Advertisement

Transaxillary Endoscopic Approach to Capsular Contracture Following Previous Breast Augmentation: Operative Technique and Clinical Outcome

  • Chang Liu
  • Yuzhe ChenEmail author
  • Yajuan Xu
  • Qi Qu
  • Zijun Wang
  • Yan Fan
Original Article Breast Surgery
  • 23 Downloads

Abstract

Background

Capsular contracture (CC) is a complication of breast augmentation that frequently requires revision surgery. The axillary approach reduces the visibility of the postoperative scar. It is unclear whether the previous incision can be used to repair the deformity caused by CC.

Methods

This study analyzed 21 patients (42 breasts) with grade III–IV CC during 2012–2017. The mean age of the patients was 32 years (range 23–48). Previous axillary scars were used to expose, and CCs were taken out completely or partially. Breast implants were removed. The dissection was performed with endoscopic assistance, using electrocautery under direct visualization.

Results

The mean follow-up period was 13 months (range 6–24 months). The dissection plane was changed to dual plane. Thirty-five CCs were taken out completely. Thirty-eight breast implants taken out remained intact. None of the patients required additional surgery.

Conclusion

Endoscopic-assisted treatment may be an effective technique for treating CC and avoiding the additional scar.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Keywords

Endoscopes Capsular contracture Breast augmentation Reoperation The transaxillary approach Dual plane 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We sincerely thank all members, who offer their support and assistance in this work, from the Department of Dynamic Team. There are no funds supporting this work, and none of the authors have any financial and personal relationship with other people or organizations that could inappropriately influence this work.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

All the authors have no conflict of interest regarding the content of this article.

Human and Animal Rights

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

For this type of study informed consent is not required.

References

  1. 1.
    Hoehler H (1973) Breast augmentation: the axillary approach. Br J Plast Surg 26:373–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Spear SL, Baker JL Jr. (1995) Classification of capsular contracture after prosthetic breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 96:1119–1123 discussion 1124 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ajdic D, Zoghbi Y, Gerth D, Panthaki ZJ, Thaller S (2016) The relationship of bacterial biofilms and capsular contracture in breast implants. Aesthet Surg J 36:297–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tebbetts JB, Adams WP (2006) Five critical decisions in breast augmentation using five measurements in 5 minutes: the high five decision support process. Plast Reconstr Surg 118:35S–45SCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Adams WP Jr. (2009) Capsular contracture: what is it? What causes it? How can it be prevented and managed? Clin Plast Surg 36(119–126):viiGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tebbetts JB (2006) Axillary endoscopic breast augmentation: processes derived from a 28-year experience to optimize outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 118:53S–80SCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Calobrace MB, Stevens WG, Capizzi PJ, Cohen R, Godinez T, Beckstrand M (2018) Risk factor analysis for capsular contracture: a 10-year sientra study using round, smooth, and textured implants for breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 141:20S–28SCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bachour Y, Verweij SP, Gibbs S, Ket JCF, Ritt M, Niessen FB et al (2018) The aetiopathogenesis of capsular contracture: a systematic review of the literature. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 71:307–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sun J, Liu C, Mu D, Wang K, Zhu S, He Y et al (2015) Chinese women’s preferences and concerns regarding incision location for breast augmentation surgery: a survey of 216 patients. Aesthetic Plast Surg 39:214–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Li S, Chen L, Liu W, Mu D, Luan J (2018) Capsular contracture rate after breast augmentation with periareolar versus other two (inframammary and transaxillary) incisions: a meta-analysis. Aesthetic Plast Surg 42:32–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Roxo AC, Marques RG, De Castro CC, Aboudib JH (2016) Response to “misconceptions of capsular contracture, operative times, and complications in the transaxillary breast augmentation literature”. Aesthet Surg J 36:191–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sim HB, Sun SH (2015) Transaxillary endoscopic breast augmentation with shaped gel implants. Aesthet Surg J 35:952–961CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lee DW, Kim SJ, Kim H (2019) Endoscopic transaxillary versus inframammary approaches for breast augmentation using shaped implants: a matched case-control study. Aesthetic Plast Surg 43:563–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Li Yu, Chuan Y, Zhihong F et al (2004) Application of endoscopic technique in the minimally invasive treatment of post-augmentative capsular contracture. Chin J Pract Aesthet Plast Surg 06:283–285Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Park SH, Sim HB (2018) Endoscopic transaxillary prepectoral conversion for submuscular breast implants. Arch Plast Surg 45:158–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rieger UM, Mesina J, Kalbermatten DF, Haug M, Frey HP, Pico R et al (2013) Bacterial biofilms and capsular contracture in patients with breast implants. Br J Surg 100:768–774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Headon H, Kasem A, Mokbel K (2015) Capsular contracture after breast augmentation: an update for clinical practice. Arch Plast Surg 42:532–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sim HB (2014) Transaxillary endoscopic breast augmentation. Arch Plast Surg 41:458–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chang Liu
    • 1
    • 2
  • Yuzhe Chen
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Yajuan Xu
    • 2
  • Qi Qu
    • 2
  • Zijun Wang
    • 2
  • Yan Fan
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Plastic Surgery, Beijing Shijitan HospitalCapital Medical UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.The Dynamic TeamBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations