Environmental Management

, Volume 35, Issue 4, pp 396–409 | Cite as

Integrated Approaches in Urban Storm Drainage: Where Do We Stand?

  • Wolfgang rauch
  • Katja Seggelke
  • Rebekah Brown
  • Peter Krebs
PROFILE

Abstract

Integrated approaches to urban stormwater drainage management are being increasingly advocated as necessary for advancing more sustainable and holistic management of urban water environments. In this paper, the status of integrated approaches in the management of urban stormwater discharges to receiving waterways is summarized. The starting point of the paper is with the recent scientific contributions, revealing that integration is being pursued and implemented predominantly at two conceptual levels. These include 1) integrating the technical system with the receiving waterway environment, and 2) considering the interaction and influence of the human system with the technical system through processes such as stakeholder and public participation. Additionally, it is argued that the evolving shift towards the implementation of water-quality-based strategies advances the need for further development and application of integrated models and approaches. The cases of online physically based models for predictive control and integrated source control and public participation are presented as examples of such ongoing developments in pursuit of integrated urban stormwater management.

Keywords

Urban drainage Integrated management Modeling Water quality Public participation Source control 

References

  1. Bishop, P., Davis, G. 2002Mapping public participation in policy choicesAustralian Journal of Public Administration611429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown, R. R. 1998. Stormwater Source Control: Facing the Challenges. Proceedings of the First South Pacific Conference on Comprehensive Stormwater & Aquatic Ecosystem Management. 22–25 February, Auckland, New Zealand. 2:66–74Google Scholar
  3. Brown, R. R. 2003. Institutionalisation of integrated urban water management: multiple-case analysis of local management reform across metropolitan Sydney. PhD dissertation. The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia. February 2003Google Scholar
  4. Brown, R. R., and R. Ryan. 2001a. The source control paradox: Professionalism, knowledge and expertise. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference NOVATECH 2001. 25–27 June, Lyon, France. 2:683–690, ISBN 2-9509337-3-4Google Scholar
  5. Brown, R. R., and R. Ryan. 2001b. Evaluation of the stormwater management planning process. Environment Protection Authority EPA 2000/88, Sydney. ISBN 0-7313-2756Google Scholar
  6. Brown, R. R., R. Ryan, and R. McManus. 2001. An Australian case study: Why a transdisciplinary framework is essential for integrated urban stormwater planning. Proceedings of Frontiers in Urban Water Management: deadlock or hope? Marseilles, France. June 2001, IHP-V. Technical Documents in Hydrology 45:251–259Google Scholar
  7. Burkhard, R., Deletic, A., Craig, A. 2000Techniques for water and wastewater management: A review of techniques and their integration in planningUrban Water2197 221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chopyak, J., Levesque, P. 2002Public participation in science and technology decision-making: trends for the futureTechnology in Society24155166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Coombes, P. J., Kuczera, G., Kalma, J. D., Argue, J. R. 2002An evaluation of the benefits of source control measures at the regional scaleUrban Water4307320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Erbe, V., Frehmann, T., Geiger, W. F., Krebs, P., Londong, J., Rosenwinkel, K.-H., Seggelke, K. 2002Integrated modelling as an analysing and optimisation tool for urban watershed managementWater Science and Technology46141150PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Fischer, F. 1990Technocracy and the politics of expertiseSageLondonGoogle Scholar
  12. FWR1994Urban pollution management manualFoundation for Water ResearchMarlow, UKGoogle Scholar
  13. Gujer, W., Krejci, V., Schwarzenbach, R., Zobrist, J. 1982Von der Kanalisation ins Grundwasser—Charakterisierung eines Regenereignisses im GlattalGas-Wasser-Abwasser62298311Google Scholar
  14. Gullstrand, M., Lowgren, M., Castensson, R. 2003Water issues in comprehensive municipal planning: a review of the Motala River BasinJournal of Environmental Management69239247CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Harding, R. 1998Environmental decision-making: the role of scientists, engineers and the publicThe Federation PressSydneyGoogle Scholar
  16. Harremoës, P., Rauch, W. 1996Integrated design and analysis of drainage systems, including sewers, treatment plant and receiving watersJournal of Hydraulic Research34815826Google Scholar
  17. Harremoës, P. 2003Ethical aspects of scientific incertitude in environmental analysis and decision makingJournal of Cleaner Production11705712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Healey, P. 1997Collaborative planningMcMillanLondonGoogle Scholar
  19. Hendriks, C. 2002Institutions of deliberative democratic processes and interests groups: Roles, tensions and incentivesAustralian Journal of Public Administration616475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Herrmann, T., Schmida, U. 2000Rainwater utilisation in Germany: Efficiency, dimensioning, hydraulic and environmental aspectsUrban Water1307316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Huisman, J. 2001. Transport and transformation processes in combined sewers. ETH dissertation no. 13989, Institute for Hydromechanics and Water Management, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  22. Johansen, R. C., Imhoff, J. C., Kittle, J. L., Donigian, A. S. 1984Hydrological simulation model Fortran: User manual for release 8: EPA 600/3-84-066US Environmental Protection AgencyAthensGeorgiaGoogle Scholar
  23. Johnson, N., Ravnborg, H. M., Westermann, O., Probst, K. 2002User participation in watershed management and researchWater Policy3507520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kallis, G., Butler, D. 2001The EU water framework directive: Measures and implicationsWater Policy3125142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kerr, J., Chung, K. 2002Evaluating watershed management projectsWater Policy3537554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Krebs, P. 2000. Immissionskonzept in der Siedlungsentwässerung vor dem Hintergrund der EU-Wasserrahmenrichtlinie. Report no. 103, 17–35 pp. Institute for Urban Water Management, University of Karlsruhe, Germany. ISBN 3-9807000-6-2Google Scholar
  27. Krebs, P., and W. Rauch. 2000. Dynamics at the interfaces of the compartments in the integrated wastewater system. Proceedings, IMUG Conference, Prague, Czech RepublicGoogle Scholar
  28. Krebs, P., Holzer, P., Huisman, J. L., Rauch, W. 1999First flush of dissolved compoundsWater Science and Technology395562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Krejci, V., R. Fankhauser, S. Gammeter, M. Grottker, B. Harmuth, P. Merz, and W. Schilling. 1994. Integrierte Siedlungsentwässerung Fallstudie Fehraltorf. Schriftenreihe der EAWAG Nr. 8, Dübendorf, Schweiz. ISBN: 3-906484-09-2Google Scholar
  30. Lloyd, S. D., Wong, T. H. F., Porter, B. 2001Implementing an ecological sustainable stormwater drainage system in a residential developmentWater Science and Technology4517Google Scholar
  31. Lundqvist, J., Narain, S., Turton, A. 2001

    Social, institutional and regulatory issues

    Maksimovic, C.Tejada-Guilbert, J. A. eds. Frontiers in urban water management: Deadlock or hopeIWA PublishingLondon344398
    Google Scholar
  32. Maksimovic, C., Tejada-Guilbert, J. A. 2001Frontiers in urban water management: Deadlock or hopeIWA PublishingLondonGoogle Scholar
  33. Marsalek, J., Rochfort, Q., Savic, D. 2001

    Urban water as a part of integrated catchment management

    Maksimovic, C.Tejada-Guilbert, J. A. eds. Frontiers in urban water management: Deadlock or hopeIWA PublishingLondon3783
    Google Scholar
  34. Matuzic, J., G. O’loughlin, S. Beecham, and S. Myl. 2001. Stormwater infiltration experiments on a sandy area in eastern Australia. Pages 825–832 in Proceedings of Novatech 2001. ISBN 2-9509337-3-4Google Scholar
  35. McManus, R., and R. R. Brown. 2002. The increasing organisational uptake of source control approaches for sustainable stormwater management. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Urban Storm Drainage—CD ROM. 30 August–3 September 2002, Portland, OR, USAGoogle Scholar
  36. Meirlaen, J., Huyghebaert, B., Sforzi, F., Benedetti, L., Vanrolleghem, P. 2001Fast, simultaneous simulation of the integrated urban wastewater system using mechanistic surrogate modelsWater Science and Technology43301309Google Scholar
  37. Nolde, E. 2000Greywater reuse systems for toilet flushing in multi-storey buildings—over ten years experience in BerlinUrban Water1275284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. NSWEPA. 1998. Managing urban stormwater: Source control. New South Wales Environment Protection Authority. Chatswood, Australia. December 1998, http://www. epa.nsw.gov.au/stormwater/download/srcectrl.pdf
  39. Rauch, W., Harremoës, P. 1999Genetic algorithms in real time control applied to minimize transient pollution from urban wastewater systemsWater Research3312651277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rauch, W., Aalderink, H., Krebs, P., Schilling, W., Vanrolleghem, P. 1998Requirements for integrated wastewater models driven by receiving water objectivesWater Science and Technology3897104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rauch, W., Bertrand-Krajewski, J.-L., Krebs, P., Mark, O., Schilling, W., Schuetze, M., Vanrolleghem, P. A. 2002aMathematical modeling of integrated urban drainage systemsWater Science and Technology458194Google Scholar
  42. Rauch, W., Brockmann, D., Peters, I., Larsen, T. A., Gujer, W. 2003Combining urine separation with waste design: an analysis using a stochastic model for urine productionWater Research37681689CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Rauch, W., Krejci, V., Gujer, W. 2002bREBEKA—a software tool for planning urban drainage on the basis of predicted impacts on receiving waterUrban Water4355361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Robertson, H. A., McGee, T. K. 2003Applying local knowledge: The contribution of oral history to wetland rehabilitation at Kanyapella Basin, AustraliaJournal of Environmental Management69275287CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Schütze, M. R. 1998. Integrated simulation and optimum control of the urban wastewater system. PhD dissertation, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, LondonGoogle Scholar
  46. Seggelke, K. 2002. Integrierte Bewirtschaftung von Kanalnetz und Kläranlage zur Reduzierung der Gewässerbelastung. PhD Thesis, Institute for Water Quality and Waste Management, University of Hanover, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  47. Seggelke, K., Rosenwinkel, K.-H. 2002Online-simulation of the WWTP to minimise the total emission of WWTP and sewer systemWater Science and Technology45101108Google Scholar
  48. Taylor, A., and T. Wong. 2002. Non-structural stormwater quality best management practices—A literature review. Cooperative Research Centre for Catchment Hydrology, technical report 02/13, December 2002, ISBN 1 876006935Google Scholar
  49. Taylor, A., and T. Wong. 2003. Non-structural stormwater quality best management practices—Guidelines. Cooperative Research Centre for Catchment Hydrology, technical report 03/14, November 2003, ISBN 1 920813047Google Scholar
  50. Vanrolleghem, P., Schilling, W., Rauch, W., Krebs, P., Aalderink, H. 1999Setting up measuring campaigns for integrated wastewater modellingWater Science and Technology39257268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Walker, D. J., Hurl, S. 2002The reduction of heavy metals in a stormwater wetlandEcological Engineering18407414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Warburton, D. eds. 1998Community & sustainable development: Participation in the futureEarthscan PublicationsLondonGoogle Scholar
  53. WEF. 1998. Urban runoff quality management. WEF manual of practice no. 23 and ASCE manual and report on engineering practice no. 87. Water Environment Federation, Alexandria, USA. ISBN 1-57278-039-8 and 0-7844-0174-8Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wolfgang rauch
    • 1
  • Katja Seggelke
    • 2
  • Rebekah Brown
    • 3
  • Peter Krebs
    • 4
  1. 1.Institute of Environmental EngineeringUniversity InnsbruckAustria
  2. 2.Institute for Technical and Scientific Hydrology (itwh)Germany
  3. 3.School of Geography and Environmental ScienceMonash UniversityAustralia
  4. 4.Institute for Urban Water ManagementDresden University of TechnologyGermany

Personalised recommendations