Surgical Calf Augmentation Techniques: Personal Experience, Literature Review and Analysis of Complications
- 6 Downloads
More attention is paid to calf appearance, both in males and females, and several surgical techniques are available. Different studies have been published over time for calf augmentation, but, to the best of our knowledge, no comprehensive literature review and complications analysis have been published.
The aim of the study is to analyse the overall complication rate of calf augmentation surgical procedures and complication rates associated with the investigated techniques, namely subfascial implant placement, submuscular implant placement and fat grafting or lipofilling. Demographic analysis, including age and gender, is also performed.
Materials and Methods
A literature review on the PubMed database was performed for clinical studies regarding calf augmentation surgical procedures. The authors selected and analysed 26 articles among the actual literature on this field and reported personal experience in calf augmentation surgery.
Twenty-six studies, published from 1993 to 2018, were included in the study for a total amount of 1498 patients, with a total of 2629 calves treated. Three different surgical techniques have been reviewed, excluding medical procedures: subfascial implant augmentation (n = 1929), submuscular implant augmentation (n = 435) and fat grafting (n = 265). The overall complication rate was 4.4883%. Calf augmentation with subfascial implants presented a total complication rate of 5.702%. The submuscular implant placement complication rate was 0.92%. Fat grafting presented a global complication rate of 1.509%.
Calf augmentation, with all reviewed surgical techniques, has a low rate of complications compared to other body contouring procedures, but a high rate of satisfaction among patients. Fat grafting has the lowest rate of complications, but multiple sessions are required. Specific complications of implants, such as capsular contracture, malposition or rupture, are less common compared to the use of implants for other cosmetic purposes. Procedures should always be performed by experienced plastic surgeons.
Level of Evidence IV
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
KeywordsCalf augmentation Calf implants Lipofilling Body contouring
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
For this type of study, informed consent is not required.
- 30.Hendy A (2010) Calf and leg augmentation: autologous fat or silicone implant. Egypt, J Plast Reconstr Surg 34(2):123–126Google Scholar
- 34.Carlsen LN, Voice SD (1991) Calf augmentation. In: Vistnes LM (ed) Procedures in plastic surgery: how they do it, chapter 15. Little Brown, Boston, pp 281–294Google Scholar