Environmental Management

, Volume 32, Issue 3, pp 312–321 | Cite as

Trail Impacts in Sagarmatha (Mt. Everest) National Park, Nepal: A Logistic Regression Analysis

Profile

Abstract

A trail study was conducted in the Sagarmatha (Mt. Everest) National Park, Nepal, during 1997–1998. Based on that study, this paper examines the spatial variability of trail conditions and analyzes factors that influence trail conditions. Logistic regression (multinomial logit model) is applied to examine the influence of use and environmental factors on trail conditions. The assessment of trail conditions is based on a four-class rating system: (class I, very little damaged; class II, moderately damaged, class III, heavily damaged; and class IV, severely damaged). Wald statistics and a model classification table have been used for data interpretation. Results indicate that altitude, trail gradient, hazard potential, and vegetation type are positively associated with trail condition. Trails are more degraded at higher altitude, on steep gradients, in areas with natural hazard potential, and within shrub/grassland zones. Strong correlations between high levels of trail degradation and higher frequencies of visitors and lodges were found. A detailed analysis of environmental and use factors could provide valuable information to park managers in their decisions about trail design, layout and maintenance, and efficient and effective visitor management strategies. Comparable studies on high alpine environments are needed to predict precisely the effects of topographic and climatic extremes. More refined approaches and experimental methods are necessary to control the effects of environmental factors.

Keywords

Trail degradation Trail condition class Visitor impacts Logistic regression Environmental factors Use factors 

References

  1. 1.
    Andrews, C. 1983Photographs and notes on tourism and deforestation in the Solu Khumbu, Nepal.Mountain Research and Development3182185Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bjønness, I. 1980Ecological conflicts and economic dependency on tourist trekking in Sagarmatha (Mt. Everest) National Park, Nepal. An alternative approach to park planning.Norsk Geografisk Tiddskrift34119138Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boucher, D. H., Aviles, J., Chepote, R., Gil, O. E., Vilchez, B. 1991Recovery of trailside vegetation from trampling in a tropical rain forest.Environmental Management15257262Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bratton, S. P., Stromberg, L. L., Harmon, M. E. 1982Firewood-gathering impacts in backcountry campsites in Great Smoky Mountains National Park.Environmental Management66371Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bright, J. A. 1986Hiker impact on herbaceous vegetation along trails in an evergreen woodland of central Texas.Biological Conservation365369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bryan, R. B. 1977The influence of soil properties on degradation of mountain hiking trail at Grovelsjon.Geografiska Annaler59A4965Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Byers A. 1987. A geoecological study of landscape change and man accelerated soil loss: the case of Sagarmatha (Mt. Everest) National Park, Khumbu, Nepal. PhD thesis. Department of Geography, University of Colorado, Boulder, ColoradoGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cole, D. 1983. Assessing and monitoring backcountry trail conditions. Research Paper INT-303. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Burlington, VermontGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cole, D.N. 1987. Research on soil and vegetation in wilderness: a state of knowledge review. Pages 135–177 in Proceedings - National Wilderness research Conference: Issues, State- of-Knowledge, Future Directions. General Technical Report INT-220, USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Ogden, UtahGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Farrell, T. A., Marion, J. L. 2001Identifying and assessing ecotourism visitor impacts at eight protected areas in Costa Rica and Belize.Environmental Conservation28215225Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Farrell, T. A., Marion, J. L. 2001/2002Trail impacts and trail impact management related to visitation at Torres del Paine National Park, Chile.Leisure/Loisir263159Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Garratt, K. A. J. 1981. Sagarmatha National Park management plan. Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation, His Majesty’s Government, NepalGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hammitt, W. E., Cole, D. N. 1998Wildland recreation: Ecology and Management. 2nd ed.John WileyNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hartley, E. 1976

    Visitor impact on subalpine meadow vegetation in Glacier National Park, Montana. Pages 1279–1286

    Linn, R. M. eds. Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Scientific Research in National Parks.American Institute of Biological Sciences and USDI National Park ServiceWashington, DC
    Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Helgath, S. F. 1975. Trail deterioration in the Selway-Bitterroot Wilderness. Research Note INT-193. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Ogden, UtahGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lance, A. N., Baugh, I. D., Love, J. A. 1989Continued footpath widening in the Cairngorm Mountains, Scotland.Biological Conservation49201214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Leung, Y. F., Marion, J. L. 2000

    Recreation impacts and management in wilderness: a state-of-knowledge review. Pages 23–48

    Cole, D. N.McCool, S. F.Borrie, W. T.O’Loughlin, J. eds. Wilderness science in a time of change conference–volume 5: Wilderness ecosystems, threats, and managementUSDA Forest ServiceOgden, UT
    Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Liddle, M. J. 1997Recreation ecology: the ecological impact of outdoor recreation and ecotourismChapman and HallLondonGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Marion, J. L. 1994. An assessment of trail conditions in Great Smoky Mountains National Park. US Department of Interior, National Parks Service, Southeast Region. Atlanta, GeorgiaGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Marion, J. L., Leung, Y. F. 1999Assessing trail conditions in protected areas: An application of a problem assessment method in Great Smoky Mountains National Park, USA.Environmental Conservation26270279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Marion, J. L., Leung, Y. F. 2001Trail resource impacts and an examination of alternative assessment techniques.Journal of Park and Recreation Administration191737Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    McFadden, D. 1979

    Quantitative methods for analyzing travel behavior of individuals: Some recent developments. Pages 279–318

    Hensher, D. A.Stopher, P. R. eds. Behavioral travel modellingCroom HelmLondon
    Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Monz, C. 2000

    Recreation resource assessment and monitoring techniques for mountain regions. Pages 47–68

    Godde, P. M.Price, M.Zimmermann, F. M. eds. Tourism and development in mountain regionsCABI PublishingOxon, UK
    Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mortensen, C. O. 1989Visitor use impacts within the Knobstone Trail Corridor.Journal of Soil and Water Conservation44156159Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nepal, S. 1999. Tourism induced environmental changes in the Nepalese Himalaya: a comparative analysis of the Everest, Annapurna, and Mustang regions. PhD thesis. Submitted to the Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Berne, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nepal, S. K., Kohler, T., Banzhaf, B. 2002Great Himalaya: tourism and the dynamics of change in NepalSwiss Foundation for Alpine ResearchBerneGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences). 1998. SYSTAT 8.0. SPSS Inc., ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sun, D., Liddle, M. D. 1993A survey of trampling effects on vegetation and soil in eight tropical and subtropical sites.Environmental Management17497510Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Weaver, T., D. Dale, and E. Hartley. 1979. The relationship of trail condition to use, vegetation, user, slope, season, and time. Pages 94–100 in Proceedings—recreational impact on wildlands. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest RegionGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wilson, J. P., Seney, J. P. 1994Erosional impacts of hikers, horses, motorcycles and off-road bicycles on mountain trails in Montana.Mountain Research and Development147788Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wright, R. E. 1995

    Logistic Regression. Pages 217–244

    Grimm, L. G.Yarnold, P. R. eds. Reading and understanding multivariate statisticsAmerican Psychological AssociationWashington, DC
    Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wrigley, N. 1985Categorical data analysis for geographers and environmental scientistsLongmanNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Zimmermann, M., Bichsel, M., Kienholz, H. 1986Mountain Hazards Mapping in the Khumbu Himal, Nepal, with prototype map, scale 1:50,000.Mountain Research and Development62940PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Geography/Resource Recreation and Tourism ProgramUniversity of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, British ColumbiaCanada

Personalised recommendations