Advertisement

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery

, Volume 42, Issue 6, pp 1609–1617 | Cite as

Strategies of Mandibular Revision: A Retrospective Study of Revisional Mandibular Surgery for Unaesthetic Results of Previous Mandibular Reduction

  • Panxi Yu
  • Guodong Song
  • Xianlei Zong
  • Xiaonan Yang
  • Jingyi Zhao
  • Xiaoshuang Guo
  • Chenzhi Lai
  • Zuoliang Qi
  • Xiaolei Jin
Original Article Craniofacial/Maxillofacial
  • 110 Downloads

Abstract

Background

Mandibular reduction has been developed and popularized in Asia for decades. Despite the technical advancement and experience accumulation, complications and unaesthetic results still occur, and some need a revision surgery. This study aims to introduce the experience of revision surgery to reshape the unaesthetic mandibular contour after previous mandibular reduction.

Methods

From May 2011 to September 2017, patients dissatisfied with the result of previous mandibular reduction and who received a secondary mandibular revision were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed.

Results

Twenty-five patients were included in this study. Under-correction (88%, 22/25) was the most common aesthetic problem requiring revision, followed by asymmetry (56%, 14/25), broad chin (40%, 10/25), second mandibular angle (32%, 8/25), and over-correction (8%, 2/25). As revision techniques, long-curve mandibular reduction, simple mandibular reduction, and mandibular grinding were performed on 60% (15/25), 36% (9/25), and 4% (1/25) of the patients, respectively. All the patients were satisfied with the results. Cephalometric measurements indicated a significant bone removal after revision.

Conclusions

When performing a revision surgery to reshape the mandibular contour, the surgeon should have a clear surgical plan based on comprehensive evaluation, focus on the balanced harmony of the entire face, use proper technique and instruments, and avoid concomitant injury and complications. The one-staged technique that treats the whole mandible as an entirety is superior than multistaged techniques to improve the aesthetic outcomes to the largest extent.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these evidence-based medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Keywords

Mandibular revision Mandibular reduction Contour reshaping 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.

References

  1. 1.
    Satoh K (1998) Mandibular contouring surgery by angular contouring combined with genioplasty in orientals. Plast Reconstr Surg 101(2):461–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Satoh K, Mitsukawa N (2014) Mandibular marginal contouring in oriental aesthetic surgery: refined surgical concept and operative procedure. Ann Plast Surg 72(5):498–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Adams WM (1949) Bilateral hypertrophy of the masseter muscle; an operation for correction; case report. Br J Plast Surg 2(2):78–81PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Converse JM (1977) Deformities of the jaws. Reconstructive plastic surgery. Saunders, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Baek SM, Kim SS, Bindiger A (1989) The prominent mandibular angle: preoperative management, operative technique, and results in 42 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 83(2):272–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yang DB, Park CG (1991) Mandibular contouring surgery for purely aesthetic reasons. Aesthet Plast Surg 15(1):53–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yang DB, Song HS, Park CG (1995) Unfavorable results and their resolution in mandibular contouring surgery. Aesthet Plast Surg 19(1):93–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gui L, Yu D, Zhang Z, Changsheng LV, Tang X, Zheng Z (2005) Intraoral one-stage curved osteotomy for the prominent mandibular angle: a clinical study of 407 cases. Aesthet Plast Surg 29(6):552–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yoon ES, Seo YS, Kang DH, Koo SH, Park SH (2006) Analysis of incidences and types of complications in mandibular angle ostectomy in Koreans. Ann Plast Surg 57(5):541–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lee SW, Ahn SH (2013) Angloplasty revision: importance of genioplasty for narrowing of the lower face. Plast Reconstr Surg 132(2):435–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Park S, Lee TS (2018) Strategic considerations for effective sagittal resection of the mandible to achieve a slim and attractive jawline. Plast Reconstr Surg 141(1):152–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhang C, Teng L, Chan F, Xu J, Lu J, Xie F, Zhao J, Xu M, Jin X (2014) Single stage surgery for contouring the prominent mandibular angle with a broad chin deformity: en-bloc mandibular angle-body-chin curved ostectomy (MABCCO) and outer cortex grinding (OCG). J Craniomaxillofac Surg 42(7):1225–1233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Seok H, Kim SG, Park YW, Lee YC (2017) Postoperative three-dimensional evaluation of mandibular contouring surgery using computer-assisted simulation planning and a three-dimensional-printed surgical guide. J Craniofac Surg 28(3):768–770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hsieh AM, Huon LK, Jiang HR, Liu SY (2017) A safe and accurate method to perform esthetic mandibular contouring surgery for far Eastern Asians. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 46(5):578–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Song IS, Kwon JS, Choi YJ, Ryu JJ, Lee UL (2017) Occlusion-fit v-line guide and gooseneck saw for safe and accurate mandibuloplasty in Asians. Aesthet Plast Surg 41(4):930–937CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gao B, He J, Xie F, Zhu H, Yu LG, Li Q (2017) “Stamp perforation” technique for correction of prominent mandibular angle: 10 years of experience in mandibular reshaping in Asians. Ann Plast Surg 78(6):618–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lee TS (2015) Standardization of surgical techniques used in facial bone contouring. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 68(12):1694–1700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hsu YC, Li J, Hu J, Luo E, Hsu MS, Zhu S (2010) Correction of square jaw with low angles using mandibular “V-line” ostectomy combined with outer cortex ostectomy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 109(2):197–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The 16th Department, Plastic Surgery HospitalChinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations