Advertisement

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery

, Volume 43, Issue 3, pp 608–615 | Cite as

50 Shades of Red: The Predictive Value of Closed Suction Drains for the Detection of Postoperative Bleeding in Breast Surgery

  • A. M. AnkerEmail author
  • B. H. Miranda
  • L. Prantl
  • A. Kehrer
  • C. Strauss
  • V. Brébant
  • S. M. Klein
Original Article Breast Surgery
  • 32 Downloads

Abstract

Background

While closed suction drains (CSDs) are still frequently employed in clinical practice, the supporting evidence is limited with some studies demonstrating a failure of routine CSD use in preventing hematoma or seroma. Nonetheless, CSD quantity and quality fluid assessment is still appreciated by clinicians to detect postoperative bleeding. This study investigates the value of routine CSD use, in breast surgery, to predict postoperative bleeding.

Methods

A retrospective, intra-individual analysis, of CSD fluid volumes between the hematoma side and the unaffected contralateral breast, was undertaken in patients (n = 20) with unilateral postoperative bleeding following bilateral breast surgery (2003–2018). Statistical analysis was undertaken to establish a minimum cutoff fluid volume that might assist in the detection of postoperative bleeding. To determine the usefulness of quality assessment of CSD fluid output by visual inspection, surgeons (n = 56) prospectively matched six eligible hemoglobin concentrations corresponding to pre-filled CSDs.

Results

Statistical analysis did not yield a clinically reliable cutoff fluid volume indicating postoperative bleeding. All six eligible hemoglobin concentrations were completely successfully matched to pre-filled CSDs by 30.4% (17/56) of surgeons.

Conclusions

This study questions the significance of routine CSD use to assist in the decision-making process to return to the theater and address postoperative bleeding. Quantity as well as quality analysis of CSD fluid output failed the reliability and diagnostic validity tests. Hemoglobin measurements in drain fluid specimens via blood gas analysis might contribute to the detection of postoperative bleeding.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Keywords

Closed suction drains (CSDs) Breast surgery Prediction of postoperative bleeding Diagnostic validity 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

Institutional research ethics committee approval (Ref. 18-955-104) was obtained prior to the initiation of this study.

Informed Consent

Informed patient consent was obtained.

References

  1. 1.
    Seretis K, Goulis D, Demiri EC, Lykoudis EG (2017) Prevention of seroma formation following abdominoplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aesthet Surg J 37:316–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Phillips BT, Wang ED, Mirrer J, Lanier ST, Khan SU, Dagum AB, Bui DT (2011) Current practice among plastic surgeons of antibiotic prophylaxis and closed-suction drains in breast reconstruction: experience, evidence, and implications for postoperative care. Ann Plast Surg 66:460–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kosins AM, Scholz T, Cetinkaya M, Evans GR (2013) Evidence-based value of subcutaneous surgical wound drainage: the largest systematic review and meta-analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 132:443–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Inwang R, Hamed H, Chaudary MA, Fentiman IS (1991) A controlled trial of short-term versus standard axillary drainage after axillary clearance and iridium implant treatment of early breast cancer. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 73:326–328Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Keskin M, Sutcu M, Cigsar B, Karacaoglan N (2014) Necessity of suction drains in gynecomastia surgery. Aesthet Surg J 34:538–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wrye SW, Banducci DR, Mackay D, Graham WP, Hall WW (2003) Routine drainage is not required in reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 111:113–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Khan SM, Smeulders MJ, Van der Horst CM (2015) Wound drainage after plastic and reconstructive surgery of the breast. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews: CD007258Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Collis N, McGuiness CM, Batchelor AG (2005) Drainage in breast reduction surgery: a prospective randomised intra-patient trail. Br J Plast Surg 58:286–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Miranda BH, Wilson RB, Amin K, Chana JS (2015) The drain game: abdominal drains for transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 68:810–814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Miranda BH, Amin K, Chana JS (2014) The drain game: back drains for latissimus dorsi breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 67:226–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Miranda BH, Amin K, Chana JS (2014) The drain game: abdominal drains for deep inferior epigastric perforator breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 67:946–950CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tan J, Timmons MJ, Watt DA (2007) Breast reduction surgery without drains. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 60:1168–1169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tahiri Y, Bouteaud J, Tahiri M, Lessard L, Williams BH, Nikolis A (2010) Routine drainage in reduction mammaplasty: an evidence-based analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 63:e549–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Arrowsmith J, Eltigani E, Krarup K, Varma S (1999) An audit of breast reduction without drains. Br J Plast Surg 52:586–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Corion LU, Smeulders MJ, van Zuijlen PP, van der Horst CM (2009) Draining after breast reduction: a randomised controlled inter-patient study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 62:865–868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tsujinaka S, Kawamura YJ, Konishi F, Maeda T, Mizokami K (2008) Pelvic drainage for anterior resection revisited: use of drains in anastomotic leaks. ANZ J Surg 78:461–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Galandiuk S (2005) To drain or not to drain. Ann Surg 241:14–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hood K, Ganesh Kumar N, Kaoutzanis C, Higdon KK (2018) Hematomas in aesthetic surgery. Aesthet Surg J 38:1013–1025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ruopp MD, Perkins NJ, Whitcomb BW, Schisterman EF (2008) Youden Index and optimal cut-point estimated from observations affected by a lower limit of detection. Biom J 50:419–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hajian-Tilaki K (2013) Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis for medical diagnostic test evaluation. Caspian J Intern Med 4:627–635Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Simundic AM (2009) Measures of diagnostic accuracy: basic definitions. EJIFCC 19:203–211Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kaoutzanis C, Winocour J, Gupta V, Ganesh Kumar N, Sarosiek K, Wormer B, Tokin C, Grotting JC, Higdon KK (2017) Incidence and risk factors for major hematomas in aesthetic surgery: analysis of 129,007 patients. Aesthet Surg J 37:1175–1185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Boccara D, Serror K, Malca N, Chaouat M, Mimoun M (2018) Closed-suction drains after subcutaneous mastectomy for gynecomastia: Do they reduce complications? A different approach. Aesthet Plast Surg 42:908–910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Basile FV, Basile AR, Basile VV (2013) Use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors antidepressants and bleeding risk in breast cosmetic surgery. Aesthet Plast Surg 37:561–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Matarasso A, Wallach SG, Rankin M (1998) Reevaluating the need for routine drainage in reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 102:1917–1921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chao JW, Raveendran JA, Maly C, Rogers G, Boyajian M, Oh AK (2017) Closed-suction drains after subcutaneous mastectomy for gynecomastia: Do they reduce complications? Aesthet Plast Surg 41:1291–1294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Iwuagwu OC, Platt AJ, Drew PJ (2006) Breast reduction surgery in the UK and Ireland—current trends. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 88:585–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Shander A, Javidroozi M, Naqvi S, Aregbeyen O, Caylan M, Demir S, Juhl A (2014) An update on mortality and morbidity in patients with very low postoperative hemoglobin levels who decline blood transfusion (CME). Transfusion 54:2688–2695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Timan IS, Tatsumi N, Aulia D, Wangsasaputra E (2004) Comparison of haemoglobinometry by WHO haemoglobin colour scale and copper sulphate against haemiglobincyanide reference method. Clin Lab Haematol 26:253–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Cunningham BL, Gear AJ, Kerrigan CL, Collins ED (2005) Analysis of breast reduction complications derived from the BRAVO study. Plast Reconstr Surg 115:1597–1604CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. M. Anker
    • 1
    Email author
  • B. H. Miranda
    • 2
  • L. Prantl
    • 1
  • A. Kehrer
    • 1
  • C. Strauss
    • 1
  • V. Brébant
    • 1
  • S. M. Klein
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Plastic, Reconstructive, Aesthetic and Hand SurgeryUniversity Hospital Regensburg and Caritas Hospital St. Josef RegensburgRegensburgGermany
  2. 2.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery DepartmentRoyal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Free HospitalLondonUK

Personalised recommendations