Advertisement

Clinical Characteristics of Asymmetric Bilateral Gynecomastia: Suggestion of Desirable Surgical Method Based on a Single-Institution Experience

  • Alessandro Innocenti
  • Serena Ghezzi
  • Dario Melita
  • Marco Innocenti
Letter to the Editor
  • 26 Downloads

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

References

  1. 1.
    Lee SR, Lee SG, Byun GY, Kim MJ, Koo BH (2018) Clinical characteristics of asymmetric bilateral gynecomastia: suggestion of desirable surgical method based on a single-institution experience. Aesth Plast Surg 42:708–715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Innocenti A, Melita D, Mori F, Ciancio F, Innocenti M (2017) Management of Gynecomastia in patients with different body types. Considerations on 312 consecutive treated cases. Ann Plast Surg 78:492–496CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Innocenti A, Ciancio F, Portincasa A, Parisi D (2017) Discussion: surgical management of gynecomastia-subcutaneous mastectomy and liposuction. Aesth Plast Surg 4:983–984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Innocenti A, Melita D, Ciancio F, Innocenti M (2017) Discussion: “Long-term follow-up of recurrence and patient satisfaction after surgical treatment of gynecomastia”. Aesthetic Plast Surg 41(5):1242–1243CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Innocenti A, Ciancio F, Francesco M, Melita D, Innocenti M (2017) Comment to “No-drain single incision liposuction pull-through technique for gynecomastia”. Aesthetic Plast Surg 41(4):990–991CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alessandro Innocenti
    • 1
  • Serena Ghezzi
    • 1
  • Dario Melita
    • 1
  • Marco Innocenti
    • 1
  1. 1.Plastic and Reconstructive MicrosurgeryCareggi University HospitalFlorenceItaly

Personalised recommendations