Advertisement

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery

, Volume 42, Issue 2, pp 603–609 | Cite as

Drivers of Hospital Costs in the Self-Pay Facelift (Rhytidectomy) Patient: Analysis of Hospital Resource Utilization in 1890 Patients

  • Anmol Chattha
  • Alexandra Bucknor
  • David Chi
  • Klaas Ultee
  • Austin D. Chen
  • Samuel J. Lin
Original Article Special Topics

Abstract

Introduction

Rhytidectomy is one of the most commonly performed cosmetic procedures by plastic surgeons. Increasing attention to the development of a high-value, low-cost healthcare system is a priority in the USA. This study aims to analyze specific patient and hospital factors affecting the cost of this procedure.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of self-pay patients over the age of 18 who underwent rhytidectomy using the Healthcare Utilization Cost Project National Inpatient Sample database between 2013 and 2014. Mean marginal cost increases patient characteristics, and outcomes were studied. Generalized linear modeling with gamma regression and a log-link function were performed along with estimated marginal means to provide cost estimates.

Results

A total of 1890 self-pay patients underwent rhytidectomy. Median cost was $11,767 with an interquartile range of $8907 [$6976–$15,883]. The largest marginal cost increases were associated with postoperative hematoma ($12,651; CI $8181–$17,120), West coast region ($7539; 95% CI $6412–$8666), and combined rhinoplasty ($7824; 95% CI $3808–$11,840). The two risk factors associated with the generation of highest marginal inpatient costs were smoking ($4147; 95% CI $2804–$5490) and diabetes mellitus ($5622; 95% CI $3233–8011). High-volume hospitals had a decreased cost of − $1331 (95% CI − $2032 to − $631).

Conclusion

Cost variation for inpatient rhytidectomy procedures is dependent on preoperative risk factors (diabetes and smoking), postoperative complications (hematoma), and regional trends (West region). Rhytidectomy surgery is highly centralized and increasing hospital volume significantly decreases costs. Clinicians and hospitals can use this information to discuss the drivers of cost in patients undergoing rhytidectomy.

Level of Evidence V

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Keywords

Rhytidectomy Cost-analysis National inpatient sample Aesthetic surgery 

Supplementary material

266_2017_984_MOESM1_ESM.docx (13 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 13 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Kronick R, Rousseau D (2007) Is medicaid sustainable? Spending projections for the program’s second 40 years. Health Aff 26:w271–w287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Johns B, Torres TT (2005) WHO-CHOICE. Costs of scaling up health interventions: a systematic review. Health Policy Plan 20:1–13CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Antos J, Bertko J, Chernew M, Cutler D, Goldman D, McClellan M et al (2009) Bending the curve: effective steps to address long-term healthcare spending growth. Am J Manag Care 15:676–680PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    ASAPS (2015) ASAPS cosmetic surgery national data bank statistics [internet]. ASAPS Cosmet Surg Natl Data Bank Stat [cited 2016 Jan 1], p 8. http://www.surgery.org/sites/default/files/ASAPS-Stats2015.pdf
  5. 5.
    Jacono AA, Malone MH, Lavin TJ (2016) Nonsurgical facial rejuvenation procedures in patients under 50 prior to undergoing facelift: habits, costs, and results. Aesthet Surg J 37:448–453Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    NIS, HCUP nationwide inpatient sample. Healthcare cost and utilization project (HCUP) [internet] [cited 2017 Jul 3]. https://www-hcup-us-ahrq-gov.elibrary.amc.edu/nisoverview.jsp
  7. 7.
    Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. NIS database documentation [internet] 2016 [cited 2017 Jul 31]. https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nis/nisdbdocumentation.jsp
  8. 8.
    Jones AM, Lomas J, Rice N (2015) Healthcare Cost regressions: going beyond the mean to estimate the full distribution. Health Econ 24:1192–1212CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Manning WG, Basu A, Mullahy J (2005) Generalized modeling approaches to risk adjustment of skewed outcomes data. J Health Econ 24:465–488CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Alsarraf R, Larrabee WF, Johnson CM (2001) Cost outcomes of facial plastic surgery: regional and temporal trends. Arch Facial Plast Surg 3:44–47CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Krieger LM, Lee GK (2004) The economics of plastic surgery practices: trends in income, procedure mix, and volume. Plast Reconstr Surg 114:192–199CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Krieger LM (2002) Discount cosmetic surgery: industry trends and strategies for success. Plast Reconstr Surg 110:614–619CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Resnick CM, Daniels KM, Flath-Sporn SJ, Doyle M, Heald R, Padwa BL (2016) Physician assistants improve efficiency and decrease costs in outpatient oral and maxillofacial surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 74:2128–2135CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shin JI, Kim JS, Steinberger J, Dicapua J, Cho SK (2017) Patient factors contributing to prolonged postoperative length of stay and increased rate of readmission after elective posterior cervical fusion. Clin Spine Surg.  https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000000512 Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gavin LA (1992) Perioperative management of the diabetic patient. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 21:457–475PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cox TC, Blair LJ, Huntington CR, Colavita PD, Prasad T, Lincourt AE et al (2016) The cost of preventable comorbidities on wound complications in open ventral hernia repair. J Surg Res 206:214–222CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Richardson C, Mattison G, Workman A, Gupta S (2015) Pricing of common cosmetic surgery procedures: local economic factors trump supply and demand. Aesthet Surg J 35:218–224CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA): House Price Index (HPI) Quarterly Report—Q42016 [Internet]. [cited 2017 Mar 17]. https://www.fhfa.gov/AboutUs/Reports/ReportDocuments/2016Q4_HPI.pdf
  19. 19.
    Berlin NL, Tuggle CT, Steinbacher DM (2016) Improved short-term outcomes following orthognathic surgery are associated with high-volume centers. Plast Reconstr Surg 138:273e–281eCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Williams SB, Amarasekera CA, Gu X, Lipsitz SR, Nguyen PL, Hevelone ND et al (2012) Influence of surgeon and hospital volume on radical prostatectomy costs. J Urol 188:2198–2204CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Koo JJ, Wang J, Thompson CB, Merbs SL, Grant MP (2013) Impact of hospital volume and specialization on the cost of orbital trauma care. Ophthalmology 120:2741–2746CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lee JA, Park JH, Lee EJ, Kim SY, Kim Y, Lee SI (2011) High-quality, low-cost gastrectomy care at high-volume hospitals. Arch Surg 146:930CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pyle JW, Angobaldo JO, Bryant AK, Marks MW, David LR (2010) Outcomes analysis of a resident cosmetic clinic. Ann Plast Surg 64:270–274CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Baker DC, Stefani WA, Chiu ES (2005) Reducing the incidence of hematoma requiring surgical evacuation following male rhytidectomy: a 30-year review of 985 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 16:1973–1985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ramanadham SR, Mapula S, Costa C, Narasimhan K, Coleman JE, Rohrich RJ (2015) Evolution of hypertension management in face lifting in 1089 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 135:1037–1043CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Abboushi N, Yezhelyev M, Symbas J, Nahai F (2012) Facelift complications and the risk of venous thromboembolism: a single center’s experience. Aesthet Surg J 32:413–420CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tadisina KK, Chopra K, Mohan R, Singh DP (2015) Nationwide incidence, cost, and epidemiologic trends in facial rhytidectomy: an examination of inpatient facelifts using the nationwide inpatient sample (NIS) database. Aesthet Surg J 35:266–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Cosmetic Surgery National Data Bank Statistics (The American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery) [Internet]. 2014. p 7. https://www.surgery.org/sites/default/files/2014-Stats.pdf
  29. 29.
    Cosmetic Surgery National Data Bank Statistics (The American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery) [Internet]. 2013. p 7. https://www.surgery.org/sites/default/files/Stats2013_4.pdf
  30. 30.
    Martén E, Langevin C-J, Kaswan S, Zins JE (2011) The safety of rhytidectomy in the elderly. Plast Reconstr Surg 127:2455–2463CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Guyuron B, Bokhari F, Thomas T (1997) Secondary rhytidectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 100:1281–1284CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Beale EW, Rasko Y, Rohrich RJ (2013) A 20-year experience with secondary rhytidectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 131:625–634CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterHarvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA
  2. 2.Erasmus University RotterdamRotterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations