Free Versus Pedicled TRAM Flaps: Cost Utilization and Complications
- 496 Downloads
- 1 Citations
Abstract
Introduction
Conventionally, free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (fTRAM) flap breast reconstruction has been associated with decreased donor site morbidity and improved flap inset. However, clinical success depends upon more sophisticated technical expertise and facilities. This study aims to characterize postoperative outcomes undergoing free versus pedicled TRAM (pTRAM) flap breast reconstruction.
Methods
Nationwide inpatient sample database (2008–2011) was reviewed for cases of fTRAM (ICD-9-CM 85.73) and pTRAM (85.72) breast reconstruction. Inclusion criteria were females undergoing pTRAM or fTRAM breast reconstruction; males were excluded. We examined demographics, hospital setting, insurance information, patient income, and comorbidities. Clinical endpoints included postoperative complications, length-of-stay (LOS), and total charges (TC). Bivariate/multivariate analyses were performed to identify independent risk factors associated with increased complications and resource utilization.
Results
Overall, 21,655 cases were captured. Seventy-percent were Caucasian, 95 % insured, and 72 % treated in an urban teaching hospital. There were 9 pTRAM and 6 fTRAM in-hospital mortalities. On bivariate analysis, the fTRAM cohort was more likely to be obese (OR 1.2), undergo revision (OR 5.9), require hemorrhage control (OR 5.7), suffer hematoma complications (OR 1.9), or wound infection (OR 1.8) (p < 0.003). The pTRAM cohort was more likely to suffer pneumonia (OR 1.6) and pulmonary embolism (OR 2.0) (p < 0.004). Reconstruction type did not affect risk of flap loss or seroma occurrence. TC were higher with fTRAM (p < 0.001). LOS was not affected by procedure type. On risk-adjusted multivariate analysis, fTRAM was an independent risk factor for increased LOS (OR 1.6), TC (OR 1.8), and postoperative complications (OR 1.3) (p < 0.001).
Conclusion
Free TRAM has an increased risk of postoperative complications and resource utilization versus pTRAM on the current largest risk-adjusted analysis. Further analyses are required to elucidate additional factors influencing outcomes following these procedures.
Level of Evidence III
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the A3 online Instructions to Authors.www.springer.com/00266.
Keywords
Autologous breast reconstruction Free TRAM Pedicled TRAM Cost utilization Complications Length of stayNotes
Authors contributions
S.G. contributed to data analysis, writing manuscript, and final draft editing. D.J.G. contributed to study design, data analysis, and final draft editing. J.T. contributed to study design, statistical analysis, and data analysis. S.R.T. contributed to study design, final draft editing, and overseeing study project.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
References
- 1.Kroll SS, Coffey JA Jr, Winn RJ, Schusterman MA (1995) A comparison of factors affecting aesthetic outcomes of tram flap breast reconstructions. Plast Reconstr Surg 96:860–864CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 2.Eberlein TJ, Crespo LD, Smith BL, Hergrueter CA, Douville L, Eriksson E (1993) Prospective evaluation of immediate reconstruction after mastectomy. Ann Surg 218:29–36CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 3.Hidalgo DA (1998) Aesthetic refinement in breast reconstruction: complete skin-sparing mastectomy with autogenous tissue transfer. Plast Reconstr Surg 102(1):63–70CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 4.Wilkins EG, August DA, Kuzon WM Jr, Chang AE, Smith DJ (1995) Immediate transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap reconstruction after mastectomy. J Am Coll Surg 180:177–183PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 5.Alderman AK, Wilkins EG, Lowery JC, Kim M, Davis JA (2000) Determinants of patient satisfaction in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 106:769–776CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 6.Kroll SS, Baldwin B (1992) A comparison of outcomes using three different methods of breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 90:455–462CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 7.Namnoum JD (2007) Breast reconstruction: tram flap techniques. In: Thorne CH (ed) Grabb and smith’s plastic surgery. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 641–647Google Scholar
- 8.Macadam SA, Zhong T, Weichman K, Papsdorf M, Lennox PA, Hazen A, Matros E, Disa J, Mehrara B, Pusic AL (2016) Quality of life and patient-reported outcomes in breast cancer survivors: a multicenter comparison of four abdominally based autologous reconstruction methods. Plast Reconstr Surg 137:758–771CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.Holmstrom H (1979) The free abdominoplasty flap and its use in breast reconstruction. an experimental study and clinical case report. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 13:423–427CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 10.Grotting JC, Urist MM, Maddox WA, Vasconez LO (1989) Conventional tram flap versus free microsurgical tram flap for immediate breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 83(5):828–841CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 11.Elliott LF, Eskenazi L, Beegle PH Jr, Podres PE, Drazan L (1993) Immediate tram flap breast reconstruction: 128 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 92:217–227CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 12.Schusterman MA, Kroll SS, Weldon ME (1992) Immediate breast reconstruction: Why the free TRAM over the conventional TRAM flap? Plast Reconstr Surg 90(2):255–261CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.Gart MS, Smetona JT, Hanwright PJ, Fine NA, Bethke KP, Khan SA, Wang E, Kim JY (2013) Autologous options for postmastectomy breast reconstruction: a comparison of outcomes based on the american college of surgeons national surgical quality improvement program. J Am Coll Surg 216:229–238CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.Kroll SS, Evans GR, Reece GP, Miller MJ, Robb G, Baldwin BJ, Schusterman MA (1996) Comparison of resource costs between implant-based and tram flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 97:364–372CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Alderman AK, Kalliainen L (2014) Discussion: comparative analysis of 18-month outcomes and costs of breast reconstruction flap procedures. Plast Reconstr Surg 133:480–481PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.Sando IC, Chung KC, Kidwell KM, Kozlow JH, Malay S, Momoh AO (2014) Comprehensive breast reconstruction in an academic surgical practice: an evaluation of the financial impact. Plast Reconstr Surg 134:1131–1139CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 17.Israeli R, Funk S, Reaven NL (2014) Comparative analysis of 18-month outcomes and costs of breast reconstruction flap procedures. Plast Reconstr Surg 133:471–479CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 18.Grover R, Padula WV, Van Vliet M, Ridgway EB (2013) Comparing five alternative methods of breast reconstruction surgery: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 132:709e–723eCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 19.Alderman AK, Hu E, Atisha D, Wilkins EG (2007) Surgical outcomes of breast reconstruction: comparison of autogenous tissue and expander/implant techniques. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 7:385–391CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 20.Hcup databases. Healthcare cost and utilization project (hcup) (2014)Google Scholar
- 21.Polednak AP (2000) Geographic variation in postmastectomy breast reconstruction rates. Plast Reconstr Surg 106:298–301CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 22.Wilkins EG, Alderman AK (2004) Breast reconstruction practices in north america: current trends and future priorities. Semin Plast Surg 18:149–155CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 23.Masoomi H, Wirth GA, Paydar KZ, Richland BK, Evans GR (2014) Perioperative outcomes of autologous breast reconstruction surgery in teaching versus nonteaching hospitals. Plast Reconstr Surg 134:514e–520eCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 24.Amey CH, Miller MK, Albrecht SL (1997) The role of race and residence in determining stage at diagnosis of breast cancer. J Rural Health 13:99–108CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 25.Mitchell JB, Khandker RK (1995) Black–white treatment differences in acute myocardial infarction. Healthc Financ Rev 17:61–70Google Scholar
- 26.Hargraves JL, Cunningham PJ, Hughes RG (2001) Racial and ethnic differences in access to medical care in managed care plans. Health Serv Res 36:853–868PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 27.Shippee TP, Kozhimannil KB, Rowan K, Virnig BA (2014) Health insurance coverage and racial disparities in breast reconstruction after mastectomy. Women’s Health Issues 24:261–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Alderman AK, Storey AF, Nair NS, Chung KC (2009) Financial impact of breast reconstruction on an academic surgical practice. Plast Reconstr Surg 123:1408–1413CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 29.Shubinets V, Fox JP, Sarik JR, Kovach SJ, Fischer JP (2016) Surgically treated hernia following abdominally based autologous breast reconstruction: prevalence, outcomes, and expenditures. Plast Reconstr Surg 137:749–757CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 30.Chang DW, Wang B, Robb GL, Reece GP, Miller MJ, Evans GR, Langstein HN, Kroll SS (2000) Effect of obesity on flap and donor-site complications in free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 105:1640–1648CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 31.Kroll SS, Netscher DT (1989) Complications of tram flap breast reconstruction in obese patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 84:886–892CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 32.Hartrampf CR Jr, Bennett GK (1987) Autogenous tissue reconstruction in the mastectomy patient. a critical review of 300 patients. Ann Surg 205:508–519CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 33.Scheflan M, Kalisman M (1984) Complications of breast reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 11:343–350PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 34.Kroll SS (1994) Necrosis of abdominoplasty and other secondary flaps after tram flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 94:637–643CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 35.Hanwright PJ, Davila AA, Hirsch EM, Khan SA, Fine NA, Bilimoria KY, Kim JY (2013) The differential effect of bmi on prosthetic versus autogenous breast reconstruction: a multivariate analysis of 12,986 patients. Breast 22:938–945CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 36.Gherardini G, Arnander C, Gylbert L, Wickman M (1994) Pedicled compared with free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps in breast reconstruction. Scand J Plast Reconst Surg Hand Surg 28(1):69–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 37.Banic A, Boeckx W, Greulich M, Guelickx P, Marchi A, Rigotti G, Tschopp H (1995) Late results of breast reconstruction with free tram flaps: a prospective multicentric study. Plast Reconstr Surg 95:1195–1204CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 38.Massenburg BB, Sanati-Mehrizy P, Ingargiola MJ, Rosa JH, Taub PJ (2015) Flap failure and wound complications in autologous breast reconstruction: a national perspective. Aesthet Plast Surg 39:902–909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 39.Andrades P, Fix RJ, Danilla S, Howell RE 3rd, Campbell WJ, De la Torre J, Vasconez LO (2008) Ischemic complications in pedicle, free, and muscle sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps for breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 60:562–567CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 40.Baldwin BJ, Schusterman MA, Miller MJ, Kroll SS, Wang BG (1994) Bilateral breast reconstruction: conventional versus free tram. Plast Reconstr Surg 93:1410–1416CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 41.Rosen PB, Jabs AD, Kister SJ, Hugo NE (1990) Clinical experience with immediate breast reconstruction using tissue expansion or transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flaps. Ann Plast Surg 25:249–257CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 42.Mioton LM, Smetona JT, Hanwright PJ, Seth AK, Wang E, Bilimoria KY, Gaido J, Fine NA, Kim JY (2013) Comparing thirty-day outcomes in prosthetic and autologous breast reconstruction: a multivariate analysis of 13,082 patients? J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg 66:917–925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 43.Greco JA 3rd, Castaldo ET, Nanney LB, Wu YC, Donahue R, Wendel JJ, Hagan KF, Shack RB (2008) Autologous breast reconstruction: the vanderbilt experience (1998 to 2005) of independent predictors of displeasing outcomes. J Am Coll Surg 207:49–56CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 44.Ascherman JA, Seruya M, Bartsich SA (2008) Abdominal wall morbidity following unilateral and bilateral breast reconstruction with pedicled tram flaps: an outcomes analysis of 117 consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 121:1–8CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 45.Selber JC, Kurichi JE, Vega SJ, Sonnad SS, Serletti JM (2006) Risk factors and complications in free tram flap breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 56:492–497CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 46.Harashina T, Fujino T, Watanabe S (1976) The intimal healing of microvascular anastomoses. Plast Reconstr Surg 58:608–613CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 47.Liao EC, Taghinia AH, Nguyen LP, Yueh JH, May JW Jr, Orgill DP (2008) Incidence of hematoma complication with heparin venous thrombosis prophylaxis after tram flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 121:1101–1107CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 48.Sharma S, Chang DW, Koutz C, Evans GR, Robb GL, Langstein HN, Kroll SS (2001) Incidence of hematoma associated with ketorolac after tram flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 107:352–355CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 49.Shultz KJ, Don S, Mahabir RC, Verheyden CN (2014) Pulmonary function after pedicled transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000310 Google Scholar
- 50.Ford GT, Rosenal TW, Clergue F, Whitelaw WA (1993) Respiratory physiology in upper abdominal surgery. Clin Chest Med 14:237–252PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 51.Munegato G, Brandolese R (2001) Respiratory physiopathology in surgical repair for large incisional hernias of the abdominal wall. J Am Coll Surg 192:298–304CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 52.Ridings PC, Bloomfield GL, Blocher CR, Sugerman HJ (1995) Cardiopulmonary effects of raised intra-abdominal pressure before and after intravascular volume expansion. J Trauma 39:1071–1075CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 53.Losken A, Carlson GW, Tyrone JW, Jones GE, Culbertson JH, Beegle PH Jr, Elliott LF 2nd (2005) The significance of intraabdominal compartment pressure after free versus pedicled tram flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 115:261–263PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 54.Losken A, Carlson GW, Jones GE, Hultman CS, Culbertson JH, Bostwick J 3rd (2002) Significance of intraabdominal compartment pressures following tram flap breast reconstruction and the correlation of results. Plast Reconstr Surg 109:2257–2264CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 55.Pannucci CJ, Alderman AK, Brown SL, Wakefield TW, Wilkins EG (2012) The effect of abdominal wall plication on intra-abdominal pressure and lower extremity venous flow: a case report. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 65:392–394CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 56.Lemaine V, McCarthy C, Kaplan K, Mehrara B, Pusic AL, Cordeiro PG, Disa JJ (2011) Venous thromboembolism following microsurgical breast reconstruction: an objective analysis in 225 consecutive patients using low-molecular-weight heparin prophylaxis. Plast Reconstr Surg 127:1399–1406CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 57.Kim EK, Eom JS, Ahn SH, Son BH, Lee TJ (2009) The efficacy of prophylactic low-molecular-weight heparin to prevent pulmonary thromboembolism in immediate breast reconstruction using the tram flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 123:9–12CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 58.Agnelli G, Bolis G, Capussotti L, Scarpa RM, Tonelli F, Bonizzoni E, Moia M, Parazzini F, Rossi R, Sonaglia F, Valarani B, Bianchini C, Gussoni G (2006) A clinical outcome-based prospective study on venous thromboembolism after cancer surgery: the @RISTOS project. Ann Surg 243:89–95CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 59.Kroll SS, Evans GR, Reece GP, Miller MJ, Robb GL, Baldwin BJ, Schusterman MA (1996) Comparison of resource costs of free and conventional tram flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 98:74–77CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 60.Serletti JM, Moran SL (1997) Free versus the pedicled tram flap: A cost comparison and outcome analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 100:1418–1424CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 61.Grotting JC (1994) Immediate breast reconstruction using the free tram flap. Clin Plast Surg 21:207–221PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 62.Arnez ZM, Bajec J, Bardsley AF, Scamp T, Webster MH (1991) Experience with 50 free tram flap breast reconstructions. Plast Reconstr Surg 87:470–478CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 63.Larson DL, Yousif NJ, Sinha RK, Latoni J, Korkos TG (1999) A comparison of pedicled and free tram flaps for breast reconstruction in a single institution. Plast Reconstr Surg 104:674–680CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 64.Knight MA, Nguyen DTt, Kobayashi MR, Evans GR (2006) Institutional review of free tram flap breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 56:593–598CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 65.Galla TJ, Lukas B, Feller AM (1999) Pedicled versus free tram flap for breast reconstruction. Handchirurgie, Mikrochirurgie, plastische Chirurgie: Organ der Deutschsprachigen Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Handchirurgie: Organ der Deutschsprachigen Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Mikrochirurgie der Peripheren Nerven und Gefasse 31:126–133Google Scholar
- 66.Halls MJ (2000) A comparison of pedicle and free tram flaps for breast reconstruction in a single institution. Plast Reconstr Surg 105:1573–1574PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 67.Feller AM (1994) Free tram. results and abdominal wall function. Clin Plast Surg 21:223–232PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 68.Khouri RK, Cooley BC, Kunselman AR, Landis JR, Yeramian P, Ingram D, Natarajan N, Benes CO, Wallemark C (1998) A prospective study of microvascular free-flap surgery and outcome. Plast Reconstr Surg 102:711–721CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 69.Yoon CS, Kim KN (2016) Selective salvage of zones 2 and 4 in the pedicled tram flap: a focus on reducing fat necrosis and improving aesthetic outcomes. SpringerPlus 5:68CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 70.Beasley ME (1994) The pedicled tram as preference for immediate autogenous tissue breast reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 21:191–205PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 71.Mizgala CL, Hartrampf CR Jr, Bennett GK (1994) Assessment of the abdominal wall after pedicled tram flap surgery: 5 to 7-year follow-up of 150 consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 93:988–1002CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar