Advertisement

Environmental Management

, Volume 36, Issue 1, pp 48–58 | Cite as

A Comparison of Campfire Impacts and Policies in Seven Protected Areas

  • Scott E. Reid
  • Jeffrey L. MarionEmail author
RESEARCH

ABSTRACT

Using resource-monitoring data from seven protected areas, the effectiveness of three campfire policies—campfire ban, designated campfires, and unregulated campfires—were assessed based on the number of fire sites and the amount of tree damage. Results indicate that unregulated campfire policies permitted substantial numbers of fire sites and tree damage in campsites, although fire bans did not eliminate or even substantially decrease these problems. A designated campfire policy was effective in decreasing number of fire sites, but little difference was found among policies regarding tree damage. Given the importance of campfires to visitor experiences, campfire prohibitions could be viewed as unnecessarily restrictive based on their limited success in preventing resource damage. Conclusions encourage protected-area managers to consider designated campfire policies and prohibitions on axes, hatchets, and saws to better meet resource protection and visitor experience mandates.

Keywords

Campfire impacts Camping impacts Recreation impacts Recreation ecology 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the U.S. National Park Service. We also appreciate the thoughtful guidance and thorough reviews of Kevin Larkin and Joe Roggenbuck.

Literature Cited

  1. Bratton, S. P., M. G. Hickler, and J. H. Graves. 1978. Trail and campsite erosion survey for Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Management report 16, 4 volumes. USDI National Park Service, Great Smoky Mountains National Park, Uplands Field Research Laboratory, Gatlinburg, TNGoogle Scholar
  2. Bratton, S. P., Stromberg, L., Harmon, M. E. 1982Firewood-gathering impacts in backcountry campsites in Great Smoky Mountains National ParkEnvironmental Management66371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Christensen, N. A., and D. N. Cole. 2000. Leave No Trace practices: behaviors and preferences of wilderness visitors regarding use of cookstoves and camping away from lakes. Pages 77–85 in Wilderness Science in a Time of Change Conference Proceedings. May 23-27, 1999. Missoula, MT. RMRS-P-15-VOL-5. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Ogden, UTGoogle Scholar
  4. Cole, D. N. 1992Modeling wilderness campsites: factors that influence amount of impactEnvironmental Management16255264Google Scholar
  5. Cole, D. N. 1995Wilderness research news: rationale behind fire building and wood gathering practicesMaster Network71213Google Scholar
  6. Cole, D. N., and J. Dalle-Molle. 1982. Managing campfire impacts in the backcountry. General technical report INT-135. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Ogden, UT, 16 ppGoogle Scholar
  7. Cole, D. N., A. E. Watson, T. E. Hall, and D. R. Spildie. 1997. High-use destinations in wilderness: social and biophysical impacts, visitor responses and management options. Research paper INT-RP-496. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Ogden, UT, 30 ppGoogle Scholar
  8. Daniels, M. L. 2004. Minimizing visitor impacts to protected lands: an examination of site management and visitor education methods. Masters thesis, Virginia Tech, Department of Forestry, Blacksburg, VA, 130 ppGoogle Scholar
  9. Davies, M. A. 2004. What’s burning in your campfire: garbage in, toxics out. Tech tip 0423-2327-MTDC. USDA, Forest Service, Missoula Technology and Development Center, Missoula, MT, 8 ppGoogle Scholar
  10. Farrell, T. A., and J. L. Marion. 1998. An evaluation of camping impacts and their management at Isle Royale National Park. Management report. USDI National Park Service Washington, DC, 98 ppGoogle Scholar
  11. Fenn, D. B., J. G. Gogue, and R. E. Burge. 1976. Effects of campfires on soil properties. Ecological Services Bulletin 76-20782. USDI National Park Service, Washington, DC, 16 ppGoogle Scholar
  12. Hall, T. E., Farrell, T. A. 2001Fuelwood depletion at wilderness campsites: extent and potential ecological significanceEnvironmental Conservation2817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hammitt, W. E. 1980Fire rings in the backcountry: are they necessary?Parks589Google Scholar
  14. Hammitt, W. E. 1982Alternatives to banning campfiresParks789Google Scholar
  15. Hammitt, W. E., Cole, D. N. 1998Wildland recreation: ecology and management. second editionWileyNew York, NY361Google Scholar
  16. Kendall, W. 1999Reasons why campfires should be discouragedThe Register2311Google Scholar
  17. Lee, R. G. 1975The management of human components in the Yosemite National Park ecosystemYosemite InstituteYosemite National Park, CA134Google Scholar
  18. Leung, Y. F., and J. L. Marion. 1995. A Survey of campsite conditions in eleven wilderness areas of the Jefferson National Forest. Final report. USDA Forest Service, Jefferson National Forest, Blacksburg, VA, 79 ppGoogle Scholar
  19. Leung, Y. F., and J. L. Marion. 1998. A Survey of whitewater recreation impacts along five West Virginia rivers. Final report. USDI U.S. Geological Survey, Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Blacksburg, VA, 106 ppGoogle Scholar
  20. Liddle, M. 1997Recreation ecology: the ecological impact of outdoor recreation and tourismChapman and HallNew York, NY639 ppGoogle Scholar
  21. Lucas, R. C. 1980. Use patterns and visitor characteristics, attitudes and preferences in nine wilderness and other roadless areas. Research paper INT-253. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Ogden, UT, 89 ppGoogle Scholar
  22. Manning, R. E., W. Valliere, J. J. Bacon, A. Graefe, G. Kyle, and R. Hennessey. 2000. Use and users of the Appalachian Trail: a source book. Appalachian Trail Conference, Harpers Ferry, WV, 479 ppGoogle Scholar
  23. Marion, J. L. 1994. Changes in campsite condition: results from campsite monitoring at Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area. Technical report NPS/MARDEWA/NRTR-94/063. USDI National Park Service, Mid-Atlantic Region, Philadelphia, PA, 83 ppGoogle Scholar
  24. Marion, J. L. 1995Environmental auditing: capabilities and management utility of recreation impact monitoring programEnvironmental Management19763771Google Scholar
  25. Marion, J. L. 1998. Recreation ecology research findings: implications for wilderness and park managers. Pages 188–196 in Proceedings of the National Outdoor Ethics Conference, April 18-21, 1996, St. Louis, MO. Izaak Walton League of America, Gaithersburg, MDGoogle Scholar
  26. Marion, J. L., Cole, D. N. 1996Spatial and temporal variation in soil and vegetation impacts on campsitesEcological Applications6520530Google Scholar
  27. Marion, J. L., Farrell, T. A. 2002Management practices that concentrate visitor activities: camping impact management at Isle Royale National Park, USAJournal of Environmental Management66201212CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Marion, J. L., and Y. F. Leung. 1997. An Assessment of campsite conditions in Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Research/resources management report. USDI National Park Service, Southeast Regional Office, Atlanta, GA, 127 ppGoogle Scholar
  29. Marion, J. L., and L. C. Merriam 1985. Recreational impacts on well-established campsites in the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness. Station bulletin AD-SB-2502. University of Minnesota. Agricultural Experiment Station, St. Paul, MN, 15 ppGoogle Scholar
  30. Marion, J. L., J. W. Roggenbuck, and R. Manning. 1993. Problems and practices in backcountry recreation management: a survey of National Park Service managers. Natural resources report NPS/NRVT/NRR-93/12. USDI National Park Service. Denver, CO, 48 ppGoogle Scholar
  31. McEwen, D., D. N. Cole, and M. Simon. 1996. Campsite impacts in four wildernesses in the South-Central United States. Research paper INT-RP-490. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Ogden, UT, 12 ppGoogle Scholar
  32. Roggenbuck, J. W., Williams, D. R., Watson, A. E. 1993Defining acceptable conditions in wildernessEnvironmental Management17187197Google Scholar
  33. Shelby, B., Shindler, B. 1992Interest group standards for ecological impacts at wilderness campsitesLeisure Sciences141727Google Scholar
  34. Shelby, B., Vaske, J., Harris, R. 1988User standards for ecological impacts at wilderness campsitesJournal of Leisure Research20245256Google Scholar
  35. Vachowski, B. 1997. Leave No Trace campfires and firepans. Report 9723-2815-MTDC. USDA Forest Service, Technology and Development Program, Missoula, MT, 12 ppGoogle Scholar
  36. Washburne, R. F., and D. N. Cole. 1983. Problems and practices in wilderness management: a survey of managers. Research paper INT-304. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT, 15 ppGoogle Scholar
  37. Weetman, G. F., Webber, B. 1972The influence of wood harvesting on the nutrient status of two spruce standsCanadian Journal of Forest Resources2351369Google Scholar
  38. White, D., Hall, T. E., Farrell, T. A. 2001Influence of ecological impacts and other campsite characteristics on wilderness visitors’ campsite choicesJournal of Park and Recreation Administration198397Google Scholar
  39. Williams, P. B., and J. L. Marion. 1995. Assessing campsite conditions for limits of acceptable change management in Shenandoah National Park. Technical Report NPS/MARSHEN/NRTR-95/071. USDI National Park Service, Luray, VA, 138 ppGoogle Scholar
  40. Williams, P. B., and J. L. Marion. 1996. Assessment of backcountry campsite conditions in Big Bend National Park. Research/resources management report. USDI National Park Service, Southwest Regional Office, Santa Fe, NM, 63 ppGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Trails Resource Specialist Summit County Open SpaceFriscoUSA
  2. 2.Leader, Virginia Tech Field UnitUnited States Geological SurveyPatuxent Wildlife Research CenterBlacksburgUSA

Personalised recommendations