Environmental Management

, Volume 34, Issue 5, pp 684–690

Education and Changes in Residential Nonpoint Source Pollution

  • Michael E. Dietz
  • John C. Clausen
  • Karen K. Filchak
RESEARCH

ABSTRACT

Urban areas contribute pollutants such as excess nitrogen and bacteria to receiving water bodies. The objective of this project was to determine if stormwater quality could be improved by educating homeowners and implementing best management practices (BMPs) in a suburban neighborhood. The paired watershed design was used, where a control and treatment watershed are monitored during a calibration and treatment period. Treatment consisted of the education of homeowners and structural changes designed to minimize nonpoint pollution. Some changes in measured behavior were reported. According to the treatment period survey, 11% of respondents in the treatment watershed began fertilizing their lawn based on the results of a soil test, whereas none had done so previously. In addition, 82% of respondents in the treatment watershed stated that they left clippings on the lawn compared to 62% from the initial survey. Twelve of 34 lots (35%) adopted some BMPs following education efforts, indicating a significant (P = 0.001) increase in BMP use overall. However, a χ2 analysis of survey data indicated no significant changes in measured behavior with regard to specific questions. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) results indicated that a 75% reduction in nitrite + nitrate - N (change in intercept, P = 0.001) and a 127% reduction in fecal coliform bacteria (change in slope, P = 0.05) concentrations occurred. However, the treatment period regression was nonsignificant for bacteria. Total nitrogen, total phosphorus, and ammonia-N concentrations did not change significantly. Intensive education efforts produced BMP implementation and measurable water quality improvements.

Keywords

Stormwater Education Nonpoint Residential Impervious 

Literature Cited

  1. APHA (American Public Health Association)1998Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 20th edAmerican Public Health AssociationWashington, DCGoogle Scholar
  2. Bannerman, R. T., Owens, D. W., Dodds, R. B., Hornewer, N. J. 1993Sources of pollutants in Wisconsin stormwaterWater Science and Technology28241259Google Scholar
  3. Bormann, F. H., Balmori, D., Geballe, G. T. 2001Redesigning the American lawnYale University PressNew Haven, ConnecticutGoogle Scholar
  4. Brenner, A. J., Brush, L. A., Martin, J. S., Olsson, K. Y., Rentschler, P. L., Wolf, J. K. 1998The Huron River Watershed Council: Grassroots organization for holistic watershed managementDiffuse pollution, Water Science and Technology39331337Google Scholar
  5. Clausen, J. C., Spooner, J. 1993Paired watershed study design. EPA 41-F-93-009United States Environmental Protection AgencyWashington, DCGoogle Scholar
  6. Hottenroth, D., Harper, D., Turner, J. 1999Effectiveness of integrated stormwater management in a Portland, Oregon watershedJournal of the American Water Resources Association35633642Google Scholar
  7. McCann, A. 1997

    Site assessment: Protecting water quality around your home

    Andrews, E.Bosmans, R.Castelnuovo, R.DuPoldt, C.Filchak, K.Johnson, C. eds. Home*A*Syst, an environmental risk-assessment for the homeNortheast Regional Agricultural Engineering ServiceIthaca, New York714
    Google Scholar
  8. Morton, T. G., Gold, A. J., Sullivan, W. M. 1988Influence of overwatering and fertilization on nitrogen losses from home lawnsJournal of Environmental Quality17124130Google Scholar
  9. NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration). Climatological data annual summary, New England, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002. National Climatic Data Center, Asheville, North CarolinaGoogle Scholar
  10. Prince George’s County. 1999. Low-impact development design strategies, an integrated design approach. Maryland Department of Environmental Resources Programs and Planning DivisionGoogle Scholar
  11. Reynolds, C. A. 1979. Soil survey of New Haven County, Connecticut. USDA Soil Conservation Service,.Google Scholar
  12. SAS Institute Inc.2001The SAS System for Windows (Release 8. 0)SAS Institute, Inc.Cary, North CarolinaGoogle Scholar
  13. Smullen, J. T., Shallcross, A. L., Cave, K. A. 1999Updating the U.S. nationwide urban runoff quality data baseWater Science and Technology39916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Swann, C. P. 2000. A survey of nutrient behavior among residents in the Chesapeake Bay watershed. Pages 230–237 in Proceedings of the National Conference on Tools for Urban Water Resource Management and Protection, 7–10 February 2000, Chicago, Illinois (EPA/625/R-00/001)Google Scholar
  15. USDA (United States Department of Agriculture). 1979. Field manual for research in agricultural hydrology, Agricultural Handbook No. 224Google Scholar
  16. USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency). 1983. Methods for chemical analysis of water and wastes. Cincinnati, Ohio (EPA 600/4-79-020)Google Scholar
  17. USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency). 1992. Summary of implementation and demonstration projects in bays and estuaries. EPA 842/B-92/009. Office of Water, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  18. USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency). 1993. Guidance specifying management measures for sources of nonpoint pollution in coastal waters. EPA 840-B-92-002. Office of Water, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  19. USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency). 2000. Stormwater Phase II Final Rule. Public education and outreach minimum control measure. Fact Sheet 2.3. EPA 833-F-00-005. Office of Water, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  20. USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency). 2002. National water quality inventory 2000 report to congress. EPA-841-R-02-001. Office of Water, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  21. Urbonas, B. 1994Assessment of stormwater BMPs and their technologyWater Science and Technology29347353Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael E. Dietz
    • 1
  • John C. Clausen
    • 1
  • Karen K. Filchak
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Natural Resources Management and EngineeringUniversity of ConnecticutStorrsUSA
  2. 2.Windham Extension CenterUniversity of Connecticut Cooperative ExtensionBrooklynUSA

Personalised recommendations