Environmental Management

, Volume 32, Issue 1, pp 141–151 | Cite as

An Evaluation of Vernal Pool Creation Projects in New England: Project Documentation from 1991–2000

Environmental Assessment


Vernal pools are vulnerable to loss through development and agricultural and forestry practices owing to their isolation from open water bodies and their small size. Some vernal pool-dependent species are already listed in New England as Endangered, Threatened, or Species of Special Concern. Vernal pool creation is becoming more common in compensatory mitigation as open water ponds, in general, may be easier to create than wooded wetlands. However, research on vernal pool creation is limited. A recent National Research Council study (2001) cites vernal pools as “challenging to recreate.” We reviewed documentation on 15 vernal pool creation projects in New England that were required by federal regulatory action. Our purpose was to determine whether vernal pool creation for compensatory mitigation in New England replaced key vernal pool functions by assessing project goals and documentation (including mitigation plans, pool design criteria, monitoring protocols, and performance standards). Our results indicate that creation attempts often fail to replicate lost pool functions. Pool design specifications are often based on conjecture rather than on reference wetlands or created pools that function successfully. Project monitoring lacks consistency and reliability, and record keeping by regulatory agencies is inadequate. Strengthening of protection of isolated wetlands in general, and standardization across all aspects of vernal pool creation, is needed to ensure success and to promote conservation of the long-term landscape functions of vernal pools.


Vernal pool Wetland creation Compensatory mitigation Wetland monitoring Reference wetlands New England 


  1. Alford, R. A., Richards, S. J. 1999Global amphibian declines: a problem in applied ecology.Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics30133165Google Scholar
  2. Antonelli, J. J. 1997The use of shallow groundwater wells to obtain hydrologic data for wetland delineation.Wetland Journal937Google Scholar
  3. Babbitt, K. J., Tanner, K. W. 2000Use of temporary wetlands by anurans in a hydrologically modified landscape.Wetlands20313322Google Scholar
  4. Berven, K. A., Grudzien, T. A. 1990Dispersal in the wood frog (Rana sylvatica): Implications for genetic population structure.Evolution4420472056Google Scholar
  5. Bonner, L. A., Diehl, W. J., Altig, R. 1997Physical, chemical and biological dynamics of five temporary dystrophic forest pools in central Mississippi.Hydrobiologia3537789Google Scholar
  6. Breaux, A., Serefiddin, R. 1999Validity of performance criteria and a tentative model for regulatory use in compensatory wetland mitigation permitting.Environmental Management24327336Google Scholar
  7. Brinson, M. M., Rheinhardt, R. 1996The role of reference wetlands in functional assessment and mitigation.Ecological Applications66976Google Scholar
  8. Brooks, R. T., Stone, J., Lyons, P. 1998An inventory of seasonal forest ponds on the Quabbin Reservoir watershed, Massachusetts.Northeastern Naturalist5219230Google Scholar
  9. Brown, S., Veneman, P. 1998Compensatory wetland mitigation in MassachusettsMassachusetts Agricultural Experiment Station, University of MassachusettsAmherst, MAGoogle Scholar
  10. Butterwick, M. 1996

    The hydrogeomorphic approach and its use in vernal pool functional assessment.

    Witham, C. W.Bauder, E. T.Belk, D.Ferren, W. R.,Jr.Ornduff, R. eds. Ecology, conservation, and management of vernal pool ecosystems. Proceeding from a 1996 ConferenceCalifornia Native Plant SocietySacramento, CA5055
    Google Scholar
  11. Calhoun, A. J. K., and M. W. Klemens. 2002. Best development practices for conserving pool-breeding amphibians. Wildlife Conservation Society Technical Paper #5. Wildlife Conservation Society, Rye, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Calhoun, A. J. K., Hunter, M. L. 2003

    Managing ecosystems for amphibian populations.

    Semlitsch, R. D. eds. Amphibian conservation.Smithsonian Institution PressWashington, D.C.228241
    Google Scholar
  13. Calhoun, A. J. K., Walls, T., McCollough, M., Stockwell, S. 2003Developing conservation strategies for vernal pools: a Maine case study.Wetlands237081Google Scholar
  14. Carey, C., Cohen, N., Rollins-Smith, L. 1999Amphibian declines: an immunological perspective.Developmental and Comparative Immunology23459472Google Scholar
  15. De Weese, J. 2000. Vernal pool construction monitoring protocol and habitat replacement evaluation: Pacific region. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. (URL: www.rl.fws.gov/es/vpfinal.html)Google Scholar
  16. Dodd, C. K.,Jr., Cade, B. S. 1998Movement patterns and the conservation of amphibians breeding in small, temporary wetlands.Conservation Biology12331339Google Scholar
  17. Duellman, W. E., Trueb, L. 1986Biology of amphibiansMcGraw-Hill, Inc.New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Ernst, C. H., Barbour, R. W. 1989Snakes of eastern North AmericaGeorge Mason University PressFairfax, VaGoogle Scholar
  19. Fagan, W. F. 1999Weak influences of initial conditions on metapopulation persistence times.Ecological Applications914301438Google Scholar
  20. Fretwell, J. D., J. S. Williams, and P. J. Redman (eds.) 1996. National water summary on wetland resources. USGS Water Supply Paper 2425, USGS Information Services, Denver, COGoogle Scholar
  21. Galatowitsch, S. M., van der Valk, A. G. 1996Characteristics of recently restored wetlands in the prairie pothole region.Wetlands167583Google Scholar
  22. Gibbs, J. P. 2000Wetland loss and biodiversity conservation.Conservation Biology14314317Google Scholar
  23. Hanski, I., Gilpin, M. E. 1991Metapopulation dynamics: Brief history and conceptual domain.Biological Journal of the Linnean Society42316Google Scholar
  24. Joyal, L. A., McCollough, M., Hunter, M. L.,Jr. 2001Landscape ecology approaches to wetland species conservation: a case study of two turtle species in southern Maine.Conservation Biology1517551762Google Scholar
  25. Kusler, J. A. 2001. The SWANCC decision and state regulation of wetlands. Association of State Wetland Managers, Inc. (url: http://www.aswm.org/swancc/aswm-int.pdf)
  26. Kusler, J. A., Kentula, M. E. 1990

    Executive summary.

    Kusler, J. A.Kentula, M. E. eds. Wetland creation and restoration: the status of the scienceIsland PressWashington, D.C.xviixxv
    Google Scholar
  27. Lannoo, M., Lang, J. K., Waltz, T., Phillips, G. S. 1994An altered amphibian assemblage: Dickenson County, Iowa, 70 years after Frank Blanchard’s survey.American Midland Naturalist131311319Google Scholar
  28. Lubow, B. C. 1996Optimal translocation strategies for enhancing stochastic metapopulation viability.Ecological Applications612681280Google Scholar
  29. Marsh, D. M., Trenham, P. C. 2001Metapopulation dynamics and amphibian conservation.Conservation Biology154049Google Scholar
  30. Mitsch, W. J., Wilson, R. F. 1996Improving the success of wetland creation and restoration with know-how, time, and self-design.Ecological Applications67783Google Scholar
  31. Mitsch, W. J., Wu, X., Nairn, R. W., Weihe, P. E., Wang, N., Deal, R., Boucher, C. E. 1998Creating and restoring wetlands.BioScience4810191030Google Scholar
  32. National Research Council2001Compensating for wetland losses under the Clean Water ActNational Academy PressWashington, D.C.322Google Scholar
  33. National Wetlands Policy Forum1988Protecting American’s wetlands: an action agendaConservation FoundationWashington, D.C.69Google Scholar
  34. Pechmann, J. H. K., Wilbur, H. M. 1994Putting declining amphibian populations in perspective: natural fluctuations and human impacts.Herpetologica506584Google Scholar
  35. Pechmann, J. H. K., Estes, R. A., Scott, D. E., Gibbons, J. W. 2001Amphibian colonization and use of ponds created for trial mitigation of wetland loss.Wetlands2193111Google Scholar
  36. Pope, S. E., Fahrig, L., Merriam, H. G. 2000Landscape complementation and metapopulation effects on leopard frog populations.Ecology8124982508Google Scholar
  37. Pough, F. H. 1983

    Amphibians and reptiles as low-energy systems.

    Aspey, W. P.Lustick, S. I. eds. Behavior energetics: the cost of survival in vertebrates.Ohio State University PressColumbus, OH141188
    Google Scholar
  38. Preisser, E. L., Kefer, J. Y., Lawrence, J. D., Clark, T. W. 2000Vernal pool conservation in Connecticut: an assessment and recommendations.Environmental Management26503513Google Scholar
  39. Richter, K. O. 1997

    Criteria for the restoration and creation of wetland habitats of lentic-breeding amphibians of the Pacific Northwest.

    Macdonald, K. B.Weinmann, F. eds. Wetland and riparian restoration: Taking a broader view. Contributed papers and selected abstracts, Society for Ecological Restoration, 1995 International Conference, September 14-16, 1995University of WashingtonSeattle, WA, USA7294Publication EPA 910-R-97-007. USEPA, Region 10, Seattle, WA
    Google Scholar
  40. Richter, K. O., Azous, A. L. 1995Amphibian occurrence and wetland characteristics in the Puget Sound Basin.Wetlands15305312Google Scholar
  41. Rowe, C. L., Dunson, W. A. 1995Impacts of hydroperiod on growth and survival of larval amphibians in temporary ponds of Central Pennsylvania, USA.Oecologia102397403Google Scholar
  42. Sala, O. E. 2000Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100.Science28717701774Google Scholar
  43. Semlitsch, R. D. 1998Biological delineation of terrestrial buffer zones for pond-breeding salamanders.Conservation Biology1218Google Scholar
  44. Semlitsch, R. D. 2002Critical elements for biologically based recovery plans of aquatic-breeding amphibians.Conservation Biology16619629Google Scholar
  45. Semlitsch, R. D., Bodie, J. R. 1998Are small, isolated wetlands expendable?Conservation Biology1211291133Google Scholar
  46. Seigel, R. A., Dodd, C. K.,Jr. 2002Translocations of amphibians: Proven management method or experimental technique?Conservation Biology16552553Google Scholar
  47. Snodgrass, J. W., Komoroski, M. J., Bryan, A. L.,Jr., Burger, J. 2000Relationships among isolated wetland size, hydroperiod, and amphibian species richness: implications for wetland regulations.Conservation Biology14414419Google Scholar
  48. Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 2001 WL 15333 (Sup. Ct., 2001)Google Scholar
  49. Trenham, P. C., Marsh, D. M. 2002Amphibian translocation programs: Reply to Seigel and Dodd.Conservation Biology16555556Google Scholar
  50. Stone, J. S. 1992. Vernal pools in Massachusetts: Aerial photographic identification, biological and physiographic characteristics, and state certification criteria. Master’s Thesis. University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MAGoogle Scholar
  51. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1989. Memorandum of Agreement Between the Environmental Protection Agency and the Department of the Army concerning the determination of mitigation under the Clean Water Act Section 404 (b)(1) Guidelines. Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  52. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, New England District. April 1, 2002 Checklist for review of mitigation plan with accompanying introduction: performance guidelines and supplemental information on the checklist for review of mitigation planGoogle Scholar
  53. Wilbur, H. M. 1980Complex life cycles.Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics116793Google Scholar
  54. Windmiller, B. S. 1996. The pond, the forest, and the city: Spotted salamander ecology and conservation in a human-dominated landscape. Ph. D. Dissertation. Tufts University, Medford, MAGoogle Scholar
  55. Winston, R. B. 1997Problems associated with reliably designing groundwater-dominated constructed wetlands.Wetland Journal92125Google Scholar
  56. Wyman, R. L. 1998Experimental assessment of salamanders as predators of detrital food webs: effects on invertebrates, decomposition and the carbon cycle.Biodiversity and Conservation7641650Google Scholar
  57. Young, B. E., Lips, K. R., Reaser, J. K., Ibanez, R., Salas, A. W., Cedeno, J. R.,  et al. 2001Amphibian conservation in Latin America.Conservation Biology1512131223Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Plant, Soil, and Environmental SciencesUniversity of MaineOronoUSA

Personalised recommendations