Environmental Management

, Volume 37, Issue 4, pp 553–566 | Cite as

Optimal Environmental Management Strategy and Implementation for Groundwater Contamination Prevention and Restoration

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT

Abstract

An innovative management strategy is proposed for optimized and integrated environmental management for regional or national groundwater contamination prevention and restoration allied with consideration of sustainable development. This management strategy accounts for availability of limited resources, human health and ecological risks from groundwater contamination, costs for groundwater protection measures, beneficial uses and values from groundwater protection, and sustainable development. Six different categories of costs are identified with regard to groundwater prevention and restoration. In addition, different environmental impacts from groundwater contamination including human health and ecological risks are individually taken into account. System optimization principles are implemented to accomplish decision-makings on the optimal resources allocations of the available resources or budgets to different existing contaminated sites and projected contamination sites for a maximal risk reduction. Established management constraints such as budget limitations under different categories of costs are satisfied at the optimal solution. A stepwise optimization process is proposed in which the first step is to select optimally a limited number of sites where remediation or prevention measures will be taken, from all the existing contaminated and projected contamination sites, based on a total regionally or nationally available budget in a certain time frame such as 10 years. Then, several optimization steps determined year-by-year optimal distributions of the available yearly budgets for those selected sites. A hypothetical case study is presented to demonstrate a practical implementation of the management strategy. Several issues pertaining to groundwater contamination exposure and risk assessments and remediation cost evaluations are briefly discussed for adequately understanding implementations of the management strategy.

Keywords

Groundwater contamination Prevention and restoration System optimization Environmental management Strategy Implementation Human health and ecological risks Sustainable development 

Literature Cited

  1. American Petroleum Institute. 1989. Hydrogeologic database for groundwater modeling. Publication no. 4476, American Petroleum Institute, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  2. Bartell S. M., R. H. Gardner, R. V. O’Neill. 1992. Ecological risk estimation. Lewis Publishers, MichiganGoogle Scholar
  3. Bedient P. B., H. S. Rifai, C. J. Newell. 1999. Ground water contamination. Prentice Hall PTR, Englewood Cliffs, NJGoogle Scholar
  4. Bojorquez-Tapia L. A., L. Juarez, G. Cruz-Bello. 2002. Integrating fuzzy logic, optimization, and GIS for ecological impact assessments. Environmental Management 30:418–433Google Scholar
  5. Dynamac Corp. 1998. Characterization of hydraulic properties of potentially fractured industrial D landfill sites, and a study of heterogeneity effects on fate and transport in groundwater. Subsurface Protection and Remediation Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s National Risk Management Research LaboratoryGoogle Scholar
  6. Field S. A., A. J. Tyre, N. Jonzen, J. R. Rhodes, H. P. Possingham. 2004. REPORT: minimizing the cost of environmental management decisions by optimizing statistical thresholds. Ecology Letters 7:669–675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fu G., A. T. Kan, M. B. Tomson. 1994. Adsorption and desorption irreversibility of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in surface sediment. I. Characterization of desorption hysteresis. Environmental Toxicology Chemistry 13:1559–1567Google Scholar
  8. Gelhar L.W., C. Welty, K. R. Rehfeldt. 1992. A critical review of data on field-scale dispersion in aquifers. Water Resources Research 28:1955–1974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kan A. T., G. Fu, M. B. Tomson. 1994. Adsorption/desorption hysteresis in organic pollutant and soil/sediment interaction. Environmental Science & Technology 28:859–867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kan A. T., G. Fu, M. A. Hunter, M. B. Tomson. 1997. Irreversible adsorption of naphthalene and tetrachlorobiphenyl to Lula and Surrogate Sedments. Environmental Science & Technology 31:2176–2185. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kulatilake P. H. S. W., B. B. Panda. 2000. Effect of block size and joint geometry on jointed rock hydraulics and REV. ASCE Journal of Engineering Mechanics 126:850–858Google Scholar
  12. Macdonald J. A., M. C. Kavanaugh. 1994. Restoring contaminated groundwater: an achievable goal? Environmental Science & Technology 28:362A–368AGoogle Scholar
  13. Martin-Fernandez S., E. Martinez-Falero, J. M. Perez-Gonzalez. 2002. Optimization of the resources management in fighting wildfires. Environmental Management 30:352–364Google Scholar
  14. National Research Council. 1994. Alternatives for ground water cleanup. National Science Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  15. Nema A. K., P. M. Modak. 1998. A strategic design approach for optimization of regional hazardous waste management systems. Waste Management & Research 16:210–224Google Scholar
  16. Panda B. B., P. H. S. W. Kulatilake. 1999a. Influence of discontinuity geometry parameters and transmissivity on hydraulic behavior of discontinuous rock. ASCE Journal of Engineering Mechanics 125:41–50Google Scholar
  17. Panda B. B., P. H. S. W. Kulatilake. 1999b. Relations between fracture tensor parameters and permeability tensor parameters for discontinuous rock. ASCE Journal of Engineering Mechanics 125:51–59Google Scholar
  18. Pavlostathis S. P., K. Jaglal. 1991. Desorptive behavior of trichloroethylene in contaminated soil. Environmental Science & Technology 25:274–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pignatello J. P., B. Xing. 2000. Mechanisms of slow sorption of organic chemicals to natural particles. Environmental Science & Technology 29:1–10Google Scholar
  20. Reisch, M. 1997. Superfund reauthorization issues in the 105th Congress. Congressional Research Service Reports IB95013, The Library of CongressGoogle Scholar
  21. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1990. The national water quality inventory. 1988 Report to CongressGoogle Scholar
  22. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1992. Final State comprehensive ground water protection program guidance. EPA 100-R-93-001Google Scholar
  23. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1999. Waste research strategy. EPA/600/R-98/154Google Scholar
  24. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2003. Multimedia, Multipathway, and Multireceptor Risk Assessment (3MRA) modeling system, Volume I: Modeling system and science. EPA530-D-03-001aGoogle Scholar
  25. Wang, M. 2000. Investigation of hydraulic behaviors for fluid flow in fractured rocks based on fracture geometry parameters. EoS Transactions, 2000 Fall Meeting, American Geophysical Union, San Francisco, California. 81(48): F409Google Scholar
  26. Wang M., P. H. S. W. Kulatilake, B. Panda, M. L. Rucker. 2001. Groundwater resources evaluation case study via fracture fluid flow modeling. International Journal of Engineering Geology 62:267–291Google Scholar
  27. Wang M., P. H. S. W. Kulatilake, J. Um, J. Narvaiz. 2002. Estimation of REV size and three dimensional hydraulic conductivity tensor for a fractured rock mass through a single well packer test and discrete fracture fluid flow modeling. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences 39:887–904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Westinghouse Savannah River Company. 2004. Baseline natural attenuation processes: lines of inquiry supporting monitored natural attenuation of chlorinated solvents. WSRC-TR-2003-00329, Westinghouse Savannah River Company. Aiken, SCGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Subsurface Modeling Support (Shaw Environmental)U.S. EPA Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research CenterAdaUSA

Personalised recommendations