Environmental Management

, Volume 37, Issue 1, pp 111–125

Colorado River Floods, Droughts, and Shrimp Fishing in the Upper Gulf of California, Mexico

Article

Abstract

Accurate procedures that measure hydrologic variability would have great value for evaluating ecosystem impacts of upstream water use in the Colorado River Basin. Many local extractive income-based stakeholders rely directly or indirectly on ecosystem health and are adversely affected when the river does not flow. This study focuses on the impact of little or no Colorado River flow on the Mexican shrimp industry. Although there have been complaints that U.S. diversions of Colorado River flow have greatly impaired the shrimp fishery, this research demonstrates that freshwater rarely reaches the Gulf even during times of flooding, and that other factors such as overfishing may influence the instability of shrimp populations. Advanced very-high-resolution radiometer (AVHRR) satellite imagery was used to assess water volumes diverted away from the channel of the Colorado River and ultimately the Gulf of California during flooding periods. Analysis of data demonstrated that little freshwater actually reaches the Gulf even during floods because of its diversion into a large dry lake bed basin known as Laguna Salada. Fuller use of the Colorado River throughout its entire course to the sea is possible and could benefit a large cohort of users without catastrophic habitat destruction in delta ecosystems. Reconstruction of a natural earthen berm, as proposed by Ducks Unlimited, would maximize the use of floodwaters for ecosystem benefits. These findings have profound implications for local economic activities dependent on hydrologic resources in the Colorado River Delta and Upper Gulf.

Keywords

Colorado River Delta Endangered species habitat Remote sensing Climate variability Flooding Change detection NDVI AVHRR 

Literature Cited

  1. Ali A. 1989. Study of river flood hydrology in Bangladesh with AVHRR data. International Journal of Remote Sensing 10:1873–1892Google Scholar
  2. All, J. 1997. Personal communication with operational staff at Morelos Dam in Baja California Norte, Mexico, June 28Google Scholar
  3. All, J. 2001. Unpublished data from measurements and observations at the Laguna Salada, November 22Google Scholar
  4. All J., S. Yool. 2004. Indexing endangered species risk in the Colorado River Delta, Mexico using AVHRR NDVI time series data. Geocarto International 19(4):5–13Google Scholar
  5. Andrade E. R., W. D. Sellers. 1988. El Nino and its effect on precipitation in Arizona. Journal of Climate 8:403–410Google Scholar
  6. Bagwell, K. 1998. River protection is also urged for Mexico segment. Arizona Daily Star, May 23, pp 1b and 8bGoogle Scholar
  7. Birkett C. M. 2000. Synergistic remote sensing of Lake Chad: Variability of basin inundation. Remote Sensing Environment 72:218–236Google Scholar
  8. Brazil, E. 2001. Colorado River “surplus” challenge. San Francisco Chronicle, December 9, p A1Google Scholar
  9. Briggs M. K., S. Cornelius. 1998. Opportunities for ecological improvement along the Lower Colorado River and Delta. Wetlands 18(4):513–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bryant R. G. 1999. Application of AVHRR to monitor a climatically sensitive playa: Case study: Chott el Djerid, southern Tunisia. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 24:283–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bureau of Reclamation. 1997. Water measurement manual. 3rd ed. U.S. Government Printing Office, 300 pp.Google Scholar
  12. Carriquiry J. D., A. Sanchez. 1999. Sedimentation in the Colorado River Delta and Upper Gulf of California after nearly a century of discharge loss. Marine Geology 158:125–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cayan D. R. 1996. Interannual climate variability and snowpack in the western United States. Journal of Climate 9:928–948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cohen, M. J., and C. Henges-Jeck. 2001. Missing water: The uses and flows of water in the Colorado River Delta region. Pacific Institute for Studies in Development, Environment, and Security publication. San Francisco, CA, 44 ppGoogle Scholar
  15. Cohen M. J., C. Henges-Jeck, G. Castillo-Moreno. 2001. A preliminary water balance for the Colorado River Delta, 1992-1998. Journal of Arid Environments 49:35–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cummings R. G., V. Nercissiantz. 1992. The use of water pricing as a means for enhancing water use efficiency in irrigation: Case studies in Mexico and the United States. Natural Resources Journal 32(4):731–755Google Scholar
  17. Delegacion Federal de Pesca. 1993. San Felipe B.C.: Captura de Camaron de 1957 a 1993. Ensenada, Baja, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  18. Department of Agriculture. 1979. Field manual for research in agricultural hydrology. Agriculture Handbook No. 224. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington DC, 547 ppGoogle Scholar
  19. Eidenshink J. C. 1992. The 1990 conterminous U.S. AVHRR dataset. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 58(6):809–813Google Scholar
  20. Felger R. S. 2000. Flora of the Gran Desierto and Rio Colorado Delta. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, AZ, 673 ppGoogle Scholar
  21. Fimbres M. I. V. 1983. Frontera en el Desierto, historia de San Luis Rio Colorado. Instituto Nacional de Anthropologia e Historia, Hermosillo, Mexico, 133 ppGoogle Scholar
  22. Flessa, K. W., D. L. Dettman, B. R. Schone, D. H. Goodwin, C. A. Rodriguez, S. K. Noggle, M. A. Tellez-Duatr, G. E. Avila-Serrano, M. Kowalewski, and G. A. Goodfriend. 2001. Poster presented at the United States—Mexico Colorado River Delta Symposium, International Boundary and Water Commission, Department of Interior and Mexican Secretariat of the Environment and Natural Resources, Mexicali, Baja California Norte, Mexico, September 11–12. Available at: http://www.geo.arizona.edu/ceam/Hecold/before%20the%20dam%20body.htm (Accessed May 2004)
  23. Furnish D. B., J. R. Ladman. 1975. The Colorado River Salinity Agreement of 1973 and the Mexicali Valley. Natural Resources Journal 15:83–107Google Scholar
  24. Galindo-Bect M. S., E. P. Glenn, H. M. Page, K. Fitzsimmons, L. A. Galindo-Bect, J. M. Hernandez-Ayon, R. L. Petty, J. Garcia-Hernandez, D. Moore. 2000. Panaeid shrimp landings in the Upper Gulf of California in relation to Colorado River freshwater discharge. Fish Bull 98:222–225Google Scholar
  25. Garcia S. 1983. The stock-recruitment relationship in shrimps: Reality or artefacts and misinterpretations? Oceanographic Tropicale 18(1):25–48Google Scholar
  26. Getches D. H. 1993. From Askhabad, to Wellton-Mohawk, to Los Angeles: The drought in water policy. University of Colorado Law Review 64:523–553Google Scholar
  27. Glenn E. P., R. S. Felger, A. Burquez, D. S. Turner. 1992. Cienega de Santa Clara: Endangered wetland in the Colorado River Delta, Sonora, Mexico. Natural Resources Journal. 32:816–824Google Scholar
  28. Glenn E. P., C. Lee, R. Felger, S. Zengel. 1996. Effects of water management on the wetlands of the Colorado River Delta, Mexico. Conservation Biology 10(4):1175–1186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Glenn E. P., J. Garcia, R. Tanner, C. Congdon, D. Luecke. 1999. Status of wetlands supported by agricultural drainage water in the Colorado River Delta, Mexico. Horticulture Science 34(1):39–45Google Scholar
  30. Greenberg J. B. 1998. The tragedy of commoditization: Political ecology of the Colorado River Delta’s destruction. Research in Economic Anthropology 19:133–149Google Scholar
  31. Harris A. R. 1994. Time series remote sensing of a climatically sensitive lake. Remote Sensing Environment 50:83–94Google Scholar
  32. Harris A. R., I. M. Mason. 1985. Lake area measurement using AVHRR: A case study. International Journal of Remote Sensing 10:885–895Google Scholar
  33. Hays R. 1996. Cross-border indigenous nations: A history. Borderlines 4(1):32–48Google Scholar
  34. Holben B. N. 1986. Characteristics of maximum-value composite images from temporal AVHRR data. International Journal of Remote Sensing 11(8):1511Google Scholar
  35. Holburt M. B. 1982. International problems on the Colorado River. Water Supply and Management 6(1/2):115–127Google Scholar
  36. Holburt M. B. 1984. The 1983 high flows on the Colorado River and their aftermath. Water International 9:99–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Holmquist J. G., J. M. Schmidt-Gengenback, B. B. Yoshioka. 1998. High dams and marine-freshwater linkages: Effects on native and introduced fauna in the Caribbean. Conservation Biology 12:621–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jassby A. D., W. J. Kimmerer, S. G. Monismith, C. Armor, J. E. Cloern, T. M. Powell, J. R. Schubel, T. J. Vendlinski. 1995. Isohaline position as a habitat indicator for estuarine populations. Ecological Applications 5:272–289Google Scholar
  39. Jimenez, G. C., O. B. Grecco, H. Robles, and E. J. Aranda. 1984. Estudio preliminar de la pesqueria de la Laguna Salada, Baja California. Delegation Federal de Pesca en La Estado de Baja California. Available at: http://www.sci.sdsu.edu/salton/PrelStdFisheryLagunaSalada.html (Accessed May 2004)
  40. Kahya E., J. A. Dracup. 1996. The influence of type I El Nino and La Nina events on streamflow in the Pacific Southwest of the United States. Journal of Climate 7(6):965–976Google Scholar
  41. Kiladis G., H. F. Diaz. 1989. Global climatic anomalies associated with extremes of the southern oscillation. Journal of Climate 2:1069–1090Google Scholar
  42. Knighton D. 1998. Fluvial forms and processes. John Wiley & Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  43. Lavin M. F., S. Sanchez. 1999. On how the Colorado River affected the hydrology of the Upper Gulf of California. Continental Shelf Research 19:1545–1560.Google Scholar
  44. Leopold A. 1949. A Sand County almanac. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  45. Lepley, L. K., S. P. Vonder Haar, J. R. Hendrickson, and G. Calderon-Riveroll. 1975. Circulation in the Northern Gulf of California from orbital photographs and ship investigations. Pages 86–93 in National Oceanic and Atmospheric Investigations, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  46. Loomis, B. 2001. U.S. leaves Mexico a river that’s just a trickle of its former self. Salt Lake Tribune, March 4. Available at: http://www.sltrib.com/03042001/nation_w/76520.htm (Accessed May 2004)
  47. Luecke D. F., J. Pitt, C. Congdon, E. Glenn, C. Valdes-Casillas, M. Briggs. 1999. A delta once more: Restoring riparian and wetland habitat in the Colorado River Delta. Environmental Defense Fund Publications. Washington, DC, 88 ppGoogle Scholar
  48. Lyon J. G., W. S. Hutchinson. 1995. Application of a radiometric model for evaluation of water depths and verification of results with airborne scanner data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 61(2):161–166Google Scholar
  49. Magallon-Barajas F. J. 1987. The Pacific shrimp fishery of Mexico. CalCOFl Rep. Fisheries Ministry, Mexico City 28:43–52.Google Scholar
  50. McGuire T. R. 2004. The river, the delta, and the sea. Journal. of the Southwest. (in press)Google Scholar
  51. McGuire, T. R., and J. B. Greenberg (eds). 1993. Maritime Community and Biosphere Reserve: Crisis and response in the Upper Gulf of California. Occasional Paper No. 2, Bureau of Applied Research in Anthropology, University of Arizona. Tucson, AZGoogle Scholar
  52. McGuire T. R., G. C. Valdez-Gardea. 1997. Endangered species and precarious lives in the Upper Gulf of California. Culture and Agriculture 19(3):101–107Google Scholar
  53. Metternicht G. I., J. A. Zinck. 1998. Evaluating the information content of JERS-1 SAR and Landsat TM data for discrimination of soil erosion features. Photogrammetric Enginering and Remote Sensing 53:143–153Google Scholar
  54. Muniz-Arriola, F., J. Carriquiry-Beltran, E. Nieto-Garcia, and M. Hernandez-Ayon. 2002. Colorado River Delta biogeochemical budget model output. Land–ocean interactions in the Coastal Zone (LOICZ) Project, International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme. Available at: http://www.data.ecology.su.se/mnode/mexicanlagoons/colorado/coloradodelta.htm (Accessed may 2004)
  55. Nijhuis, M. 2000. A river resurrected: The Colorado River gets a second chance. High Country News, July 3, pp 1, 10–13Google Scholar
  56. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). 2000. What is NDVI? Available at: http://www.csc.noaa.gov/crs/definitions/NDVI.html (Accessed May 2004)
  57. Orcutt, C. R. 1891. A visit to Lake Maquata. The West American Scientist 7(59):158–164. Available at: http://www.sci.sdsu.edu/salton/LakeMaquatavisit.html (Accessed May 2004)
  58. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. 1997. Review of agricultural policies in Mexico. Report to the Committee for Agriculture and the Trade Committee, Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  59. Payne, J. M., F. A. Reid, and E. C. Gonzalez. 1992. Feasibility study for the possible enhancement of the Colorado Delta Wetlands Baja California Norte, Mexico. Report to Ducks Unlimited Inc. and Ducks Unlimited of Mexico, Sacramento, California, USAGoogle Scholar
  60. Peterson D. H., D. R. Cayan, J. DiLeo, M. Noble, M. D. Dettinger. 1995. The role of climate in estuarine variability. American Scientist 83:58–67Google Scholar
  61. Pico E. F., and C. P. Mathews. 1975. Estudios preliminares sobre la ecologia del Camaron en el Zona Cercana a la Desembocadura del Rio Colorado. Fisheries Ministry, Mexico City, pp 68–85Google Scholar
  62. Piechota T. C., J. A. Dracup, R. G. Fovell. 1997. Western U.S. streamflow and atmospheric circulation patterns during El Nino—southern oscillation. Journal of Hydrology 201(1–4):249–271Google Scholar
  63. Pilon P. G., P. J. Howarth, R. A. Bullock. 1988. An enhanced classification approach to change detection in semiarid environments. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 54(12):1709–1716Google Scholar
  64. Pitt J., D. F. Luecke, M. J. Cohen, E. P. Glenn, C. Valdes-Casillas. 2000. Two nations, one river: Managing ecosystem conservation in the Colorado River Delta. Natural Resources Journal 40:819–864Google Scholar
  65. Pontius, D. 1997. Colorado River Basin study final report. Report to the Western Water Policy Review Advisory Commission. National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia, USAGoogle Scholar
  66. Postel S. L., J. I. Morrison, P. H. Gleick. 1998. Allocating fresh water to aquatic ecosystems: The case of the Colorado River Delta. Water International 23:119–125Google Scholar
  67. Prata A. J. 1990. Satellite-derived evaporation from Lake Eyre, South Australia. International Journal of Remote Sensing 11:2051–2068Google Scholar
  68. Rasid H., M. A. H. Paramanik. 1990. Visual interpretation of satellite imagery for monitoring floods in Bangladesh. Environmental Management 14:815–821Google Scholar
  69. Redmond K. T., R. W. Koch. 1991. Surface climate and streamflow variability in the Western United States and their relationship to large-scale circulation indices. Water Resources Research 27:2381–2399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Richardson J., J. Carrier. 1992. The Colorado: A river at risk. Westcliffe Publications, Englewood, Colorado, USAGoogle Scholar
  71. Rodriguez C. A., K. W. Flessa, D. L. Dettman. 2001. Effects of upstream diversion of Colorado River water on the estuarine bivalve mollusc (Mulinia coloradoensis). Conservation Biology 15(1):249–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Ruiz A. L., L. P. Lyle. 1992. Fluctuaciones periodicas de al captura de Sardina crinuda (Opisthonema spp.) en el Golfo de California, 1972–1990. CalCOFl Rep Fisheries Ministry, Mexico City 33:124–129Google Scholar
  73. Schneider S. R., D. F. McGinnis, G. Stevens. 1985. Monitoring Africa’s Lake Chad Basin with Landsat and NOAA satellite data. International Journal of Remote Sensing 6:59–73Google Scholar
  74. SEMARNAT. 2002. Reserva de la Biosfera Alto Golfo de California y Delta del Rio Colorado. Secretaria de Medio Ambiente, Recursos Naturales y Pesca, Instituto National de Ecologia. Available at: http://www.rds.org.mx/atlas/altogolf.htm (Accessed May 2004)
  75. Sheng Y., Y. Su, Q. Xiao. 1998. Challenging the cloud contamination problem in flood monitoring with NOAA/AVHRR Imagery. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 64:191–198Google Scholar
  76. Sheng Y., P. Gong, Q. Xiao. 2001. Quantitative dynamic flood monitoring with NOAA AVHRR. International Journal of Remote Sensing 22(9):1709–1724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Sohl T. L. 1999. Change analysis in the United Arab Emirates: An investigation of techniques. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 65(4):475–484Google Scholar
  78. Stockton C. W., G. C. Jacoby. 1976. Long-term surface-water supply and streamflow trends in the Upper Colorado River Basin based on tree ring analyses. Lake Powell Research Project Bulletin 18:1–67Google Scholar
  79. Streeter, R. 1999. Personal communication (Ducks Unlimited Inc. Latin American Program), August 12Google Scholar
  80. Sykes, G. 1937. Delta, estuary, and lower portion of the channel of the Colorado River, 1933 to 1935. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington DC. Publication Number 460Google Scholar
  81. Tobin, M. 2001. Barely a river pressure is on the U.S. to help revive Mexico’s Colorado River Delta. Arizona Daily Star, June 26. Available at: http://www.azstarnet.com/clips/river01/index.html (Accessed May 2004)
  82. Travaglia, C., J. M. Kapetsky, and G. Righini. 1995. Monitoring wetlands for fisheries by NOAA AVHRR LAC thermal data. FAO Report, Rome, RSC series 68Google Scholar
  83. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). 2004. Draft environmental impact statement for the Imperial-Mexicali 230-kV transmission lines Appendix F: Calculations in support of water resources analysis. Available at: http://www.eh.doe.gov/nepa/docs/deis/eis0365/ (Accessed January 5, 2005)
  84. Valdes-Casillas C., E. P. Glenn, O. Hinojosa-Huerta, Y. Carrillo-Guerrero, J. Garcia-Hernandez, F. Zamora-Arroyo, M. Munoz-Viveros, M. Briggs, C. Lee, E. Chavarria-Correa, J. Riley, D. Baumgartner, C. Condon. 1998. Wetland management and restoration in the Colorado River Delta: The first steps. Special publication of CECARENA-ITESM Campus Guaymas and NAWCC, Mexico. 32 pp.Google Scholar
  85. Valdez-Holgin J. E., G. Gaxiola-Castro, R. Cervantes-Duarte. 1995. Productidad primaria en El Golfo de California, calculada a partir de la relacion enter irradiancia superficial y clorofila de la Zona Eufotica. Ciencias Marinas 21(3):311–329Google Scholar
  86. Valdez-Holguin J. E., J. R. Lara-Lara. 1985. Productividad primaria en El Golfo de California: Efectos del evento El Nino 1982–1983. Ciencias Marinas 13(2):34–50Google Scholar
  87. Vasquez-Leon M., T. R. McGuire. 1993. La Iniciativa privada in the Mexican shrimp industry. Maritime Anthropology Studies 6(1/2):59–73Google Scholar
  88. Waller T. 1994. The politics of water conservation in the border region of the Californias. Ph.D. dissertation, the University of California, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  89. Wiesnet D. R., D. F. McGinnis, J. A. Pritchard. 1974. Mapping of the 1973 Mississippi River floods by NOAA-2 satellite. Water Resources Bulletin 10:1040–1049Google Scholar
  90. Zein-Eldin Z. P., M. L. Renaud. 1986. Inshore environmental effects on brown shrimp (Penaeus aztecus) and white shrimp (P. setiferus), populations in coastal waters, particularly of Texas. Marine Fisheries Review 48(3):9–19Google Scholar
  91. Zengel S. A., V. J. Meretsky, E. P. Glenn, R. S. Felger, D. Ortiz. 1995. Cienega de Santa Clara: A remnant wetland in the Rio Colorado Delta (Mexico): Vegetation distribution and the effects of water flow reduction. Ecological Engineering 4:19–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Geography and GeologyWestern Kentucky UniversityBowling GreenUSA

Personalised recommendations