Environmental Management

, Volume 32, Issue 6, pp 693–705

Impacts of Camping on Vegetation: Response and Recovery Following Acute and Chronic Disturbance

Research

Abstract

Experiments with controlled levels of recreational camping were conducted on previously undisturbed sites in two different plant communities in the subalpine zone of the Wind River Mountains, Wyoming, USA. The plant communities were coniferous forest with understory dominated by the low shrub Vaccinium scoparium and a riparian meadow of intermixed grasses and forbs, of which Deschampsia cespitosa was most abundant. Sites were camped on at intensities of either one or four nights per year, for either one (acute disturbance) or three consecutive years (chronic disturbance). Recovery was followed for three years on sites camped on for one year and for one year on sites camped on for three years. Reductions in vegetation cover and vegetation height were much more pronounced on sites in the forest than on sites in the meadow. In both plant communities, increases in vegetation impact were not proportional to increases in either years of camping or nights per year of camping. Close to the center of campsites, near-maximum levels of impact occurred after the first year of camping on forested sites and after the second year on meadow sites. Meadow sites recovered completely within a year, at the camping intensities employed in the experiments. Forest sites, even those camped on for just one night, did not recover completely within three years. Differences between acute and chronic disturbance were not pronounced.

Keywords

Campsites ecological impact recreation ecology resistance vegetation impact Wilderness 

References

  1. Bayfield, N. G. 1979.Recovery of four montane heath communities on Cairngorm, Scotland, from disturbance by trampling.Biological Conservation15165179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bender, E. A., Case, T. J., Gilpin, M. E. 1984Perturbation experiments in community ecology: theory and practice.Ecology65113Google Scholar
  3. Bogucki, D. J., Malanchuk, J. L., Schenck, T. E. 1975Impact of short-term camping on ground-level vegetation.Journal of Soil and Water Conservation30231232Google Scholar
  4. Cole, D. N. 1987

    Research on soil and vegetation in wilderness: a state-of-knowledge review.

    Lucas, R. C. eds. Proceedings, national wilderness research conference: issues, state-of-knowledge, future directions. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report INT-220.Intermountain Research StationOgden, Utah135177
    Google Scholar
  5. Cole, D. N. 1989. Area of vegetation loss: a new index of campsite impact. USDA Forest Service Research Note INT-389, Intermountain Research Station, Ogden, Utah.Google Scholar
  6. Cole, D. N. 1993. Campsites in three western wildernesses: proliferation and changes in condition over 12 to 16 years. USDA Forest Service Research Paper INT-463. Intermountain Research Station, Ogden, Utah.Google Scholar
  7. Cole, D. N. 1995aDisturbance of natural vegetation by camping: experimental applications of low-level stress.Environmental Management19405416Google Scholar
  8. Cole, D. N. 1995bExperimental trampling of vegetation. II. Predictors of resistance and resilience.Journal of Applied Ecology32215224Google Scholar
  9. Cole, D. N., Monz, C. A. 2002Trampling disturbance of high-elevation vegetation, Wind River Mountains, Wyoming, U.S.A.Arctic, Antarctic and Alpine Research34365376Google Scholar
  10. Cole, D. N., Hammond, T. P., McCool, S. F. 1997Information quantity and communication effectiveness: low impact messages on wilderness trailside bulletin boards.Leisure Sciences195972Google Scholar
  11. Frissell, S. S., Duncan, D. P. 1965Campsite preference and deterioration in the Quetico-Superior canoe country.Journal of Forestry65256260Google Scholar
  12. Gniesser, C. H. (2000) “Ecological consequences of recreation on subarctic-alpine tundra: experimental assessment and predictive modeling as planning tools for sustainable visitor management in protected areas.” Dissertation, University of Calgary, AB, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  13. Hampton, B., Cole, D. 1995Soft paths: how to use the wilderness without harming it, 2nd ed.Stackpole BooksMechanicsburg, PennsylvaniaGoogle Scholar
  14. Hendee, J. C., Dawson, C. P. 2002Wilderness management: stewardship and protection of resources and values, 3rd ed.Fulcrum PublishingGolden, ColoradoGoogle Scholar
  15. Hurlbert, S. N. 1984Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments.Ecological Monographs54187211PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Leonard, R. E., J. M. McBride, P. W. Conkling, and J. L. McMahon. 1983. Ground cover changes resulting from low-level camping stress on a remote site. USDA Forest Service Research Paper NE-530, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, Broomall, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  17. Leung, Y., Marion, J. L. 2000

    Recreation impacts and management in wilderness: a state-of-knowledge review.

    Cole, D. N.McCool, S. F.Borrie, W. T.O’Loughlin, J. eds. Wilderness science in a time of change—volume 5: wilderness ecosystems, threats, and management. USDA Forest Service Proceedings RMRS-P-15-Vol-5Rocky Mountain Research StationOgden, Utah 2348
    Google Scholar
  18. Liddle, M. J. 1997Recreation ecology: the ecological impact of outdoor recreation and tourism.Chapman and HallLondonGoogle Scholar
  19. Manning, R., Ballinger, N., Marion, J., Roggenbuck, J. 1996Recreation management in natural areas: problems and practices, status and trends.Natural Areas Journal16142146Google Scholar
  20. Marion, J. L., Cole, D. N. 1996Spatial and temporal variation in soil and vegetation impacts on campsites.Ecological Applications62520530Google Scholar
  21. Marion, J. L., Farrell, T. A. 2002Management practices that concentrate visitor activities: camping impact management at Isle Royale National Park, USA.Journal of Environmental Management66201212CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Newsome, D., Moore, S. A., Dowling, R. K. 2002Natural area tourism: ecology, impacts and management.Channel View PublicationsCleveden, UKGoogle Scholar
  23. Taylor, K. C., Reader, R. J., Larson, D. W. 1993Scale-dependent inconsistencies in the effects of trampling on a forest understory community.Environmental Management17239248Google Scholar
  24. Wagar, J. A. 1964The carrying capacity of wild lands for recreation. Forest Science Monograph 7.Society of American ForestersWashington, DCGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Aldo Leopold Wilderness Research InstituteRocky Mountain Research Station, USDA Forest Service, P.O. Box 8089, Missoula, Montana 59807USA
  2. 2.National Outdoor Leadership School, Lander, WY 82520USA
  3. 3.St. Lawrence University, CantonNew York 13617, USA

Personalised recommendations