Advertisement

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery

, Volume 40, Issue 5, pp 733–738 | Cite as

The “Superior Ledge”: a Modification of the Standard Superomedial Pedicle Reduction Mammoplasty to Accentuate Nipple-Areola Complex Projection

  • Peter W. Henderson
  • Michelle M. Chang
  • Erin M. Taylor
  • Ross Weinreb
  • Christine H. RohdeEmail author
Original Article Breast
  • 532 Downloads

Abstract

Background

The superomedial pedicle parenchymal excision pattern for reduction mammaplasty has the benefits of a reproducible breast shape and improved superomedial fullness, but is limited by a susceptibility to nipple retraction. The senior author of this paper has formalized the “superior ledge” modification of the superomedial pedicle technique (SL-SMP) to address these limitations.

Objective

To describe the technical details of the SL-SMP breast reduction technique and to analyze patient outcomes.

Methods

The technique involves only partial-thickness parenchymal excision superolateral to the pedicle, thereby leaving a “superior ledge” of parenchyma on top of which the nipple-areola complex (NAC) rests in a tension-free manner. Postoperative photographs were recorded; and patient demographics, intraoperative details, complications, and outcomes were recorded and analyzed.

Results

One hundred seven patients underwent SL-SMP reduction mammaplasty between 2007 and 2013. Complications included wound-healing complications (9.3 %), infection (2.8 %), seroma (1.9 %), and hematoma (1.9 %). Mean follow-up was 44.6 months (Range: 17–72), and during that period no incidence of clinically relevant NAC retraction was noted by either the patient or surgical team.

Conclusions

Maintenance of a distinct superior ledge underlying the final position of the NAC is an important modification to stress, to prevent nipple retraction. Importantly, the height of the ledge can be personalized for each patient. We feel it is a valuable addition to the plastic surgeon’s armamentarium to optimize outcomes for patients seeking relief from excessive breast tissue.

Level of Evidence V

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Keywords

Macromastia Breast reduction Mastopexy Superomedial pedicle 

Notes

Funding

None.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 (MOV 283024 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Lugo LM, Prada M, Kohanzadeh S et al (2013) Surgical outcomes of gigantomastia breast reduction superomedial pedicle technique: a 12-year retrospective study. Ann Plast Surg 70(5):533–537CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    DeGeorge BR, Colen DL, Mericli AF et al (2013) Reduction mammoplasty operative techniques for improved outcomes in the treatment of gigantomastia. ePlasty 13:466–476Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    ASPS 2012 Plastic surgery statistics Report. Published by American Society of Plastic Surgeons, 2012Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wise RJ (1956) A preliminary report on a method of planning the mammoplasty. Plast Reconstruc Surg 17(5):367–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rinker B (2013) Lowering revisions rates in medial pedicle breast reduction by the selective addition of “inverted-T” technique. Aesthet Plast Surg 37:341–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hall-Findlay EJ (1999) A simplified vertical reduction mammaplasty: shortening the learning curve. Plast Reconstruc Surg 104(3):748–759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Karaci S, Kose R, Baykan H et al (2013) Chair purse-string suture used to shorten the vertical incision in vertical breast reduction. Aesthetic Plast Surg 37(1):88–90CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Atiyeh BS, Rubeiz MT, Hayek SN (2005) Refinements of vertical scar mammaplasty: circumvertical skin excision design with limited inferior pole subdermal undermining and liposculpture of the inframammary crease. Aesthet Plast Surg 29(6):519–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Okoro SA, Barone C, Bohnenblust M et al (2008) Breast reduction trend among plastic surgeons: a national survey. Plast Reconstruc Surg 122(5):1312–1320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Davison SP, Mesbahi AN, Ducic I et al (2007) The versatility of the superomedial pedicle with various reduction patterns. Plast Reconstruc Surg 120(6):1466–1476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Iorio ML, Endara M, Ducic I et al (2013) Reduction mammoplasty in patients with a medialized nipple-areola complex: modification of the superomedial dermoglandular pedicle and skin pattern. Plast Reconstr Surg 131(2):302–303eCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Spear SL, Davison SP, Ducic I (2004) Superomedial pedicle reduction with short scar. Semin Plast Surg 18(3):203–210CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Abdel-Khalek A (2008) Vertical breast reduction: superomedial pedicle. Egypt J Plast Reconstr Surg 32(1):111–117Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Swanson E (2014) A matched cohort study of superomedial pedicle vertical scar breast reduction (100 breasts) and traditional inferior pedicle wise-pattern reduction (100 breasts): an outcomes study over 3 years. Plast Reconstr Surg 133(6):883e–885eCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hall-Findlay EJ (2002) Vertical breast reduction with a medially-based pedicle. Aesthet Surg J 22(2):185–194CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hamdi M, Landuyt KV, Tonnard P, Verpaele A, Monstrey S (2009) Septum-based mammoplasty—a surgical technique based on Wuringer’s septum for breast reduction. Plast Reconstr Surg 123:443–454CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Grimm K, Frische E (2000) Reduction of breasts…Hans Schaller and the first mammoplasty in 1561. Handchir Mikrochir Plastic Chir 32(5):316–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Karsidag S, Akcal A, Karsidag T et al (2011) Reduction mammaplasty using the free-nipple-graft vertical technique for sever breast hypertrophy: improved outcomes with the superior dermaglandular flap. Aesthet Plast Surg 35(2):254–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bitik O, Uzun H, Zins JE (2013) Nipple areola reconstructing reduction mammoplasty. Aesthetic Surgery Journal 33:1129–1137CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Shiffman MA (2009) History of breast reduction. In: Shiffman MA (ed) Mastopexy and Breast Reduction. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Orlando JC, Guthrie RH (1975) The superomedial dermal pedicle for nipple transposition. British J Plast Surg 28(1):42–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chao JW, Taylor EM, Rohde CH (2014) Reducing wound healing complications of Wise pattern breast reduction with the inverted “V” modification. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 67(3):421–422CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Antony AK, Yegiyants SS, Kanielson KK et al (2013) A matched cohort study of superomedial pedicle vertical scar breast reduction (100 breasts) and traditional inferior pedicle Wise-pattern reduction (100 breasts): an outcomes study over 3 years. Plast Reconstr Surg 132:1068–1076CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter W. Henderson
    • 1
  • Michelle M. Chang
    • 1
  • Erin M. Taylor
    • 1
  • Ross Weinreb
    • 1
  • Christine H. Rohde
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of SurgeryColumbia University Medical CenterNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations