Advertisement

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery

, Volume 41, Issue 4, pp 863–871 | Cite as

Epicanthoplasty with Epicanthal Dermatic Tension-Releasing Incision Based on Skin Projection of Inner Canthal Ligament

  • Linghuan ZengEmail author
  • Ying Cen
  • Junjie Chen
  • Lei Lei
Original Article Oculoplastic

Abstract

Background

Epicanthoplasty is a reconstructive procedure that eliminates the deformity of the epicanthal fold and provides a more esthetic inner canthus. The epicanthal tension-releasing incision is a core technique of epicanthoplasty. However, which epicanthal dermatic tension-releasing incision most effectively provides epicanthal tension release remains unclear. We designed a novel dermatic tension-releasing incision based on the skin projection of the inner canthal ligament and compared it with the more conventional incision parallel to the lower inner canthal mucocutaneous junction (white line).

Methods

From December 2014 to March 2016, 30 patients were divided into two groups according to the type of dermatic tension-releasing incision. Each group comprised 15 patients and 30 eyes. In Group A, incision line a was performed (tension-releasing incision parallel to the lower inner canthal mucocutaneous junction, 4–5 mm away from the mucocutaneous junction). In Group B, incision line b was performed (tension-releasing incision pointed toward the lacrimal lake, along the skin projection of the inner canthal ligament). The defect angles of the two groups were photographed intraoperatively after tension release and analyzed postoperatively.

Results

The defect angles in Group B were significantly larger than group A (P < 0.0001). All patients obtained an esthetically pleasing inner canthus without hypertrophic scarring or injury to the lacrimal apparatus during the 3- to 24-month follow-up period.

Conclusion

An epicanthal dermatic tension-releasing incision based on the skin projection of the inner canthal ligament is more effective and safer than an incision parallel to the lower inner canthal mucocutaneous junction.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Keywords

Epicanthoplasty Blepharoplasty Dermatic tension-releasing incision Epicanthal fold 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Supplementary material

Video 1 Surgical procedure of Group A (WMV 92872 kb)

Video 2 Surgical procedure of Group B (WMV 172485 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Saonanon P (2016) The new focus on epicanthoplasty for Asian eyelids. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 27:457–464CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Park JW, Hwang K (2016) Anatomy and histology of an epicanthal fold. J Craniofac Surg 27:1101–1103CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Park DH, Park SU, Lee BK et al (2014) Medial epicanthoplasty without a vertical scar. Ann Plast Surg 73:8–11CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sa HS, Lee JH, Woo KI et al (2012) A new method of medial epicanthoplasty for patients with blepharophimosis-ptosis-epicanthus inversus syndrome. Ophthalmology 119:2402–2407CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wang S, Shi F, Luo X et al (2013) Epicanthal fold correction: our experience and comparison among three kinds of epicanthoplasties. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg JPRAS 66:682–687CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wang L, Chen X, Zheng Y (2013) A modified z-epicanthoplasty combined with blepharoplasty used to create an in-type palpebral fissure in Asian eyelids. Aesthet Plast Surg 37:704–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lu JJ, Yang K, Jin XL et al (2011) Epicanthoplasty with double eyelidplasty incorporating modified Z-plasty for Chinese patients. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg JPRAS 64:462–466CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Park JI (1996) Z-epicanthoplasty in Asian eyelids. Plast Reconstr Surg 98:602–609CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fujiwara T, Maeda M, Kuwae K et al (2006) Modified split V-W plasty for entropion with an epicanthal fold in Asian eyelids. Plast Reconstr Surg 118:635–642CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cho BC, Lee KY (2002) Medial epicanthoplasty combined with plication of the medial canthal tendon in Asian eyelids. Plast Reconstr Surg 110:293–300 (discussion 301) CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hu X, Lin X, Ma G et al (2012) Two-Z-epicanthoplasty in a three-dimensional model of Asian eyelids. Aesthet Plast Surg 36:788–794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lyu D, Jin Y, Chang L et al (2017) The modified Z-epicanthoplasty-A stepwise and individualized design. Ann Plast Surg 78:7–11CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yoo WM, Park SH, Kwag DR (2002) Root Z-epicanthoplasty in Asian eyelids. Plast Reconstr Surg 109:2067–2071 (discussion 2072–2063) CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Drake Richard L, Vogl Wayne, Mitchell Adam WM (2010) Gray’s anatomy for students. Elsevier, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kwon BS, Kong JS, Kim YW et al (2014) Corrective epicanthoplasty in patients with unnatural results of prior epicanthoplasty: rearrangement of the orbicularis oculi muscle above the medial canthal tendon. Ann Plast Surg 73:12–15CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yi SK, Paik HW, Lee PK et al (2007) Simple epicanthoplasty with minimal scar. Aesthet Plast Surg 31:350–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kao YS, Lin CH, Fang RH (1998) Epicanthoplasty with modified Y-V advancement procedure. Plast Reconstr Surg 102:1835–1841CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kakizaki H, Prabhakaran V, Pradeep T et al (2009) Peripheral branching of levator superioris muscle and Muller muscle origin. Am J Ophthalmol 148(800–803):e801Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Saonanon P (2014) Update on Asian eyelid anatomy and clinical relevance. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 25:436–442CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kang H, Takahashi Y, Nakano T et al (2015) Medial canthal support structures: the medial retinaculum: a review. Ann Plast Surg 74:508–514CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hwang K, Kim DJ, Hwang SH (2005) Anatomy of lower lacrimal canaliculus relative to epicanthoplasty. J Craniofac Surg 16:949–952CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Park JI (2003) Root Z-epicanthoplasty in Asian eyelids. Plast Reconstr Surg 111:2476–2477CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sebastia R, Herzog Neto G, Fallico E et al (2011) A one-stage correction of the blepharophimosis syndrome using a standard combination of surgical techniques. Aesthet Plast Surg 35:820–827CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Burn and Plastic Surgery, West China HospitalSichuan UniversityChengduPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations