Environmental Management

, Volume 33, Issue 3, pp 355–367 | Cite as

Quality and Quantity of Suspended Particles in Rivers: Continent-Scale Patterns in the United States

Research

Abstract

Suspended solids or sediments can be pollutants in rivers, but they are also an important component of lotic food webs. Suspended sediment data for rivers were obtained from a United States–wide water quality database for 622 stations. Data for particulate nitrogen, suspended carbon, discharge, watershed area, land use, and population were also used. Stations were classified by United States Environmental Protection Agency ecoregions to assess relationships between terrestrial habitats and the quality and quantity of total suspended solids (TSS). Results indicate that nephelometric determinations of mean turbidity can be used to estimate mean suspended sediment values to within an order of magnitude (r2 = 0.89). Water quality is often considered impaired above 80 mg TSS L−1, and 35% of the stations examined during this study had mean values exceeding this level. Forested systems had substantially lower TSS and somewhat higher carbon-to-nitrogen ratios of suspended materials. The correlation between TSS and discharge was moderately well described by an exponential relationship, with the power of the exponent indicating potential acute sediment events in rivers. Mean sediment values and power of the exponent varied significantly with ecoregion, but TSS values were also influenced by land use practices and geomorphological characteristics. Results confirm that, based on current water quality standards, excessive suspended solids impair numerous rivers in the United States.

Ecoregions Land use Pollution Seston Suspended sediment Turbidity Water quality 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the Kansas Department of Health and Environment and the Konza NSF LTER for financial support of this project. Dolly Gudder made helpful comments on the manuscript. Jeff Pontius and Mendy Smith assisted with statistical analyses. This is contribution 02-66-J from the Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station.

Literature Cited

  1. Alexander, R. B., Slack, J. R. Ludke, A. S., Fitzgerald, K. F., Schertz. T. L. 1996. Data for selected US Geological Survey National Stream Water-Quality Monitoring Networks (WQN). USGS Digital Data Series DDS-37.Google Scholar
  2. Alexander, R. B., Slack, J. R., Ludke, A. S., Fitzgerald, K. F., Schertz, T. L. 1998Data from selected U.S. Geological Survey national stream water quality monitoring networksWater Resources Research924012405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. ASTM, 1999, D 3977-97, Standard test method for determining sediment concentration in water samples, annual book of standards, water and environmental technology, 1999, Volume 11.02, p 389–394.Google Scholar
  4. Berkman, H. E., Rabeni, C. F. 1987Effect of siltation on stream fish communitiesEnvironmental Biology of Fishes18285294Google Scholar
  5. Bryce, S. A., Omernik, J. M., Larsen, D. P. 1999Ecoregions: A geographic framework to guide risk characterization and ecosystem managementEnvironmental Practice1131155Google Scholar
  6. Commission for Environmental Cooperation. 1997. Ecological regions of North America: Toward a common perspective. Commission for Environmental Cooperation, Montreal Map (scale 1:12,500,000). Quebec, Canada. 71 pp.Google Scholar
  7. Cooper, C. M. 1993Biological effects of agriculturally derived surface water pollutants on aquatic systems—a reviewJournal of Environmental Quality22402408Google Scholar
  8. Cooper, C. M. 1988The toxicity of suspended sediments on selected freshwater invertebratesInternationalen vereinigung für theoretische und angewandte Limnologie, Verhandlungen2316191625Google Scholar
  9. Culp, J. M., Wrona, F. J., Davies, R. W. 1986Response of stream benthos and drift to fine sediment deposition versus transportCanadian Journal of Zoology6413451351Google Scholar
  10. Earhart, H. G. 1984Monitoring total suspended solids by using nephelometryEnvironmental Management88186Google Scholar
  11. Garvey, J. E., Marschall, E. A., Wright, R. A. 1998From star charts to stoneflies: detecting relationships in continuous bivariate dataEcology79442447Google Scholar
  12. Griffith, G. E., Omernik, J. M., Woods, A. J. 1999Ecoregions, watershed, basins, and HUCs: How state and federal agencies frame water qualityJournal of Soil and Water Conservation54666677Google Scholar
  13. Hubbard, R. K., Sheridan, J. M., Marti, L. R. 1990Dissolved suspended solids transport from coastal plain watershedsJournal of Environmental Quality19413420Google Scholar
  14. Lettenmaier, D. P., Hooper, E. R., Wagoner, C., Faris, K. B. 1991Trends in stream quality in the continental United States, 1978–1987Water Resources Research27327339Google Scholar
  15. Omernik, J. M. 1987Ecoregions of the conterminous United States. Map (scale 1:7,500,000)Annals of the Association of American Geography77118125Google Scholar
  16. Omernik, J. M., Bailey, R. G. 1997Distinguishing between watersheds and ecoregionsJournal of the American Water Research Association33935949Google Scholar
  17. Pan, Y., Stevenson, R. J., Hill, B. H., Herlihy, A. T. 2000Ecoregions and benthic diatom assemblages in Mid-Atlantic Highlands streams, USAJournal of the North American Benthological Society19518540Google Scholar
  18. Pozo, J., Elosegui, A., Basaguren, A. 1993Seston transport variability at different spatial and temporal scales in the Aguera watershed (north Spain)Water Research28125136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rice, R. M., Lewis, J. 1991Estimating erosion risks associated with logging and forest roads in northwestern CaliforniaWater Research Bulletin27809818Google Scholar
  20. Thomas, R. B., Lewis, J. 1993A comparison of selection at list time and time-stratified sampling for estimating suspended sediment loadsWater Resources Research2912471256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Thomas, R. B., Lewis, J. 1995An evaluation of flow-stratified sampling for estimating suspended sediment loadsJournal of Hydrobiology1702745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. United States Environmental Protection Agency. 2000. Water quality conditions in the United States a profile from the 1998 National Water Quality Inventory Report to Office of Water (4503F) EPA841-F-00-006.Google Scholar
  23. VanSickle, J., Beschta, R. L. 1983Supply-based models of suspended sediment transport in streamsWater Resources Research19768778Google Scholar
  24. Wallace, J. B., Merritt, R. W. 1980Filter-feeding ecology of aquatic insectsAnnual Review of Entomology25103132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Waters, T. F. 1995. Sediment in streams: sources, biological effects, and control. American Fisheries Society Monograph no. 7. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland.Google Scholar
  26. Whiles, M. R., Dodds, W. K. 2002Relationships between stream size, suspended particles, and filter-feeding macroinvertebrates in a Great Plains drainage networkJournal of Environmental Quality3115891600PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Wood, P. L., Armitage, P. D. 1997Biological effects of fine sediment in the lotic environmentEnvironmental Management21203217CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Wotton, R. S. 1994The biology of particles in aquatic systemsLewis PublishersBoca Raton, FloridaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of BiologyKansas State UniversityKansas 66506USA
  2. 2.Department of ZoologySouthern Illinois UniversityIlinois, 62901-6501USA

Personalised recommendations