Advertisement

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery

, Volume 43, Issue 6, pp 1480–1488 | Cite as

Breast Reduction: 33 Years Using a Single Central Block

  • João ErfonEmail author
  • Claudio Mauricio M. Rodrigues
  • Aleksandra Markovic
Original Article Breast Surgery
  • 114 Downloads

Abstract

Background

Since 1985, the author has been using the single central block technique for breast reduction and mastopexy, prioritizing the good relation between the final breast shape and the length of the scars, different from other authors who emphasize only the shape of the breast (Peixoto in Plast Reconstr Surg 65(2):217–225, 1980; Aesthet Plast Surg 8:231–236, 1984) and others who have drawn attention to the length of the scars (Arié in Rev Latinoam Cir Plast 3:23–31, 1957; Bozola in Plast Reconstr Surg 85:728–738, 1990; Sepúlveda in Rev Bras Cir 71(1):11–18, 1981). In this study, the author describes the use of a single central block of the mammary tissue and the nipple–areolar complex (NAC), dissected from the skin flaps and based on the superior vascular pedicle for reduction mammoplasty and mastopexy (Erfon et al. in Annals of the international symposium recent advances in plastic surgery, São Paulo, 1989; Hinderer (ed) Plastic surgery, Elsevier, Madrid, 1992; Proceedings of the 65th annual scientific meeting of the American society of plastic and reconstructive surgeons, Dallas, 1996).

Methods

A retrospective study was performed, evaluating patients who underwent breast reduction and mastopexy using the single central block technique from July 1985 to December 2018 by a senior author.

Results

A total of 2097 procedures were performed using this technique, 1556 being reduction mammoplasties and 541 mastopexies. The mean patient age was 44, and the mean weight of tissue resected was 455 g. Fat necrosis on the distal area of the flap was observed in 47 cases (2.24%). Hematoma was observed in 6 patients (0.28%). Surgical revisions were undertaken in 75 patients (3.57%). Hypertrophic scars occurred in 12 of the cases (0.57%). Dehiscence in the inverted “T” scars occurred in 78 of the surgeries (3.71%).

Conclusions

This technique allows the surgeon to easily form a good cone shape of the breast, repositioning the NAC and preserving its vascularization and sensation without tension on the skin flaps sutures, resulting in smaller and better scars.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Keywords

Breast reduction Mammoplasty Mastopexy Single central block Nipple–areolar complex (NAC) Superior vascular pedicle 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest, commercial associations or financial interests to disclose.

Ethics Statement

This study was performed in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration for research in human subjects and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with ethical standards of the institutional research committee.

Informed Consent

All patients provided written informed consent for surgery and use of photographs.

References

  1. 1.
    Peixoto G (1980) Reduction mammaplasty: a personal technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 65(2):217–225PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Peixoto G (1984) Reduction mammoplasty. Aesthet Plast Surg 8:231–236Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Arié G (1957) Una nueva Técnica de Mastoplastia. Rev Latinoam Cir Plast 3:23–31Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bozola AR (1990) Breast reduction with short L scar. Plast Reconstr Surg 85:728–738PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sepúlveda A (1981) Tratamento das Assimetrias Mamárias. Rev Bras Cir 71(1):11–18Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Erfon J, Barbosa V, Brasil AG Jr (1989) Reduction Mammaplasty in Central Block. In: Annals of the international symposium recent advances in plastic surgery, São Paulo, pp 306–313Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Erfon J, Barbosa V, Brasil A Jr (1992) Reduction mammaplasty in a single block. In: Hinderer UT (ed) Plastic surgery, vol 2. Elsevier, Madrid, pp 629–634Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Erfon J, Hochberg J, Ardenghy M, Cols (1996) Central Block reduction mammaplasty and mastopexy. In: Proceedings of the 65th annual scientific meeting of the American society of plastic and reconstructive surgeons, vol 19, Dallas, pp 176–178Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Weiner PL, Aiache AE, Silver L, Ttitanonda TA (1973) Single dermal pedicle for nipple transposition in subcutaneous mastectomy reduction mammaplasty or mastopexy. Plast Reconstr Surg 51(2):115–120PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Strombeck JO (1960) Mammaplasty: report of a new technique based on the two-pedicle procedure. Br J Plast Surg 13:79–90PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pitanguy I (1967) Surgical treatment of breast hypertrophy. Br J Plast Surg 20(1):78–85PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mckissock PK (1972) Reduction mammaplasty with a vertical dermal flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 49(3):245–252PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Franco T, Rebello C (1977) Cirurgia Estética, 1ª Edição. Atheneu, Rio de Janeiro, p 211Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Spector JA, Karp NS (2007) Reduction mammaplasty: a significant improvement at any size. Plast Reconstr Surg 120(4):845–850PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kececi Y, Sir E, Gungor M (2015) Patient-reported quality-of-life outcomes of breast reduction evaluated with generic questionnaires and the breast reduction assessed severity scale. Aesthet Surg J 35(1):48–54PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pitanguy I (1976) Personal preferences for reduction mammaplasty. In: Goldwyn R (ed) Plastic and reconstructive surgery of the breast. Little Brown, Boston, p 167Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lima JC (1979) Breast reduction: new method and refinements. In: Ely JF (ed) Transaction of the 7th international congress of plastic reconstructive surgery. Cartigraf, Rio de Janeiro, p 508Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Souza Pinto EB et al (1983) Dermoadipose and adenoadipose flaps in mammaplasty. Aesthet Plast Surg 7(7):101–108Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wise RJ, Gannon JP, Hill JR (1963) Further experience with reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 32(1):12PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lassus C (1987) Breast reduction: evolution of a technique. A single vertical scar. Aesthet Plast Surg 11(2):107–112Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Benelli L (1990) A new periareolar mammaplasty: the "round block" technique. Aesthet Plast Surg 14(2):93–100Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chiari A Jr (1992) The L short-scar mammaplasty: a new approach. Plast Reconstr Surg 90(2):233–246Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lexer E (1912) Hypertrophie bei der mammae. Munch Med Wochenschr 59:2702Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Schwarzman E (1930) Die Technik der Mammaplastik Der Chirurg 2:932–944Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Thorek M (1942) Plastic surgery of the breast and the abdominal wall. Charles C Thomas, SpringfieldGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Skoog T (1963) A technique of breast reduction; transposition of the nipple on a cutaneous vascular pedicle. Acta Chir Scand 126:453–465PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Silveira-Neto E (1976) Mastoplastia redutora setorial com pedículo areolar interno. In: XIII Congresso Brasileiro de Cirurgia Plástica, Porto AlegreGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Orlando JC, Guthrie RH Jr (1975) The superomedial dermal pedicle for nipple transposition. Br J Plast Surg 28(1):42–45PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Davison SP, Mesbahi AN, Ducic I, Sarcia M, Dayan J, Spear SL (2007) The versatility of the superomedial pedicle with various skin reduction patterns. Plast Reconstr Surg 120(6):1466–1476PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Jurado J (1979) The vertical dermal-glandular flap of inferior single pedicle in breast surgery. Presented at the 7th international congress of plastic and reconstructive surgery, Rio de JaneiroGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Robbins TH (1977) A reduction mammaplasty with the areola–nipple based on an inferior dermal pedicle. Plast Reconstr Surg 59(1):64–67PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Abramo AC (2012) A superior vertical dermal pedicle for the nipple–areola: an alternative for severe breast hypertrophy and ptosis. Aesthet Plast Surg 36:134–139Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Agbenorku P, Agamah G, Agbenorku M, Obeng M (2012) Reduction mammaplasty in a developing country: a guideline for plastic surgeons for patient selection. Aesthet Plast Surg 36:91–96Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Chiummariello S, Cigna E, Buccheri EM, Dessy LA, Alfano C, Scudery N (2008) Breastfeeding after reduction mammaplasty using different techniques. Aesthet Plast Surg 32:294–297Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    van Deventer PV, Page BJ, Graewe FR (2008) The safety of pedicles in breast reduction and mastopexy procedures. Aesthet Plast Surg 32:307–312Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Karsidag S, Akcal A, Karsidag T, Yesiloglu N, Yesilada AK, Ugurlu K (2011) Reduction mammaplasty using the free-nipple–graft vertical technique for severe breast hypertrophy: improved outcomes with the superior dermaglandular flap. Aesthet Plast Surg 35:254–261Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Foustanos A, Panagiotopoulos K, Skouras G (2011) Intraoperative modification of Pitanguy technique of reduction mammaplasty for elevation of the nipple–areola complex in case of severe breast ptosis. Aesthet Plast Surg 35:55–60Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Fischer JP, Cleveland EC, Shang EK, Nelson JA, Serletti JM (2014) Complications following reduction mammaplasty: a review of 3538 cases from the 2005–2010 NSQIP data sets. Aesthet Surg J 34(1):66–73PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Uebel CO, Piccinini PS, Ramos RFM, Meneguzzi K (2019) Breast reduction: the superolateral dermo glandular pedicle revisited. Aesthet Plast Surg 43:36–45Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Moufarrege R, El Yamani MEM, Barriault L, Alaoui AA (2019) The effect of the Moufarrege total posterior pedicle reduction Mammaplasty on the Erogenous sensation of the nipple. Surg Sci 10:127–140Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.FortalezaBrazil

Personalised recommendations