Environmental Management

, Volume 36, Issue 2, pp 237–247 | Cite as

Off-Target Herbicide Deposition Associated with Treating Individual Trees



There are a wide variety of different herbicide treatment methods used to remove single trees. Each method (cut-stump, basal, foliar) has a unique amount of off-target disturbance that should be considered in selecting a treatment for use in management. We quantified the amount of off-target deposition that resulted from four conventional herbicide application methods: 1) basal, 2) cut-stump, 3) high-volume, hydraulic foliar, and 4) low-volume, backpack foliar. Basal and cut-stump herbicide treatments deposited up to 200 and 4000 times more herbicide (a.i. per unit area) at groundline than the low-volume and high-volume foliar treatments, respectively. On a per tree basis, basal and cut-stump treatments deposited nearly six times more total herbicide than high-volume foliar, and 68 times more than low-volume foliar. All of the herbicide deposited off-target landed within 0.6 m of the basal and cut-stump treatments, 3.7 m with the low-volume foliar, and 7.3 m with high-volume foliar methods. Off-target herbicide deposition resulted in affected areas with killed or damaged vegetation ranging in size from 0.36 m2 (cut stump) to 7.08 m2 (high-volume foliar). Deposition amounts and affected areas were greater with larger trees, compared to smaller ones. We observed that 48% of the total amount of herbicide applied per plot was deposited off-target with cut-stump treatment, compared to only 4% to 11% for the other treatments. We suspect this difference is due to applicator error with the cut-stump treatment, likely related to the type of spray device used to apply the treatment.


Rights-of-way Environmental impact Vegetation management Powerline corridor 

Lterature Cited

  1. Abrahamson, L. P., Nowak, C. A., Charlton, P. M., Snyder, P. G. 1995

    Cost effectiveness of herbicide and non-herbicide vegetation management methods for electric utility rights-of-way in the Northeast: state-of-the-art review

    Doucet, G. J.Séguin, C.Giguère, M. eds. Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Environmental Concerns in Rights-of-Way Management, September 19–22, 1993MontrealQuebec, Canada2743
    Google Scholar
  2. Ashton, F. M., Crafts, A. S. 1981Mode of action of herbicidesJohn Wiley and SonsNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Bramble, W. C., Byrnes, W. R., Hutnik, R. J., Liscinsky, S. A. 1996Interference factors responsible for resistance of forb-grass cover types to tree invasion on an electric utility right-of-wayJournal of Arboriculture2299105Google Scholar
  4. Dreyer, G. D., Niering, W. A. 1986Evaluation of two herbicide techniques on electric transmission rights-of-way: development of relatively stable shrublandsEnvironmental Management10113118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. ECI (Environmental Consultants, Inc.). 1991. Determination of the effectiveness of herbicide buffer zones in protecting water quality on New York State powerline rights-of-way. Empire State Electric Energy Research Corporation, Schenectady, NY, Research Report EP 89–44Google Scholar
  6. Finch, K. E., Shupe, S. D. 1997

    Nearly two decades of integrated vegetation management on electric transmission rights-of-way

    William, J. R.Goodrich-Mahoney, J. W.Wisniewski, J. R.Wisniewski, J. eds. Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Environmental Concerns in Rights-of-Way Management, February 24–26, 1997New Orleans, Louisiana, Elsevier Science, Inc.New York6575
    Google Scholar
  7. Gangstad, E. O. 1989Woody brush controlCRC Press, Inc.Boca Raton, FloridaGoogle Scholar
  8. Hill, J. D., Canham, C. D., Wood, D. M. 1995Patterns and causes of resistance to tree invasion in rights-of-wayEcological Applications5459470Google Scholar
  9. Jackson, L. W. 1997

    A history of utility transmission right-of-way management in New York State

    William, J. R.Goodrich-Mahoney, J. W.Wisniewski, J. R.Wisniewski, J. eds. Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Environmental Concerns in Rights-of-Way Management, February 24–26, 1997New Orleans, Louisiana Elsevier Science, Inc.New York103110
    Google Scholar
  10. Lautenschlager, R. A., Sullivan, T. P. 2002Effects of herbicide treatments on biotic components in regenerating northern forestsThe Forestry Chronicle78695731Google Scholar
  11. Luken, J. O. 1990Directing ecological successionChapman and HallNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Luken, J. O., Beiting, S. W., Kareth, S. K., Kumler, R. L., Liu, J. H., Seither, C. A. 1994Target and nontarget discrimination of herbicides applied to vegetation in a powerline corridorEnvironmental Management18251255Google Scholar
  13. McLoughlin, K. T. 1997

    Application of integrated pest management to electric utility rights-of-way vegetation management in New York State

    William, J. R.Goodrich-Mahoney, J. W.Wisniewski, J. R.Wisniewski, J. eds. Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Environmental Concerns in Rights-of-Way Management, February 24–26, 1997New Orleans, Louisiana, Elsevier Science, Inc.New York118126
    Google Scholar
  14. McLoughlin, K. T. 2002

    Integrated vegetation management: the exploration of a concept to application

    Goodrich-Mahoney, J. W.Mutrie, D. F.Guild, C. A. eds. Proceedings of the 7th Symposium on Environmental Concerns in Rights-of-Way Management, September 9–13, 2000Calgary, Alberta, Canada, Elsevier Science Ltd.Kidlington, Oxford, UK2946
    Google Scholar
  15. Nickerson, N. H., G. E. Moore, A. D. Cutter, J. M. Clark, A. Curtis, and R. Putnam. 1994. Study of environmental fates of herbicides in wetlands on electric utility rights of way in Massachusetts over the short term. Unpublished report, Tufts University, Medford, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  16. Niering, W. A. 1958Principles of sound right-of-way vegetation managementEconomic Botany12140144Google Scholar
  17. Niering, W. A., Goodwin, R. H. 1974Creation of relatively stable shrublands with herbicides: Arresting “succession” on rights-of-way and pasturelandsEcology55784795Google Scholar
  18. NMPC (Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation)2001Transmission right-of-way management programNiagara Mohawk: A National Grid CompanySyracuse, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Nowak, C. A., and L. P. Abrahamson. 1992. Vegetation management on electric transmission line rights-of-way in New York State: the stability approach to reducing herbicide use. Pages 183–191 in D. H. Gjerstad (eds). Proceedings of the International Conference on Forest Vegetation Management: Ecology, Practice and Policy, April 27–May 1, 1992, Auburn, Alabama, Auburn University School of Forestry Report 1993:1Google Scholar
  20. Nowak, C. A., Abrahamson, L. P., Neuhauser, E. F., Foreback, C. G., Freed, H. D., Shaheen, S. B., Stevens, C. H. 1992Cost-effective vegetation management on a recently cleared electric transmission line right-of-wayWeed Technology6828837Google Scholar
  21. Nyland, R. D. 2002. Silviculture: concepts and applications. 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill, BostonGoogle Scholar
  22. SAS Institute, Inc. 2001. SAS computer software package. SAS, Cary, North CarolinaGoogle Scholar
  23. Smith, D.M., B.C. Larson, M.J. Kelty, and P.M.S. Ashton. 1997. The practice of Silviculture: applied forest ecology. 9th ed. Wiley New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Tucker, G. F., Lassoie, J. P., Fahey, T. J. 1993Crown architecture of stand-grown sugar maple (Acer saccharum Marsh.) in the Adirondack MountainsTree Physiology13297310PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Wagner, R. G. 1994Toward integrated forest vegetation managementJournal of Forestry922630Google Scholar
  26. Whitney, R. W., Roth, L. O. 1985String collectors for spray pattern analysisAmerican Society of Agricultural Engineers2817491753Google Scholar
  27. Zedaker, S. M., J. B. Lewis, D. W. Smith, and R. E. Kreh. 1987. Impact of season of harvest and site quality on cut-stump treatment of piedmont hardwoods. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 11:46–49Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Forest and Natural Resources ManagementState University of New York College of Environmental Science and ForestryNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations