutikof JP, Sparks TH (eds.) (1999) Indicators of climate change in the UK. London, UK, DETR, 74 ppGoogle Scholar
  12. Cayan DR, Kammerdiener SA, Dettinger MD, Caprio JM, Peterson DH (2001) Changes in the onset of spring in the western United States. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 82:399–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cleland EE, Chiariello NR, Loarie SR, Mooney HA, Field CB (2006) Diverse responses of phenology to global changes in a grassland ecosystem. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103:13740–13744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dunne JA, Harte J, Taylor KJ (2003) Subapline meadow flowering phenology responses to climate change: integrating experimental and gradient methods. Ecological Monographs 73:69–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Graham EA, Hamilton MP, Mishler BD, Rundel PW, Hansen MH (2006) Use of a networked digital camera to estimate net CO2 uptake of a dessication-tolerant moss. International Journal of Plant Science 167:751–758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hall FC (2001) Photo point monitoring handbook: part A—field procedures. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-526. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, Oregon, 48 ppGoogle Scholar
  17. Hamerlynck EP, Tuba Z, Csintalan Z, Nagy Z, Henegry G, Goodin D (2000) Diurnal variation in photochemical dynamics and surface reflectance of the dessication-tolerant moss. Tortula ruralis. Plant Ecology 151:55–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hastings JR, Turner RM (1965) The changing mile: an ecological study of vegetation changes with time in the lower mile of an arid and semiarid region. The University of Arizona Press, Tuscon, AZ, 334 ppGoogle Scholar
  19. Huemmerich KF, Black TA, Jarvis PG, McCaughey JH, Hall FG (1999) High temporal resolution NDVI phenology from micrometeorological radiation sensors. Journal of Geophysical Research 104:27935–27944CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Huete A, Didan K, Miura T, Rodriguez EP, Gao X, Ferreira LG (2002) Overview of the radiometric and biophysical performance of the MODIS vegetation indices. Remote Sensing of the Environment 83:195–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2001) Climate change 2001: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. New York, NY, Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  22. Jackson MT (1966) Effects of microclimate on spring flowering phenology. Ecology 47:407–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lukina EV, Stone ML, Raun WR (1999) Estimating vegetation coverage in wheat using digital images. Journal of Plant Nutrition 22:341–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Luscier JD, Thompson WL, Wilson JM, Gorham BE, Dragut LD (2006) Using digital photographs and object-based image analysis to estimate percent ground cover in vegetation plots. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 4:408–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mahall BE, Bormann FH (1978) A quantitative description of the vegetative phenology of herbs in a northern hardwood forest. Botanical Gazette 139:467–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Memmott J, Craze PG, Waser NM, Price MV (2007) Global warming and the disruption of plant-pollinator interactions. Ecology Letters 10:710–717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Menzel A (2000) Trends in phenological phases in Europe between 1951 and (1996). International Journal of Biometeorology 44:76–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Miller-Rushing AJ, Primack RB, Primack D, Mukunda S (2006) Photographs and herbarium specimens as tools to document phenological changes in response to global warming. American Journal of Botany 93:1667–1674Google Scholar
  29. Myneni RB, Keeling CD, Tucker CJ, Asrar G, Nemani RR (1997) Increased plant growth in the northern high latitudes from 1981 to 1991. Nature 386:698–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nash MS, Wierenga PJ, Gutjahr A (1991) Time series analysis of soil moisture and rainfall along a line transect in arid rangeland. Soil Science 152:189–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nüsser M (2001) Understanding cultural landscape transformation: a re-photographic survey in Chitral, eastern Hindukush, Pakistan. Landscape and Urban Planning 57:241–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Peñuelas J, Boada M (2003) A global change-induced biome shift in the Montseny mountains (NE Spain). Global Change Biology 9:131–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Peñuelas J, Filella I (2001) Responses to a warming world. Science 294:793–794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Przeszlowska A, Trlica MJ, Weltz MA (2006) Near-ground remote sensing of green area index on the shortgrass prairie. Rangeland Ecology and Management 59:422–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rathcke B, Lacey EP (1985) Phenological patterns of terrestrial plants. Annual Review of Ecological Systems 16:179–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Richardson AD, Berlyn GP, Gregoire TG (2001) Spectral reflectance of Picea rubens (Pinaceae) and Abies balsamea (Pinaceae) needles along an elevational gradient, Mt. Moosilauke, New Hampshire, USA. American Journal of Botany 88:667–676Google Scholar
  37. Richardson AD, Jenkins JP, Braswell BH, Hollinger DY, Ollinger SV, Smith ML (2007) Use of digital webcam images to track spring green-up in a deciduous broadleaf forest. Oecologia 152:323–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Running SW, Hunt ER (1993) Pages 141–158 in JR Ehleringer and CB Field (eds.), Scaling physiological processes: leaf to globe. Academic, San Diego, CAGoogle Scholar
  39. Running SW, Nemani RR (1988) Relating seasonal patterns of the AVHRR vegetation index to simulated photosynthesis and transpiration of forest in different climates. Remote Sensing of the Environment 24:347–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schwartz MD, Reiter BE (2000) Changes in North American spring. International Journal of Climatology 20:929–932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sparks TH (2007) Lateral thinking on data to identify climate impacts. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 22:169–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sparks TH, Huber K, Croxton PJ (2006) Plant development scores from fixed-date photographs: the influence of weather variables and recorder experience. International Journal of Biometeorology 50:275–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Thompson LG, Mosley-Thompson E, Davis ME, Henderson KA, Brecher HH, Zagorodnov VS, T et al (2002) Kilimanjaro ice core records: evidence of Holocene climate change in tropical Africa. Science 298:589–593Google Scholar
  44. United States Natural Resources Conservation Service. Web soil survey of Pima County, eastern part, Arizona. Available at: http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/. Accessed: April 24, 2007
  45. Wang Q, Tenhunen J, Dinh NQ, Reichstein M, Vesala T, Keronen P (2004) Similarities in ground- and satellite-based NDVI time series and their relationship to physiological activity of a Scots pine forest in Finland. Remote Sensing of the Environment 93:225–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Webb RH, Leake SA, Turner RM (2007) The ribbon of green: change in riparian vegetation in the southwestern United States. The University of Arizona Press, Tucson, AZGoogle Scholar
  47. Went FW (1957) The experimental control of plant growth. Varronica Botanica, Waltham, MAGoogle Scholar
  48. Western Regional Climate Center. (2007) Arizona climate summary. Available at: http://www.wrcc.dri.edu/summary/climsmaz.html. Accessed: March 15, 2007

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Soil, Water, and Environmental ScienceThe University of ArizonaTucsonUSA
  2. 2.Office of Arid Lands StudiesThe University of ArizonaTucsonUSA

Personalised recommendations