Advertisement

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery

, Volume 42, Issue 6, pp 1591–1599 | Cite as

One-Stage Combined Postbariatric Surgery: A Series of 248 Procedures in 55 Cases

  • Recep Anlatıcı
  • Gökhan Özerdem
  • Sarp Demiralay
  • Ömer Refik Özerdem
Original Article Body Contouring
  • 73 Downloads

Abstract

Introduction

Combined and/or multistage operations often are needed in postbariatric surgery.

Aim

With this retrospective study of a series of 55 cases, we aim to determine the effectiveness and safety of one-stage combined postbariatric surgery.

Materials and Methods

A total of 248 postbariatric procedures were performed in one session (except one-staged gynecomastia case) in 55 patients. The procedures included face and neck lifting, upper and lower trunk lifting, gluteal fat injection, mammoplasty, gynecomastia correction, abdominoplasty, and thigh and arm lifting. Sagged tissues of the trunk and extremities were removed by avulsing after tumescent liposuction. Liposuction was performed also on the neighboring tissues. Multilayer repair from superficial fascia to the skin was carried out after meticulous hemostasis and suction drain insertion.

Results

At least two plastic surgeons and two assistants entered the operations; operation time never exceeded 4.5 h except in one, and blood transfusion was needed only in one case. All patients were discharged from the hospital after 1 or 2 nights. Postoperative problems included infection (3.64% of the patients), delayed wound healing after seroma formation (32.73%), abnormal scar formation (1.82%), and demanded scar revision and revisionary liposuction by 10 patients (18.18%).

Conclusion

Combined postbariatric operations are very effective and the likelihood of serious complications could be decreased significantly when performed under certain conditions. The tumescent dermolipectomy method is a very useful method for these cases.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Keywords

Postbariatric surgery Combined surgery Body lift Scarpa preserving abdominoplasty 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest to disclose.

References

  1. 1.
    Coon D, Joseph M, Gusenoff JA et al (2010) Multiple procedures and staging in the massive weight loss population. Plast Reconstr Surg 125:691–698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hurwitz DJ, Agha-Muhammadi S, Ota K et al (2008) A clinical review of total body lift surgery. Aesthet Surg J 28:294–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Costa-Ferreira A, Rebelo M, Vasconez LO et al (2010) Scarpa fascia preservation during abdominoplasty: a prospective study. Plast Reconstr Surg 125:1232–1239Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hurwitz DJ, Holland SW (2006) The L brachioplasty: an innovative approach to correct excess tissue of the upper arm, axilla, and lateral chest. Plast Reconstr Surg 117:403–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Agha-Mohammadi S, Hurwitz DJ (2006) Postbariatric surgery breast reshaping the spiral flap. Ann Plast Surg 56:481–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Song AY, Jean RD, Hurwitz DJ et al (2005) A classification of contour deformities after bariatric weight loss: the Pittsburgh rating scale. Plast Reconstr Surg 116:1535–1544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hurwitz DJ (2012) J Torsoplasty: a novel approach to avoid circumferential scars of the upper body lift. Plast Reconstr Surg 130:382e–383eCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hurwitz DJ (2014) Aesthetic refinements in body contouring in the massive weight loss patient: trunk. Plast Reconstr Surg 134:1185–1195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hurwitz DJ (2015) Boomerang pattern correction of gynecomastia. Plast Reconstr Surg 135:433–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hurwitz DJ, Rubin P, Risin M et al (2004) Correcting the saddlebag deformity in the massive weight loss patient. Plast Reconstr Surg 114:1313–1325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Agha-Mohammadi S, Hurwitz DJ (2010) Enhanced recovery after body-contouring surgery: reducing surgical complication rates by optimizing nutrition. Aesthet Plast Surg 34:617–625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Costa-Ferreira A, Rebelo M, Silva A et al (2013) Scarpa fascia preservation during abdominoplasty: randomized clinical study of efficacy and safety. Plast Reconstr Surg 131:644–651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hall-Findlay EJ (2002) Vertical breast reduction with a medially-based pedicle. Aesthet Surg J 22:185–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lejour M (1999) Vertical mammaplasty: update and appraisal of late results. Plast Reconstr Surg 104:771–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lassus C (1986) An “all-season” mammoplasty. Aesthet Plast Surg 10:9–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Luis O. Vasconez’s aesthetic fellow in 2005–2006. Personal communication. University of Alabama, BirminghamGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    De Cordier BC, Al-Hakeem MS, Rosenberg LZ et al (2002) Endoscopic forehead lift: review of technique, cases, and complications. Plast Reconstr Surg 110:1558–1568Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gamboa GM, Vasconez LO (2009) Suture suspension technique for midface and neck rejuvenation. Ann Plast Surg 62:478–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Brown RH, Chang DK, Siy R et al (2015) Trends in the surgical correction of gynecomastia. Semin Plast Surg 29:122–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kornstein AN, Cinelli P (1992) Inferior pedicle reduction technique for larger forms of gynecomastia. Aesthet Plast Surg 16:331–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Durnig P, Jungwirth W (2006) Low-molecular-weight heparin and postoperative bleeding in rhytidectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 118:502–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Schonfeld SA, Ploysongsang Y, Dilisio R et al (1983) Fat embolism prophylaxis with corticosteroids: a prospective study in high-risk patients. Ann Int Med 99:438–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lindeque BG, Schoeman HS, Dommisse GF et al (1987) Fat embolism and the fat embolism syndrome. A double-blind therapeutic study. Bone Joint J 69:128–131Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Burk RW, Guzman-Stein G, Vasconez LO (1996) Lidocaine and epinephrine levels in tumescent technique liposuction. Plast Reconstr Surg 97:1379–1384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Klein JA (1990) Tumescent technique for regional anesthesia permits lidocaine doses of 35 mg/kg for liposuction. Dermatol Surg 16:248–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Klein JA (1990) The tumescent technique. Anesthesia and modified liposuction technique. Dermatol Clin 8:425–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ostad A, Kageyama N, Moy RL (1996) Tumescent anesthesia with a lidocaine dose of 55 mg/kg is safe for liposuction. Dermatol Surg 22:921–927Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Carson JL, Becker JL, Kleinman S et al (2012) Red blood cell transfusion: a clinical practice guideline from the AABB. Ann Intern Med 157:49–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Villanueva NL, Del Vecchio DA, Afrooz PN et al (2018) Staying safe during gluteal fat transplantation. Plast Reconstr Surg 141:79–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Cárdenas-Camarena L, Durán H, Robles-Cervantes JA et al (2018) Critical differences between microscopic (MIFE) and macroscopic (MAFE) fat embolism during liposuction and gluteal lipoinjection. Plast Reconstr Surg 141:880–890CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rohrich RJ, Leed JE, Swamy R et al (2006) Fluid resuscitation in liposuction: a retrospective review of 89 consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 117:431–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Recep Anlatıcı
    • 1
  • Gökhan Özerdem
    • 2
  • Sarp Demiralay
    • 3
  • Ömer Refik Özerdem
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Plastic and Reconstructive SurgerySanko UniversityGaziantepTurkey
  2. 2.A-Plast EstetikAntalyaTurkey
  3. 3.School of MedicineBahcesehir UniversityIstanbulTurkey
  4. 4.A-Plast EstetikIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations