Environmental Management

, Volume 37, Issue 4, pp 496–512 | Cite as

Estimating the Unknown Components of Nutrient Mass Balances for Forestry Plantations in Mine Rehabilitation, Upper Hunter Valley, New South Wales, Australia

  • A. M. Mercuri
  • J. A. Duggin
  • H. Daniel
  • P. V. Lockwood
  • C. D. Grant
Article
First Online:

Abstract

Commercial forestry plantations as a postmining land use in the Upper Hunter Valley of New South Wales, Australia are restricted by both the poor nutrient availability of mining substrates and low regional rainfall. An experiment was conducted to investigate whether municipal waste products and saline groundwater from coal mining operations could improve early tree growth without impacting on the environment through salt accumulation and/or nutrient enrichment and changes in groundwater quality. Potential impacts were investigated by quantifying the nutrient cycling dynamics within the plantation using an input–output mass balance approach for exchangeable calcium (Ca2+), exchangeable magnesium (Mg2+), exchangeable potassium (K+), exchangeable sodium (Na+), nitrogen (N), and phosphorus (P). Measured inputs to and outputs from the available nutrient pool in the 0–30 cm of the overburden subsystem were used to estimate the net effect of unmeasured inputs and outputs (termed “residuals”). Residual values in the mass balance of the irrigated treatments demonstrated large leaching losses of exchangeable Ca, Mg, K, and Na. Between 96% and 103% of Na applied in saline mine-water irrigation was leached below the 0–30-cm soil profile zone. The fate of these salts beyond 30 cm is unknown, but results suggest that irrigation with saline mine water had minimal impact on the substrate to 30 cm over the first 2 years since plantation establishment. Accumulations of N and P were detected for the substrate amendments, suggesting that organic amendments (particularly compost) retained the applied nutrients with very little associated losses, particularly through leaching.

Keywords

Coal mine rehabilitation Salinity Input–output analysis Nitrogen Phosphorus Basic cations Substrate nutrient storage 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

Muswellbrook Shire Council funded the research program and postgraduate scholarship for this project in collaboration with Ecosystem Management in the School of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resources Management at the University of New England. Drayton Colliery generously provided the land, facilities, and infrastructure support for the study. Pam Simpson from Drayton Colliery provided valuable assistance and support during the project. We wish to thank Dr. Ian Davies from the School of Mathematics, Statistics and Computing Sciences, UNE for statistical advice. Marion Costigan and Judi Kenny provided valuable technical assistance in the laboratory, and Trevor Stace assisted in many fieldwork components.

Literature Cited

  1. Alastuey A., X. Querol, A. Chaves, C. R. Ruiz, A. Carratala, A. Lopez-Soler. 1994. Bulk deposition in a rural area located around a large coal-fired power station, northeast Spain. Environmental Pollution 106:359–367Google Scholar
  2. Albaladejo J., M. Stocking, E. Diaz, V. Castillo. 1994. Land rehabilitation by urban refuse amendments in a semi-arid environment: Effect on soil chemical properties. Soil Technology 7:249–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. American Public Health Association. 1981. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. Public Health Association, American Waterworks Association and Water Pollution Control Federation, American Public Health Association, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson D. I., L. J. Henderson. 1986. Sealed chamber digestion for plant nutrient analysis. Agronomy Journal 78:937–938Google Scholar
  5. Andrews N. (ed.). 1999. Synoptic plan: Integrated landscapes for coal mine rehabilitation in the Hunter Valley of New South Wales. Department of Mineral Resources, Sydney. Google Scholar
  6. Bindraban P. S., J. J. Stoorvogel, D. M. Jansen, J. Vlaming, J. J. R. Groot. 2000. Land quality indicators for sustainable land management: proposed method for yield gap and soil nutrient balance. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 81:103–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Borken W., A. Muhs, F. Beese. 2002. Changes in microbial and soil properties following compost treatment of degraded temperate forest soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 34:403–412Google Scholar
  8. Bormann F. H., G. E. Likens. 1967. Nutrient cycling: Small watersheds can provide invaluable information about terrestrial ecosystems. Science 155:424–429Google Scholar
  9. Brady N. C., R. R. Weil. 2002. The nature and properties of soils, 13th ed. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJGoogle Scholar
  10. Brockway D. G., D. H. Urie, P. V. Nguyen, J. B. Hart. 1986. Wastewater and sludge nutrient utilization in forest ecosystems. in D. W. Cole, C. L. Henry, W. L. Nutter (eds.). The forest alternative for treatment and utilization of municipal and industrial wastes. University of Washington Press, Seattle. Pages 221–224Google Scholar
  11. Burns M. W. 1987. Reafforestation of open-cut coal mines using direct seeding techniques. New South Wales Coal Association, NewcastleGoogle Scholar
  12. Cravotta C. A. 1998. Effect of sewage sludge land application to northern hardwood forests. Ecological Applications 5:53–62Google Scholar
  13. Dang Z., C. Liu, M. J. Haigh. 2002. Mobility of heavy metals associated with the natural weathering of coal mine spoils. Environmental Pollution 118:419–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. EPA (Environment Protection Authority). 1997. State of the environment report. Environmental Protection Agency, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  15. Feller M. C. 1980. Biomass and nutrient distribution in two eucalypt forest ecosystems. Australian Journal of Ecology 5:309–333Google Scholar
  16. Folle F., J. W. Shuford, R. W. Taylor, A. A. Mehadi, W. Tadesse. 1995. Effect of sludge treatment, heavy metals, phosphate rate, and pH on soil phosphorus. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 26:1369–1381Google Scholar
  17. Frederick D. J., H. A. I. Madgwick, G. R. Oliver, M. F. Jurgensen. 1985a. Dry matter and nutrient content of 8-year-old Eucalyptus saligna growing at Taheke Forest. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science 15:251–254Google Scholar
  18. Frederick D. J., H. A. I. Madgwick, M. F. Jurgensen, G. R. Oliver. 1985b. Dry matter content and nutrient distribution in an age series of Eucalyptus regnans plantations in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science 15:158–179Google Scholar
  19. Frederick D. J., H. A. I. Madgwick, G. R. Oliver, M. F. Jurgensen. 1985c. Dry matter, energy and nutrient content of 8-year-old stands of Eucalyptus regnans, Acacia dealbata and Pinus radiata in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science 15:142–157Google Scholar
  20. Gast M., W. Schaaf, J. Scherzer, R. Wilden, B. U. Schneider, R. F. Huttl. 2001. Element budgets of pine stands on lignite and pyrite containing mine soils. Journal of Geochemical Exploration 73:63–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gee, G. W., and J. W Bauder. 1986. Particle-size analysis. Pages 383–411 in A. Klute (ed.). Methods of soil analysis (Part 1): Physical and mineralogical properties, 2nd ed. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WisconsinGoogle Scholar
  22. Gibson A. H., M. M. Roper, D. M. Halsall. 1988. Nitrogen fixation not associated with legumes. in J. R. Wilson (ed.). Advances in nitrogen cycling in agricultural ecosystems. C.A.B. International, Wallingford, UK. Pages 66–88Google Scholar
  23. Grigg A. H., D. R. Mulligan. 1999. Biometric relationships for estimating standing biomass, litterfall and litter accumulation of Acacia salicina on mined land in central Queensland. Australian Journal of Botany 47:807–816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Guerrero C., I. Gomez, R. Moral, J. Mataix-Solera, J. Mataix-Beneyto, T. Hernandez. 2001. Reclamation of a burned forest soil with municipal waste compost: Macronutrient dynamics and improved vegetation cover recovery. Bioresources Technology 76:221–227Google Scholar
  25. Gupta S. C., W. E. Larson. 1979. A model for predicting packing density of soils using particle-size distribution. Soil Science Society of America Journal 15:1633–1635Google Scholar
  26. Hannan J. C., R. M. Gordon. 1996. Environmental management of coal mines in the Hunter Valley, New South Wales. in D. R. Mulligan (ed.). Environmental management in the Australian minerals and energy industries. University of New South Wales Press, Sydney. Pages 265–290Google Scholar
  27. Hawkins J. W. 1998. Hydrogeologic characteristics of surface-mine spoil. in K. B. C. Brady, M. W. Smith, J. Schueck (eds.). Coal mine drainage prediction and pollution prevention in Pennsylvannia. Department of Environment Protection, Pittsburgh, PA. Pages 3.1–3.11Google Scholar
  28. Herridge D.F., F.J. Bergersen. 1988. Symbiotic nitrogen fixation, in J. R. Wilson (ed.) Advances in nitrogen cycling in agricultural ecosystems. C.A.B. International, Wallingford, UK. Pages 46-65Google Scholar
  29. Insightful Corporation. 2001. S-PLUS 6 for Windows-Professional. Insightful Corporation, Seattle, WAGoogle Scholar
  30. Johnson D. W. 1992. Base cations: Introduction. in D. W. Johnson, S. E. Lindberg (eds.). Atmospheric deposition and forest nutrient cycling: A synthesis of the integrated forest study. Springer-Verlag, New York. Pages 233–235Google Scholar
  31. Johnson F. L., D. J. Gibson, P. G. Risser. 1982. Revegetation of unreclaimed coal strip-mines in Oklahoma. Journal of Applied Ecology 19:453–463Google Scholar
  32. Joyce, A. M. 2003. Plantation early growth responses to saline mine water irrigation and nutrient amendment on coal mine spoil in the Upper Hunter Valley, NSW. PhD thesis, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  33. Katterer T., A. Fabiao, M. Madeira, C. Ribeiro, E. Steen. 1995. Fine-root dynamics, soil moisture and soil carbon content in a Eucalyptus globulus plantation under different irrigation and fertilisation regimes. Forest Ecology and Management 74:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Keith H. 1997. Nutrient cycling in eucalypt ecosystems. in J. E. Williams, J. C. Z. Woinarski (eds.). Eucalypt ecology: Individuals to ecosystems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Pages 195–226Google Scholar
  35. Keolsch R., G. Lesoing. 1999. Nutrient balance on Nebraska livestock confinement systems. Journal of Animal Science 77:63–71Google Scholar
  36. Kimber A. J., I. D. Pulford, H. J. Duncan. 1978. Chemical variation and vegetation distribution on a coal waste tip. Journal of Applied Ecology 15:627–633Google Scholar
  37. Kirschbaum M. U. F., D. W.Bellingham, R. N Cromer. 1992. Growth analysis of the effect of phosphorus nutrition on seedlings of Eucalyptus grandis. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 19:55–66Google Scholar
  38. Likens G. E., F. H. Bormann. 1995. Biogeochemistry of a forested ecosystem, 2nd ed. Springer-Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  39. Lockwood, P. V. 1989. Element cycling in forest ecosystems with particular reference to weathering rates. PhD thesis, University of New England, Armidale, NSW AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  40. Lund L. J., A. L. Page, C. G. Nelson, R. A. Elliot. 1981. Nitrogen balances for an effluent irrigation area. Journal of Environmental Quality 10:349–352Google Scholar
  41. Lutrick M. C., H. Riekerk, J. A. Cornell. 1986. Soil and slash pine response to sludge applications in Florida. Soil Science Society of America Journal 50:447–451Google Scholar
  42. McFee W. W., W. R. Byrnes, J. G. Stockton. 1981. Characteristics of coal mine overburden important to plant growth. Journal of Environmental Quality 10:300–308Google Scholar
  43. Mercuri A. M., J. A. Duggin, C. D. Grant. 2005. The use of saline mine water and municipal wastes to establish plantations on rehabilitated open-cut coal mines, Upper Hunter Valley, NSW Australia. Forest Ecology and Management 204:195–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Misra R. K., C. R. A. Turnbull, R. N. Cromer, A. K. Gibbons, A. V. LaSala. 1998a. Below- and above-ground growth of Eucalyptus nitens in a young plantation I. Biomass. Forest Ecology and Management 106:282–293. Google Scholar
  45. Misra R. K., C. R. A. Turnbull, R. N. Cromer, A. K. Gibbons, A. V. LaSala, L. M. Ballard. 1998b. Below- and above-ground growth of Eucalyptus nitens in a young plantation II. Nitrogen and phosphorus. Forest Ecology and Management 106:295–306Google Scholar
  46. Muswellbrook Shire Council. 1998. State of the environment report. Muswellbrook Shire Council, Muswellbrook, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  47. Myers B. J. 1992. Effluent loading rates for irrigated plantations: A water balance model. Australian Forestry 55:39–47Google Scholar
  48. Newbould P. J. 1967. Methods for estimating primary production of forests, 2nd ed. International Biological Programme, LondonGoogle Scholar
  49. Page A. L., R. H. Miller, and D. R. Keeney (eds.). 1982. Methods of soil analysis, Part 2: Microbiological and biochemical properties, 2nd ed. American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science, Madison, WisconsinGoogle Scholar
  50. Palmer J. P., M. J. Chadwick. 1985. Factors affecting the accumulation of nitrogen in colliery spoil. Journal of Applied Ecology 22:249–257Google Scholar
  51. Pare D., P. Rochan, S. Brais. 2002. Assessing the geochemical balance of managed boreal forests. Ecological Indicators 1:293–311Google Scholar
  52. Polglase, P. J., and B. J. Myers. 1999. Saline water and amendments for tree plantations on rehabilitated mine sites in the Upper Hunter Valley: Design for trial at Drayton Colliery, A report to the Muswellbrook Shire Council. CSIRO Forestry and Forest Products, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  53. Power Survey Sectional Committee. 1955. A report on the coal resources of the Commonwealth of Australia. The Standards Association of Australia, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  54. Ranger J., M. Turpault. 1999. Input–output nutrient budgets as a diagnostic tool for sustainable forest management. Forest Ecology and Management 122:139–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rayment G. E., F. R. Higginson. 1992. Australian laboratory handbook of soil and water chemical methods. Inkata Press, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  56. Robinson M. B., P. J. Polglase. 1996. Release and leaching of nitrogen from biosolids applied to a pine plantation. in P. J. Polglase, W. M. Tunningley (eds.). Land application of wastes in Australia and New Zealand: research and practice. Proceedings of the 14th New Zealand land treatment collective. CSIRO Forestry and Forest Products, Canberra. Pages 26–31Google Scholar
  57. Ryan, P. J. 1995. Factors affecting the establishment and management of tree stands on rehabilitated coal mines in the Hunter Valley, New South Wales. State Forests of New South Wales Research Division, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  58. Smethurst P. J., E. K. Nambiar. 1995. Changes in soil carbon and nitrogen during the establishment of a second crop of Pinus radiata. Forest Ecology and Management 73:145–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sverdrup H., K. Rosen. 1998. Long-term base cation mass balances for Swedish forests and the concept of sustainability. Forest Ecology and Management 110:221–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tedeschi A., A. Beltran, and R. Aragues. 2001. Irrigation management and hydrosalinity balance in a semi-arid area of the middle Ebro river basin (Spain). Agricultural Water Management 49:31–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wilden R., W. Schaaf, R. F. Huttl. 2001. Element budgets of two afforested mine sites after application of fertilizer and organic residues. Ecological Engineering 17:253–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Xu D., B. Dell, N. Malajczuk, M. Gong. 2002. Effects of P fertilisation on productivity and nutrient accumulation in a Eucalyptus grandis × E. urophylla plantation in southern China. Forest Ecology and Management 16:89–100Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. M. Mercuri
    • 1
  • J. A. Duggin
    • 2
  • H. Daniel
    • 3
  • P. V. Lockwood
    • 3
  • C. D. Grant
    • 4
    • 5
  1. 1.Ecosystem Management and Agronomy and Soil ScienceUniversity of New EnglandArmidaleAustralia
  2. 2.Ecosystem ManagementUniversity of New EnglandArmidaleAustralia
  3. 3.Agronomy and Soil ScienceUniversity of New EnglandArmidaleAustralia
  4. 4.Ecosystem ManagementUniversity of New EnglandArmidaleAustralia
  5. 5.Environment DepartmentAlcoa World Alumina AustraliaApplecrossAustralia

Personalised recommendations