Environmental Management

, Volume 36, Issue 5, pp 702–710 | Cite as

Do Embedded Roadway Lights Protect Sea Turtles?

RESEARCH

Abstract

Street lighting on coastal roadways is often visible at sea turtle nesting beaches, and disrupts the nocturnal orientation of hatchlings as they crawl toward the sea. Our objective was to determine whether an alternative lighting system (light-emitting diodes, embedded in the roadway pavement) prevented orientation disruption. Hatchlings at the beach oriented normally when only the embedded lights were on, or when all lighting was switched off. However, turtles showed poor orientation when street lighting was on. Measurements confirmed that street lighting was scattered to the beach, whereas embedded lighting was not. We conclude that embedded lighting keeps the beach dark and thus protects sea turtles. However, on two overcast evenings, lighting (“skyglow”) from nearby development, reflected by cloud cover to the beach, weakened hatchling orientation. Thus, both indirect (reflected) and direct sources of lighting negatively impact the turtles.

Keywords

Artificial lighting Orientation Sea turtle Loggerhead Caretta 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank A. Broadwell (FDOT) for administering the contract that supported this study, B. E. Witherington for suggesting the embedded lighting project, and the Florida Department of Transportation and the City of Boca Raton for financing it. This study served as a Masters thesis in Biology for L. B. Its design was approved by the State (Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, turtle permit No. 72) and by the Florida Atlantic University Institutional Animal Care Committee.

Literature Cited

  1. Adamany S., M. Salmon, B. E. Witherington. 1997. Behavior of sea turtles at an urban beach III. Costs and benefits of nest caging as a management strategy. Florida Scientist 60:239–253Google Scholar
  2. Bustard H. R. 1967. Mechanism of nocturnal emergence from the nest in green turtle hatchlings. Nature 214:317Google Scholar
  3. Carr A., L. Ogren. 1960. The ecology and migrations of sea turtles. IV. The green turtle in the Caribbean sea. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 121:6–45Google Scholar
  4. Ecological Associates, Inc. 1997. Beach lighting management plan: A comprehensive approach for addressing coastal lighting impacts on sea turtles in Broward County, Florida. Broward County technical report 97-06Google Scholar
  5. Ecological Associates, Inc. 1998. Coastal roadway lighting manual: A handbook of practical guidelines for managing street lighting to minimize impacts to sea turtles. Report prepared for the Florida Power & Light CorporationGoogle Scholar
  6. Ellis, R. D., and S. Washburn. 2003. Evaluation of the safety and user response to embedded roadway lighting systems on an FDOT demonstration project. Summary report #BC354–31, Florida Department of Transportation, Tallahassee, Florida, 3 ppGoogle Scholar
  7. Florida Department of Environmental Protection. 1996. Marine Turtle Conservation Guidelines, January, 1996. Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Tallahassee, Florida. 43 ppGoogle Scholar
  8. Gocke, J., M. Salmon, and K. Horch. 2004. Spectral sensitivity of leatherback (Dermochelys coriacea) and loggerhead (Caretta caretta) hatchling to light: a comparative study. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Symposium on sea turtle Biology and Conservation. NOAA Technical Memorandum (in press)Google Scholar
  9. Limpus C. J. 1971. Sea turtle ocean finding behaviour. Search 2:385–387Google Scholar
  10. Lohmann K. J., C. M. F. Lohmann 2003. Orientation mechanisms of hatchling loggerheads. In A. B. Bolten, B. E. Witherington (eds.), Loggerhead sea turtles. Smithsonian Books, Washington, DC, pp 44–62Google Scholar
  11. Lohmann K. J., B. E. Witherington, C. M. F. Lohmann, M. Salmon 1997. Orientation, navigation, and natal beach homing in sea turtles. In P. L. Lutz, J. A. Musick (eds.), The biology of sea turtles. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, pp 107–135Google Scholar
  12. Mrosovsky N. 1968. Nocturnal emergence of hatchling sea turtles: Control by thermal inhibition of activity. Nature 220:1338–1339PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Mrosovsky N., S. F. Kingsmill. 1985. How turtles find the sea. Z Tierpsychol 67:237–256. Google Scholar
  14. Salmon M. 2003. Artificial lighting and sea turtles. The Biologist 50:163–168Google Scholar
  15. Salmon, M. 2005. Artificial lighting and sea turtles: lessons learned from Florida. Pages 141–168 in T. Longhorn and C. Rich (eds.), Ecological consequences of artificial light. Island Press, San Francisco Google Scholar
  16. Salmon M., B. E. Witherington 1995. Artificial lighting and seafinding by loggerhead hatchlings: Evidence for lunar modulation. Copeia 4:931–938Google Scholar
  17. Salmon M, J. Wyneken, E. Fritz, M. Lucas 1992. Seafinding by hatchling sea turtles: Role of brightness, silhouette and beach slope as orientation cues. Behaviour 122:56–77Google Scholar
  18. Tuxbury S. M., M. Salmon. 2005. Competitive interactions between artificial lighting and natural cues during the orientation of marine turtle hatchlings. Biological Conservation 21:311–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Verheijen F. J. 1958. The mechanisms of the trapping effect of artificial light sources upon animals. Arch Neerl Zool 3:1–107. Google Scholar
  20. Verheijen F. J. 1980. The moon: A neglected factor in studies on collisions of nocturnal migrant birds with tall lighted structures and with aircraft. Vogelwarte 30:305–320Google Scholar
  21. Verheijen F. J. 1981. Bird kills at lighted man-made structures: Not on nights close to a full moon. American Birds 35:251–254Google Scholar
  22. Verheijen F. J. 1985. Photopollution: Artificial light optic spatial control systems fail to cope with. Incidents, causation, remedies. Experimental Biology 44:1–18PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Witherington, B. E. 1992a. Sea-finding behavior and the use of photic orientation cues by hatchling sea turtles. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FloridaGoogle Scholar
  24. Witherington B. E. 1992b. Behavioral responses of nesting sea turtles to artificial lighting. Herpetologica 48:31–39Google Scholar
  25. Witherington B. E., K. A. Bjorndal. 1991. Influences of artificial lighting on the seaward orientation of hatchling loggerhead turtles (Caretta caretta). Biological Conservation 55:139–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Witherington, B. E., and R. E. Martin. 1996. Understanding, assessing, and resolving light-pollution problems on sea turtle nesting beaches. Florida Marine Research Institute Technical Report. FMRI Technical Report RT-2Google Scholar
  27. Zar J. H. 1999. Biostatistical analysis. Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 412 ppGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Broward County Department of Planning and Environmental ProtectionBiological Resources DivisionFort LauderdaleUSA
  2. 2.Department of Biological SciencesFlorida Atlantic UniversityBoca RatonUSA

Personalised recommendations