Aesthetic Plastic Surgery

, Volume 43, Issue 2, pp 554–555 | Cite as

3D Imaging Versus MRI for Measuring Breast Volume: What is the Evidence?

  • Mathilde Nejrup HemmingsenEmail author
  • Andreas Larsen
  • Mathias Ørholt
  • Peter Vester-Glowinski
  • Mikkel HerlyEmail author
Letter to the Editor


Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. 1.
    Wang C, Luan J, Cheng H, Chen L, Li Z, Panayi AC et al (2018) Menstrual cycle-related fluctuations in breast volume measured using three-dimensional imaging: implications for volumetric evaluation in breast augmentation. Aesth Plast Surg. Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Herold C, Ueberreiter K, Busche MN, Vogt PM (2013) Autologous fat transplantation: volumetric tools for estimation of volume survival. A systematic review. Aesth Plast Surg 37(2):380–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Herly M, Ørholt M, Larsen A, Pipper CB, Bredgaard R, Gramkow CS et al (2018) Efficacy of breast reconstruction with fat grafting: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesth Surg 71(12):1740–1750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hussain Z, Roberts N, Whitehouse GH, Garcia-Finana M, Percy D (1999) Estimation of breast volume and its variation during the menstrual cycle using MRI and stereology. Br J Radiol 72(855):236–245CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fowler PA, Casey CE, Cameron GG, Foster MA, Knight CH (1990) Cyclic changes in composition and volume of the breast during the menstrual cycle, measured by magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 97(7):595–602CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kovacs L, Eder M, Hollweck R, Zimmermann A, Settles M, Schneider A et al (2007) Comparison between breast volume measurement using 3D surface imaging and classical techniques. Breast (Edinb) 16(2):137–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Glovinski PV, Herly M, Muller FC, Elberg JJ, Kolle ST, Fischer-Nielsen A et al (2016) Avoiding a systematic error in assessing fat graft survival in the breast with repeated magnetic resonance imaging. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 4(9):e1023CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Choppin SB, Wheat JS, Gee M, Goyal A (2016) The accuracy of breast volume measurement methods: a systematic review. Breast (Edinb) 28:121–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mathilde Nejrup Hemmingsen
    • 1
    Email author
  • Andreas Larsen
    • 1
  • Mathias Ørholt
    • 1
  • Peter Vester-Glowinski
    • 1
  • Mikkel Herly
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Plastic Surgery and Burns TreatmentCopenhagen University Hospital, RigshospitaletCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations