Environmental Management

, Volume 41, Issue 6, pp 820–833 | Cite as

The Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem: Challenges for Regional Ecosystem Management

  • Heather J. Lynch
  • Stephanie Hodge
  • Christian Albert
  • Molly Dunham
Article

Abstract

An adaptive management approach is necessary but not sufficient to address the long-term challenges of the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem (GYE). Adaptive management, in turn, has its own particular challenges, of which we focus on two: science input, and stakeholder engagement. In order to frame our discussion and subsequent recommendations, we place the current management difficulties into their historical context, with special emphasis on the 1990 Vision document, which attempted a broad synthesis of management goals for the ecosystem. After examining these two key challenges in the context of the GYE, we make several recommendations that would allow for more effective ecosystem management in the long term. First, we recommend adoption of the GYE as a site for long-term science research and monitoring with an emphasis on integrative research, long-term federal funding, and public dissemination of data. Second, we conclude that a clearer prioritization of legislative mandates would allow for more flexible ecosystem management in the GYE, a region where conflicting mandates have historically led to litigation antithetical to effective ecosystem management. Finally, we recommend a renewed attempt at an updated Vision for the Future that engages stakeholders (including local landholders) substantively from the outset.

Keywords

Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem Ecosystem management Adaptive learning Stakeholder engagement Greater Yellowstone Coordinating Committee 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank William Clark and Jody Freeman for their comments and advice, Steve Forrest for his careful review of the manuscript, and Susan Clark, Suzanne Lewis, Bruce Ramsey, Craig Gehrke, and Bruce Babbitt, who allowed us to interview them for this analysis. We would also like to thank the reviewers, all of whom provided insight, excellent references, and a careful review of the manuscript. C. A. acknowledges financial support from the DAAD (German Academic Exchange Service) Scholarship as well as the Charles W. Holtzer Scholarship of Harvard University. H. J. L. acknowledges financial support from the National Science Foundation’s Integrative Graduate Education and Research Traineeship (IGERT) program.

References

  1. Barbee R, Troyer J, Reiswig B, Aus R, Scott MG (2006) Pages 8–19 in Greater Yellowstone Public Lands (Eighth Biennial Scientific Conference Proceedings). National Park Service, Yellowstone National ParkGoogle Scholar
  2. Bath A (1989) The public and wolf reintroduction in Yellowstone National Park. Society & Natural Resources 2(4):297–306Google Scholar
  3. Bath A (1991) In: Keiter RB, Boyce MS (eds) The Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem: Redefining America’s Wilderness Heritage. Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut pp 367–376Google Scholar
  4. Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C (2000) Rediscovery of Traditional Ecological Knowledge as Adaptive Management. Ecological Applications 10(5):1251–1262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boynton W, DeVanzo C, Hornberger G, Lugo A, Melillo J, Pickett S, Vaughan H (2005) Report II of the Scientific Task Force’s Advisory Committee. Woods Hole, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  6. Cash D, Clark W, Alcock F, Dickson N, Eckley N, Jäger J (2002) Salience, credibility, legitimacy and boundaries: linking research, assessment and decision making. Faculty Research Working Paper RWP02-046. Cambridge, MA: John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard UniversityGoogle Scholar
  7. Cash DW, Clark WC, Alcock F, Dickson NM, Eckley N, Gutson DH, Jäger J, Mitchell RB (2003) Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100(14):8086–8091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cheng AS, Daniels SE (2003) Examining the Interaction Between Geographic Scale and Ways of Knowing in Ecosystem Management: A Case Study of Place-Based Collaborative Planning. Forest Science 6:841–854Google Scholar
  9. Clark TW (2002) The policy process: a practical guide for natural resource professionals. Yale University Press, New Haven, ConnecticutGoogle Scholar
  10. Clark WC (2002) Adaptive Management, Heal Thyself. Environment 44(2): cover2Google Scholar
  11. Clark WC, Majone G (1985) The critical appraisal of scientific inquiries with policy implications. Science, Technology, and Human Values 10(3):6–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clark WC, Mitchell RB, Cash DW (2006) In: Mitchell RB, Clark WC, Cash DW, Dickson NM (eds) Global Environmental Assessments – Information and Influence. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, pp 1–28Google Scholar
  13. Clark TW, Amato ED, Whittemore DG, Harvey AH (1991) Policy and Programs for Ecosystem Management in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem: An Analysis. Conservation Biology 5(3):412–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Clark WC, Mitchell R, Cash DW, Alcock F (2002) Information as Influence (John F. Kennedy School of Govt., Harvard Univ., Cambridge, MA), Faculty Working Paper RWP02-044Google Scholar
  15. Cloudwalker C December 4, 2002. Plan With Fewer Wolves Backed By County. Cody EnterpriseGoogle Scholar
  16. Cloudwalker C December 16, 2002. County Seeks Fed Wolf Help. Cody EnterpriseGoogle Scholar
  17. Collins S (2007) Integrative Science for Society and the Environment: A mechanistic approach to socio-ecological research. LTER Mini-symposium at the National Science Foundation, March 8, 2007Google Scholar
  18. Craighead JJ (1991) In: Keiter RB, Boyce MS (eds) The Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem: Redefining America’s Wilderness Heritage. Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut, pp 27–39Google Scholar
  19. Crosby N, Kelly JM, Schaefer P (1986) Citizens Panels: A New Approach to Citizen Participation. Public Administration Review 46(2):170–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. DeLeon P (1997) Democracy and the Policy Sciences. State University of New York Press, Albany, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Dustin DL, Schneider IE (2005) The Science of Politics/The Politics of Science: Examining the Snowmobile Controversy in Yellowstone National Park. Environmental Management 34(6):761–767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Eckley N, Clark W, Farrell A, Jäger J, Stanners D (2002) Designing Effective Assessments. Harvard Global Environmental Assessment Project and European Environment Agency, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  23. Eden S (1996) Public participation in environmental policy: considering scientific, counter-scientific and non-scientific contributions. Public Understanding of Science 5:183–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Folke C, Hahn T, Olsson P, Norberg J (2005) Adaptive Governance of Social-Ecological Systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 30:441–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Freemuth J (1989) The National Parks: Political Versus Professional Determinants of Policy. Public Administration Review 49(3):278–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Freemuth J, Cawley RM (1998) Science, expertise and the public: the politics of ecosystem management in the Greater Yellowstone ecosystem. Landscape and Urban Planning 40:211–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fritts SH, Bangs EE, Gore JF (1994) The relationship of wolf recovery to habitat conservation and biodiversity in the northwestern United States. Landscape and Urban Planning 28(1):23–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Greater Yellowstone Coordinating Committee. 1990. Vision for the Future: A Framework for Coordination in the Greater Yellowstone Area, draft, August 1990Google Scholar
  29. Guston DH (1999) Stabilizing the Boundary between US Politics and Science: The Role of the Office of Technology Transfer as A Boundary Organization. In: Social Studies of Science, 29(1):87–111Google Scholar
  30. Haeuber R (1998) Ecosystem management and environmental policy in the United States: open window or closed door? Landscape and Urban Planning 40:221–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Haney A, Power RL (1996) Adaptive Management for Sound Ecosystem Management. Environmental Management 20(6):879–886CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Johnson BL (1999) Introduction to the Special Feature: Adaptive Management—Scientifically Sound, Socially Challenged? Conservation Ecology 3(1):10Google Scholar
  33. Karkkainen BC (2002) Collaborative Ecosystem Governance: Scale, Complexity, and Dynamism. Virginia Environmental Law Journal 21:189–243Google Scholar
  34. Keiter R (1989) Taking account of the ecosystem on the public domain: law and ecology in the Greater Yellowstone region. University of Colorado Law Review 60:923–1007Google Scholar
  35. Keiter RB (1996/1997) Preserving Nature in the National Parks: Law, Policy, and Science in a Dynamic Environment. Denver University Law Review 74(3):649–695Google Scholar
  36. Keiter RB (1998) Ecosystems and the Law: Towards an Integrated Approach. Ecological Applications 8(2):332–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. King CS, Feltey KM, Susel BO (2001) In: Stivers C (ed) Democracy, Bureaucracy, and the Study of Administration. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado, pp 301–323Google Scholar
  38. Lockhart WJ (1991) In: Keiter RB, Boyce MS (eds) The Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem: Redefining America’s Wilderness Heritage. Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut, pp 49–64Google Scholar
  39. Long Term Ecological Research Network. (2006) Online resource (program website): http://www.lternet.edu/
  40. Marston RA, Anderson JE (1991) Watersheds and Vegetation of the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. Conservation Biology 5(3):338–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McBeth MK, Shanahan EA (2004) Public opinion for sale: The role of policy marketers in Greater Yellowstone policy conflict. Policy Sciences 37:319–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McLain RJ, Lee RG (1996) Adaptive Management: Promises and Pitfalls. Environmental Management 20(4):437–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mitchell JG (1994) Uncle Sam’s undeclared war against wildlife. Wildlife Conservation, September/October, 20–31Google Scholar
  44. Morris JM, McBeth MK (2002) Democratic Proceduralism in Community Policy Making. In: Redburn FS, Buss TF (eds) Public Policies for Distressed Communities Revisited. Lexington Books, New York, New York, pp 179–191Google Scholar
  45. Nie MA (2003) Beyond Wolves: The Politics of Wolf Recovery and Management. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MinnesotaGoogle Scholar
  46. Patten DT (1991) In: Keiter RB, Boyce MS (eds) The Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem: Redefining America’s Wilderness Heritage. Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut, pp 19–26Google Scholar
  47. Pringle CM, Collins SL (2004) Needed: A Unified Infrastructure to Support Long-term Scientific Research on Public Lands. Ecological Applications 14(1):18–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pritchard JA (1999) Preserving Yellowstone’s Natural Conditions: Science and the Perception of Nature. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, NebraskaGoogle Scholar
  49. Reading RP, Clark TW, Kellert SR (1994) Attitudes and knowledge of people living in the greater Yellowstone ecosystem. Society & Natural Resources 7(4):349–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Robbins P (2006) The politics of barstool biology: Environmental knowledge and power in greater Northern Yellowstone. Geoforum 37:185–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Robbins J (2007) Yellowstone Proposal Sets Greater Snowmobile Access. New York Times February 5, 2007Google Scholar
  52. Stapleton RM (1993) On the western front. National Parks January/February:32–36Google Scholar
  53. Straub N February 9, 2007. Cubin: Allow More Wolf Comment. Casper Star-TribuneGoogle Scholar
  54. UNCED (1993) Agenda 21: Earth Summit – The United Nations Programme of Action from Rio. United Nations, New York, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  55. USFWS (US Fish and Wildlife Service) (1987) Northern Rocky Mountain Wolf Recovery Plan. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Denver, ColoradoGoogle Scholar
  56. Walters LC, Aydelotte J, Miller J (2000) Putting More Public in Policy Analysis. Public Administration Review 60(4):349–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wilson MA (1997) The Wolf in Yellowstone: Science, Symbol, or Politics? Deconstructing the Conflict Between Environmentalism and Wise Use. Society & Natural Resources 10(5):453–469Google Scholar
  58. Wondolleck JM, Yaffee SL (2000) Making Collaboration Work. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Heather J. Lynch
    • 1
  • Stephanie Hodge
    • 2
  • Christian Albert
    • 3
  • Molly Dunham
    • 4
  1. 1.Biology DepartmentUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkUSA
  2. 2.UNEP/UNDPSt. AnthonyCanada
  3. 3.Institute of Environmental PlanningLeibniz University of HannoverHannoverGermany
  4. 4.Real Estate DepartmentFried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLPNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations