Advertisement

Preemptive Analgesic Efficacy of the Ultrasound-Guided Bilateral Superficial Serratus Plane Block on Postoperative Pain in Breast Reduction Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study

  • Ali AhiskaliogluEmail author
  • Ahmet Murat Yayik
  • Ufuk Demir
  • Elif Oral Ahiskalioglu
  • Erkan Cem Celik
  • Mursel Ekinci
  • Mine Celik
  • Hakan Cinal
  • Onder Tan
  • Muhammed Enes Aydin
Original Article Breast Surgery
  • 60 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

Breast surgery is an exceedingly common procedure and associated with an increased incidence of acute and chronic pain. Preemptive regional anesthesia techniques may improve postoperative analgesia for patients undergoing breast surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of preoperative bilateral serratus plane block on postoperative opioid consumption in patients undergoing breast reduction surgery.

Methods

After ethical board approval, 40 patients undergoing breast reduction surgery were randomized into 2 groups: control group (Group C, n = 20) and serratus plane block group (Group SPB, n = 20). Group C received bilateral ultrasound-guided 2 ml 0.9% saline subcutaneously each block side, Group SPB received ultrasound-guided bilateral SPB with 0.25% bupivacaine 30 ml each side. The groups were administered the routine general anesthesia protocol. All operations were performed with the mediocentral pedicled reduction mammaplasty technique by the same surgeon. Postoperative analgesia was performed intravenously in the 2 groups twice a day with dexketoprofen trometamol 50 mg and patient-controlled analgesia with fentanyl. Postoperative analgesia was evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS). Fentanyl consumption, additional analgesia requirement and opioid-related side effects were recorded during the first 24 h after surgery.

Results

Compared with control, the VAS score was statistically lower in the SPB group during all measurement times (p < 0.05). The 24-h opioid consumption was significantly higher in the control group compared with the SPB group (372.50 ± 39.65 vs. 296.25 ± 58.08 μq, respectively; p < 0.001). In addition, the analgesia requirement was statistically lower in the SPB group (8/20 vs. 2/20, respectively, p < 0.028). Nausea or vomiting was observed more often in the control group than in SPB block (9/20 vs. 2/20, respectively, p = 0.013), whereas other side effects were similar for the two groups.

Conclusions

SPB can be used safely bilaterally in the management of pain for breast reduction surgery as it is easy to perform, provides excellent analgesia, and reduces opioid consumption and opioid sparing effect.

Level of Evidence II

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Keywords

Serratus plane block Breast reduction surgery Pain Preemptive analgesia Ultrasonography 

Notes

Funding

The authors have no sources of funding to declare for this manuscript

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies, whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.

Ethical Approval

Institutional Review Board approval was obtained.

Informed Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects (patients) in this study.

References

  1. 1.
    Woolf CJ, Chong MS (1993) Preemptive analgesia—treating postoperative pain by preventing the establishment of central sensitization. Anesth Analg 77(2):362–379.  https://doi.org/10.1213/00000539-199377020-00026 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Broyles JM, Tuffaha SH, Williams EH, Glickman L, George TA, Lee Dellon A (2016) Pain after breast surgery: etiology, diagnosis, and definitive management. Microsurgery.  https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.30055 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wallace MS, Wallace AM, Lee J, Dobke MK (1996) Pain after breast surgery: a survey of 282 women. Pain 66(2–3):195–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vila H Jr, Liu J, Kavasmaneck D (2007) Paravertebral block: new benefits from an old procedure. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 20(4):316–318.  https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0b013e328166780e CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tahiri Y, Tran DQ, Bouteaud J, Xu L, Lalonde D, Luc M, Nikolis A (2011) General anaesthesia versus thoracic paravertebral block for breast surgery: a meta-analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 64(10):1261–1269.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2011.03.025 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Elsharkawy H, Pawa A, Mariano ER (2018) Interfascial plane blocks: back to basics. Reg Anesth Pain Med 43(4):341–346.  https://doi.org/10.1097/aap.0000000000000750 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gurkan Y, Kus A (2017) Fascial plane blocks in regional anaesthesia and new approaches. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim 45(2):85–86.  https://doi.org/10.5152/tjar.2017.040401 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Blanco R, Parras T, McDonnell JG, Prats-Galino A (2013) Serratus plane block: a novel ultrasound-guided thoracic wall nerve block. Anaesthesia 68(11):1107–1113.  https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.12344 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ahiskalioglu A, Alici HA, Yayik AM, Celik M, Oral Ahiskalioglu E (2017) Ultrasound guided serratus plane block for management of acute thoracic herpes zoster. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med 36(5):323–324.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accpm.2017.01.008 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ahiskalioglu A, Yayik AM, Celik EC, Ahiskalioglu EO, Emsen M (2018) Two plane two block for surgical anesthesia: ultrasound-guided serratus and erector spinae plane blocks. J Clin Anesth 47:19–20.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.03.004 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Khemka R, Chakraborty A, Ahmed R, Datta T, Agarwal S (2016) Ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block in breast reconstruction surgery. A A Case Rep 6(9):280–282.  https://doi.org/10.1213/xaa.0000000000000297 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    McGuirk S, Fahy C, Costi D, Cyna AM (2011) Use of invasive placebos in research on local anaesthetic interventions. Anaesthesia 66(2):84–91.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2010.06560.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ke RW, Portera SG, Bagous W, Lincoln SR (1998) A randomized, double-blinded trial of preemptive analgesia in laparoscopy. Obstet Gynecol 92(6):972–975.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0029-7844(98)00303-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Moiniche S, Kehlet H, Dahl JB (2002) A qualitative and quantitative systematic review of preemptive analgesia for postoperative pain relief: the role of timing of analgesia. Anesthesiology 96(3):725–741.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200203000-00032 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Andersen KG, Kehlet H (2011) Persistent pain after breast cancer treatment: a critical review of risk factors and strategies for prevention. J Pain 12(7):725–746.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2010.12.005 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Benyamin R, Trescot AM, Datta S, Buenaventura R, Adlaka R, Sehgal N, Glaser SE, Vallejo R (2008) Opioid complications and side effects. Pain Physician 11(2 Suppl):S105–S120PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gago Martinez A, Escontrela Rodriguez B, Planas Roca A, Martinez Ruiz A (2016) Intravenous ibuprofen for treatment of post-operative pain: a multicenter, double blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial. PLoS ONE 11(5):e0154004.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154004 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kang CM, Kim WJ, Yoon SH, Cho CB, Shim JS (2017) Postoperative pain control by intercostal nerve block after augmentation mammoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 41(5):1031–1036.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-017-0802-6 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tan P, Martin MS, Shank N, Myers L, Wolfe E, Lindsey J, Metzinger S (2017) A comparison of 4 analgesic regimens for acute postoperative pain control in breast augmentation patients. Ann Plast Surg 78(6S Suppl 5):S299–S304.  https://doi.org/10.1097/sap.0000000000001132 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gardiner S, Rudkin G, Cooter R, Field J, Bond M (2012) Paravertebral blockade for day-case breast augmentation: a randomized clinical trial. Anesth Analg 115(5):1053–1059.  https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e318264ba33 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Karaca O, Pinar HU, Arpaci E, Dogan R, Cok OY, Ahiskalioglu A (2019) The efficacy of ultrasound-guided type-I and type-II pectoral nerve blocks for postoperative analgesia after breast augmentation: a prospective, randomised study. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med 38(1):47–52.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accpm.2018.03.009 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wahba SS, Kamal SM (2014) Thoracic paravertebral block versus pectoral nerve block for analgesia after breast surgery. Egypt J Anaesth 30(2):129–135.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egja.2013.10.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Giebler RM, Scherer RU, Peters J (1997) Incidence of neurologic complications related to thoracic epidural catheterization. Anesthesiology 86(1):55–63.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-199701000-00009 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ekinci M, Ciftci B, Celik EC, Karakaya MA, Demiraran Y (2019) The efficacy of different volumes on ultrasound-guided type-I pectoral nerve block for postoperative analgesia after subpectoral breast augmentation: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Aesthetic Plast Surg 43(2):297–304.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-019-01322-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Oksuz G, Bilgen F, Arslan M, Duman Y, Urfalioglu A, Bilal B (2019) Ultrasound-guided bilateral erector spinae block versus tumescent anesthesia for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing reduction mammoplasty: a randomized controlled study. Aesthetic Plast Surg 43(2):291–296.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-018-1286-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Schuitemaker RJ, Sala-Blanch X, Sanchez Cohen AP, Lopez-Pantaleon LA, Mayoral RJ, Cubero M (2019) Analgesic efficacy of modified pectoral block plus serratus plane block in breast augmentation surgery: a randomised, controlled, triple-blind clinical trial. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim 66(2):62–71.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redar.2018.08.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hadzic A (2017) Hadzic’s textbook of regional anesthesia and acute pain management, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill Education, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Butterworth JF, Lahaye L (2019) Clinical use of local anesthetics in anesthesia. UpToDate.com. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/clinical-use-of-local-anesthetics-in-anesthesia?csi=92468338-3863-4d6f-860a-eaef407b16d7&source=contentShare. Accessed 19 Apr 2019
  29. 29.
    Kirkham KR, Jacot-Guillarmod A, Albrecht E (2018) Optimal dose of perineural dexamethasone to prolong analgesia after brachial plexus blockade: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anesth Analg 126(1):270–279.  https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000002488 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Vandepitte C, Kuroda M, Witvrouw R, Anne L, Bellemans J, Corten K, Vanelderen P, Mesotten D, Leunen I, Heylen M, Van Boxstael S, Golebiewski M, Van de Velde M, Knezevic NN, Hadzic A (2017) Addition of liposome bupivacaine to bupivacaine HCl versus bupivacaine HCl alone for interscalene brachial plexus block in patients having major shoulder surgery. Reg Anesth Pain Med 42(3):334–341.  https://doi.org/10.1097/aap.0000000000000560 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Patel MA, Gadsden JC, Nedeljkovic SS, Bao X, Zeballos JL, Yu V, Ayad SS, Bendtsen TF (2019) Brachial plexus block with liposomal bupivacaine for shoulder surgery improves analgesia and reduces opioid consumption: results from a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. Pain Med.  https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnz103 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mayes J, Davison E, Panahi P, Patten D, Eljelani F, Womack J, Varma M (2016) An anatomical evaluation of the serratus anterior plane block. Anaesthesia 71(9):1064–1069.  https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.13549 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bonomi S, Salval A, Crippa S (2016) Ultrasound-guided thoracic wall nerve blocks to reduce postoperative pain and eliminate opioid consumption in patients undergoing implant-based breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 138(3):543e–544e.  https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000002436 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Bhoi D, Pushparajan HK, Talawar P, Kumar A, Baidya DK (2016) Serratus anterior plane block for breast surgery in a morbidly obese patient. J Clin Anesth 33:500–501.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2015.09.004 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Yao Y, Li J, Hu H, Xu T, Chen Y (2019) Ultrasound-guided serratus plane block enhances pain relief and quality of recovery after breast cancer surgery: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol 36(6):436–441.  https://doi.org/10.1097/eja.0000000000001004 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Abdallah FW, MacLean D, Madjdpour C, Cil T, Bhatia A, Brull R (2017) Pectoralis and serratus fascial plane blocks each provide early analgesic benefits following ambulatory breast cancer surgery: a retrospective propensity-matched cohort study. Anesth Analg 125(1):294–302.  https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000001975 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ali Ahiskalioglu
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ahmet Murat Yayik
    • 1
  • Ufuk Demir
    • 1
  • Elif Oral Ahiskalioglu
    • 1
  • Erkan Cem Celik
    • 1
  • Mursel Ekinci
    • 2
  • Mine Celik
    • 1
  • Hakan Cinal
    • 3
  • Onder Tan
    • 3
  • Muhammed Enes Aydin
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Anesthesiology and ReanimationAtaturk University School of MedicineErzurumTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Anesthesiology and ReanimationMedipol University School of MedicineIstanbulTurkey
  3. 3.Department of Plastic and Reconstructive SurgeryAtaturk University School of MedicineErzurumTurkey

Personalised recommendations