Advertisement

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery

, Volume 42, Issue 6, pp 1465–1471 | Cite as

Fat Graft in Composite Breast Augmentation with Round Implants: A New Concept for Breast Reshaping

  • Luca MaioneEmail author
  • Fabio Caviggioli
  • Valeriano Vinci
  • Andrea Lisa
  • Federico Barbera
  • Mattia Siliprandi
  • Andrea Battistini
  • Francesco Klinger
  • Marco Klinger
Original Article Breast Surgery
  • 217 Downloads

Abstract

Background

Breast augmentation surgery with implants is one of the most common aesthetic surgical procedures. Round and anatomical textured implants are employed very often, and fat grafting has proven to be a very useful complementary procedure in breast augmentation. Many authors report a more natural result with anatomical compared to round implants. Nevertheless, anatomical implants can be associated with complications such as implant rotation with subsequent shape distortion. In this article, we propose a combination of high-profile round implants and fat grafting to obtain a natural result analyzing its impact on the aesthetic outcome and patient satisfaction.

Methods

In this study, we report our personal approach on 31 consecutive patients undergoing primary aesthetic breast augmentation with high-profile round implants and fat grafting. We describe our personal technique of breast augmentation via the periareolar approach and fat grafting. We evaluated short- and medium-term aesthetic outcomes and patient satisfaction using a 10-point VAS scale.

Results

We achieved in all cases high patient satisfaction and good aesthetic outcomes with a “natural” breast shape and a “smoothened” upper pole with low complication rates. The technique is safe, simple, fast, and it leads to high levels of patient satisfaction.

Conclusions

Our observations show that the combination of high-profile round implants and fat grafting in aesthetic breast augmentation can improve the aesthetic outcome and patient satisfaction as with anatomical implants eliminating the risk of implant rotation.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Keywords

Fat grafting Breast augmentation Round implants 

Notes

Acknowledgements

No financial support or benefits have been received by any author. We do not have any relationship with any commercial source related directly or indirectly to this scientific paper. The principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki have been followed in this study.

References

  1. 1.
    Brown MH, Shenker R, Silver SA (2005) Cohesive silicone gel breast implants in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 116(3):768–779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cronin TD, Gerow FJ (1964) Augmentation mammoplasty: a new “natural feel” prosthesis. In: Transactions of the 3rd international congress of plastic surgery. Excerpta Medica International Congress Series, #66, Amsterdam, p 41Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bostwich J II (1983) Aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery. C.V. Mosby, St Louis, p 29Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mc Grath M, Burkhardt BR (1984) The safety and efficacy of breast implants for augmentation mammoplasty. Past Reconstr Surg 74:550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Berkel H, Birdsell DC, Jenkin S (1992) Breast augmentation: a risk factor for breast cancer? N Engl J Med 326:1649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Deapen D, Hamilton A, Bernstein L, Brody GS (1992) The relationship between breast cancer and augmentation mammaplasty: an epidemiologic study. Plast Reconstr Surg 89:660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    The American Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons. Institute of Medicine Report released: breast implants get clean bill of health. Plast Surg. News, July 1999Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sanchez-Guerrero J, Schnur PH, Sergent IS, Liang MH (1994) Silicone breast implants and rheumatic disease: clinical, immunologic, and epidemiologic studies. Arthritis Rheumatol 37:158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Deapen DM, Brody GS (1995) Augmentation mammaplasty and breast cancer: a five year update of the Los Angeles study. J Clin Epidemiol 48:551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Autologous Fat Grafting in Cosmetic Breast Augmentation (2016) A systematic review on radiological safety, complications, volume retention, and patient/surgeon satisfaction. Aesthet Surg J 36:993–1007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hedén P, Montemurro P, Adams WP Jr, Germann G, Scheflan M, Maxwell GP (2015) Anatomical and round breast implants: how to select and indications for use. Plast Reconstr Surg 136:263–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Adams WP Jr, Mallucci P (2012) Breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 130:597e–611eCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Adams WP Jr, Small KH (2015) The process of breast augmentation with special focus on patient education, patient selection and implant selection. Clin Plast Surg 42:413–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hedén P, Brown MH, Luan J, Maxwell GP, Munhoz AM, Carter M (2015) Delphi study consensus recommendations: patient selection and preoperative planning measurements for Natrelle 410. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 3:e556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Caplin DA (2014) Indications for the use of MemoryShape breast implants in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery: longterm clinical outcomes of shaped versus round silicone breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 134(Suppl):27S–37SCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hammond DC (2014) Technique and results using MemoryShape implants in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 134(Suppl):16S–26SCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hedén P, Jernbeck J, Hober M (2001) Breast augmentation with anatomical cohesive gel implants: the world’s largest current experience. Clin Plast Surg 28:531–552PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Baeke JL (2002) Breast deformity caused by anatomical or teardrop implant rotation. Plast Reconstr Surg 109:2555–2564 (discussion 2568) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tebbetts JB. Dual plane breast augmentation: Optimizing implant-soft-tissue relationships in a wide range of breast types. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118(Suppl):81S–98S; discussion 99S–102SGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hahn M, Kuner RP, Scheler P et al (2008) Sonographic criteria for the confirmation of implant rotation and the development of an implant-capsule-interaction (“interface”) in anatomically formed textured breast implants with texturised Biocell-surface. Ultraschall Med 29:399–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hammond DC, Migliori MM, Caplin DA, Garcia ME, Phillips CA (2012) Mentor contour profile gel implants: clinical outcomes at 6 years. Plast Reconstr Surg 129:1381–1391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Maxwell GP, Van Natta BW, Murphy DK, Slicton A, Bengtson BP (2012) Natrelle style 410 form-stable silicone breast implants: core study results at 6 years. Aesthet Surg J 32:709–717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lista F, Tutino R, Khan A, Ahmad J (2013) Subglandular breast augmentation with textured, anatomic, cohesive silicone implants: a review of 440 consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 132:295–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Maxwell GP, Scheflan M, Spear S, Nava MB, Hedén P (2014) Benefits and limitations of macrotextured breast implants and consensus recommendations for optimizing their effectiveness. Aesthet Surg J 34:876–881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Maxwell GP, Van Natta BW, Bengtson BP, Murphy DK (2015) Ten-year results from the Natrelle 410 anatomical form-stable silicone breast implant core study. Aesthet Surg J 35:145–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Maione L, Vinci V, Klinger M, Klinger FM, Caviggioli F (2015) Autologous fat graft by needle: analysis of complications after 1000 patients. Ann Plast Surg 74(3):277–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Maione L, Vinci V, Caviggioli F, Klinger F, Banzatti B, Catania B, Lisa A, Klinger M (2014) Autologous fat graft in postmastectomy pain syndrome following breast conservative surgery and radiotherapy. Aesthet Plast Surg 38(3):528–532.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-014-0311-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Caviggioli F, Forcellini D, Vinci V, Cornegliani G, Klinger F, Klinger M (2012) Employment of needles: a different technique for fat placement. Plast Reconstr Surg 130(2):373e–374eCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Groen JW, Negenborn VL, Twisk JW, Ket JC, Mullender MG, Smit JM (2016) Autologous fat grafting in cosmetic breast augmentation: a systematic review on radiological safety, complications, volume retention, and patient/surgeon satisfaction. Aesthet Surg J 36:993–1007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lewis JR Jr (1965) The augmentation mammoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 35:51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    McKinney P, Shedbalker A (1974) Augmentation mammoplasty using a non-inflatable prosthesis through circum-areolar incision. Br J Plast Surg 27:35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hoehler H (1973) Breast Augmentation: the Axillary Approach. Br J Plast Surg 26:373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Johnson GW, Christ JE (1993) The endoscopic breast augmentation: the transumbelical insertion of saline-filled breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 92:801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Griffiths CO (1967) The submuscular implant in augmentation mammaplasty. In: Translation of the fourth international congress of plastic surgery. Excepta Medica Foundation, Amsterdam, p 1009Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Truppman ES, Ellenby JD (1978) A13-year evaluation of subpectoral augmentation mammaplasty. In: Owsley JQ, Peterson RA (eds) Symposium on aesthetic surgery of the breast. Mosby, St LuisGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hidalgo AD (2000) Breast augmentation: choosing the optimal incision, implant, and pocket plane. Plast Reconstr Surg 105(6):2202–2216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Fruhstorfer BH, Hodgson ELB, Malata CM (2004) Early experience with an anatomical soft cohesive silicone gel prosthesis in cosmetic and reconstructive breast implant surgery. Ann Plast Surg 53(6):536–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Hamas RS (1999) The postoperative shape of round and teardrop saline-filled breast implants. Aesthet Surg J 19:369–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Klinger M, Klinger F, Giannasi S, Veronesi A, Bandi V, Banzatti B, Catania B, Vinci V, Lisa A, Cornegliani G, Giaccone M, Caviggioli F, Maione L (2017) Stenotic breast malformation and its reconstructive surgical correction: a new concept from minor deformity to tuberous breast. Aesthet Plast Surg 41(5):1068–1077CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Khouri RK, Rigotti G, Cardoso E, Khouri RK Jr, Biggs TM (2014) Megavolume autologous fat transfer: part II. Practice and techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 133(6):1369–1377CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luca Maione
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Fabio Caviggioli
    • 3
  • Valeriano Vinci
    • 1
  • Andrea Lisa
    • 1
  • Federico Barbera
    • 1
  • Mattia Siliprandi
    • 1
  • Andrea Battistini
    • 1
  • Francesco Klinger
    • 3
  • Marco Klinger
    • 1
  1. 1.Plastic Surgery Unit, Department of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine BIOMETRA, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Plastic Surgery School, Humanitas Clinical and Research HospitalUniversity of MilanRozzanoItaly
  2. 2.Plastic Surgery Unit, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Plastic Surgery School, Clinica San CarloUniversity of MilanPaderno DugnanoItaly
  3. 3.Plastic Surgery Unit, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Plastic Surgery School, MultiMedica Holding S.p.A.University of MilanSesto San GiovanniItaly

Personalised recommendations