Environmental Management

, Volume 41, Issue 3, pp 389–397 | Cite as

Perceptions of a Nearby Exurban Protected Area in South Carolina, United States

Article

Abstract

To address the dearth of literature on the relations between local residents in urban areas and nearby higher-order exurban protected areas, this study examined the perceptions of Columbia (South Carolina) residents toward Congaree National Park. Mail-out survey results from a random sample of 455 adult residents showed positive overall attitudes toward the park, although this did not extend to a desire to personally volunteer in park activities. Cluster analysis on the basis of seven perceptual statements produced three groups: “very enthusiastic park supporters” (VEPS), accounting for one fourth of the sample; “less enthusiastic park supporters” (LEPS), accounting for approximately one half of the sample; and “ambivalents” (AMBS), accounting for the rest. The AMBS tend to be younger than members of the other clusters and have higher income, but enthusiasm was more clearly related to high levels of interaction and awareness relative to the park. Managerial implications of the study are considered, including the need to encourage higher levels of park awareness and visitation, as well as more ecologically responsible behavior, among residents of the greater Columbia urban area.

Keywords

Congaree National Park Local community perceptions National parks Rural–urban fringe 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the College of Hospitality, Retail, and Sport Management at the University of South Carolina (Columbia campus) for funding this research project. The input of management at CNP is also recognized.

References

  1. Aldenderfer M, Blashfield R (1984) Cluster analysis. Sage University Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, No. 44. Sage, Newbury Park, NJGoogle Scholar
  2. Buckley R, Sander N, Ollenburg C, Warnken J (2006) Green change: Inland amenity migration in Australia. In: Moss LA (ed.) The amenity migrants: seeking and sustaining mountains and their cultures. CABI, Wallingford, UK. pp 278–294Google Scholar
  3. Chipeniuk R (2006) Planning for amenity migration in communities of the British Columbia hinterland. In: Moss LA (ed.) The amenity migrants: seeking and sustaining mountains and their cultures. CABI, Wallingford, UK. pp 163–174Google Scholar
  4. Daniels T (1999) When city and country collide: managing growth in the metropolitan fringe. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  5. De Boer W, Baquete D (1998) Natural resource use, crop damage, and attitudes of rural people in the vicinity of the Maputo Elephant Reserve, Mozambique. Environmental Conservation 25:208–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dey E (1997) Working with low survey response rates: the efficacy of weighting adjustments. Research in Higher Education 38:215–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Environmental Protection Agency (2006) NPL site narrative for SCRDI Bluff Road. Available at: http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/npl/nar475.htm. Accessed: February 2, 2007
  8. Ghimire K, Pimbert M (eds.) (1997) Social change and conservation: environmental politics and impacts of national parks and protected areas. Earthscan, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  9. Hair J, Anderson R, Tatham R, Black W (1995) Multivariate data analysis, fourth edition. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJGoogle Scholar
  10. Hall CM (2006) Amenity migration in the South Island of New Zealand: contestation for land and landscape in Central Otago. In: Moss LA (ed.) The amenity migrants: seeking and sustaining mountains and their cultures. CABI, Wallingford, UK. pp 295–305Google Scholar
  11. Ham S (1992) Environmental interpretation. North American Press, Golden, COGoogle Scholar
  12. Ham S, Weiler B (2002) Interpretation as the centerpiece of sustainable wildlife tourism. In: Harris R, Griffin T, Williams P (eds). Sustainable tourism: a global perspective. Elsevier, Oxford, UK. pp 35–44Google Scholar
  13. Jim CY, Xu SS (2002) Stifled stakeholders and subdued participation: interpreting local responses toward Shimentai Nature Reserve in South China. Environmental Management 30:327–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jobes PC (2000) Moving nearer to heaven: the illusions and disillusions of migrants to scenic rural places. Praeger, Westport, CTGoogle Scholar
  15. Jobes PC (1991) The Greater Yellowstone social system. Conservation Biology 5:387–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Johnson J, Maxwell B, Aspinall R (2003) Moving nearer to heaven: growth and change in the Greater Yellowstone region, USA. In: Buckley R, Pickering C, Weaver DB (eds). Nature-based tourism, environment and land management. CABI, Wallingford, UK. pp 77–88Google Scholar
  17. Jones S (2005) Community-based ecotourism: the significance of social capital. Annals of Tourism Research 32:303–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kellert S, Mehta J, Ebbin S, Lichtenfeld L (2000) Community natural resource management: promise, rhetoric, and reality. Society and Natural Resources 13:705–715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lai P, Nepal S (2006) Local perspectives of ecotourism development in Tawushan Nature Reserve, Taiwan. Tourism Management 27:1117–1129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lynch M (2006) “Too much love?”: the environmental and community impacts of amenity migrants on Jackson Hole, Wyoming. In: Moss LA (ed.) The amenity migrants: seeking and sustaining mountains and their cultures. CABI, Wallingford, UK. pp 94–107Google Scholar
  21. Madhusudan M (2003) Living amidst large wildlife: livestock and crop depredation by large mammals in the interior villages of Bhadra Tiger Reserve, South India. Environmental Management 31:466–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McNeely JA (1990) The future of national parks. Environment 32(1):16–20, 36–41Google Scholar
  23. Mehta J, Heinen J (2001) Does community-based conservation shape favorable attitudes among locals? An empirical study from Nepal. Environmental Management 28:165–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Miller JR, Hobbs RJ (2002) Conservation where people live and work. Conservation Biology 16:330–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Moore S, Williams P, Gill A (2006) Finding a pad in paradise: amenity migration effects on Whistler, British Columbia. In: Moss LA (ed.) The amenity migrants: seeking and sustaining mountains and their cultures. CABI, Wallingford, UK. pp 135–147Google Scholar
  26. Morais D, Zhu C, Dong E, Yan G (2006) Promoting sustainability through increased community involvement: the Shangri-La Ecotourism Demonstration Project. Tourism Review International 10:131–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. National Park Service (2005) Congaree National Park visitor study spring 2005. Available at: http://www.psu.uidaho.edu/files/usp/reports/163_CONG_rept.pdf. Accessed: June 28, 2007
  28. National Park Service (2006) Congaree National Park South Carolina. Available at: http://www.nps.gov/cosw/. Accessed: February 2, 2007)
  29. National Park Service (2007) Visitation statistics. Available at: http://www2. nature.nps.gov/stats/. Accessed: June 28, 2007
  30. Nelson A (1992) Characterizing exurbia. Journal of Planning Literature 6:350–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Oppermann M (2000) Tourism destination loyalty. Journal of Travel Research 39: 78–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rasker R (1993) Rural development, conservation and public policy in the Greater Yellowstone ecosystem. Society and Natural Resources 6:109–126Google Scholar
  33. Redford KH, Robinson JG, Adams WM (2006) Parks as shibboleths. Conservation Biology 20:1–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rukert R, Churchill G (1984) Reliability and validity of alternative measures of channel member satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Research 21:226–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sharkey J, Haines P (2001) The feasibility of using a telephone-administered survey for determining nutritional service needs of noninstitutionalized older adults in rural areas: time and costs. The Gerontologist 41:546–552Google Scholar
  36. Spiteri A, Nepal S (2006) Incentive-based conservation programs in developing countries: a review of some key issues and suggestions for improvement. Environmental Management 37:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Stenhouse RN (2004) Local government conservation and management of native vegetation in urban Australia. Environmental Management 34:209–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Thompson S (2006) Gateway to glacier: will amenity migrants in north-western Montana lead the way for amenity conservation? In: Moss LA (ed.) The amenity migrants: seeking and sustaining mountains and their cultures. CABI, Wallingford, UK. pp 108–119Google Scholar
  39. United States Census Bureau (2003) Columbia, SC MSA. Available at: http://www.census.gov/acs/www/Products/Profiles/Single/2003/ACS/Tabular/380/38000US17602.htm. Accessed: February 10, 2007
  40. United States Census Bureau (2006) Cumulative estimates of population change for metropolitan statistical areas and rankings: April 1 2000 to July 1 2005. Available at: http://www.census.gov/population/www/estimates/metropop/2005/cbsa-07-fmt.xls. Accessed: February 4, 2007
  41. Vincent V, Thompson W (2002) Assessing community support and sustainability for ecotourism development. Journal of Travel Research 41:153–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wakefield S, Elliott S, Eyles J, Cole D (2006) Taking environmental actions: the role of local composition, context, and collective. Environmental Management 37:40–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Walpole M, Goodwin H (2001) Local attitudes towards conservation and tourism around Komodo National Park, Indonesia. Environmental Conservation 28:160–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wang S, Lassoie J, Curtis P (2006) Farmer attitudes towards conservation in Jigme Singye Wangchuck National Park, Bhutan. Environmental Conservation 33:148–156Google Scholar
  45. Weaver D, Lawton L (2002) Overnight ecotourist market segmentation in the Gold Coast hinterland of Australia. Journal of Travel Research 40:270–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Weaver D, Lawton L (2004) Visitor attitudes toward tourism development and product integration in an Australian urban-rural fringe. Journal of Travel Research 42:286–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wolf P (1999) Hot towns: the future of the fastest growing communities in America. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Hotel, Restaurant, and Tourism ManagementUniversity of South CarolinaColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations