Fat Graft in Composite Breast Augmentation with Round Implants: A New Concept for Breast Reshaping
- 217 Downloads
Breast augmentation surgery with implants is one of the most common aesthetic surgical procedures. Round and anatomical textured implants are employed very often, and fat grafting has proven to be a very useful complementary procedure in breast augmentation. Many authors report a more natural result with anatomical compared to round implants. Nevertheless, anatomical implants can be associated with complications such as implant rotation with subsequent shape distortion. In this article, we propose a combination of high-profile round implants and fat grafting to obtain a natural result analyzing its impact on the aesthetic outcome and patient satisfaction.
In this study, we report our personal approach on 31 consecutive patients undergoing primary aesthetic breast augmentation with high-profile round implants and fat grafting. We describe our personal technique of breast augmentation via the periareolar approach and fat grafting. We evaluated short- and medium-term aesthetic outcomes and patient satisfaction using a 10-point VAS scale.
We achieved in all cases high patient satisfaction and good aesthetic outcomes with a “natural” breast shape and a “smoothened” upper pole with low complication rates. The technique is safe, simple, fast, and it leads to high levels of patient satisfaction.
Our observations show that the combination of high-profile round implants and fat grafting in aesthetic breast augmentation can improve the aesthetic outcome and patient satisfaction as with anatomical implants eliminating the risk of implant rotation.
Level of Evidence IV
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
KeywordsFat grafting Breast augmentation Round implants
No financial support or benefits have been received by any author. We do not have any relationship with any commercial source related directly or indirectly to this scientific paper. The principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki have been followed in this study.
- 2.Cronin TD, Gerow FJ (1964) Augmentation mammoplasty: a new “natural feel” prosthesis. In: Transactions of the 3rd international congress of plastic surgery. Excerpta Medica International Congress Series, #66, Amsterdam, p 41Google Scholar
- 3.Bostwich J II (1983) Aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery. C.V. Mosby, St Louis, p 29Google Scholar
- 7.The American Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons. Institute of Medicine Report released: breast implants get clean bill of health. Plast Surg. News, July 1999Google Scholar
- 19.Tebbetts JB. Dual plane breast augmentation: Optimizing implant-soft-tissue relationships in a wide range of breast types. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118(Suppl):81S–98S; discussion 99S–102SGoogle Scholar
- 20.Hahn M, Kuner RP, Scheler P et al (2008) Sonographic criteria for the confirmation of implant rotation and the development of an implant-capsule-interaction (“interface”) in anatomically formed textured breast implants with texturised Biocell-surface. Ultraschall Med 29:399–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.Griffiths CO (1967) The submuscular implant in augmentation mammaplasty. In: Translation of the fourth international congress of plastic surgery. Excepta Medica Foundation, Amsterdam, p 1009Google Scholar
- 35.Truppman ES, Ellenby JD (1978) A13-year evaluation of subpectoral augmentation mammaplasty. In: Owsley JQ, Peterson RA (eds) Symposium on aesthetic surgery of the breast. Mosby, St LuisGoogle Scholar
- 39.Klinger M, Klinger F, Giannasi S, Veronesi A, Bandi V, Banzatti B, Catania B, Vinci V, Lisa A, Cornegliani G, Giaccone M, Caviggioli F, Maione L (2017) Stenotic breast malformation and its reconstructive surgical correction: a new concept from minor deformity to tuberous breast. Aesthet Plast Surg 41(5):1068–1077CrossRefGoogle Scholar