Advertisement

Environmental Management

, Volume 34, Issue 5, pp 656–668 | Cite as

A Model of Navigation-Induced Currents in Inland Waterways and Implications for Juvenile Fish Displacement

  • Christian WolterEmail author
  • Robert Arlinghaus
  • Alexander Sukhodolov
  • Christof Engelhardt
RESEARCH

Abstract

The likely extension of commercial inland navigation in the future could increase hazards directly impacting on the nurseries of freshwater fish, especially for smaller individuals with limited swimming abilities. One limitation of the evaluation of inland navigation on fish assemblages is the lack of suitable hydraulic models. This article presents a hydraulic model to assess the increase of navigation-induced physical forces due to higher vessel speed, length, and drought in a low-flowing waterway related to maximum swimming performance of fish to (1) foresee hazards of enhancement of inland navigation, (2) derive construction measures to minimize the hydraulic impact on small fish, and (3) improve fish recruitment in waterways.

The derived model computed current velocities induced by passing commercial vessels in inland waterways experimentally verified and parameterized in a German lowland waterway. Results were linked with a model of maximum fish swimming performance to elucidate consequences for freshwater fish populations. The absolute magnitude of navigation-induced current limits the availability of littoral habitats for small fish. Typical navigation-induced current velocities of 0.7–1 m/s in the straight reaches of waterways will be maintained by fish longer than 42 mm only. Smaller juveniles unable to withstand those currents could become washed out, injured, or displaced. In contrast, in small local bays, the navigation-induced current declined significantly. According to our model, in a 20-m extended bay, the return current drops below 0.11 m/s, corresponding to the maximum swimming speed of a 9-mm-long fish. Thus, enhancing shoreline development by connecting oxbows, tributaries, and especially by purpose-built bays limits the impact on fish recruitment without restricting navigation resulting in more precautionary and sustainable inland navigation.

Inland navigation Navigation impacts Navigation-induced habitat bottleneck Hydraulic forces Critical flow velocity Fish larvae 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Heiner Bungartz and Werner Sauer for their assistance in field work. Piotr Parasiewicz from Cornell University, Fritz Schiemer from the University of Vienna, and one anonymous reviewer provided excellent comments on the manuscript.

Literature Cited

  1. 1.
    Adams, S. R., Keevin, T. M., Killgore, K. J., Hoover, J. J. 1999Stranding potential of young fishes subjected to simulated vessel-induced drawdownTransactions of the American Fisheries Society12812301234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ahas, R. 1999Long-term phyto-, ornitho- and ichthyophenological time-series analyses in EstoniaInternational Journal of Biometeorology42119123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Arlinghaus, R., Engelhardt, C., Sukhodolov, A., Wolter, C. 2002aFish recruitment in a canal with intensive navigation: implications for ecosystem managementJournal of Fish Biology6113861402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Arlinghaus, R., Mehner, T., Cowx, I.G. 2002bReconciling traditional inland fisheries management and sustainability in industrialized countries, with emphasis on EuropeFish and Fisheries3261316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    ASCE Task Committee on Hydraulics, Bank Mechanics, and Modelling of River Width Adjustment1998River width adjustment. I: Processes and mechanismsJournal of Hydraulic Engineering124881902Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bartell, S. M., Campbell, K. R. 2000Ecological risk assessment of the effects of the incremental increase of commercial navigation traffic (25, 50, 75, and 100 percent increase of 1992 baseline traffic) on fish. US Army Corps of Engineers, Upper Mississippi River–Illinois Waterway System Navigation Study, ENV Report 16, US Army Corps of EngineersWashington, DCGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Beamish, F. W. H. (1978) “Swimming capacity” In: Hoar, W. S., Randall, D. J. (eds.), Fish physiology.Vol. VII. Locomotion, Academic Press, New York, pp 101–187Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Beamish, F. W. H., Howlett, J. C., Medland, T. E. 1989Impact of diet on metabolism and swimming performance in juvenile lake trout, Salvelinus namaycushCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences46384388Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bhowmik, N.G., Mazumder, B. S. (1990) “Physical forces generated by barge-tow traffic within a navigable waterway” In: Chang, H. H., Hill, J.C. (eds.), Hydraulic engineering, American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, pp 604–609Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bischoff, A. 2002Juvenile fish recruitment in the large lowland river Oder: Assessing the role of physical factors and habitat availabilityShaker-VerlagAachenGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bradford, M. J. 1997An experimental study of stranding of juvenile salmonids on gravel bars and in side channels during rapid flow decreasesRegulated Rivers: Research & Management13395401Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bradford, M. J., Taylor, G. C., Allan, J. A., Higgins, P. S. 1995An experimental study of stranding of juvenile coho salmon and rainbow trout during rapid flow decreases in winter conditionNorth American Journal of Fisheries Management15473479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Brett, J. R. 1964The respiratory metabolism and swimming performance of young sockeye salmonJournal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada2111831226Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Byström, P., Garcia-Berthou, E. 1999Density dependent growth and size specific competitive interactions in young fishOikos86217232Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Byström, P., Persson, L., Wahlström, E., Westman, E. 2003Size- and density-dependent habitat use in predators: consequences for habitat shifts in young fishJournal of Animal Ecology72156168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    CIA2002The world factbook 2002Central Intelligence Agency, Office of Public AffairsWashington DCGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Colvile, R. N., Hutchinson, E. J., Mindell, J. S., Warren, R. F. 2001The transport sector as a source of air pollutionAtmospheric Environment3515371565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Copp, G. H. 1992Comparative microhabitat use of cyprinid larvae and juveniles in a floodplain channelEnvironmental Biology of Fishes33181193Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Copp, G. H. 1997Importance of marinas and off-channel waterbodies as refuges for young fishes in a regulated lowland riverRegulated Rivers: Research & Management13303307Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Costanza, R., d’Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O’Neill, R. V., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R. G., Sutton, P., van den Belt, M. 1997The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capitalNature387253260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Costanza, R., Andrade, F., Antunes, P., van den Belt, M., Boersma, D., Boesch, D. F., Catarino, F., Hanna, S., Limburg, K., Low, B., Molitor, M., Pereira, J. G., Rayner, S., Santos, R., Wilson, J., Young, M. 1998Principles for sustainable governance of the oceansScience281198199CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Council of the European Union2000Council Resolution of 14 February 2000 on the promotion of intermodality and intermodal freight transport in the European Union. (2000/C 56/01)Official Journal of the European CommunitiesC 5612Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Downes, B. J., Lake, P. S., Schreiber, E. S. G., Glaister, A. 1998Habitat structure and regulation of local species diversity in a stony, upland streamEcological Monographs68237257Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Drucker, E. G. 1996The use of gait transition speed in comparative studies of fish locomotionAmerican Zoologist36555566Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Dynesius, M., Nilsson, C. 1994Fragmentation and flow regulation of river systems in the northern third of the worldScience266753762Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    ECE (Economic Commission for Europe, Working Party on Inland Water Transport). (2003). Study of the current situation and trends in inland water transport in member countries. TRANS/SC.3/2003/11. United Nations, Geneva.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    European Commission. (2001). White Paper—European transport policy for 2010: Time to decide. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Farber, T. 1994On waterEcco PressHopewell, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Fletcher, D. J. 2001A vision for the Strategic Enhancement for Britain’s Inland Navigation NetworkAssociation of Inland Navigation AuthoritiesWatford, UKGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Gaudin, P. 2001Habitat shifts in juvenile riverine fishesArchiv für Hydrobiologie(Suppl.) 135393408Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Graßl, H., Kokott, J., Kulessa, M., Luther, J., Nuscheler, F., Sauerborn II, R., Schellnhuber, -J., Schubert, R., Schulze, E. -D. 2002Charging the use of global commons. Special Report, German Advisory Council on Global ChangeBerlinGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Gregory, T. R., Wood, C. M. 1999Interactions between individual feeding behaviour, growth, and swimming performance in juvenile rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) fed different rationsCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences56479486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Gutreuter, S., Dettmers, J. M., Wahl, D. H. 2003Estimating mortality rates of adult fishes from entrainment through the propellers of river towboatsTransactions of the American Fisheries Society132646661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Haefner, J. W., Bowen, M. D. 2002Physical-based model of fish movement in fish extraction facilitiesEcological Modelling152227245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hammer, C. 1995Fatigue and exercise tests with fishComparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A112120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Harrison, I. J., Stiassny, M. L. J. (1999) “The quiet crisis. A preliminary listing of the freshwater fishes of the world that are extinct or “missing in action.” In: MacPhee, R. D. E. (eds.), Extinctions in near time, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York, pp 271–331Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Holland, L. E. 1986Effects of barge traffic on distribution and survival of ichthyoplankton and small fishes in the Upper Mississippi RiverTransactions of the American Fisheries Society115162165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Holland, L. E. 1987Effect of brief navigation-related dewaterings on fish eggs and larvaeNorth American Journal of Fisheries Management7145147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Holland, L. E., Sylvester, J. R. 1983Distribution of larval fishes related to potential navigation impacts on the Upper Mississippi River, Pool 7Transactions of the American Fisheries Society112293301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Holmlund, C. M., Hammer, M. 1999Ecosystem services generated by fish populationsEcological Economics29253268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Hüsig, A., Linke, T., Zimmermann, C. 2000Effects from supercritical ship operation on inland canalsJournal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering126130135Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kieffer, J. D. 2000Limits to exhaustive exercise in fishComparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A126161179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Killgore, K. J., Maynord, S. T., Chan, M. D., Morgan II, R. P. 2001Evaluation of propeller- induced mortality on early life stages of selected fish speciesNorth American Journal of Fisheries Management21947955CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Koblickaya, A. F. 1981A key for identifying young freshwater fishes.2nd ed, Light- and food Industry PublishingMoscowGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Lamouroux, N., Olivier, J.-M., Persat, H., Pouilly, M., Souchon, Y., Statzner, B. 1999Predicting community characteristics from habitat conditions: Fluvial fish and hydraulicsFreshwater Biology42275299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Lelek, A., Buhse, G. 1992Fische des Rheins—früher und heuteSpringer-VerlagHeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Malmqvist, B., Rundle, S. 2002Threats to the running water ecosystems of the worldEnvironmental Conservation29134153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Maynord, S. T. 1999Application of UNET model to vessel drawdown in backwaters of navigation channels. US Army Corps of Engineers, Upper Mississippi River–Illinois Waterway System Navigation Study, ENV Report 11, US Army Corps of EngineersWashington, DCGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Maynord, S. T. 2000Power versus speed for shallow draft navigationJournal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering126103106Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Mazumder, B. S., Bhowmik, N. G., Soong, T. W. 1993Turbulence in rivers due to navigation trafficJournal of Hydraulic Engineering119581597Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Morgan II, R. P., Ulanowicz, R. E., Rasin Jr, V. J., Noe, L. A., Gray, G. B. 1976Effects of shear on eggs and larvae of striped bass, Morone saxatilis, and white perch, M. americanaTransactions of the American Fisheries Society105149154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Nielsen, L. A., Sheehan, R. J., Orth, D. J. 1986Impacts of navigation on riverine fish production in the United StatesPolish Archive of Hydrobiology33277294Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Parmesan, C., Yohe, G. 2003A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systemsNature4213742CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Pimm, S. L., Russell, G. J., Gittleman, J. L., Brooks, T. M. 1995The future of biodiversityScience269347350Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Pinder, A. C. 2001Keys to larval and juvenile stages of coarse fishes from fresh waters in the British IslesFreshwater Biological AssociationCumbria, UKGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Revenga, C., Brunner, J., Henninger, N., Kassem, K., Payne, R. 2000Pilot analysis of global ecosystems. Freshwater systemsWorld Resources InstituteWashington DCGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Rodriguez, J. F., Admiraal, D. M., Lopez, F., Garcia, M. H. 2002Unsteady bed shear stresses induced by navigation: laboratory observationsJournal of Hydraulic Engineering128515526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Sala, O. E., Chapin III, F. S., Armesto, J. J., Berlow, E., Bloomfield, J., Dirzo, R., Sanwald, E. Huber-, Huenneke, L. F., Jackson, R. B., Kinzig, A., Leemans, R., Lodge, D. M., Mooney, H. A., Oesterheld, M., Poff, N. L., Sykes, M. T., Walker, B. H., Walker, M., Wall, D. H. 2000Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100Science28717701774CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Saltveit, S. J., Halleraker, J. H., Arnekleiv, J. V., Harby, A. 2001Field experiments on stranding in juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) and brown trout (Salmo trutta) during rapid flow decreases caused by hydropeakingRegulated Rivers: Research & Management17609622Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Sand-Jensen, K., Pedersen, O. 1999Velocity gradients and turbulence around macrophyte stands in streamsFreshwater Biology42315328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Scheidegger, K. J., Bain, M. B. 1995Larval fish distribution and microhabitat use in free- flowing and regulated riversCopeia1995 (1)125135Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Sparks Companies2002Upper Mississippi River and Illinois waterway navigation study. Economic scenarios and resulting demand for barge transportation. Final Report, Sparks Companies IncMemphis, TennesseeGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Staas, S., Neumann, D. 1996The occurence of larval and juvenile 0+ fish in the lower river RhineArchiv für HydrobiologieSuppl. 113325332Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Stenseth, N. C., Mysterud, A., Ottersen, G., Hurrell, J. W., Chan, K. -S., Lima, M. 2002Ecological effects of climate fluctuationsScience29712921296CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Stiassny, M. L. J. (1999) “The medium is the message: freshwater biodiversity in peri” In: Cracraft, J., Grifo, F. T. (eds.), The living planet in crisis: Biodiversity science and policy, Columbia University Press, New York, pp 53–71Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Stockstill, R. L., Berger, R. C. 2001Simulating barge drawdown and currents in channel and backwater areasJournal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering127290298Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Sukhodolov, A., Thiele, M., Bungartz, H. 1998Turbulence structure in a river reach with sand bedWater Resources Research3413171334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Sukhodolov, A., Engelhardt, C., Krüger, A., Bungartz, H. 2004Case study: Turbulent flow and sediment distributions in a groyne fieldJournal of Hydraulic Engineering ASCE13019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Tockner, K., Stanford, J. A. 2002Riverine flood plains: present state and future trendsEnvironmental Conservation29308330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    United Nations. (1997). Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. FCCC/CP/1997/L.7/Add.1. United Nations, New York.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Videler, J. J. 1993Fish swimmingChapman & HallLondonGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Walther, G.-R., Post, E., Convey, P., Menzel, A., Parmesan, C., Beebee, T. J. C., Fromentin, J.-M., Hoegh-Guldberg, O., Bairlein, F. 2002Ecological responses to recent climate changeNature416389395CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Wardle, C. S. 1975Limit of fish swimming speedNature255725727PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Webb, P. W. 1975Hydrodynamics and energetics of fish propulsionBulletin of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada1901159Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Wilcove, D. S., Rothstein, D., Dubow, J., Phillips, A., Loscos, E. 1998Quantifying threats to imperiled species in the United StatesBioScience48607615Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Wolter, C. 2001aRapid changes of fish assemblages in artificial lowland waterwaysLimnologica312735Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Wolter, C. 2001bConservation of fish species diversity in navigable waterwaysLandscape and Urban Planning53135144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Wolter, C., Arlinghaus, R. 2003Navigation impacts on freshwater fish assemblages: The ecological relevance of swimming performanceReview in Fish Biology and Fisheries136389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Wolter, C., Vilcinskas, A. 1997Perch (Perca fluviatilis) as an indicator species for structural degradation in regulated rivers and canals in the lowlands of GermanyEcology of Freshwater Fish6174181Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Wolter, C., Vilcinskas, A. 2000Charakterisierung der Fischartendiversität in Wasserstraßen und urbanen GewässernWasser & Boden521418Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Zauner, G., Schiemer, F. 1994Auswirkung der Schiffahrt auf die Fischfauna großer FließgewässerWissenschaftliche Mitteilungen des Niederösterreichischen Landesmuseum8271285Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christian Wolter
    • 1
    Email author
  • Robert Arlinghaus
    • 1
  • Alexander Sukhodolov
    • 2
  • Christof Engelhardt
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Biology and Ecology of FishesLeibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland FisheriesBerlinGermany
  2. 2.Department of EcohydrologyLeibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland FisheriesBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations