Advertisement

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery

, Volume 42, Issue 6, pp 1600–1608 | Cite as

Evaluation of the Number of Progressive Tension Sutures Needed to Prevent Seroma in Abdominoplasty with Drains: A Single-Blind, Prospective, Comparative, Randomized Clinical Trial

  • Miluska Bromley
  • Walter Marrou
  • Luiz Charles-de-Sa
Original Article Body Contouring
  • 167 Downloads

Abstract

Background

Seroma formation has become the most reported complication after abdominoplasties. In 2000, progressive tension sutures (PTS) were described and reported to be associated with a seroma rate of 0.1%. Surgeons worldwide use PTS to prevent seroma; however, there are discrepancies in the number of PTS commonly used, starting from five up to 35 sutures. The absence of standardization may cause a lack of seroma prevention, increased surgical time, and general hesitation to perform the technique.

Objective

To determine whether 11 PTS are sufficient to prevent seroma in abdominoplasties.

Methods

We performed a single-blind, prospective, comparative, randomized clinical trial of 63 healthy patients from January to December 2017. Patients were divided into groups: group 1, classic abdominoplasty without the use of PTS and drains; group 2, abdominoplasty with the use of 11 PTS and drains; and group 3, abdominoplasty with the use of 22 PTS and drains. The duration of the surgical technique, presence of clinical seroma, number of aspirations, and days to drain removal were evaluated. The Cochran–Armitage, Fisher exact, Kruskal–Wallis, and t tests were used in the statistical analyses.

Results

PTS reduced the rate of seroma formation to 3.5%. Results showed that there is a benefit in using 11 PTS instead of 22 PTS because using more sutures led to an increased surgical time (30 min vs. 13 min) and possible complications. Compared to patients with PTS, those without PTS underwent more seroma aspirations and delayed drain removal.

Conclusions

Eleven PTS should be used in classic abdominoplasties.

Level of Evidence I

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Keywords

Abdominoplasty Progressive tension sutures Seroma 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

Dr. Bromley, Dr. Marrou and Dr. Charles de Sa´ have nothing to disclose.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all patients.

References

  1. 1.
    Matarasso A (1995) Liposuction as an adjunct to a full abdominoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 95:829–836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zimman OA, Butto CD, Ahualli PE (2001) Frequency of seroma in abdominal lipectomies. Plast Reconstr Surg 108:1449–1451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pollock TA, Pollock H (2010) No drain abdominoplasty with progressive tension sutures. Clin Plast Surg 37(3):515–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hester TR Jr, Baird W, Bostwick J, Nahai F, Cukic J (1989) Abdominoplasty combined with other major surgical procedures: safe or sorry? Plast Reconstr Surg 83:997–1004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kargi E, Akduman D, Dokuzoguz B (2003) Late complication of abdominoplasty in an obese patient: systemic inflammatory response syndrome and seroma. Plast Reconstr Surg 111:1568–1571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zecha PJ, Missotten FE (1999) Pseudocyst formation after abdominoplasty: extravasations of Morel-Lavallee. Br J Plast Surg 52:500–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jabbour S, Awaida C, Mhawej R, Bassilios Habre S, Nasr M (2017) Does the addition of progressive tension sutures to drains reduce seroma incidence after abdominoplasty? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Aesthet Surg J 37(4):440–447PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chaouat M, Levan P, Lalanne B, Buisson T, Nicolau P, Mimoun M (2000) Abdominal dermolipectomies: early postoperative complications and long-term unfavorable results. Plast Reconstr Surg 106:1614–1618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Baroudi R, Ferreira C (1998) Seroma: how to avoid it and how to treat it. Aesthet Surg J 18(6):439–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sforza M, Jonavonic M (2015) Use of quilting sutures during abdominoplasty to prevent seroma formation: Are they really effective? Aesthet Surg J 35(5):574–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Arantes HL, Rosique RG, Rosique MJ, Melega JM (2010) The use of quilting sutures in abdominoplasty does not require aspiration drainage for prevention of seroma. Aesthet Plast Surg 34(1):102–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pollock H, Pollock T (2000) Progressive tension sutures: a technique to reduce local complications in abdominoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 1057:2583–2586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pollock T, Pollock H (2012) Progressive tension sutures in abdominoplasty: a review of 597 consecutive cases. Aesthet Surg J 326:729–742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Macias L, Kwon E, Gould DJ, Spring MA, Stevens G (2016) decrease in seroma rate after adopting progressive tension sutures without drains: a single surgery center experience of 451 abdominoplasties over 7 years. Aesthet Surg J 369:1029–1035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Antonetti JW, Antonetti AR (2010) Reducing seroma in outpatient abdominoplasty: analysis of 516 consecutive cases. Aesthet Surg J 303:418–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Khan UD (2008) Risk of seroma with simultaneous liposuction and abdominoplasty and the role of progressive tension sutures. Aesthet Plast Surg 32(1):93–99 (discussion 100) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bercial M, Sabino M, Call JA, Rosetto LA, Ferreira LM (2012) Suction drains, quilting sutures, and fibrin sealant in the prevention of seroma formation in abdominoplasty: Which is the best strategy? Aesthet Plast Surg 36(2):370–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pitanguy I (2016) Cirurgia Plastica, Uma Visao de Sua Amplitude. Atheneu, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, pp 467–470Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Matarasso A (1991) Abdominolipoplasty: a system of classification and treatment for combined abdominoplasty and suction assisted lipectomy. Aesthet Plast Surg 15:111–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Seretis K, Gouilis D, Demiri EC, Lykoudis EG (2017) Prevention of seroma formation following abdominoplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aesthet Surg J 37(3):316–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gould DJ, Macias LH, Saeg F, Dauwe P, Hammoudeh Z, Stevens G (2018) Seroma rates are not increased when combining liposuction with progressive tension suture abdominoplasty: a retrospective cohort study of 619 patients. Aesthet Surg J 13(387):763–769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nahas FX (2007) Does quilting sutures prevent seroma in abdominoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 1193:1060–1064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Matarasso A, Swift RW, Rankin M (2006) Abdominoplasty and abdominal contour surgery: a national plastic surgery survey. Plast Reconstr Surg 117:1797–1808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Drapeau CM, D’Aniello C, Brafa A, Nicastri E, Silvestri A, Nisi G, Petrosillo N (2007) Surgical site infections in plastic surgery: an Italian multicenter study. J Surg Res 143:393–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Coulston JE, Tuff V, Twine CP, Chester JF, Eyers PS, Stewart AH (2012) Surgical factors in the prevention of infection following major lower limb amputation. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 43:556–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Simchen E, Rozin R, Wax Y (1990) The israeli study of surgical infection of drains and the risk of wound infection in operations for hernia. Surg Gynecol Obstet 170:331–337PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Vilar-Compte D, Mohar A, Sandoval S, de la Rosa M, Gordillo P, Volkow P (2000) Surgical site infections at the National Cancer Institute in Mexico: a case–control study. Am J Infect Control 28:14–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kim J, Stevenson TR (2006) Abdominoplasty, liposuction of the flanks, and obesity: analyzing risk factors for seroma formation. Plast Reconstr Surg 117:773–779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Fang RC, Lin SJ, Mustoe TA (2010) Abdominoplasty flap elevation in a more superficial plane: decreasing the need for drains. Plast Reconstr Surg 125:677–682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Stoff A, Reichenberger MA, Richter DF (2007) Comparing the ultrasonically activated scalpel (Harmonic) with high-frequency electrocautery for postoperative serous drainage in massive weight loss surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 120:1092–10933CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Dillerud E (1990) Abdominoplasty combined with suction lipoplasty: a study of complications, revision and risk factors in 487 cases. Ann Plast Surg 255:333–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Najera RM, Asheld W, Sayeed SM, Glickman LT (2011) Comparison of seroma formation following abdominoplasty with or without liposuction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1271:417–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Instituto Ivo PitanguyRio de JaneiroBrazil

Personalised recommendations