Assessment Tools for Facial Rejuvenation Treatment: A Review
- 1.1k Downloads
In the field of cosmetic medicine, patient satisfaction is an important and common indicator used to measure the efficacy of the treatment. However, it is insufficient to prove objectively that the benefit of the specific factors involved in the cosmetic outcomes. The practitioner should be aware of these assessment tools, in particular in case of demanding or litigious patients.
The aim of this review was to establish a list and discuss the subjective and objective methods used to assess facial aesthetic rejuvenation treatments.
A systematic literature search was performed using the Pubmed search engine. Studies published over the last 5 years, i.e. between January 2010 and January 2015 were considered for review. The following keywords were used: “aesthetic treatment”, “facial rejuvenation”, and “subjective evaluation” or “objective evaluation”.
Of the 446 articles identified by the search strategy, 47 articles focused specifically on facial rejuvenation and on the efficacy of aesthetic medical treatments were retrieved for review. Thirty-seven articles used quantitative methods to assess aesthetic treatment outcomes and only 12 used subjective methods. The different assessment methods were listed according to the tools used and treatment indications.
This review will help in choosing adequate methods to assess facial rejuvenation medical treatment. It is important to combine these tools adequately to improve the assessment. There is no current consensus on assess facial rejuvenation treatments but we noted that objective assessment methods seem helpful.
No Level Assigned
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
KeywordsAesthetic treatment Facial rejuvenation Subjective evaluation Objective evaluation
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 6.Ascher B, Bayerl C, Brun P, Kestemont P, Rzany B, Poncet M, Guennoun M, Podda M (2011) Efficacy and safety of a new hyaluronic acid dermal filler in the treatment of severe nasolabial lines—6-month interim results of a randomized, evaluator-blinded, intra-individual comparison study. J Cosmet Dermatol 10(2):94–98CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 10.Buntrock H, Reuther T, Prager W, Kerscher M (2013) Efficacy, safety, and patient satisfaction of a monophasic cohesive polydensified matrix versus a biphasic nonanimal stabilized hyaluronic acid filler after single injection in nasolabial folds. Dermatol Surg 39:1097–1105CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 11.Royo de la Torre J, Moreno-Moraga J, Isarría MJ, Muñoz E, Cruz I, Pérez G, Cornejo P (2013) The evaluation of hyaluronic acid, with and without lidocaine, in the filling of nasolabial folds as measured by ultrastructural changes and pain management. J Drugs Dermatol 12(3):e46–e52PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 18.Kestemont P, Cartier H, Trevidic P, Rzany B, Sattler G, Kerrouche N, Dhuin JC (2012) Sustained efficacy and high patient satisfaction after cheek enhancement with a new hyaluronic acid dermal filler. J Drugs Dermatol 11(1 Suppl):9–16Google Scholar
- 27.Kim JE, Chang S, Won CH, Kim CH, Park KH, Choi JH, Lee MW (2012) Combination treatment using bipolar radiofrequency-based intense pulsed light, infrared light and diode laser enhanced clinical effectiveness and histological dermal remodeling in Asian photoaged skin. Dermatol Surg 38(1):68–76CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 30.Tanaka Y, Tsunemi Y, Kawashima M, Tatewaki N, Nishida H (2014) Treatment of skin laxity using multisource, phase-controlled radiofrequency in Asians: visualized 3-dimensional skin tightening results and increase in elastin density shown through histologic investigation. Dermatol Surg 40:756–762PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 42.Min P, Xi W, Grassetti L, Trisliana Perdanasari A, Torresetti M, Feng S, Su W, Pu Z, Zhang Y, Han S, Zhang YX, Di Benedetto G, Lazzeri D (2015) Sebum production alteration after botulinum toxin type a injections for the treatment of forehead rhytides: a prospective randomized double-blind dose-comparative clinical investigation. Aesthet Surg J 35(5):600–610CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar