Advertisement

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery

, Volume 41, Issue 3, pp 531–541 | Cite as

Postero-Inferior Pedicle Surgical Technique for the Treatment of Grade III Gynecomastia

  • Sophie Thiénot
  • Nicolas BertheuilEmail author
  • Raphaël Carloni
  • Cécile Méal
  • Sylvie Aillet
  • Christian Herlin
  • Eric Watier
Original Article Breast Surgery

Abstract

Introduction

Surgical treatment of Grade III gynecomastia generally utilizes mastectomy techniques and free transplantation of the nipple–areola complex. Moreover, with rising obesity rates and the development of bariatric surgery, an increasing demand for correctional surgery for pseudogynecomastia has been observed, which is comparable to Grade III gynecomastia in terms of its surgical management. Here, we describe an innovative technique to deal with these new demands: fascio-cutaneous flap by postero-inferior pedicle.

Materials and Methods

All patients in the Department of Plastic Surgery from our University Hospital suffering from Grade III gynecomastia or pseudogynecomastia underwent surgery via the postero-inferior pedicle flap technique. Briefly, we performed extensive liposuction of the infero-internal and infero-external mammary quadrants followed by liposuction of the deep tissues of the superior quadrants, except in the area of the pedicle. After removing the skin just above the dermis of the inferior quadrants and performing de-epithelialization of the postero-inferior pedicle flap, the thoracic flap was lowered and the areola transposed.

Results

Nine patients underwent surgery between March 2015 and March 2016, and their results were collected prospectively. The mean patient age was 46.6 years, the mean weight was 94.2 kg, and the mean body mass index was 30.8 kg/m2. In addition, the mean operative time was 132 min, the mean liposuction volume was 633 mL, the excised weight was 586 g, and the mean hospitalization and drainage durations were 3.8 days. No major complications occurred, no re-intervention was required, and no recurrence was found.

Conclusions

We report a new operative technique using a postero-inferior pedicle. Its main advantage is preservation of neurovascular function, which makes this a promising technique for patients who wish to maintain nipple sensitivity. This surgery is reliable and reproducible. We recommend it as the first line treatment for Grade III gynecomastia because of its low rate of major complications and favorable functional and esthetic results.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Keywords

Gynecomastia Pseudogynecomastia Massive weight loss Postero-inferior pedicle Liposuction Male breast Surgery Male mastectomy 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 (MP4 15724 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (MP4 29622 kb)

Supplementary material 3 (MP4 49158 kb)

Supplementary material 4 (MP4 20197 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Fabié-Boulard A, Fabre G, Gangloff D, Grolleau J-L, Chavoin J-P (2013) Gynécomastie. EMC Tech Chir Chir Plast Reconstr Esthét 2013831-9 Artic 45-668-D 45(668-D):1–7Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wiesman IM, Lehman JA, Parker MG, Tantri MDP, Wagner DS, Pedersen JC (2004) Gynecomastia: an outcome analysis. Ann Plast Surg 53(2):97–101CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Webster JP (1946) Mastectomy for gynecomastia through a semicircular intra-areolar incision. Ann Surg 124(3):557–575CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bonte A (2013) Gynécomastie: techniques chirurgicales et indications. EMC Tech Chir Chir Plast Reconstr Esthét 2013831-9 Artic 45-668-D. 45(668-D):1–9Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Colombo-Benkmann M, Buse B, Stern J, Herfarth C (1999) Indications for and results of surgical therapy for male gynecomastia. Am J Surg 178(1):60–63CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cordova A, Moschella F (2008) Algorithm for clinical evaluation and surgical treatment of gynaecomastia. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg JPRAS 61(1):41–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hage JJ, Bloem JJ (1995) Chest wall contouring for female-to-male transsexuals: Amsterdam experience. Ann Plast Surg 34(1):59–66CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hage JJ, van Kesteren PJ (1995) Chest-wall contouring in female-to-male transsexuals: basic considerations and review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg 96(2):386–391CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tashkandi M, Al-Qattan MM, Hassanain JM, Hawary MB, Sultan M (2004) The surgical management of high-grade gynecomastia. Ann Plast Surg 53(1):17–20 (discussion 21) CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Simon BE, Hoffman S, Kahn S (1973) Classification and surgical correction of gynecomastia. Plast Reconstr Surg 51(1):48–52CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gusenoff JA, Coon D, Rubin JP (2008) Pseudogynecomastia after massive weight loss: detectability of technique, patient satisfaction, and classification. Plast Reconstr Surg 122(5):1301–1311CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gheita A (2008) Gynecomastia: the horizontal ellipse method for its correction. Aesthetic Plast Surg 32(5):795–801CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Beer GM, Budi S, Seifert B, Morgenthaler W, Infanger M, Meyer VE (2001) Configuration and localization of the nipple-areola complex in men. Plast Reconstr Surg 108(7):1947–1952 (discussion 1953) CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shulman O, Badani E, Wolf Y, Hauben DJ (2001) Appropriate location of the nipple-areola complex in males. Plast Reconstr Surg 108(2):348–351CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bertheuil N, Chaput B, Berger-Müller S, Ménard C, Mourcin F, Watier E (2016) Liposuction preserves the morphological integrity of the microvascular network: flow cytometry and confocal microscopy evidence in a controlled study. Aesthetic Surg J Am Soc Aesthetic Plast Surg 36(5):609–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bertheuil N, Chaput B, De Runz A, Girard P, Carloni R, Watier E (2017) The lipo-body lift: a new circumferential body-contouring technique useful after bariatric surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 139(1):38e–49eCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bertheuil N, De Runz A, Varin A, Carloni R, Francois C, Chaput B (2017) Concomitant liposuction reduces complications of vertical medial thigh lift in massive weight loss patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 139(2):569e–570eCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bertheuil N, Thienot S, Chaput B, Varin A, Watier E (2015) Quality-of-Life assessment after medial thighplasty in patients following massive weight loss. Plast Reconstr Surg 135(1):67e–73eCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    de Runz A, Colson T, Minetti C, Brix M, Pujo J, Gisquet H et al (2015) Liposuction-assisted medial brachioplasty after massive weight loss: an efficient procedure with a high functional benefit. Plast Reconstr Surg 135(1):74e–84eCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Vernon S (1957) Umbilical transplantation upward and abdominal contouring in lipectomy. Am J Surg 94(3):490–492CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wray RC, Hoopes JE, Davis GM (1974) Correction of extreme gynaecomastia. Br J Plast Surg 27(1):39–41CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Maetz B, Bodin F, Abbou R, Wilk A, Bruant-Rodier C (2013) Management of weight loss consequences in the male chest: The amputation grafting technique with a L scar. Ann Chir Plast Esthét 58(6):650–657CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kornstein AN, Cinelli PB (1992) Inferior pedicle reduction technique for larger forms of gynecomastia. Aesthetic Plast Surg 16(4):331–335CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mojallal A, Comparin JP, Voulliaume D, Chichery A, Papalia I, Foyatier JL (2005) Reduction mammaplasty using superior pedicle in macromastia. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 50(2):118–126CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Georgiade NG, Serafin D, Morris R, Georgiade G (1979) Reduction mammaplasty utilizing an inferior pedicle nipple-areolar flap. Ann Plast Surg 3(3):211–218CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mey AD, Lejour M (1999) Plasties mammaires pour hypertrophie et ptôse. Ann Chir Plast EsthetGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Revol M, Binder JP, Danino A, May P, Servant JM (2009) Manuel de chirurgie plastique reconstructrice et esthétique. http://www.unitheque.com/Livre/sauramps_medical/Manuel_de_chirurgie_plastique_reconstructrice_et_esthetique-56590.html
  28. 28.
    Cannistra C, Piedimonte A, Albonico F (2009) Surgical treatment of gynecomastia with severe ptosis: periareolar incision and dermal double areolar pedicle technique. Aesthetic Plast Surg 33(6):834–837CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    McKissock PK (1979) Reduction mammaplasty. Ann Plast Surg 2(4):321–331CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Stoff A, Velasco-Laguardia FJ, Richter DF (2012) Central pedicled breast reduction technique in male patients after massive weight loss. Obes Surg 22(3):445–451CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Walgenbach KJ, Riabikhin AW, Galla TJ, Bannasch H, Voigt M, Andree C et al (2001) Effect of ultrasonic assisted lipectomy (UAL) on breast tissue: histological findings. Aesthetic Plast Surg 25(2):85–88CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ramon Y, Fodor L, Peled IJ, Eldor L, Egozi D, Ullmann Y (2005) Multimodality gynecomastia repair by cross-chest power-assisted superficial liposuction combined with endoscopic-assisted pull-through excision. Ann Plast Surg 55(6):591–594CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Fan L, Yang X, Zhang Y, Jiang J (2009) Endoscopic subcutaneous mastectomy for the treatment of gynecomastia: a report of 65 cases. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 19(3):e85–e90CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Petty PM, Solomon M, Buchel EW, Tran NV (2010) Gynecomastia: evolving paradigm of management and comparison of techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 125(5):1301–1308CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Prado AC, Castillo PF (2005) Minimal surgical access to treat gynecomastia with the use of a power-assisted arthroscopic–endoscopic cartilage shaver. Plast Reconstr Surg 115(3):939–942CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Iwuagwu OC, Calvey TAJ, Ilsley D, Drew PJ (2004) Ultrasound guided minimally invasive breast surgery (UMIBS): a superior technique for gynecomastia. Ann Plast Surg 52(2):131–133CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Varma SK, Henderson HP (1990) A prospective trial of adrenaline infiltration for controlling bleeding during surgery for gynaecomastia. Br J Plast Surg 43(5):590–593CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A (2004) Classification of surgical complication: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Hoşnuter M (2014) An ameliorated approach for sharp resection in gynecomastia surgery. Indian J Surg 76(5):419–424CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sophie Thiénot
    • 1
  • Nicolas Bertheuil
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • Raphaël Carloni
    • 4
  • Cécile Méal
    • 1
  • Sylvie Aillet
    • 1
  • Christian Herlin
    • 5
  • Eric Watier
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Hospital SudUniversity of Rennes 1RennesFrance
  2. 2.SITI Laboratory, Etablissement Français du Sang BretagneRennes University HospitalRennesFrance
  3. 3.STROMAlab, UMR5273 CNRS/UPS/EFS – INSERM U1031Rangueil HospitalToulouseFrance
  4. 4.Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Nicolle HospitalUniversity of RouenRouenFrance
  5. 5.Department of Plastic and Burn SurgeryCHU of MontpellierMontpellierFrance

Personalised recommendations