Barbed Sutures in Body-Contouring: Outcome Analysis of 695 Procedures in 623 Patients and Technical Advances
- 641 Downloads
Surgical wound closure is often complicated by suture-related issues. The recent introduction of knotless barbed sutures may address the shortcomings of conventional sutures and offer the additional benefit of reduced operating time. In this paper, we describe our experience with barbed sutures for body-contouring procedures. We share technical insights and evaluate postoperative complications.
Patients and Methods
A retrospective assessment of prospectively collected data over a period of more than 5 years was undertaken. Six hundred twenty-three consecutive patients underwent 695 body-contouring procedures with barbed suture closure. Patients were followed for at least 12 weeks postoperatively. Patient demographics, operation time as well as suture-related complications, such as wound dehiscence and wound site infection were recorded and analyzed.
Barbed sutures can facilitate skin closure, rectus plication, quilting, and deep layer closure in body-contouring procedures. The average operating time in our study cohort was 108 min with reduction mammoplasty being the quickest (94 min) and bodylift (156 min) being the slowest procedure. Sixty-eight patients experienced suture-related complications resulting in an overall complication rate of 9.7 % with thigh lift having the most (15 %) and reduction mammoplasty (7 %) the fewest adverse events.
The use of barbed sutures allows quick closure of lengthy body-contouring incision lines with low complication rates. Our observations support that barbed sutures are safe, convenient and effective. In our hands barbed sutures appear to be superior to traditional wound-closure techniques in body-contouring procedures.
Level of Evidence IV
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
KeywordsBarbed suture V-loc Body contouring
Drs. Duscher, Pollhammer, Wenny, Shamiyeh, and Schmidt have no financial interest in any of the products, or devices mentioned in this article. Dr. Huemer serves on the speaker’s bureau of Covidien, which provided suture material. No funding was received for this work.
Supplementary material 1 (MP4 150834 kb)
- 3.Rubin JP, Hunstad JP, Polynice A, Gusenoff JA, Schoeller T, Dunn R et al (2014) A multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing absorbable barbed sutures versus conventional absorbable sutures for dermal closure in open surgical procedures. Aesth Surg J Am Soc Aesth Plast Surg 34(2):272–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Surgery TASfAP (2013) Cosmetic Surgery National Data Bank [May 23, 2014]Google Scholar
- 15.Mansberger ARJE, Smith EP, Yeager GH (1951) A new type pull-out wire for tendon surgery: a preliminary report. Bull Univ Md Sch Med 36(3):170–173Google Scholar
- 16.Sulamanidze MA, Fournier PF, Paikidze TG, Sulamanidze GM (2002) Removal of facial soft tissue ptosis with special threads. Dermatol Surg Off Publ Am Soc Dermatol Surg [et al]. 28(5):367–371Google Scholar
- 29.Bartlett LC (1985) Pressure necrosis is the primary cause of wound dehiscence. Can J Surg (Journal canadien de chirurgie) 28(1):27–30Google Scholar
- 31.Gingras K, Zaruby J, Maul D (2012) Comparison of V-Loc 180 wound closure device and Quill PDO knotless tissue-closure device for intradermal closure in a porcine in vivo model: evaluation of biomechanical wound strength. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 100(4):1053–1058CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 32.Duscher D, Maan ZN, Wong VW, Rennert RC, Januszyk M, Rodrigues M et al (2014) Mechanotransduction and fibrosis. J Biomech 47(9):1997–2005Google Scholar
- 36.Longaker MT, Rohrich RJ, Greenberg L, Furnas H, Wald R, Bansal V et al (2014) A randomized controlled trial of the embrace advanced scar therapy device to reduce incisional scar formation. Plast Reconstr Surg 134(3):536–546Google Scholar
- 38.Koide S, Smoll NR, Liew J, Smith K, Rizzitelli A, Findlay MW et al (2015) A randomized ‘N-of-1’ single blinded clinical trial of barbed dermal sutures vs. smooth sutures in elective plastic surgery shows differences in scar appearance 2-years post-operatively. J Plast Reconstr Aesth Surg JPRAS 68(7):1003–1009CrossRefGoogle Scholar